Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards Globally Unique Identification of Physical Samples: Governance and Technical Implementation of the IGSN Global Sample Number Cover

Towards Globally Unique Identification of Physical Samples: Governance and Technical Implementation of the IGSN Global Sample Number

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Alercia, A, López, FM, Sackville Hamilton, NR and Masella, M. 2018. Digital Object Identifiers for food crops – Descriptors and guidelines of the Global Information System. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2018002129.
  2. Australian Antarctic Data Centre. 2015. The Australian Antarctic Program Data Policy. Kingston, TAS, Australia: Australian Antarctic Division. Available at https://data.aad.gov.au/aadc/about/data_policy.cfm.
  3. Ballsun-Stanton, B, Ross, SA, Sobotkova, A and Crook, P. 2018. FAIMS Mobile: Flexible, open-source software for field research. SoftwareX, 7: 4752. DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2017.12.006
  4. Bechtold, S. 2003. Governance in Namespaces. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 36(3): 12391320. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.413681
  5. Brase, J. 2004. Using Digital Library Techniques – Registration of Scientific Primary Data. In: Jones, M, Fox, EA, Shen, R, Stern, J, Yoo, K-Y, Pfitzmann, B, Iwama, K, Gao, W, Li, M, Wille, R, Zhang, J and Varadharajan, V (eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 488494. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30230-8_44
  6. Brase, J. 2009. DataCite – A Global Registration Agency for Research Data. In: Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, 2009. COINFO ’09, 257–261. Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, 2009. COINFO ’09. DOI: 10.1109/COINFO.2009.66
  7. Bütikofer, N. 2009. Catalogue of criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of PI systems (No. 13). Göttingen, Germany: Niedersächsische Staats und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen. Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-20080710227.
  8. CODATA. 2019. The Beijing Declaration on Research Data (position paper). Paris, France: CODATA. Available at http://www.codata.org/news/361/62/The-Beijing-Declaration-on-Research-Data [Last accessed 19 November 2019].
  9. Conze, R, Lorenz, H, Ulbricht, D, Elger, K and Gorgas, T. 2017. Utilizing the International Geo Sample Number Concept in Continental Scientific Drilling During ICDP Expedition COSC-1. Data Science Journal, 16(1): 18. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-002
  10. Cox, SJD. 2020. Extensions to the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology (W3C Working Draft No. TR/2020/WD-vocab-ssn-ext-20200116). Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Available at https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/WD-vocab-ssn-ext-20200116/.
  11. Damerow, JE, Varadharajan, C, Boye, K, Brodie, EL, Burrus, M, Chadwick, KD, Crystal-Ornelas, R, Elbashandy, H, Eloy Albes, RJ, Ely, KS, Goldman, AE, Habermann, T, Hendrix, V, Kakalia, Z, Kemner, KM, Kersting, AB, Merino, N, O’Brien, F, Perznan, Z, Robles, E, Sorensen, P, Stegen, JC, Walls, RL, Weisenhorn, P, Zavarin, M and Agarwal, D. 2021. Sample Identifiers and Metadata to Support Data Management and Reuse in Multidisciplinary Ecosystem Sciences. Data Science Journal, 20(1): 11. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-011
  12. DataCite Metadata Working Group. 2016. DataCite Metadata Schema 4.0. Hannover, Germany: DataCite e.V. DOI: 10.5438/0012
  13. DataCite Metadata Working Group. 2018. DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data (No. Version 4.2). Hannover, Germany: DataCite e.V. DOI: 10.5438/bmjt-bx77
  14. Davies, N, Deck, J, Kansa, EC, Kansa, SW, Kunze, J, Meyer, C, Orrell, T, Ramdeen, S, Snyder, R, Vieglais, D, Walls, RL and Lehnert, K. 2021. Internet of Samples (iSamples): Toward an interdisciplinary cyberinfrastructure for material samples. GigaScience, 10(giab028). DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab028
  15. Dere, AL, White, TS, April, RH, Reynolds, B, Miller, TE, Knapp, EP, McKay, LD and Brantley, SL. 2013. Climate dependence of feldspar weathering in shale soils along a latitudinal gradient. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 122: 101126. DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.08.001
  16. Devaraju, A, Klump, JF, Cox, SJD and Golodoniuc, P. 2016. Representing and Publishing Physical Sample Descriptions. Computers & Geosciences, 96: 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.018
  17. Devaraju, A, Klump, J, Tey, V, Cox, SJD and Fraser, R. 2017. Towards a web-enabled geo-sample web: An open source registration and management system for connecting geo-samples to the web. In: Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G) Conference Proceedings. Presented at the FOSS4G 2017. Boston, MA: OSGEO. p. Article 16. DOI: 10.7275/R5P26W9H
  18. European Environment Agency. 2004. GEMET – GEneral Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency. Available at https://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/en/about/.
