Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Framework for Active DMPs in Photon and Neutron Science Large-Scale Facilities Cover

A Framework for Active DMPs in Photon and Neutron Science Large-Scale Facilities

Data Science Journal
Volume 23 (2024): Issue 1
By: Heike Görzig,  Alejandra N. Gonzalez Beltran,  Felix Engel and  Brian Matthews  
Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. 1Bodin, M, et al. 2023. Data management plans for the Photon and Neutron Communities. CODATA Data Science Journal, 22(1): 30. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2023-030
    Back to article
  2. 2Bolmsten, F, et al. 2021. DMP Template for facility users. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5639428
    Back to article
  3. 3Cardoso, J, Castro, LJ and Miksa, T. 2021. Interconnecting systems using machine-actionable data management plans – Hackathon report. Data Science Journal, 20(1). DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-035
    Back to article
  4. 4Collins, SP, et al. 2021. ExPaNDS ontologies v1.0. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4806026
    Back to article
  5. 5Crusoe, MR, Abeln, S, Iosup, A, Amstutz, P, Chilton, J, Tijanić, N, Ménager, H, Soiland-Reyes, S, Gavrilovic, B and Goble, C. 2021. Methods Included: Standardizing Computational Reuse and Portability with the Common Workflow Language. Communications of the ACM, 65: 54–63. DOI: 10.1145/3486897
    Back to article
  6. 6Data Stewardship Wizard. Available at https://ds-wizard.org/ [Last accessed 14 February 2022].
    Back to article
  7. 7DCC and UC3. 2016. Proposed revised set of themes for Data Management Plans. URL: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/tools/dmpOnline/DMP-themes-FINAL-Dec2016.pdf.
    Back to article
  8. 8Di Iorio, A and Caron, B. 2016. PREMIS 3.0 Ontology: Improving semantic interoperability of preservation metadata. iPres. Available at https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/pif/2016/iPresDiIoria_Caron_iPRES_2016_paper_150.pdf [Last accessed 19 April 2017].
    Back to article
  9. 9ExPaNDS is the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) Photon and Neutron Data Service. Available at https://expands.eu/ [Last accessed 17 December 2019].
    Back to article
  10. 10Flannery, D, et al. 2009 ICAT: Integrating data infrastructure for facilities based science. 5th International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC 2009), 201–207. DOI: 10.1109/e-Science.2009.36
    Back to article
  11. 11Giaretta, D. 2015. Related work on data lifecycle phases from formulation to exploitation|RDA. Available at https://rd-alliance.org/group/active-data-management-plans-ig/wiki/related-work-data-lifecycle-phases-formulation [Last accessed 4 November 2022].
    Back to article
  12. 12Gonzalez-Beltran, A and Winstanley, P. 2022. The data catalog vocabulary (DCAT). DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6142906
    Back to article
  13. 13Görzig, H. 2022. DMP Pre-existing Information Ontology. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.7437982
    Back to article
  14. 14Görzig, H, et al. 2021. DMPs for Photon and Neutron RIs. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5636096
    Back to article
  15. 15Görzig, H, et al. 2022. Active DMPs for Photon and Neutron RIs. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7223438
    Back to article
  16. 16Götz, A, et al. 2020. PaNOSC data policy framework. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3862701
    Back to article
  17. 17Hanson, RM, et al. 2022. IUPAC specification for the FAIR management of spectroscopic data in chemistry (IUPAC FAIRSpec) – guiding principles. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 94(6): 623–636. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2021-2009
    Back to article
  18. 18ICAT. ICAT|metadata, data and processing. Available at https://icatproject.org/ [Last accessed 7 November 2022].
    Back to article
  19. 19Jetten, M, Simons, E and Rijnders, J. 2019. The role of CRIS’s in the research life cycle. A case study on implementing a FAIR RDM policy at Radboud University, the Netherlands. Procedia Computer Science, 146: 156–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.090
    Back to article
  20. 20Könnecke, M, et al. 2015. The NeXus data format. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 48(1): 301–305. DOI: 10.1107/S1600576714027575
    Back to article
  21. 21Matthews, B, et al. 2009. Using a core scientific metadata model in large-scale facilities. In: 5th International Digital Curation Conference. London: 106–118. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v5i1.146
    Back to article
  22. 22Matthews, B, et al. 2012. Model of the data continuum in Photon and Neutron Facilities. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3897190
    Back to article
  23. 23McBirnie, A, et al. 2021. Final data policy framework for Photon and Neutron RIs. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5205825
    Back to article
  24. 24Michaelis, O, et al. 2021. rdmorganiser/rdmo-catalog: 1.1.0-rdmo-1.6.0. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5747651
    Back to article
  25. 25Miksa, T, Oblasser, S and Rauber, A. 2022. Automating research data management using machine-actionable data management plans. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 13(2): 1–22. DOI: 10.1145/3490396
    Back to article
  26. 26Miksa, T, Walk, P and Neish, P. 2020. RDA DMP Common standard for machine-actionable data management plans. DOI: 10.15497/rda00039
    Back to article
  27. 27Miksa, T, et al. 2019. Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(3): e1006750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
    Back to article
  28. 28Moore, R, et al. 2015. Practical policy. Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/83E1B3F9-7E17-484A-A466-B3E5775121CC
    Back to article
  29. 29Muldoon, JP. 2014. PMBOK® Summarized. Available at http://johnmuldoon.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/PMBOK-Summarized.pdf [Last accessed 1 July 2016].
    Back to article
  30. 30PMI. 2013. PMBOK® Guide— Fifth Edition. 5th edn.
    Back to article
  31. 31Rauh, D, et al. 2022. Data format standards in analytical chemistry. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 94(6): 725–736. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2021-3101
    Back to article
  32. 32RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group. 2020. FAIR Data Maturity Model: Specification and guidelines. Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/rda00050
    Back to article
  33. 33RDMO. Available at https://rdmorganiser.github.io/ [Last accessed 5 August 2018].
    Back to article
  34. 34Richter, T, Murphy, G and Bolmsten, F. 2020. API Definition (common search API). Available at https://www.panosc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/D3.1_API-definition.pdf [Last accessed 8 November 2022].
    Back to article
  35. 35Romanos, N, et al. 2019. Innovative Data Management in advanced characterization: Implications for materials design. Materials Today Communications, 20: 100541. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100541
    Back to article
  36. 36Salvat, D, et al. 2020. Draft recommendations for FAIR Photon and Neutron data management. Zenodo, 857641: 1–63. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4312825
    Back to article
  37. 37SciCatProject. GitHub. Available at https://github.com/SciCatProject [Last accessed 14 November 2018].
    Back to article
  38. 38Soler, N, et al. 2022. Final recommendations for FAIR Photon and Neutron data management. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6821676
    Back to article
  39. 39The Photon and Neutron Open Science Cloud (PaNOSC) – Panosc. Available at https://www.panosc.eu/ [Last accessed 20 February 2020].
    Back to article
  40. 40Wilson, M, et al. 2011. Deliverable D2.1 Common policy framework on scientific data. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3738497
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-004 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2023
Published on: Jan 22, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
DMP,
active DMP,
Synchrotrons,
PaN sciences,
Project management,
Reuse,
Ontology,
Workflows

© 2024 Heike Görzig, Alejandra N. Gonzalez Beltran, Felix Engel, Brian Matthews, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 23 (2024): Issue 1Next article