Have a personal or library account? Click to login
FAIRness Literacy: The Achilles’ Heel of Applying FAIR Principles Cover

FAIRness Literacy: The Achilles’ Heel of Applying FAIR Principles

Data Science Journal
Volume 19 (2020): Issue 1
By: Romain David,  Laurence Mabile,  Alison Specht,  Sarah Stryeck,  Mogens Thomsen,  Mohamed Yahia,  Clement Jonquet,  Laurent Dollé,  Daniel Jacob,  Daniele Bailo,  Elena Bravo,  Sophie Gachet,  Hannah Gunderman,  Jean-Eudes Hollebecq,  Vassilios Ioannidis,  Yvan Le Bras,  Emilie Lerigoleur,  Anne Cambon-Thomsen and  The Research Data Alliance – SHAring Reward and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group  
Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Curty, RG, Crowston, K, Specht, A, et al. 2017. Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLOS ONE, 12: e0189288. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189288
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. David, R, Mabile, L, Specht, A, et al. 2020. Templates for FAIRness evaluation criteria – RDA-SHARC ig (Version 1.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3922069
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. de Miranda Azevedo, R and Dumontier, M. 2019. Considerations for the Conduction and Interpretation of FAIRness Evaluations. Data Intelligence, 285–292. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00051
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Doorn, P and Science Europe. 2018. Science Europe Guidance. Presenting a Framework for Discipline-specific Research Data Management. [WWW Document]. URL http://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/SE_Guidance_Document_RDMPs.pdf [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Doorn, P and Timmermann, M. 2018. Towards Domain Protocols for Research Data Management (IG Domain Repositories RDA 9th Plenary meeting Community-driven Research Data Management). Paper presented at the 9. Plenary meeting Community-driven Research Data Management, Barcelona. https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/attachment/RDA%20DRIG%20Domain%20Protocols%20V3%20Barcelona%20April%202017%20-%20DoornAerts.pptx [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Erdmann, C, Simons, N, Otsuji, R, et al. 2019. Top 10 FAIR Data & Software Things. [WWW Document]. [Accessed January 07, 2020]. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2555498
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation (EC DGRI). 2016. E.U. H2020 Programme Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020, Version 3.0. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU. [WWW Document], URL https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation (EC DGRI). 2017. Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices; Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU. [WWW Document]. URL https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_rewards_wgreport_final.pdf [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation (EC DGRI). 2018. Turning FAIR into reality: final report and action plan from the European Commission expert group on FAIR data. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU. [WWW Document]. URL https://op.europa.eu:443/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7769a148-f1f6-11e8-9982-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Federer, LM, Belter, CW, Joubert, DJ, et al. 2018. Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements. PLOS ONE, 13: e0194768. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194768
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Hansen, KK, Buss, M and Sztuk Haahr, L. 2018. A FAIRy tale. Zenodo. [WWW Document]. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2248200
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Herschel, M, Diestelkämper, R and Ben Lahmar, H. 2017. A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from? The VLDB Journal, 26: 881–906. DOI: 10.1007/s00778-017-0486-1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Jacobsen, A, de Miranda Azevedo, R, Juty, N, et al. 2019. FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations. Data Intelligence, 10–29. DOI: 10.1162/dint_r_00024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Jones, S, Pergl, R, Hooft, R, et al. 2019. Data Management Planning: How Requirements and Solutions are Beginning to Converge. Data Intelligence, 208–219. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00043
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Landi, A, Thompson, M, Giannuzzi, V, et al. 2019. The “A” of FAIR – As Open as Possible, as Closed as Necessary. Data Intelligence, 47–55. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00027
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Lannom, L, Koureas, D and Hardisty, AR. 2019. FAIR Data and Services in Biodiversity Science and Geoscience. Data Intelligence, 122–130. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00034
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Mabile, L, De Castro, P, Bravo, E, et al. 2016. Towards new tools for bioresource use and sharing. Information Services & Use, 36: 133–146. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-160811
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. McQuilton, P, Batista, D, Beyan, O, et al. 2019. Helping the Consumers and Producers of Standards, Repositories and Policies to Enable FAIR Data. Data Intelligence, 151–157. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00037
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Mons, B, Neylon, C, Velterop, J, et al. 2017. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Information Services & Use, 37: 49–56. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-170824
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Reymonet, N, Moysan, M, Cartier, A, et al. 2018. Réaliser un plan de gestion de données «FAIR»: modèle. [WWW Document]. URL https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_01690547/document [Accessed January 10, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Sansone, S-A, McQuilton, P, Rocca-Serra, P, et al. 2019. FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nat Biotechnol, 37: 358–367. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Schultes, E, Strawn, G and Mons, B. 2018. Ready, Set, GO FAIR: Accelerating Convergence to an Internet of FAIR Data and Services. DAMDID/RCDL. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2277/paper07.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Schwardmann, U. 2020. Digital Objects – FAIR Digital Objects: Which Services Are Required? Data Science Journal, 19(1): 15. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-015
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Stall, S, Cruse, P, Cousijn, H, et al. 2018. Data Sharing and Citations: New Author Guidelines Promoting Open and FAIR Data in the Earth, Space, and Environmental Sciences. Science Editor, 41: 83–87. https://www.csescienceeditor.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CSEv41n3_text_83-87.pdf [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Sustkova, HP, Hettne, KM, Wittenburg, P, et al. 2019. FAIR Convergence Matrix: Optimizing the Reuse of Existing FAIR-Related Resources. Data Intelligence, 158–170. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00038
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Thompson, M, Burger, K, Kaliyaperumal, R, et al. 2019. Making FAIR Easy with FAIR Tools: From Creolization to Convergence. Data Intelligence, 87–95. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00031
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IjJ, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Sansone, S-A, et al. 2019. Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, community-governed framework. Scientific Data, 6: 1–12. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0184-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Wilkinson, MD, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, et al. 2018. A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. Scientific Data 5. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.118
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Wilkinson, MD, Verborgh, R, da Silva Santos, LOB, et al. 2017. Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of Web technologies (No. e2522v2). PeerJ Inc. DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2522v2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Wittenburg, P, Sustkova, HP, Montesanti, A, et al. 2019. The FAIR Funder pilot programme to make it easy for funders to require and for grantees to produce FAIR Data. [WWW Document]. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.11162? [Accessed January 07, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-032 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 3, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jul 27, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 11, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
FAIR principles,
FAIRness literacy,
FAIR assessment,
Research data sharing,
FAIRification,
Pre-FAIRification

© 2020 Romain David, Laurence Mabile, Alison Specht, Sarah Stryeck, Mogens Thomsen, Mohamed Yahia, Clement Jonquet, Laurent Dollé, Daniel Jacob, Daniele Bailo, Elena Bravo, Sophie Gachet, Hannah Gunderman, Jean-Eudes Hollebecq, Vassilios Ioannidis, Yvan Le Bras, Emilie Lerigoleur, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, The Research Data Alliance – SHAring Reward and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 19 (2020): Issue 1Next article