  19. Fenner, M, Peters, S, Leinweber, K, Zukowski, E and Garza, K. 2019. DataCite Metadata Store (MDS). Hannover, Germany: DataCite e.V. Available at https://github.com/datacite/mds [Last accessed 17 July 2020].
  20. Fils, D, Robertson, JC, Ramdeen, S and Klump, J. 2020. Building Community and Road-Testing the New IGSN System Architecture. In: American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2020. Presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2020. San Francisco, CA: American Geophysical Union. Available at https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm20/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/726092.
  21. Genova, F, Arviset, C, Almas, BM, Bartolo, L, Broeder, D, Law, E and McMahon, B. 2017. Building a Disciplinary, World-Wide Data Infrastructure. Data Science Journal, 16(16). DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-016
  22. Golodoniuc, P, Car, NJ and Klump, J. 2017. Distributed Persistent Identifiers System Design. Data Science Journal, 16: 34. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-034
  23. Golodoniuc, P, Devaraju, A and Klump, JF. 2016. The implementation of IGSN in the context of Australian mineral exploration. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, EGU2016–1562. Presented at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2016. Vienna, Austria: Copernicus Society. Available at http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/EGU2016-1562.pdf.
  24. Groom, Q, Hyam, R and Güntsch, A. 2017. Data management: Stable identifiers for collection specimens. Nature, 546(7656): 3333. DOI: 10.1038/546033d
  25. Güntsch, A, Hyam, R, Hagedorn, G, Chagnoux, S, Röpert, D, Casino, A, Droege, G, Glöckler, F, Gödderz, K, Groom, Q, Hoffmann, J, Holleman, A, Kempa, M, Koivula, H, Marhold, K, Nicolson, N, Smith, VS and Triebel, D. 2017. Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2017(1). DOI: 10.1093/database/bax003
  26. Haller, A, Janowicz, K, Cox, SJD, Lefrançois, M, Phuoc, DL, Lieberman, J, García-Castro, R, Atkinson, RA and Stadler, C. 2019. The Modular SSN Ontology: A Joint W3C and OGC Standard Specifying the Semantics of Sensors, Observations, Sampling, and Actuation. Semantic Web, 10(1): 932. DOI: 10.3233/SW-180320
  27. Hardisty, A, Saarenmaa, H, Casino, A, Dillen, M, Gödderz, K, Groom, Q, Hardy, H, Koureas, D, de la Hidalga, AN, Paul, D, Runnel, V, Vermeersch, X, van Walsum, M and Willemse, L. 2020. Conceptual design blueprint for the DiSSCo digitization infrastructure – DELIVERABLE D8.1. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 6: e54280. DOI: 10.3897/rio.6.e54280
  28. Hills, DJ. 2015. Let’s make it easy: A workflow for physical sample metadata rescue. GeoResJ, 6: 18. DOI: 10.1016/j.grj.2015.02.007
  29. Horsburgh, JS, Aufdenkampe, AK, Mayorga, E, Lehnert, KA, Hsu, L, Song, L, Jones, AS, Damiano, SG, Tarboton, DG, Valentine, D, Zaslavsky, I and Whitenack, T. 2016. Observations Data Model 2: A community information model for spatially discrete Earth observations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79: 5574. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.010
  30. International Council of Museums. 2012. Statement on Linked Data identifiers for museum objects. Helsinki, Finland: International Council of Museums. Available at http://network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/cidoc/PDF/StatementOnLinkedDataIdentifiersForMuseumObjects.pdf.
