Have a personal or library account? Click to login
YARD: A Tool for Curating Research Outputs Cover

YARD: A Tool for Curating Research Outputs

By: Limor Peer and  Joshua Dull  
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. 1Altman, M. 2012. Mitigating Threats to Data Quality Throughout the Curation Lifecycle. In: Marchionini, G, Lee, CA, Bowden, H and Lesk, M (eds.), Curating for Quality: Ensuring Data Quality to Enable New Science. Final Report: Invitational Workshop Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Sept. 10–11, 2012, Arlington, VA. https://ils.unc.edu/callee/curating-for-quality.pdf.
  2. 2Ashley, K. 2013. Data Quality and Curation. Data Science Journal, 12: GRDI65GRDI68. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.GRDI-011
  3. 3Blei, DM and Smyth, P. 2017. Science and Data Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(33): 86898692. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702076114
  4. 4Burton, M, Lyon, L, Erdmann, C and Tijerina, B. 2018. Shifting to Data Savvy: The Future of Data Science in Libraries. Project Report. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/33891.
  5. 5Center for Research Libraries (CRL). 2007. Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist. http://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf (accessed on 2020 April 2).
  6. 6Chambers, K, et al. 2019. Towards Minimum Reporting Standards for Life Scientists. MetaArXiv. April 30. DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/9sm4x
  7. 7Circle Systems, Inc. 2017. Stat/Transfer (Version 14). [computer software]. Available from https://stattransfer.com/.
  8. 8Colectica. 2016. Colectica Repository (Version 5.0.4236). [computer software]. Available from https://www.colectica.com/software/repository/.
  9. 9Data Curation Network. 2018. Checklist of CURATED Steps Performed by the Data Curation Network. http://z.umn.edu/curate. (also found at https://datacurationnetwork.org)
  10. 10Digital Curation Centre (DCC). n.d. What is Digital Curation? http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation (accessed on 2019 December 30).
  11. 11Dillo, I and Leeuw, L. 2018. CoreTrustSeal. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 71(1): 162170. DOI: 10.31263/voebm.v71i1.1981
  12. 12International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2012. ISO 16363:2012 – Space Data and Information Transfer Systems – Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=56510 (accessed on 2020 April 2).
  13. 13Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). n.d. Data Enhancement. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/lifecycle/ingest/enhance.html (accessed on 2020 April 2).
  14. 14Iverson, J and Smith, D. 2020, January 8. Colectica/Curation: Initial Release (Version v0.9). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3600615
  15. 15Johnston, LR, et al. 2018. How Important Are Data Curation Activities to Researchers? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(General Issue): eP2198. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2198
  16. 16Leek, JT and Jager, LR. 2017. Is Most Published Research Really False? Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4(1): 109122. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054104
  17. 17Miguel, E, et al. 2014. Promoting transparency in social science research. Science, 343(6166): 3031. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6166/30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1245317
  18. 18National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25116
  19. 19National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25303
  20. 20Peer, L. 2017. Enabling Scientific Reproducibility with Data Curation and Code Review. In: Johnston, L (ed.), Curating Research Data Volume Two: A Handbook of Current Practice. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/185335.
  21. 21Peer, L, Green, A and Stephenson, E. 2014. Committing to Data Quality Review. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1): 263291. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.317
  22. 22Peer, L and Wykstra, S. 2015. New Curation Software: Step-by-Step Preparation of Social Science Data and Code for Publication and Preservation. IASSIST Quarterly, 39(4): 613. https://iassistquarterly.com/index.php/iassist/article/view/902 (accessed on 2019 October 31). DOI: 10.29173/iq902
  23. 23Sposito, FA. 2017. What Do Data Curators Care About? Data Quality, User Trust, and the Data Reuse Plan. Paper presented at: IFLA 2017 Meeting, Wrocław, Poland. http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/1797.
  24. 24Stodden, V, Seiler, J and Ma, Z. 2018. An Empirical Analysis of Journal Policy Effectiveness for Computational Reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11): 25842589. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708290115
  25. 25The Royal Society. 2012. Science as Open Enterprise. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf (accessed on 2019 December 4).
  26. 26Tiesi, G. 2014. ClamAV Native Win32 Port (Version 0.98.4). [computer software]. Available from https://github.com/clamwin/clamav-win32-old/tree/clamav-0.98.
  27. 27Yale University. 2016. Yale Persistent Linking Service – Web Service (Version 1.0). [computer software]. Available from http://link.its.yale.edu/ypls-ws/PersistentLinking?wsdl.
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 8, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2020
Published on: Jul 15, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Limor Peer, Joshua Dull, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.