References
- 1AGDC GC RAS–Analytical Geomagnetic Data Center, Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. Available at
http://ckp.gcras.ru/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 2Belakhovsky, V, Pilipenko, V, Engebretson, M, Sakharov, Y and Selivanov, V. 2019. Impulsive disturbances of the geomagnetic field as a cause of induced currents of electric power lines. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 9: A18. DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2019015
- 3Geomag Algorithms. 2020. Available at
https://github.com/usgs/geomag-algorithms [Last accessed 5 June 2020]. - 4Gjerloev, J. 2012. The SuperMAG data processing technique. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117: A09213. DOI: 10.1029/2012JA017683
- 5Gvishiani, A, Soloviev, A, Krasnoperov, R and Lukianova, R. 2016. Automated Hardware and Software System for Monitoring the Earth’s Magnetic Environment. Data Science Journal, 15: 18. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-018
- 6IAGA-2002 Exchange Format. 2016. Available at
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vdat/IAGA2002/iaga2002format.html [Last accessed 5 June 2020]. - 7IMAGE Magnetometer network. 2020. Available at
http://space.fmi.fi/image/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 8INTERMAGNET—International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network. 2020. Available at
https://intermagnet.org/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 9Lanzerotti, L, Medford, L, Maclennan, C and Thomson, D. 1995. Studies of large-scale Earth potentials across oceanic distances. AT&T Technical Journal, 74(3): 73–84. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1995.tb00185.x
- 10Map of Geomagnetic Observatories and Stations. 2018. Available at
http://gis.gcras.ru:6080/arcgis/rest/services/RSF4/Geomagnetic_observatories_stations/MapServer [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 11Pirjola, R. 2002. Review On The Calculation Of Surface Electric And Magnetic Fields And Of Geomagnetically Induced Currents In Ground-Based Technological Systems. Surveys in Geophysics, 23: 71–90. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014816009303
- 12Pulkkinen, A, Viljanen, A, Pajunpää, K and Pirjola, R. 2001. Recordings and occurrence of geomagnetically induced currents in the Finnish natural gas pipeline network. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 48(4): 219–231. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00108-2
- 13RSF4 DB Data availability. 2020. Available at
http://geomag.gcras.ru/rsf4db.html [Last accessed 5 June 2020]. - 14RUGDC–Russian-Ukrainian Geomagnetic Data Center. 2020. Available at
http://geomag.gcras.ru/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 15Soloviev, A, Agayan, S and Bogoutdinov, SH. 2016. Estimation of geomagnetic activity using measure of anomalousness. Annals of Geophysics, 59(6): G0653. DOI: 10.4401/ag-7116
- 16St-Louis, BJ, Sauter, EA, Trigg, DF, et al. 2012. INTERMAGNET Technical Reference Manual. Edinburgh: INTERMAGNET.
- 17SuperMAG. 2020. Available at
http://supermag.jhuapl.edu/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 18SuperMAG: Acknowledgement. 2020. Available at
http://supermag.jhuapl.edu/info/?page=acknowledgement [Last accessed 5 June 2020]. - 19Tanskanen, E. 2009. A comprehensive high-throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993–2003 examined. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(A5): A05204. DOI: 10.1029/2008JA013682
- 20Viljanen, A and Hakkinen, L. 1997. IMAGE magnetometer network. In: Satellite-Ground Based Coordination Sourcebook. In Lockwood, M, Wild, MN and Opgenoorth, HJ (eds.), Eur. Space Agency Spec. Publ., ESA-SP 1198, 111–117.
- 21Viljanen, A, Wintoft, P and Wik, M. 2015. Regional estimation of geomagnetically induced currents based on the local magnetic or electric field. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 5: A24. DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2015022
- 22WDC Kyoto–World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. 2020. Available at
http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wdc/Sec3.html [Last accessed 27 April 2020]. - 23WDC for STP–World Data Center for Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2019. Available at
http://www.wdcb.ru/stp/data.html [Last accessed 27 April 2020].