References
- Abras, C, Maloney-Krichmar, D and Preece, J. 2004.
User-centered design . Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 37(4): 445–456. - Al-Shboul, MK and Abrizah, A. 2014. Information needs: Developing personas of humanities scholars. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(5): 500–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.016
- Antikainen, M, Mäkipää, M and Ahonen, M. 2010. Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1): 100–119. DOI: 10.1108/14601061011013258
- Barbosa Tavares, R, Hepworth, M and De Souza Costa, SM. 2011. Investigating citizens’ information needs through participative research: a pilot study in candangolândia, brazil. Information Development, 27(2): 125–138. DOI: 10.1177/0266666911401167
- Belkin, NJ and Vickery, A. 1985. Interaction in information systems: A review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems. (No. 025.04 BEL. CIMMYT.). British Library.
- Berends, J, Carrara, W, Engbers, W and Vollers, H. 2017. Re-using open data: a study on companies transforming open data into economic & societal value. Retrieved from
https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/re-usingopendata.pdf ((accessed 2019-11-22). - Carr, SJ and Lassiter, A. 2017.
Big data, small apps: premises and products of the civic hackathon . In Seeing cities through big data, 543–559. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3 - Carrol, JM. 1999. Five reasons for scenario-based design. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual hawaii international conference on systems sciences. 1999. hicss-32. abstracts and cd-rom of full papers, 11–pp. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772890
- Chandra, L, Seidel, S and Gregor, S. 2015. Prescriptive knowledge in is research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In 2015 48th hawaii international conference on system sciences, 4039–4048. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.485
- Charalabidis, Y, Zuiderwijk, A, Alexopoulos, C, Janssen, M, Höchtl, J and Ferro, E. 2018. The world of open data. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319908496 . DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90850-2 - Daft, RL and Lengel, RH. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science, 32(5): 554–571. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
- Davies, T. 2010. Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from
data.gov.uk , 1–47. - De Tuya, M, Cook, M, Sutherland, MK and Luna-Reyes, LF. 2017. Information requirements to create public value: sharing and opening data to address urban blight. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. DOI: 10.1108/TG-12-2015-0054
- Devadason, FJ and Lingam, PP. 1997. A methodology for the identification of information needs of users. IFLA journal, 23(1): 41–51. DOI: 10.1177/034003529702300109
- Dresch, A, Lacerda, DP and Antunes, JAV. 2015. Design science research. In Design science research, 67–102. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3
- Erdelez, S. 1999. Information encountering: It’s more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 25(3): 26–29. DOI: 10.1002/bult.118
- Goldkuhl, G and Sjöström, J. 2018. Design science in the field: practice design research. In International conference on design science research in information systems and technology, 67–81. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91800-6
- Gregor, S and Hevner, AR. 2013. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 337–355. Retrieved from
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825912 . DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01 - Gregor, S, Kruse, LC and Seidel, S. 2020. Research perspectives: The anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6). DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00649
- Hellberg, A-S and Hedström, K. 2015. The story of the sixth myth of open data and open government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(1): 35–51. DOI: 10.1108/TG-04-2014-0013
- Hess, A, Diebold, P and Seyff, N. 2017. Towards requirements communication and documentation guidelines for agile teams. In 2017 ieee 25th international requirements engineering conference workshops(rew), 415–418. DOI: 10.1109/REW.2017.64
- Hevner, A, March, ST, Park, J and Ram, S. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28(1): 75–105. DOI: 10.2307/25148625
- Hey, J. 2004. The data, information, knowledge, wisdom chain: the metaphorical link. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, 26: 1–18.
- Hjalmarsson, A, Johannesson, P, Jüll-Skielse, G and Rudmark, D. 2014. Beyond innovation contests: A framework of barriers to open innovation of digital services. In Ecis 14 22nd european conference on information systems, tel aviv,
5–13 june 2014 . - Hogan, M, Ojo, A, Harney, O, Ruijer, E, Meijer, A, Andriessen, J, … others. 2017.
Governance, transparency and the collaborative design of open data collaboration platforms: understanding barriers, options, and needs . In Government 3.0-next generation government technology infrastructure and services, 299–332. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3 - Hörold, S, Mayas, C and Krömker, H. 2012. Identifying the information needs of users in public transport. Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation, 1, 331–340.