  31. ISO. 2013. Geographic information – Procedures for registration of items of geographic information (Draft No. ISO/DIS 19135-1:2013). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
  32. Kahn, R and Wilensky, R. 1995. A Framework for Distributed Digital Object Services (Technical Note No. tn09-01). Reston, VA: Corporation for National Research Initiatives. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/cnri.dlib/tn95-01.
  33. Klump, J, Bertelmann, R, Brase, J, Diepenbroek, M, Grobe, H, Höck, H, Lautenschlager, M, Schindler, U, Sens, I and Wächter, J. 2006. Data publication in the Open Access Initiative. Data Science Journal, 5: 7983. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.5.79
  34. Klump, J and Huber, RX. 2017. 20 Years of persistent identifiers – Which systems are here to stay? Data Science Journal, 16(9): 17. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-009
  35. Klump, J, Lehnert, KA, Wyborn, LAI, Ramdeen, S and IGSN 2040 Steering Committee. 2020. Building a sustainable international research data infrastructure – Lessons learnt in the IGSN 2040 project. In: EGU General Assembly 2020. Presented at the EGU General Assembly 2020. Vienna, Austria: Copernicus Society. pp. EGU202012001. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12001
  36. König-Langlo, G and Gernandt, H. 2009. Compilation of ozonesonde profiles from the Antarctic Georg-Forster-Station from 1985 to 1992. Earth System Science Data, 1(1): 15. DOI: 10.5194/essd-1-1-2009
  37. Lagoze, C, Van de Sompel, H, Nelson, ML and Warner, S. 2002. Implementation Guidelines for the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Ithaca, NY: Open Archives Initiative. Available at http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines.htm. DOI: 10.1108/07378830310479776
  38. Lannom, L, Koureas, D and Hardisty, AR. 2019. FAIR Data and Services in Biodiversity Science and Geoscience. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2): 122130. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00034
  39. Lehnert, KA. 2011. Metadata Standards for Sample-Based Observations. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, EGU2011–13113. Presented at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2011. Vienna, Austria: Copernicus Meetings. Available at https://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU2011/EGU2011-13113_presentation.pptx.
  40. Lehnert, KA, Goldstein, SL, Lenhardt, WC and Vinayagamoorthy, S. 2004. SESAR: Addressing the need for unique sample identification in the Solid Earth Sciences. In: AGU Fall Meeting 2004, SF32A-06. Presented at the AGU Fall Meeting 2004. San Francisco, CA: American Geophysical Union. Available at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AGUFMSF32A..06L [Last accessed 10 May 2016].
  41. Lehnert, KA and Klump, J. 2008. Facilitating Research in Mantle Petrology with Geoinformatics. Presented at the 9th International Kimberlite Conference. Frankfurt (M), Germany: Copernicus Society. p. 9IKCA00250. Available at http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/9IKC/00250/9IKC-A-00250-1.pdf.
  42. Lehnert, KA, Klump, J, Arko, RA, Bristol, S, Buczkowsky, B, Chan, S-L, Chan, S, Conze, R, Cox, SJD, Habermann, T, Hangsterfer, A, Hsu, L, Milan, A, Miller, S, Noren, A, Richard, S, Valentine, DW, Whitenack, T, Wyborn, LA and Zaslavsky, I. 2011. IGSN e.V.: Registration and Identification Services for Physical Samples in the Digital Universe. Presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting. San Francisco, CA: American Geophysical Union. pp. IN13B1324. Available at http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2011/FM/sections/IN/sessions/IN13B/abstracts/IN13B-1324.html.
