Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Definition of Reuse Cover

References

  1. Anderson, C. 2008. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, Wired. URL: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
  2. Boslaugh, S. 2007. An Introduction to Secondary Data Analysis, in Secondary Data Sources for Public Health: A Practical Guide, Cambridge University Press, pp. 210. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618802
  3. Brakewood, B and Poldrack, RA. 2013. The ethics of secondary data analysis: Considering the application of Belmont principles to the sharing of neuroimaging data. NeuroImage, 82: 671676. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.040
  4. Carlson, S and Anderson, B. 2007. What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2): 635651. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x
  5. Castle, JE. 2003. Maximizing research opportunities: Secondary data analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(5): 28790. DOI: 10.1097/01376517-200310000-00008
  6. Chao, TC. 2011. Disciplinary reach: Investigating the impact of dataset reuse in the earth sciences. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1): 18. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801125
  7. Corti, L. 2007. Re-using archived qualitative data – where, how, why? Archival Science, 7(1): 3754. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-006-9038-y
  8. Corti, L and Backhouse, G. 2005. Acquiring Qualitative Data for Secondary Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-6.2.459
  9. Corti, L and Bishop, L. 2005. Strategies in Teaching Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-6.1.509
  10. Curty, RG. 2016. Factors Influencing Research Data Reuse in the Social Sciences: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1): 96117. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.401
  11. Curty, RG and Qin, J. 2014. Towards a model for research data reuse behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1): 14. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101072
  12. Curty, R, Yoon, A, Jeng, W and Qin, J. 2016. Untangling data sharing and reuse in social sciences. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1): 15. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301025
  13. Daniels, MG. 2014. Data Reuse in Museum Contexts: Experiences of Archaeologists and Botanists, Dissertation, University of Michigan, Michigan. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108953.
  14. Darby, R, Lambert, S, Matthews, B, Wilson, M, Gitmans, K, Dallmeier-Tiessen, S, Mele, S and Suhonen, J. 2012. Enabling scientific data sharing and re-use. In 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science, pp. 18. DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2012.6404475
  15. Davis, LK, Alston, P and D’Ignazio, J. 2011. Repurposing Data Across Disciplines: A Study of Data Reuse Issues Between Climate Science and Social Science. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’11, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 433434. DOI: 10.1145/1998076.1998171
  16. DCC – Digital Curation Center. 2018. Overview of funders’ data policies. URL: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/policy-and-legal/overview-funders-data-policies.
  17. Dwork, C, Feldman, V, Hardt, M, Pitassi, T, Reingold, O and Roth, A. 2017. Guilt-free Data Reuse, Commun. ACM, 60(4): 8693. DOI: 10.1145/3051088
  18. EC – European Commission. 2016. Guidelines on open access to publications and research data in Horizon 2020. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf.
  19. Faniel, I, Kansa, E, Whitcher Kansa, S, Barrera-Gomez, J and Yakel, E. 2013. The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries’, JCDL ’13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 295304. DOI: 10.1145/2467696.2467712
  20. Faniel, IM, Barrera-Gomez, J, Kriesberg, A and Yakel, E. 2013. A comparative study of data reuse among quantitative social scientists and archaeologists. URL: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/42099.
  21. Faniel, IM and Jacobsen, TE. 2010. Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19(3–4): 355375. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8
  22. Faniel, IM, Kriesberg, A and Yakel, E. 2012. Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1): 110. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901068
  23. Faniel, IM, Kriesberg, A and Yakel, E. 2016. Social scientists’ satisfaction with data reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6): 14041416. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23480
  24. Faniel, IM and Zimmerman, A. 2011. Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1): 5869. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.172
  25. Farquhar, A and Brase, J. 2014. Data Identification and Citation – The Key to Unlocking the Promise of Data Sharing and Reuse. D-Lib Magazine, 20(1/2). DOI: 10.1045/january2014-farquhar
  26. Fear, KM. 2013. Measuring and anticipating the impact of data reuse, PhD thesis, University of Michigan. URL: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/102481.
