Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Geoscientists’ Perspectives on Cyberinfrastructure Needs: A Collection of User Scenarios Cover

Geoscientists’ Perspectives on Cyberinfrastructure Needs: A Collection of User Scenarios

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1American Geophysical Union. 2018. Index Terms–Publications. Available at http://publications.agu.org/author-resource-center/index-terms/ [Last accessed 21 December 2018].
  2. 2Arksey, M and Knight, PT. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. London, UK: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209335
  3. 3Asmi, A, Brus, M and Sorvari, S. 2017. Community-Driven Efforts for Joint Development of Environmental Research Infrastructures. In: Chabbi, A and Loescher, HW. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Infrastructures: Challenges, New developments and Perspectives. Boco Raton, FL: CRC press. DOI: 10.1201/9781315368252-18
  4. 4Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs. 2013. Scenarios | Usability.gov. 29 May 2013. Available at https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/scenarios.html. [Last accessed 21 December 2018].
  5. 5Bernard, HR. 2012. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  6. 6Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59: 977984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  7. 7Carroll, JM. 2000. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. 8Cohn, M. 2009. Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum, vol. 1. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
  9. 9Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J, Baker, KS, Berente, N, Carter, DR, DeChurch, LA, Flint, CC, Gershenfeld, G, Haberman, M, King, JL, Kirkpatrick, C, Knight, E, Lawrence, B, Lewis, S, Lenhardt, WC, Lopez, P, Mayernik, MS, McElroy, C, Mittleman, B, Nichol, V, Nolan, M, Shin, N, Thompson, CA, Winter, S and Zaslavsky, Z. 2016. Build It, But Will They Come? A Geoscience Cyberinfrastructure Baseline Analysis. Data Science Journal, 15(8). DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-008
  10. 10Dooley, R, Milfeld, K, Guiang, C, Pamidighantam, S and Allen, G. 2006. From Proposal to Production: Lessons Learned Developing the Computational Chemistry Grid Cyberinfrastructure. Journal of Grid Computing, 4: 195208. DOI: 10.1007/s10723-006-9043-7
  11. 11EarthCube. 2018. Homepage. Available at: https://www.earthcube.org. [Last accessed 15 January 2019].
  12. 12Finholt, TA and Birnholtz, JP. 2006. If we build it, will they come: the cultural challenges of cyberinfrastructure development. In: Banbridge, W and Rocco, MC. Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society. Netherlands: Springer. pp. 89101. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4107-1_7
  13. 13GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility). 2019. Available at: https://www.gbif.org. [Last accessed 15 January 2019].
  14. 14Geertz, C. 1973. Thick Description: Toward and Interpretive Theory of Culture. In: The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books. pp. 332.
  15. 15IRIS (Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology). 2019. Available at: www.iris.edu. [Last accessed 15 January 2019].
  16. 16Kee, KF and Browning, LD. 2010. The Dialectical Tensions in the Funding Infrastructure of Cyberinfrastructure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19: 283308. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-010-9116-9
  17. 17Kim, Y and Crowston, K. 2011. Technology adoption and use theory review for studying scientists’ continued use of cyber-infrastructure. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48: 110. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801197
  18. 18NIST Big Data Working Group. 2017. Use Cases and Requirements. 11 January 2017. Available at https://bigdatawg.nist.gov/usecases.php [Last accessed 21 December 2018].
  19. 19Open Access to Ocean Data. 2018. AODN Portal v4.38.37. Available at: https://portal.aodn.org.au/. [Last accessed: 15 January 2019].
  20. 20Ribes, D and Lee, CP. 2010. Sociotechnical Studies of Cyberinfrastructure and e-Research: Current Themes and Future Trajectories. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3/4: 231244. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-010-9120-0
  21. 21Short, JC, Broberg, JC, Cogliser, CC and Brigham, KH. 2010. Construct Validation Using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA): An Illustration Using Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organizational Research Methods, 13: 320347. DOI: 10.1177/1094428109335949
  22. 22Stocks, KI, Schramski, S, Virapongse, A and Kempler, L. 2019. EarthCube User Scenario Collection. UC San Diego Library Digital Collections. DOI: 10.6075/J0WQ024C
  23. 23Tetherless World Constellation. 2014. Use Cases. Available at https://tw.rpi.edu/web/UseCases [Last accessed 21 December 2018].
  24. 24Yin, RK. 2017. Collecting Case Study Evidence: The Principles You Should Follow in Working With Six Sources of Evidence. In: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. pp. 111164.
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2019
Accepted on: May 23, 2019
Published on: Jun 18, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Karen I. Stocks, Sam Schramski, Arika Virapongse, Lisa Kempler, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.