Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Developing Metrics for NASA Earth Science Interdisciplinary Data Products and Services Cover

Developing Metrics for NASA Earth Science Interdisciplinary Data Products and Services

Data Science Journal
Volume 21 (2022): Issue 1
By: Zhong Liu,  Chung-Lin Shie,  Anthony J. Ritrivi,  Guang-Dih Lei,  Gary T. Alcott,  Mary Greene,  James Acker,  Jennifer C. Wei,  David J. Meyer,  Angela Li and  Atheer F. Al-Jazrawi  
Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. 1ACSI. 2021. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Available online: https://www.theacsi.org/. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  2. 2Azeroual, O, Saake, G and Wastl, J. 2018. Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality. Scientometrics, 115: 1271–1290. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5
    Back to article
  3. 3Behnke, J, Mitchell, A and Ramapriyan, H. 2019. NASA’s Earth Observing Data and Information System – Near-Term Challenges. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 40. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-040
    Back to article
  4. 4Bell, S, Shaw, B and Boaz, A. 2011. Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy. Res. Eval, 20: 227–237. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635792
    Back to article
  5. 5Bugzilla. 2021. Bugzilla, Available online: https://www.bugzilla.org/. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  6. 6CFI Group. 2021. Claes Fornell International Group. Available online: https://cfigroup.com/. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  7. 7COUNTER. 2021. The Code of Practice. Available online: https://www.projectcounter.org/. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  8. 8Cousijn, H, Feeney, P, Lowenberg, D, Presani, E and Simons, N. 2019. Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 9. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-009
    Back to article
  9. 9Cruse, P, Garza, K, Budden, AE, Chodacki, J, Fenner, M, Jones, MB, Lowenberg, D, Stall, S and Vieglais, D. 2019. Make Data Count and PARSEC: Two efforts Towards Data Usage Metrics Standardization, the 2019 AGU Fall Meeting, 9–13 December 2019, San Francisco, CA.
    Back to article
  10. 10Evely, AC, Fazey, I, Lambin, X, Lambert, E, Allen, S and Pinard, M. 2010. Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environ. Conserv., 37: 442–450. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000792
    Back to article
  11. 11Fazey, I and Coauthors. 2014. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Global Environ. Change, 25: 204–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012
    Back to article
  12. 12Ferguson, DB, Finucane, ML, Keener, VW and Owen, G. 2016. Evaluation to advance science policy: Lessons from Pacific RISA and CLIMAS. In: Parris, AS, et al. (eds.), Climate in Context: Science and Society Partnering for Adaptation. Wiley, 215–234. DOI: 10.1002/9781118474785.ch10
    Back to article
  13. 13Han, W, Di, L, Yu, G, Shao, Y and Kang, L. 2016. Investigating metrics of geospatial web services: The case of a CEOS federated catalog service for earth observation data. Computers & Geosciences. 92: 1–8. July 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.04.005
    Back to article
  14. 14Kafle, D, Wanchoo, L, Won, Y-I, and Behnke, J. 2019. NASA EOSDIS Data Usage Metrics – Insight and Assessment, the 2019 AGU Fall Meeting, 9–13 December 2019, San Francisco, CA. DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10501904.1
    Back to article
  15. 15Liu, Z, Ramapriyan, HK, Wei, Y, Shie, C-L, Moroni, D, Downs, RR, Habermann, T, Scott, D and Huffman, G. 2019. “High-Priority Data Quality Recommendations for Data Producers and Distributors, Technical Note ESDS-RFC-034.” NASA ESDIS Standard Office (ESO), April 19, 1–17. https://cdn.earthdata.nasa.gov/conduit/upload/11247/ESDS-RFC-034.pdf
    Back to article
  16. 16Liu, Z, Shie, C-L, Li, A and Meyer, D. 2020. “NASA Global Satellite and Model Data Products and Services for Tropical Meteorology and Climatology.” Remote Sensing, 12(17): 2821. DOI: 10.3390/rs12172821
    Back to article
  17. 17NASA DAACs. 2021. EOSDIS Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs). Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/daacs. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  18. 18NASA EOS. 2021. NASA’s Earth Observing System Project. Available online: https://eospso.nasa.gov/content/nasas-earth-observing-system-project-science-office. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  19. 19NASA EOSDIS. 2021a. Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS). Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  20. 20NASA EOSDIS. 2021b. System Performance and Metrics. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/system-performance. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  21. 21NASA EOSDIS. 2021c. EOSDIS Annual Metrics Reports. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/system-performance/eosdis-annual-metrics-reports. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  22. 22NASA EOSDIS. 2021d. American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Reports. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/system-performance/acsi-reports. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  23. 23NASA EOSDIS. 2021e. NASA Earthdata. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  24. 24NASA EOSDIS. 2021f. Earthdata Cloud Evolution. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/cloud-evolution. