References
- 1Beagrie, N and Houghton, J. 2014. The Value and Impact of Data Sharing and Curation. A synthesis of three recent studies of UK research data centres. Jisc report. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5568/1/iDF308_-_Digital_Infrastructure_Directions_Report%2C_Jan14_v1-04.pdf.
- 2Belter, CW. 2014. Measuring the value of research data: A citation analysis of oceanographic data sets. PLoS One, 9(3):
e92590 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092590 - 3Bishop, L and Kuula-Luumi, A. 2017. Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse: A Decade On. SAGE Open, 1–15. January–March 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016685136
- 4Bruland, P, McGilchrist, M, Zapletal, E, Acosta, D, Proeve, J, Askin, S, Ganslandt, T, Doods, J and Dugas, M. 2016. Common data elements for secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical trial execution and serious adverse event reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16: 159. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0259-3
- 5Curty, RG, Crowston, K, Specht, A, Grant, BW and Dalton, ED. 2017. Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLoS ONE, 12(12):
e0189288 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189288 - 6Enke, N, Thessen, A, Bach, K, Bendix, J, Seeger, B and Gemeinholzer, B. 2012. The user’s view on biodiversity data sharing. Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data. Ecological Informatics, 11: 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
- 7Faniel, I, Kansa, E, Whitcher Kansa, S, Barrera-Gomez, J and Yakel, E. 2013. The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. JCDL 2013 Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 295–304. New York, NY:
ACM . DOI: 10.1145/2467696.2467712 - 8Faniel, IM, Kriesberg, A and Yakel, E. 2015. Social Scientists’ Satisfaction With Data Reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, June.
- 9Fear, KM. 2013.
Measuring and anticipating the impact of data reuse . Dissertation: University of Michigan.http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102481 . - 10Figueiredo, AS. 2017. Data Sharing: Convert Challenges into Opportunities. Front. Public Health, 5: 327. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00327
- 11Fry, J, Lockyer, S, Oppenheim, C, Houghton, J and Rasmussen, B. 2008. Identifying benefits arising from the curation and open sharing of research data produced by UK Higher Education and research institutes.
https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/4600/1/JISC%20data%20sharing_final%20report.pdf . - 12Gregory, K, Khalsa, SJ, Michener, WK, Psomopoulos, FE, de Waard, A and Wu, M. 2018. Eleven quick tips for finding research data. PLoS Comput Biol, 14(4):
e1006038 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006038 - 13Kim, Y and Yoon, A. 2017. Scientists’ Data Reuse Behaviors: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12): 2709–2719. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23892
- 14Kolb, TC, Blukacz-Richards, EA, Muir, AM, Claramunt, RM, Koops, MA, Taylor, WW, et al. 2013. How to manage data to enhance their potential for synthesis, presernation, sharing and reuse: A Great Lakes case study. Fisheries, 38(2): 52–64. DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2013.757975
- 15Koslow, SH. 2002. Sharing primary data: A threat or asset to discovery? Nature, 3: 311–313. April 2002. DOI: 10.1038/nrn787
- 16Kreuzthaler, M, Schulz, S and Berghold, A. 2015. Secondary use of electronic health records for building cohort studies through top-down informatiaion extraction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53: 188–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.10.010
- 17Larivière, V, Gingras, Y and Archambault, E. 2009. The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(4): 858–862. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21011
- 18Milojević, S. 2012. How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers? PLoS ONE, 7(11): e49176. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049176
- 19Piwowar, HA, Carlson, JD and Vision, TJ. 2011.
Beginning to track 1000 datasets from public repositories into the published literature . ASIST 2011, 9–13. October. New Orleans, LA, USA. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801337 - 20Piwowar, HA and Vision, TJ. 2013. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage, PeerJ, 1:
e175 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.175 - 21Pronk, TE. 2018. Replication data for: The time efficiency gain in sharing and reuse of research data. DataverseNL. Available at:
https://hdl.handle.net/10411/4MB189 V2 [Version]. - 22Pronk, TE, Wiersma, PH and van Weerden, A. 2015a. Replication data for: Games with research data sharing. DataverseNL. Available at:
http://hdl.handle.net/10411/20328 V4 [Version]. - 23Pronk, TE, Wiersma, PH, van Weerden, A and Schieving, F. 2015. A game theoretic analysis of research data sharing. PeerJ, 3: e1242. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1242
- 24Sprague, LA, Oelsner, GP and Argue, DM. 2017. Challenges with secondary use of multi-source water-quality data in the United States. Water research, 110: 252–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.024
- 25van Noorden, R. 2017. The science that’s never been cited. Nature, 552: 162–164. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-017-08404-0
- 26Yoon, A. 2016. Data Reusers’ Trust Development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4): 946–956. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23730
- 27Zimmerman, AS. 2007. Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. Int J Digit Libr, 7: 5–16. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8
- 28Zimmerman, AS. 2008. New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(5): 631–652. DOI: 10.1177/0162243907306704