  27. Federer, LM, Lu, Y-L, Joubert, DJ, Welsh, J and Brandys, B. 2015. Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. PLOS ONE, 10(6): e0129506. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506
  28. Francis, LP and Francis, JG. 2017. Data Reuse and the Problem of Group Identity. In Studies in Law, Politics, and Society. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 141164. URL: DOI: 10.1108/S1059-433720170000073004
  29. Garnett, V and Edmond, J. 2014. Building an API is not enough! Investigating Reuse of Cultural Heritage Data. URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/71611/.
  30. Gleit, C and Graham, B. 1989. Secondary Data Analysis. A Valuable Resource, Nursing Research, 38(6): 380381. URL: https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Citation/1989/11000/Secondary_Data_Analysis__A_Valuable_Resource.18.aspx. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-198911000-00018
  31. Heaton, J. 1998. Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data. social research UPDATE, 22. URL: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html
  32. Hey, T, Tansley, S and Tolle, KM. 2009. The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery, Vol. 1. Microsoft Research Redmond, WA
  33. Hinds, PS, Vogel, RJ and Clarke-Steffen, L. 1997. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Doing a Secondary Analysis of a Qualitative Data Set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3): 408424. DOI: 10.1177/104973239700700306
  34. Howard, T, Darlington, M, Ball, A, Culley, S and McMahon, C. 2010. Opportunities for and Barriers to Engineering Research Data Re-use. URL: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/21166/.
  35. Kansa, SW. 2015. Using Linked Open Data to Improve Data Reuse in Zooarchaeology. Ethnobiology Letters, 6(2): 224231. DOI: 10.14237/ebl.6.2.2015.467
  36. Kim, Y and Yoon, A. 2017. Scientists’ data reuse behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23892
  37. Kriesberg, A, Frank, RD, Faniel, IM and Yakel, E. 2013. The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1): 110. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14505001051
  38. Law, M. 2005. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Issues in the Secondary Use of Research Data. IASSIST Quarterly, 29(1): 510. URL: http://www.iassistdata.org/sites/default/files/iqvol291law.pdf. DOI: 10.29173/iq599
  39. Li, K, Lin, X and Greenberg, J. 2016. Software citation, reuse and metadata considerations: An exploratory study examining LAMMPS. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1): 110. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301072
  40. Meystre, SM, Lovis, C, Bürkle, T, Tognola, G, Budrionis, A and Lehmann, CU. 2017. Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress. IMIA Yearbook. DOI: 10.15265/IY-2017-007
  41. Missier, P. 2016. Data trajectories: tracking reuse of published data for transitive credit attribution. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1): 116. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.425
  42. Molloy, J. 2011. The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science. PLoS Biol, 9(12): e1001195 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195
  43. Mooney, H and Newton, M. 2012. The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(1). DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1035
  44. Moore, N. 2007. (Re)Using Qualitative Data? Sociological Research Online, 12(3): 113. DOI: 10.5153/sro.1496
  45. Murillo, AP. 2014. Examining data sharing and data reuse in the dataone environment. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1): 15. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101155
  46. NSF – National Science Foundation. 2017. Dissemination and sharing of research results. URL: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.
  47. OSTP – Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2013. Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. URL: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/NW2-CCBY-HO2-Public_Access_Memo_2013.pdf.
