Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Kadi4Mat: A Research Data Infrastructure for Materials Science Cover

Kadi4Mat: A Research Data Infrastructure for Materials Science

Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Afgan, E, et al. July 2, 2018. The Galaxy Platform for Accessible, Reproducible and Collaborative Biomedical Analyses: 2018 Update. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(W1): W537W544. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky379
  2. Amorim, RC, et al. Nov. 2017. A Comparison of Research Data Management Platforms: Architecture, Flexible Metadata and Interoperability. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(4): 851862. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-016-0475-y
  3. Bird, CL, Willoughby, C and Frey, JG. 2013. Laboratory Notebooks in the Digital Era: The Role of ELNs in Record Keeping for Chemistry and Other Sciences. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(20): 8157. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60122f
  4. Brandt, N. 2020. Kadi4Mat – Karlsruhe Data Infrastructure for Materials Science. URL: https://kadi.iam-cms.kit.edu (visited on Sept. 30, 2020).
  5. Brandt, N, et al. Oct. 16, 2020. IAM-CMS/Kadi: Kadi4Mat. Version 0.2.0. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4088270
  6. Cantor, S and Scavo, T. 2005. Shibboleth Architecture. Protocols and Profiles, 10: 16. DOI: 10.26869/TI.66.1
  7. CARPi, N, Minges, A and Piel, M. Apr. 14, 2017. eLabFTW: An Open Source Laboratory Notebook for Research Labs. The Journal of Open Source Software, 2(12): 146. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00146
  8. Carusi, A and Reimer, T. Jan. 2010. Virtual Research Environment Collaborative Landscape Study. JISC Report.
  9. CKAN Association. 2014. Ckan – The Open Source Data Portal Software. URL: https://ckan.org/ (visited on May 19, 2020).
  10. DataCite Metadata Working Group. 2019. DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data v4.3. Version 4.3. DataCite.
  11. Django Software Foundation. 2005. Django – The Web Framework for Perfectionists with Deadlines. URL: https://www.djangoproject.com/ (visited on May 25, 2020).
  12. Draxl, C and Scheffler, M. Sept. 2018. NOMAD: The FAIR Concept for Big Data-Driven Materials Science. MRS Bulletin 43(9): 676682. DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2018.208
  13. Elastic, NV. 2010. Elasticsearch – The Official Distributed Search & Analytics Engine. URL: https://www.elastic.co/elasticsearch (visited on June 2, 2020).
  14. Elliott, MH. 2009. Thinking beyond ELN. Scientific computing, 26(6): 610.
  15. European Materials Modelling Council. 2019. European Materials and Modelling Ontology. URL: https://github.com/emmo-repo (visited on May 24, 2020).
  16. European Organization For Nuclear Research. 2016. Invenio – Open Source Framework for Large-Scale Digital Repositories. URL: https://invenio-software.org/ (visited on May 19, 2020).
  17. European Organization For Nuclear Research & OpenAIRE. 2013. Zenodo. DOI: 10.25495/7GXK-RD71
  18. Fielding, RT and Taylor, RN. 2000. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures. Vol. 7. Irvine: University of California.
  19. Ghiringhelli, LM, et al. Dec. 2017. Towards Efficient Data Exchange and Sharing for Big-Data Driven Materials Science: Metadata and Data Formats. npj Computational Materials 3(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41524-017-0048-5
  20. Greenberg, J, et al. Nov. 30, 2009. A Metadata Best Practice for a Scientific Data Repository. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(3–4): 194212. DOI: 10.1080/19386380903405090
  21. Hawker, CD. Dec. 2007. Laboratory Automation: Total and Subtotal. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 27(4): 749770. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2007.07.010
  22. Hey, AJG, (ed.). 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Research. pp. 251.
  23. Hey, T and Trefethen, A. Mar. 11, 2003. The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective. In: Berman, F, Fox, G and Hey, T (eds.), Wiley Series in Communications Networking & Distributed Systems. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 809824. DOI: 10.1002/0470867167.ch36
  24. Hill, J, et al. May 2016. Materials Science with Large-Scale Data and Informatics: Unlocking New Opportunities. MRS Bulletin, 41(5): 399409. DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2016.93
  25. Jain, A, et al. July 2013. Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation. APL Materials, 1(1): 011002. DOI: 10.1063/1.4812323
  26. King, G. Nov. 2007. An Introduction to the Dataverse Network as an Infrastructure for Data Sharing. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(2): 173199. DOI: 10.1177/0049124107306660
  27. Kluyver, T, et al. 2016. Jupyter Notebooks – a Publishing Format for Reproducible Computational Workflows. In: Loizides, F and Scmidt, B (eds.), Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas. Netherlands: IOS Press. pp. 8790. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87
  28. Naughton, L and Kernohan, D. Mar. 7, 2016. Making Sense of Journal Research Data Policies. Insights the UKSG journal, 29(1): 8489. DOI: 10.1629/uksg.284
  29. Open Archives Initiative. 2015. Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. URL: http://www.openarchives.org/pmh/ (visited on May 25, 2020).
