Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Engaging with Researchers and Raising Awareness of FAIR and Open Science through the FAIR+ Implementation Survey Tool (FAIRIST) Cover

Engaging with Researchers and Raising Awareness of FAIR and Open Science through the FAIR+ Implementation Survey Tool (FAIRIST)

Data Science Journal
Volume 22 (2023): Issue 1
By: Christine R. Kirkpatrick,  Kevin Coakley,  Julianne Christopher and  Inês Dutra  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. 1AAAI Conference. 2022. Reproducibility Checklist, 22 February–1 March 2022. Available at https://aaai.org/Conferences/AAAI-22/reproducibility-checklist/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  2. 2Argos. Plan and follow your data. Available at https://argos.openaire.eu/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  3. 3Beck, K, Beedle, M, Van Bennekum, A, Cockburn, A, Cunningham, W, Fowler, M, Grenning, J, Highsmith, J, Hunt, A, Jeffries, R and Kern, J. 2001. Manifesto for agile software development.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bloemers, M and Montesanti, A. 2020. The FAIR funding model: providing a framework for research funders to drive the transition toward FAIR data management and stewardship practices. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2): 171–180. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00039
    Back to article
  5. 5Carroll, SR, et al. 2020. The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 43. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
    Back to article
  6. 6Coakley, K. 2022. FAIR Matrix Survey API. Available at https://github.com/kevincoakley/fair-matrix-survey-api [Last accessed 15 December 2022].
    Back to article
  7. 7CODATA-RDA-DataScienceSchools/Materials. Available at https://github.com/CODATA-RDA-DataScienceSchools/Materials/blob/master/docs/DataAtlanta2022/index.md [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  8. 8CODATA-RDA Schools of Research Data Science. Available at https://www.datascienceschools.org/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  9. 9Council of Data Facilities: Geoscience Research. Available at https://www.earthcube.org/council-of-data-facilities [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  10. 10De Lima, RA, Phillips, OL, Duque, A, Tello, JS, Davies, SJ, de Oliveira, AA, Muller, S, Honorio Coronado, EN, Vilanova, E, Cuni-Sanchez, A and Baker, TR. 2022. Making forest data fair and open. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 6(6): 656–658. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01738-7
    Back to article
  11. 11De Smedt, K, Koureas, D and Wittenburg, P. 2020. FAIR digital objects for science: From data pieces to actionable knowledge units. Publications, 8(2): 21. DOI: 10.3390/publications8020021
    Back to article
  12. 12FAIR Connect. Available at https://fairconnect.pro/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  13. 13Fecher, B and Friesike, S. 2014. Open science: one term, five schools of thought. Opening science, 17–47. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2
    Back to article
  14. 14FIP Wizard. Available at https://fip-wizard.ds-wizard.org/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  15. 15FIP Wizard Documentation. Available at https://fip-wizard.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  16. 16Gundersen, OE and Kjensmo, S. 2018. State of the Art: Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence. Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32(1). DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11503
    Back to article
  17. 17Gundersen, OE, Coakley, K and Kirkpatrick, C. 2022. Sources of Irreproducibility in Machine Learning: A Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07610.
    Back to article
  18. 18Jablonka, KM, Patiny, L and Smit, B. 2022. Making the collective knowledge of chemistry open and machine actionable. Nature Chemistry, 14(4): 365–376. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-022-00910-7
    Back to article
  19. 19Kirkpatrick, CR, Coakley, K, Schreiber, L, Christopher, J, Katz, D, Stocks, K and Rao, YD. 2022. FARR: FAIR in ML, AI Readiness, & Reproducibility Network Postcard. Available in San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) Research Data Services Materials Collection. UC San Diego Library Digital Collections. DOI: 10.6075/J0X92BG3
    Back to article
  20. 20Law, A. 2022. Fair Implementation Profiles (FIPs) In WorldFAIR: What Have We Learnt? Available at https://worldfair-project.eu/2022/09/30/fips-in-worldfair-what-have-we-learnt-public-workshop-tue-25-october/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  21. 21LibGuides: Research Data Management: FAIR data. Available at https://ufs.libguides.com/rdm/fair [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  22. 22Magnetics Information Consortium (MagIC). Available at https://www2.earthref.org/MagIC/about [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  23. 23McCormick, M. 2012. Waterfall vs. Agile methodology. MPCS, N/A, 3.
    Back to article
  24. 24Miksa, T, Walk, P and Neish, P. 2020. RDA DMP Common Standard for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. DOI: 10.15497/rda00039
    Back to article
  25. 25National Institutes of Health. 2020. Final NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, 29 October 2020. Available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  26. 26Nicholson, C, Kansa, S, Gupta, N and Fernandez, R. 2023. Will It Ever Be FAIR?: Making Archaeological Data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(1): 63–75. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2022.40
    Back to article
  27. 27NSF HSI National STEM Resource Hub: Grantsmanship – Training and Resources. Available at https://hsistemhub.org/grantsmanship/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  28. 28Praetzellis, M and Riley, B. 2019. California Digital Library: DMPTool, 8 November 2019. https://cdlib.org/services/uc3/dmptool/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  29. 29Qualtrics XM – Experience Management Software. Available at https://www.qualtrics.com/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
  30. 30Schultes, E and Wittenburg, P. 2019. FAIR Principles and Digital Objects: Accelerating convergence on a data infrastructure. Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains: 20th International Conference, DAMDID/RCDL 2018, Moscow, Russia, October 9–12, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 20 (pp. 3–16). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23584-0_1
    Back to article
  31. 31Sureshchandra, K and Shrinivasavadhani, J. 2008 Moving from waterfall to agile. Agile 2008 conference: 97–101. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/Agile.2008.49
    Back to article
  32. 32Vita, R, Overton, JA, Mungall, CJ, Sette, A and Peters, B. 2018. FAIR principles and the IEDB: short-term improvements and a long-term vision of OBO-foundry mediated machine-actionable interoperability. Database, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/database/bax105
    Back to article
  33. 33Wallis, JC and Borgman, CL. 2011. Who is responsible for data? An exploratory study of data authorship, ownership, and responsibility. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801188
    Back to article
  34. 34Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  35. 35WorldFAIR. Available at https://worldfair-project.eu/ [Last accessed 9 December 2022].
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-032 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 16, 2022
Accepted on: May 25, 2023
Published on: Sep 6, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
FAIR,
metadata,
DMP,
survey,
reproducibility

© 2023 Christine R. Kirkpatrick, Kevin Coakley, Julianne Christopher, Inês Dutra, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2023): Issue 1Next article