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  25. 25NASA ESDIS. 2021a. Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) Project, Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/esdis. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  26. 26NASA ESDIS. 2021b. ESIDS Metrics System (EMS). Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/science-system-description/eosdis-components/ems. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  27. 27NASA ESDIS. 2021c. Metrics Planning Group (MPG). Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/esdis/mpg. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  28. 28NASA GES DISC. 2021. NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC). Available online: https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  29. 29NASA Giovanni. 2021. NASA Giovanni. Available online: https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov. Last accessed, September 29, 2021.
    Back to article
  30. 30National Research Council. 2005. Thinking Strategically: The Appropriate Use of Metrics for the Climate Change Science Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11292
    Back to article
  31. 31National Research Council. 2014. Enhancing the Value and Sustainability of Field Stations and Marine Laboratories in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/18806
    Back to article
  32. 32O’Brien, M, Parr, C and Gries, C. 2020. Value Metrics for Data Repositories in Earth and Environmental Sciences, the 2020 AGU Fall Meeting, 1–17 December 2020, Online Everywhere.
    Back to article
  33. 33Parr, C, Gries, C, O’Brien, M, Downs, RR, Duerr, R, Koskela, R, Tarrant, P, Maull, KE, Hoebelheinrich, N and Stall, S. 2019. A Discussion of Value Metrics for Data Repositories in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 58. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-058
    Back to article
  34. 34Ramapriyan, HK, Peng, G, Moroni, D and Shie, C-L. 2017. “Ensuring and Improving Information Quality for Earth Science Data and Products”, D-Lib Magazine, July/August 2017. DOI: 10.1045/july2017-ramapriyan
    Back to article
  35. 35Ramapriyan, HK, “Rama”, Scott, D, Armstrong, E, DiMiceli, C, Downs, RR, Gacke, C, Gluck, S, Huffman, G, Liu, Z, Moroni, D, Shie, C-L, Smith, D and Wei, Y. 2019b. “Data Quality Working Group Recommendations for the Data Management Plan Template for Data Producers, Technical Note ESDS-RFC-032, NASA ESDIS Standard Office (ESO). February 2019, 1–7. https://cdn.earthdata.nasa.gov/conduit/upload/10744/ESDS-RFC-032v1.pdf
    Back to article
  36. 36Ramapriyan, HK, “Rama”, Scott, D, Armstrong, E, DiMiceli, C, Downs, RR, Gacke, C, Gluck, S, Huffman, G, Liu, Z, Moroni, D, Shie, C-L and Wei, Y. 2019a. “Data Management Plan Template for DAACs, Technical Note ESDS-RFC-031.” NASA ESDIS Standard Office (ESO). February 2019, 1–14. https://cdn.earthdata.nasa.gov/conduit/upload/10743/ESDS-RFC-031v1.pdf.
    Back to article
  37. 37Ramapriyan, HK, “Rama” and Leonard, PJT. 2020. Data Product Development Guide (DPDG) for Data Producers version1. NASA Earth Science Data and Information System Standards Office, 9 July 2020. DOI: 10.5067/DOC/ESO/RFC-041VERSION1
    Back to article
  38. 38Rauber, A, Asmi, A, van Uytvanck, D and Proell, S. 2015. Data Citation of Evolving Data: Recommendations of the Working Group on Data Citation (WGDC). DOI: 10.15497/RDA00016
    Back to article
  39. 39Shankaranarayanan, G and Blake, R. 2017. From content to context: The evolution and growth of data quality research. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ) 8(2), January 2017. DOI: 10.1145/2996198
    Back to article
  40. 40Shie, C-L, Ritrivi, AJ, Lei, G-D, Greene, M, Acker, J, Alcott, GT, Li, A, Wei, JC, F, Al-Jazrawi, A and Meyer, DJ. 2019: Integrated Analysis of Multiple User Metrics – A “Sequel”; and Introducing the Google Analytic (eLightning), the 2019 AGU Fall Meeting, 9–13 December 2019, San Francisco, CA. eLightning presentation available at https://agu2019fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=73-69-FA-06-81-63-5A-47-D7-5C-4E-60-C3-14-4F-62.
    Back to article
  41. 41Su, J, KC. B, Loeser, C, Rui, H, Shen, S, Lei, G and Ostrenga, D. 2019. Metrics Learning at NASA GES DISC, the 2019 AGU Fall Meeting, 9–13 December 2019, San Francisco, CA.
    Back to article
  42. 42Wall, TU, Meadow, AM and Horganic, A. 2017: Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science. Wea. Climate Soc. 9: 95–107. DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0008.1
    Back to article
  43. 43Wei, Y, Ramapriyan, HK, Downs, RR, Shie, C-L, Liu, Z, Moroni, D, Habermann, T, Khalsa, SJ and Peters, B. 2019. “Data Quality Working Group’s Comprehensive Recommendations for Data Producers and Distributors, Technical Note ESDS-RFC-033.” NASA ESDIS Standard Office (ESO), August 27, 1–81. https://cdn.earthdata.nasa.gov/conduit/upload/12101/ESDS-RFC-033.pdf.
    Back to article
  44. 44Wilkinson, M, Dumontier, M and Aalbersberg, I, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-005 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 27, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 24, 2022
Published on: Feb 11, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Metrics,
NASA,
Earth Science,
Remote Sensing,
Interdisciplinary,
Data and Services

© 2022 Zhong Liu, Chung-Lin Shie, Anthony J. Ritrivi, Guang-Dih Lei, Gary T. Alcott, Mary Greene, James Acker, Jennifer C. Wei, David J. Meyer, Angela Li, Atheer F. Al-Jazrawi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2022): Issue 1Next article