- Huang, R, Lai, T and Zhou, L. 2017. Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in china. Library Hi Tech, 35(3): 421–438. DOI: 10.1108/LHT-01-2017-0014
- Hunnius, S and Krieger, B. 2014. The social shaping of open data through administrative processes. In Proceedings of the international symposium on open collaboration, 1–5. DOI: 10.1145/2641580.2641601
- Iivari, J, Hansen, MRP and Haj-Bolouri, A. 2020. A proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles. Information Systems. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1793697
- Janssen, M, Charalabidis, Y and Zuiderwijk, A. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information systems management, 29(4): 258–268. DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
- Janssen, M and Zuiderwijk, A. 2014. Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review, 32(5): 694–711. DOI: 10.1177/0894439314525902
- Johnson, P and Robinson, P. 2014. Civic hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of policy research, 31(4): 349–357. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12074
- Juell-Skielse, G, Hjalmarsson, A, Johannesson, P and Rudmark, D. 2014. Is the public motivated to engage in open data innovation? In International conference on electronic government, 277–288. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12074
- Kohler, T, Fueller, J, Matzler, K, Stieger, D and Füller, J. 2011. Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS quarterly, 773–788. DOI: 10.2307/23042808
- Komninos, N, Pallot, M and Schaffers, H. 2013. Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2): 119–134. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-012-0083-x
- Kuhlthau, CC. 1991. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American society for information science, 42(5): 361–371. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<;361::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-#
- Kujala, S. 2003. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & information technology, 22(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/01449290301782
- March, ST and Smith, GF. 1995. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4): 251–266. DOI: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
- Moore, N. 1997. The information society. World information report, 1998, 271–284.
- Mulder, I and Stappers, PJ. 2009. Co-creating in practice: results and challenges. In 2009 ieee international technology management conference(ice), 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/ITMC.2009.7461369
- Nicholas, D and Herman, E. 2010. Assessing information needs in the age of the digital consumer. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203855799
- Open Data Handbook. 2015. The open data handbook. Retrieved 2021-04-29, from
http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/ . - Pallot, M, Trousse, B, Senach, B and Scapin, D. 2010. Living lab research landscape: From user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. In First european summer school “living labs”. Retrieved from
https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00612632 . - Paulus, D, Meesters, K and Van de Walle, B. 2018. Turning data into action: supporting humanitarian field workers with open data. In Iscram.
- Peffers, K, Tuunanen, T, Rothenberger, MA and Chatterjee, S. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3): 45–77. DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
- Portal, ED. 2019. What is open data? Retrieved from
https://www.europeandataportal.eu/elearning/en/module1/#/id/co-01 (Accessed on 2019-08-14) - Roberts, D, Hughes, M and Kertbo, K. 2014. Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2): 147–169. DOI: 10.1108/EJM-12-2010-0637
- Sanders, EB-N. 2002.
From user-centered to participatory design approaches . In Design and the social sciences, 18–25. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9780203301302-8 - Sanders, EB-N and Stappers, PJ. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1): 5–18. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
- Sein, MK, Henfridsson, O, Purao, S, Rossi, M and Lindgren, R. 2011. Action design research. MIS quarterly, 37–56. DOI: 10.2307/23043488
- Shenton, AK. 2007. Viewing information needs through a johari window. Reference Services Review. DOI: 10.1108/00907320710774337
- Staron, M, Meding, W and Baniasad, P. 2019. Information needs for safe teams and release train management: A design science research study. In Iwsmmensura, 55–70. Retrieved from
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2476/paper4.pdf . - Steen, M, Kuijt-Evers, L and Klok, J. 2007. Early user involvement in research and design projects-a review of methods and practices. In 23rd egos colloquium, 5: 1–21.
- Susha, I, Grönlund, Å and Janssen, M. 2015. Organizational measures to stimulate user engagement with open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. DOI: 10.1108/TG-05-2014-0016
- Timmerman, JG, Boer, J, Hisschemöller, M and Mulder, W. 2001. Specifying information needs: improving the working methodology. Regional Environmental Change, 2(2): 77–84. DOI: 10.1007/s101130100030
- Urquhart, C. 2001. Bridging information requirements and information needs assessment: do scenarios and vignettes provide a link. Information Research, 6(2): 6–2. Retrieved from
http://InformationR.net/ir/6-2/paper102.html . - van Schalkwyk, F, Willmers, M and McNaughton, M. 2016. Viscous open data: The roles of intermediaries in an open data ecosystem. Information Technology for Development, 22(November), 68–83. DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2015.1081868
- Verganti, R. 2008. Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of product innovation management, 25(5): 436–456. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00313.x
- Visser, FS, Stappers, PJ, Van der Lugt, R and Sanders, EB. 2005. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2): 119–149. DOI: 10.1080/15710880500135987
- Warfield, JN. 1994. Science of generic design: managing complexity through systems design. Iowa State Press.
- Warner, ES, Murray, AD and Palmour, VE. 1973. Information needs of urban residents. Final report. ERIC.
- Weerakkody, V, Irani, Z, Kapoor, K, Sivarajah, U and Dwivedi, YK. 2017. Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the citizen’s perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2): 285–300. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9679-1
- Westbrook, L. 1993. User needs: a synthesis and analysis of current theories for the practitioner. RQ, 541–549. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25829371 . - Wilson, TD. 1981. On user studies and information needs. Journal of documentation, 37(1): 3–15. DOI: 10.1108/eb026702
- Wilson, TD. 1994. Information needs and uses: fifty years of progress. Fifty years of information progress: a Journal of Documentation review, 15–51.
- Zuiderwijk, A, Susha, I, Charalabidis, Y, Parycek, P and Janssen, M. 2015. Open data disclosure and use: Critical factors from a case study. In Cedem15: Conference for e-democracy and open government (Vol. 197).