  43. Lehnert, K, Wyborn, L, Klump, J and Ramdeen, S. 2020. IGSN 2040 Organizational Steering Committee Workshop Report. Potsdam, Germany: IGSN e.V. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3724722
  44. Lloyd, AS, Ruprecht, P, Hauri, EH, Rose, W, Gonnermann, HM and Plank, T. 2014. NanoSIMS results from olivine-hosted melt embayments: Magma ascent rate during explosive basaltic eruptions. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 283: 118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.06.002
  45. McNutt, M, Lehnert, KA, Hanson, B, Nosek, BA, Ellison, AM and King, JL. 2016. Liberating field science samples and data. Science, 351(6277): 10241026. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7048
  46. National Science Foundation. 2020. Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (No. 20–1). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/index.jsp.
  47. Noble, RRP, Gonzalez-Alvarez, I, Reid, N, Krapf, C, Pinchand, T, Cole, D, Lau, I, Fox, D, Brant, F, White, AJR, Klump, J and Petts, A. 2018. Regional Geochemistry of the Coompana Area (Technical Report No. EP187470). Perth, WA, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. DOI: 10.25919/5c59cf28d6fd2
  48. OGC. Observations and Measurements v2.0 also published as ISO/DIS 19156 (Abstract Specification No. 10-004r3) 2013. Arlington, VA: Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at https://www.ogc.org/standards/om [Last accessed 13 July 2021].
  49. Pon, RK and Buttler, DJ. 2009. Metadata Registry, ISO/IEC 11179. In: Liu, L and Özsu, MT (eds.), Encyclopedia of Database Systems, 17241727. Boston, MA: Springer US. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_907
  50. Reid, N, Ballsun-Stanton, B, White, AJR, Sobotkova, A and Klump, JF. 2016. A mobile app for geological/geochemical field data acquisition. In: 35th International Geological Congress. Presented at the 35th International Geological Congress. Cape Town, South Africa.
  51. Royal Society. 2012. Science as an open enterprise (No. 02/12). London, United Kingdom: The Royal Society. Available at http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/.
  52. Sen, M and Duffy, T. 2005. GeoSciML: Development of a generic GeoScience Markup Language. Computers & Geosciences, 31(9): 10951103. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.12.003
  53. Thessen, AE, Woodburn, M, Koureas, D, Paul, D, Conlon, M, Shorthouse, DP and Ramdeen, S. 2019. Proper Attribution for Curation and Maintenance of Research Collections: Metadata Recommendations of the RDA/TDWG Working Group. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 54. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-054
  54. TIB Hannover. 2012. TIB DOI Registration. Hannover, Germany: TIB Hannover. Available at http://www.tib-hannover.de/en/services/doi-service/doi-registration/.
  55. Walls, RL, Deck, J, Guralnick, R, Baskauf, S, Beaman, R, Blum, S, Bowers, S, Buttigieg, PL, Davies, N, Endresen, D, Gandolfo, MA, Hanner, R, Janning, A, Krishtalka, L, Matsunaga, A, Midford, P, Morrison, N, Tuama, ÉÓ, Schildhauer, M, Smith, B, Stucky, BJ, Thomer, A, Wieczorek, J, Whitacre, J and Wooley, J. 2014. Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies. PLOS ONE, 9(3): e89606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089606
  56. Wieczorek, J, Bloom, D, Guralnick, R, Blum, S, Döring, M, Giovanni, R, Robertson, T and Vieglais, D. 2012. Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard. PLOS ONE, 7(1): e29715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 4, 2021
|
Accepted on: Oct 14, 2021
|
Published on: Oct 28, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Jens Klump, Kerstin Lehnert, Damian Ulbricht, Anusuriya Devaraju, Kirsten Elger, Dirk Fleischer, Sarah Ramdeen, Lesley Wyborn, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.