Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development and Governance of FAIR Thresholds for a Data Federation Cover

Development and Governance of FAIR Thresholds for a Data Federation

Data Science Journal
Volume 21 (2022): Issue 1
By: Megan Wong,  Kerry Levett,  Ashlin Lee,  Paul Box,  Bruce Simons,  Rakesh David,  Andrew MacLeod,  Nicolas Taylor,  Derek Schneider and  Helen Thompson  
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. 1AgReFed. 2021. AgReFed – Agricultural Research Federation. Agricultural Research Federation. Available at: https://www.agrefed.org.au [Last accessed 11 November 2021].
    Back to article
  2. 2Allemang, D and Bobbin, T. 2016. A Global Data Ecosystem for Agriculture and Food. Oxfordshire: GODAN, CABI. Available at: https://www.godan.info/sites/default/files/documents/Godan_Global_Data_Ecosystem_Publication_lowres.pdf [Last accessed 17 December 2021].
    Back to article
  3. 3Antle, JM, et al. 2017. Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Design and improvement. Agricultural Systems, 155: 255–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.002
    Back to article
  4. 4ARDC. 2020. AgReFed: A platform for the transformation of agricultural research. Australian Research Data Commons. DOI: 10.47486/PL005
    Back to article
  5. 5Bahim, C, et al. 2020. The FAIR data maturity model: An approach to harmonise FAIR assessments. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-041
    Back to article
  6. 6Barry, S, et al. 2017. Precision to Decision – Current and Future State of Agricultural Data for Digital Agriculture in Australia. Available at: https://www.crdc.com.au/precision-to-decision [Last accessed 11 November 2021].
    Back to article
  7. 7Box, P, et al. 2019a. Guidelines for the development of a Data Stewardship and Governance Framework for the Agricultural Research Federation (AgReFed). Sydney: Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation. DOI: 10.25919/5cf179ba35db9
    Back to article
  8. 8Box, P, et al. 2019b. White Paper for the enactment phase of the Agricultural Research Federation (AgReFed). Sydney: Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3706374
    Back to article
  9. 9Buchanan, JM. 1965. An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32: 1–14. DOI: 10.2307/2552442
    Back to article
  10. 10CGIAR. 2021. CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture https://bigdata.cgiar.org/ [Last accessed 15 November 2021].
    Back to article
  11. 11Chiles, RM, et al. 2021. Democratizing ownership and participation in the 4th Industrial Revolution: challenges and opportunities in cellular agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 38: 943–961. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-021-10237-7
    Back to article
  12. 12Collins, S, et al. 2018. Turning FAIR into reality. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: 10.2777/1524
    Back to article
  13. 13Cox, S, and Gregory, L. 2020. RDF representation of ASLS soil profile classification. v1. Australia: CSIRO. DOI: 10.25919/5f42f324b2ef8
    Back to article
  14. 14Cox, SJD, et al. 2021. Ten simple rules for making a vocabulary FAIR. PLOS Computational Biology, 17(6): 1009041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009041
    Back to article
  15. 15Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. 2019. Corangamite Soil Health Monitoring Program Data. Version 1.0. Mt Helen, Australia: Federation University. DOI: 10.25955/5c1c6b8f4d8d2
    Back to article
  16. 16CSIRO. 2013. CSIRO National Soil Site Database. Version 1. Australia: CSIRO. DOI: 10.25919/5c36d77a6299c
    Back to article
  17. 17Datacite. 2022. Repository Finder. The Enabling FAIR Data Project and FAIRsFAIR Project. Accessible at: https://repositoryfinder.datacite.org/ [Last accessed at 02 March 2022].
    Back to article
  18. 18Devaraju, A, et al. 2021. From Conceptualization to Implementation: FAIR Assessment of Research Data Objects. Data Science Journal, 20(4): 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-004
    Back to article
  19. 19Devare, M, et al. 2021. AgroFIMS: A Tool to Enable Digital Collection of Standards-Compliant FAIR Data. Frontiers of Sustainable Food Systems, 5: 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.726646
    Back to article
  20. 20Drakos, A, Protonotarios, V and Manouselis, N. 2015. agINFRA: A research data hub for agriculture, food and the environment. F1000Research, 4. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.6349.2
    Back to article
  21. 21Ernst and Young. 2019. Agricultural Innovation – A National Approach to Grow Australia’s Future. Accessible at: https://www.awe.gov.au/sites/default/files/sitecollectiondocuments/agriculture-food/innovation/summary-report-agricultural-innovation.PDF [Last accessed 24 March 2022].
    Back to article
  22. 22FAIR Data Points. 2022. Fair Data Points. Available at https://www.fairdatapoint.org/ [Last accessed 24 March 2022].
    Back to article
  23. 23Harper, L, et al. 2018. AgBioData consortium recommendations for sustainable genomics and genetics databases for agriculture. Database. DOI: 10.1093/database/bay088
    Back to article
  24. 24Ingram, J, et al. 2022. What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture? Land Use Policy, 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105962
    Back to article
  25. 25ISO/IEC. 1996. Information technology -- Open Distributed Processing – Reference Model: Architecture. ISO/IEC 10746-3: 1996. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO/IEC.
    Back to article
  26. 26Jakku, E, et al. 2019. “If they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?” Trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 100285: 90–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2018.11.002
    Back to article
  27. 27Kenney, M, Serhan, H and Trystram, G. 2020. Digitization and Platforms in Agriculture: Organizations, Power 2020 Asymmetry, and Collective Action Solutions. SSRN, 1–50. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3638547
