Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Affiliation Information in DataCite Dataset Metadata: a Flemish Case Study Cover

Affiliation Information in DataCite Dataset Metadata: a Flemish Case Study

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1Burton, A, Koers, H, Manghi, P, La Bruzzo, S, Aryani, A, Diepenbroek, M and Schindler, U. 2017. The Data-Literature Interlinking Service: towards a Common Infrastructure for Sharing Data-Article Links. Program, 51(1): 75100. DOI: 10.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048
  2. 2Chamberlain, S. 2020. rdatacite: Client for the ‘DataCite’ API. R package version 0.5.0. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rdatacite.
  3. 3Cousijn, H, Feeney, P, Lowenberg, D, Presani, E and Simons, N. 2019. Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count. Data Science Journal, 18(9): 17. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-009
  4. 4DataCite Metadata Working Group. 2019. DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.3. DOI: 10.14454/7xq3-zf69
  5. 5Flemish Open Science Board. 2020. KPIs for Open Science in Flanders. Available at https://www.ewi-vlaanderen.be/sites/default/files/bestanden/5fc5f512b328e9000c0007f3.pdf.
  6. 6Friendly, M. 2002. A Brief History of the Mosaic Display. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11(1): 89107. DOI: 10.1198/106186002317375631
  7. 7Habermann, T. 2019. MetaDIG recommendations for FAIR DataCite metadata. DataCite blog. DOI: 10.5438/2chg-b074
  8. 8Habermann, T and Lowerberg, D. 2019. Missing Data for Data – Our Quest to Clean Up Institutional Affiliations in Dryad: Wrangling RORs. Presented at the csv, conf, V4, Portland, OR, USA. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3254969
  9. 9Hahnel, M and Valen, D. 2020. How to (Easily) Extend the FAIRness of Existing Repositories. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2): 192198. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00041
  10. 10Hook, DW, Porter, SJ and Herzog, C. 2018. Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3(23). DOI: 10.3389/frma.2018.00023
  11. 11Kaufman, L and Rousseeuw, PJ. 1990. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9780470316801
  12. 12Khan, N, Pink, CJ and Thelwall, M. 2020. Identifying Data Sharing and Reuse with Scholix: Potentials and Limitations. Patterns, 1(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100007
  13. 13Kolde, R. 2019. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap.
  14. 14Lammey, R. 2020. Solutions for identification problems: a look at the Research Organization Registry. Sci Ed, 7(1): 6569. DOI: 10.6087/kcse.192
  15. 15Wu, M, Psomopoulos, F, Khalsa, SJ and de Waard, A. 2019. Data Discovery Paradigms: User Requirements and Recommendations for Data Repositories. Data Science Journal, 18(3): 113. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-003
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 24, 2021
Published on: Mar 29, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Niek Van Wettere, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.