  48. Palmer, CL, Weber, NM and Cragin, MH. 2012. The analytic potential of scientific data: Understanding re-use value. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1): 110. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801174
  49. Pampel, H and Dallmeier-Tiessen, S. 2014. Open Research Data. From Vision to Practice. In: Bartling, S, Friesike S. (eds.), Opening Science. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_14
  50. Pasquetto, I, Randles, B and Borgman, C. 2017. On the Reuse of Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 16. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-008
  51. Piwowar, HA and Vision, TJ. 2013. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1: e175. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.175
  52. Richards, JD. 1997. Preservation and re-use of digital data: the role of the Archaeology Data Service. Antiquity, 71(274): 10571059. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00086014
  53. Rolland, B and Lee, CP. 2013. Beyond Trust and Reliability: Reusing Data in Collaborative Cancer Epidemiology Research. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 435444. DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441826
  54. Rung, J and Brazma, A. 2013. Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(2): 8999. URL: https://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v14/n2/abs/nrg3394.html. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3394
  55. Safran, C, Bloomrosen, M, Hammond, WE, Labkoff, S, Markel-Fox, S, Tang, PC and Detmer, DE. 2007. Toward a National Framework for the Secondary Use of Health Data: An American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(1): 19. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2273
  56. Sands, A, Borgman, CL, Wynholds, L and Traweek, S. 2013. Follow the data: How astronomers use and reuse data. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1): 13. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901341
  57. Scaffidi, C, Shaw, M and Myers, B. 2006. Games Programs Play: Obstacles to Data Reuse, Montreal. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6af5/225449d78b11de69b705ec0ed64217e2a760.pdf.
  58. Schöch, C. 2017. Wiederholende Forschung in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften. URL: https://christofs.github.io/wiederholende-forschung-dhd/.
  59. Shen, Y. 2016. Research Data Sharing and Reuse Practices of Academic Faculty Researchers: A Study of the Virginia Tech Data Landscape. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2): 157175. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.359
  60. Sun, G and Khoo, CSG. 2017. Social science research data curation: issues of reuse. Libellarium: journal for the research of writing, books, and cultural heritage institutions, 9(2). DOI: 10.15291/libellarium.v9i2.291
  61. Szabo, V and Strang, VR. 1997. Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2): 66. URL: https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=9398940. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-199712000-00008
  62. Tenopir, C, Dalton, ED, Allard, S, Frame, M, Pjesivac, I, Birch, B, Pollock, D and Dorsett, K. 2015. Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. PLOS ONE, 10(8): e0134826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
  63. Ullman, J. 2017. Technical Perspective: Building a Safety Net for Data Reuse, Commun. ACM, 60(4): 8585. DOI: 10.1145/3051086
  64. Wallis, J. 2014. Data Producers Courting Data Reusers: Two Cases from Modeling Communities. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1): 98109. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.304
  65. Wallis, JC, Rolando, E and Borgman, CL. 2013. If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology. PLOS ONE, 8(7): e67332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
  66. Wellcome Trust. 2010. Policy on data management and sharing. URL: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTX035043.htm.
  67. Wicherts, JM, Borsboom, D, Kats, J and Molenaar, D. 2006. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7): 726728. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726
  68. Yoon, A. 2015a. Data Reuse and Users’ Trust Judgments: Toward Trusted Data Curation, Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School, Chapel Hill, NC. URL: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/record/uuid:2c2268b3-88cf-4397-b038-b39e88f80d83.
  69. Yoon, A. 2015b. “Making a square fit into a circle”: Researchers’ experiences reusing qualitative data. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Tech-nology, 51(1): 14. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101140
  70. Yoon, A. 2016. Red flags in data: Learning from failed data reuse experiences. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1): 16. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301126
  71. Yoon, A. 2017a. Data reusers’ trust development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4): 946956. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23730
  72. Yoon, A. 2017b. Role of communication in data reuse. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1): 463471. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401050
  73. Zimmerman, A. 2007. Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1–2): 516. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8
  74. Zimmerman, AS. 2003. Data Sharing and Secondary Use of Scientific Data: Experiences of Ecologists, Dissertation, The University of Michigan, Michigan. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39373
  75. Zimmerman, AS. 2008. New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(5), 631652. DOI: 10.1177/0162243907306704
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 22
Submitted on: Nov 30, 2018
Accepted on: May 24, 2019
Published on: Jun 20, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Stephanie van de Sandt, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Artemis Lavasa, Vivien Petras, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.