    Back to article
  28. 28Knapen, MJR, et al. 2020. AGINFRA PLUS: Running Crop Simulations on the D4Science Distributed e-Infrastructure. In: Environmental Software Systems. Data Science in Action. ISESS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 554. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39815-6_8
    Back to article
  29. 29Kruseman, G, et al. 2020. CGIAR modelling approaches for resource- constrained scenarios: II. Models for analyzing socioeconomic factors to improve policy recommendations. Crop Science, 60(2): 568–581. DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20114
    Back to article
  30. 30Lin, D, et al. 2020. The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1): 1–5. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
    Back to article
  31. 31Levett, K, Wong, M and MacLeod, A. 2022. Testing of AgReFed FAIR data Minimum Thresholds and Stretch Targets (Version 1). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6541413
    Back to article
  32. 32MacLeod, A, et al. 2020. The Agricultural Research Federation (AgReFed) Technical and Information Policy Suite. The Agricultural Research Federation. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3993784
    Back to article
  33. 33One Geology. 2020. One Geology. Available at https://www.onegeology.org/ [Last accessed 24 March 2022].
    Back to article
  34. 34Pearson, S, et al. 2021. Food Data Trust: A framework for information sharing. United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency and University of Lincon. FSA, project ref FS301083. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4575565
    Back to article
  35. 35Pentland, A and Hardjono, T. 2020. Data Cooperatives. In Building the New Economy. DOI: 10.21428/ba67f642.0499afe0
    Back to article
  36. 36Perrett, E, et al. 2017. Accelerating Precision Agriculture to Decision Agriculture – Analysis of the Economic Benefit and Strategies for Delivery of Digital Agriculture in Australia. Sydney: Australian Farm Institute. Available at: https://www.crdc.com.au/precision-to-decision.
    Back to article
  37. 37Peters-von Gehlen, K, et al. 2022. Recommendations for Discipline-Specific FAIRness Evaluation Derived from Applying an Ensemble of Evaluation Tools. Data Science Journal, 21: 1–21. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2022-007
    Back to article
  38. 38Petrie, R, et al. 2021. Coordinating an operational data distribution network for CMIP6 data. Geoscientific Model Development, 14: 629–644. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-629-2021
    Back to article
  39. 39Plante, RL, et al. 2021. Implementing a registry federation for materials science data discovery. Data Science Journal, 20: 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-015
    Back to article
  40. 40Rossel, V, et al. 2014. Soil and Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps - Available Water Capacity (3” resolution) – Release 1. Version 4. Australia: CSIRO. DOI: 10.4225/08/546ED604ADD8A
    Back to article
  41. 41Sanderman, J, et al. 2015. Waite Permanent Rotation Trial. Version 4. Australia: CSIRO. DOI: 10.4225/08/55E5165EC0D29
    Back to article
  42. 42Sanderson, T, Reeson, A, and Box, P. 2017. Cultivating Trust: Towards an Australian Agricultural Data Market. Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation. DOI: 10.21820/23987073.2017.10.62
    Back to article
  43. 43Sansone, S, et al. 2019. FAIRsharing, a cohesive community approach to the growth in standards, repositories and policies. Nature Biotechnology, 37: 358–367. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
    Back to article
  44. 44Schneider, D, et al. 2018. SensorNets – SMART Farms Soil Moisture Network. Australia: University of New England. DOI: 10.4226/95/5b10d5ca18aef
    Back to article
  45. 45Schweitzer, M, et al. 2021. au-research/FAIR-Data-Assessment-Tool: Release v1.0. Australian Research Data Commons. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4971127
    Back to article
  46. 46Shaw, F, et al. 2020. COPO: a metadata platform for brokering FAIR data in the life sciences [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. F1000Research, 9(495). DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.23889.1
    Back to article
  47. 47Southern Farming Systems (SFS). 2011. Southern Farming Systems Moisture Probe Network Data. Australia: Federation University DOI: 10.25955/5cdcff6168a76
    Back to article
  48. 48Taylor, N, et al. 2019. UWA/DPIRD Frost Nursery Trial 2018. Australia: The University of Western Australia. DOI: 10.26182/5cedf001186f3
    Back to article
  49. 49USDA. 2021. Ag Data Commons. U.S. Department of Agriculture https://data.nal.usda.gov/ [Last accessed 24 March 2022].
    Back to article
  50. 50Wicquart, J, et al. 2022. A workflow to integrate ecological monitoring data from different sources. Ecological Informatics, 68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101543
    Back to article
  51. 51Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(160018). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  52. 52Wiseman, L and Sanderson, J. 2018. Legal and trust issues in Australian agriculture. In: 40th Annual Conference Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. ASSCT. Handle: 10072/379876.
    Back to article
  53. 53Wong, M, et al. 2021. Agricultural Research Federation (AgReFed) Steering Policies, Roles and Responsibilities (Version 1.1). Agricultural Research Federation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5205273
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-013 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 21, 2021
Accepted on: May 13, 2022
Published on: Jun 9, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
agriculture,
AgReFed,
FAIR data,
community,
governance,
RM-ODP

© 2022 Megan Wong, Kerry Levett, Ashlin Lee, Paul Box, Bruce Simons, Rakesh David, Andrew MacLeod, Nicolas Taylor, Derek Schneider, Helen Thompson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2022): Issue 1Next article