  30. P. Bryan Heidorn. 2008. Shedding Light on the Dark Data in the Long Tail of Science. Library Trends, 57(2): 280299. DOI: 10.1353/lib.0.0036
  31. Pampel, H, et al. Nov. 4, 2013. Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The Re3data.Org Registry. In: Suleman, H (ed.), PLoS ONE, 8(11): e78080. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
  32. PostgreSQL Global Development Group. 1996. PostgreSQL: The World’s Most Advanced Open Source Database. URL: https://www.postgresql.org/ (visited on Sept. 30, 2020).
  33. Potthoff, J, et al. Mar. 2019. Procedures for Systematic Capture and Management of Analytical Data in Academia. In: Analytica Chimica Acta: X, 1: 100007. DOI: 10.1016/j.acax.2019.100007
  34. Rubacha, M, Rattan, AK and Hosselet, SC. Feb. 2011. A Review of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Available in the Market Today. Journal of Laboratory Automation, 16(1): 9098. DOI: 10.1016/j.jala.2009.01.002
  35. Sandfeld, S, et al. 2018. Strategiepapier – Digitale Transformation in der Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik.
  36. Schembera, B and Iglezakis, D. 2020. EngMeta: Metadata for Computational Engineering. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 14(1): 26. DOI: 10.1504/IJMSO.2020.107792
  37. Schindelin, J, et al. July 2015. The ImageJ Ecosystem: An Open Platform for Biomedical Image Analysis. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 82(7–8): 518529. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22489
  38. Schoof, E and Brandt, N. Oct. 16, 2020. IAM-CMS/Kadi-Apy: Kadi4Mat API Library. Version 0.2.1. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4088276
  39. SciNote LLC 2015. SciNote – Electronic Lab Notebook & Inventory Management. URL: https://www.scinote.net/ (visited on May 21, 2020).
  40. Smith, M, et al. Jan. 2003. DSpace: An Open Source Dynamic Digital Repository. D-Lib Magazine, 9(1). DOI: 10.1045/january2003-smith
  41. Taylor, KT. 2006. The Status of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks for Chemistry and Biology. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, 9(3): 348.
  42. The FAIRsharing Community, et al. Apr. 2019. FAIRsharing as a Community Approach to Standards, Repositories and Policies. Nature Biotechnology, 37(4): 358367. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
  43. The MathWorks, Inc. 2021. MATLAB – MathWorks. URL: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html (visited on Jan. 19, 2021).
  44. The Pallets Projects. 2015. Flask – The Pallets Projects. URL: https://palletsprojects.com/p/flask/ (visited on May 25, 2020).
  45. Tremouilhac, P, et al. Dec. 2017. Chemotion ELN: An Open Source Electronic Lab Notebook for Chemists in Academia. Journal of Cheminformatics, 9(1). DOI: 10.1186/s13321-017-0240-0
  46. Vue Core Development Team. 2014. Vue.Js – The Progressive JavaScript Framework. URL: https://vuejs.org/ (visited on May 25, 2020).
  47. Wilkinson, MD, et al. Dec. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  48. Wolstencroft, K, et al. July 1, 2013. The Taverna Workflow Suite: Designing and Executing Workflows of Web Services on the Desktop, Web or in the Cloud. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(W1): W557W561. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt328
  49. Zschumme, P. Jan. 15, 2021a. IAM-CMS/Process-Engine. Version 0.1.0. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4442563
  50. Zschumme, P. Jan. 15, 2021b. IAM-CMS/Process-Manager. Version 0.1.0. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4442553
  51. Zschumme, P, et al. Oct. 16, 2020. IAM-CMS/Workflow-Nodes. Version 0.1.0. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4094719
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 16, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jan 27, 2021
|
Published on: Feb 10, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Nico Brandt, Lars Griem, Christoph Herrmann, Ephraim Schoof, Giovanna Tosato, Yinghan Zhao, Philipp Zschumme, Michael Selzer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.