Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigation and Development of the Workflow to Clarify Conditions of Use for Research Data Publishing in Japan Cover

Investigation and Development of the Workflow to Clarify Conditions of Use for Research Data Publishing in Japan

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. 1ANDS. 2018. Publishing and sharing sensitive data: ANDS Guides: 23p. https://www.ands.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/489187/Sensitive-Data-Guide-2018.pdf.
  2. 2Assante, M, Candela, L, Castelli, D and Tani, A. 2016. Are Scientific Data Repositories Coping with Research Data Publishing? Data Science Journal, 15: 124. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-006
  3. 3Baldwin, J and Pinfield, S. 2018. The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access. Publications, 6(3): 31. DOI: 10.3390/publications6030031
  4. 4Ball, A. 2014. ‘How to License Research Data’. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides.
  5. 5Beagrie, N. 2006. Digital Curation for Science, Digital Libraries, and Individuals. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(1): 16. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v1i1.2
  6. 6CODATA. 2019. ‘The Beijing Declaration on Research Data’. 6p. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3552330
  7. 7Creative Commons. 2009. Defining “Noncommercial”: A Study of How the Online Population Understands “Noncommercial Use”. https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/defining-noncommercial/Defining_Noncommercial_fullreport.pdf
  8. 8Data Citation Synthesis Group. 2014. ‘Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles’. FORCE11. DOI: 10.25490/a97f-egyk
  9. 9Grabus, S and Greenberg, J. 2019. The Landscape of Rights and Licensing Initiatives for Data Sharing. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 29. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-029
  10. 10Ikeuchi, U and Minamiyama, Y. 2020. Data supporting “Investigation and Development of the workflow to clarify conditions of use for research data publishing in Japan” (Version 1.0). NII institutional repository. DOI: 10.20736/00001468
  11. 11Kelling, S, Hochachka, WM, Fink, D, Riedewald, M, Caruana, R, Ballard, G and Hooker, G. 2009. Data-intensive science: A new paradigm for biodiversity studies. Bioscience, 59(7): 613620. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12
  12. 12Kindling, M, et al., 2017. The Landscape of Research Data Repositories in 2015: A re3data Analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 23(3/4). DOI: 10.1045/march2017-kindling
  13. 13Klump, J, Bertelmann, R, Brase, J, Diepenbroek, M, Grobe, H, Höck, H, Lautenschlager, M, Schindler, U, Sens, I and Wächter, J. 2006. Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5: 7983. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.5.79
  14. 14Kowalczyk, S and Shankar, K. 2011. Data sharing in the sciences. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1): 247294. DOI: 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450113
  15. 15Lawrence, B, Jones, C, Matthews, B, Pepler, S and Callaghan, S. 2011. Citation and peer review of data: Moving towards formal data publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2): 437. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205
  16. 16Marcial, LH and Hemminger, BM. 2010. Scientific data repositories on the web: An initial survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61: 20292048. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21339
  17. 17Mayernik, MS, et al., 2020. Risk Assessment for Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 10. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-010
  18. 18Ministry of Economy, T and Industry. 2018. FY 2017 Industry and Economy Research Commissioned Project (Research on Data Protection Systems Abroad) Research Report (translated from Japanese). https://www.data.go.jp/data/en/dataset/meti_20180312_0106.
  19. 19OECD. 2015. Enquiries Into Intellectual Property’s Economic Impact, Chapter 7: Legal Aspects of Open Access to Publicly Funded Research in Enquiries into Intellectual Property’s Economic Impact. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/KBC2-IP.Final.pdf.
  20. 20RDA-CODATA Legal Interoperability Interest Group. 2016. Legal Interoperability of Research Data: Principles and Implementation Guidelines. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.162241
  21. 21RECODE project consortium. 2014. Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data. RECODE, 44. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.50863
  22. 22Research Data Utilization Forum. 2019. Guideline for specifying conditions of use in research data publishing, ver. 1.0. 32p. DOI: 10.11502/rduf_license_guideline
  23. 23Ruggles, S. 2018. The Importance of Data Curation. In: Vannette, D and Krosnick, J (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_39
  24. 24Stuart, D, et al. 2018. Whitepaper: Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5975011.v1
  25. 25Van Panhuis, WG, Paul, P and Emerson, C, et al., 2014. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health, 14: 1144. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144
  26. 26Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M and Aalbersberg, IJ. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 7, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2020
Published on: Dec 28, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Yasuyuki Minamiyama, Ui Ikeuchi, Kunihiko Ueshima, Nobuya Okayama, Hideaki Takeda, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.