Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characteristics of a Citizen Science Approach to Mental Health Research: International Delphi Consultation Cover

Characteristics of a Citizen Science Approach to Mental Health Research: International Delphi Consultation

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Aceves-Bueno, E., Adeleye, A.S., Feraud, M., Huang, Y., Tao, M., Yang, Y., and Anderson, S.E. (2017) The accuracy of citizen science data: a quantitative review. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 98(4), pp. 278290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90013289
  2. Alon, I., Haidar, H., Haidar, A., and Guimon, J. (2025) The future of artificial intelligence: Insights from recent Delphi studies. Futures, 165, p.103514. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2024.103514
  3. Ball, M.P., Bobe, J.R., Chou, M.F., Clegg, T., Estep, P.W., Lunshof, J.E., Vandewege, W. et al. (2014) Harvard Personal Genome Project: lessons from participatory public research. Genome Medicine 6(2), pp.17. 10.1186/gm527
  4. Batty, R., Florescu, A., Gulliksen, E., Wong, A., Kamvar, R., Pinfold, V., Rennick-Egglestone, S. et al. (2024) The potential of citizen mental health science. London: Wellcome Trust. Available from: 10.21955/wellcomeopenres.1115398.1
  5. Beange, I. and Collins, S. (2022) Depression Detectives (Citizen Science). Edinburgh Open Research Conference Proceedings, Edinburgh, UK, on 27 May 2022, Vol 1. DOI: 10.2218/eorc.2022.7114
  6. Blacker, S., Kimura, A.H., and Kinchy, A. (2021) When citizen science is public relations. Social studies of science, 51, pp. 780796. DOI: 10.1177/03063127211027662
  7. Bonhoure, I., Cigarini, A., Vicens, J., and Perelló, J. (2019) Citizen social science in practice: a critical analysis Of A Mental Health Community-Based Project. Palgrave Communications, 6. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/63aj7
  8. Cipriani, A., Seedat, S., Milligan, L., Salanti, G., Macleod, M., Hastings, J., Thomas, J., et al. (2023) New living evidence resource of human and non-human studies for early intervention and research prioritisation in anxiety, depression and psychosis. BMJ Mental Health, 26(1). DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300759
  9. Colder Carras, M., Machin, K., Brown, M., Marttinen, T.-L., Maxwell, C., Frampton, B., Jackman, M., et al. (2023) Strengthening review and publication of participatory mental health research to promote empowerment and prevent co-optation. Psychiatric Services, 74(2), pp.166172. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220085
  10. Collins, S.E., Clifasefi, S.L., Stanton, J., Straits, K.J., Gil-Kashiwabara, E., Rodriguez Espinosa, P., Nicasio, A. V., et al. (2018) Community-based participatory research (CBPR): Towards equitable involvement of community in psychology research. American Psychologist, 73, 884. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000167
  11. Corrigan, P.W. and Twiss, M., (2026). What are the implications of investigator positionality for mental health services research?. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 228(2), pp.9597.DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2025.114
  12. den Broeder, L., Devilee, J., van Oers, H., Schuit, A. J. and Wagemakers, A. (2018) Citizen Science for public health. Health Promotion International, 33(3), pp. 505514. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw086
  13. Fontúrbel, F.E. (2023) Predatory Citizen Science? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 104(3), p.e2075. DOI: 10.1002/bes2.2075
  14. Güell, E., Benito-Amat, C. and Molas-Gallart, J. (2023) Priority setting in mental health research: A scoping review of participatory methods. Mental Health & Prevention, 30, p.e200279 DOI: 10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200279
  15. Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S., Vohland, K. et al. (2021a) What is citizen science? The challenges of definition. In: K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson et al (eds.), The science of citizen science (pp.1333). London: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
  16. Haklay, M., Fraisl, D., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hecker, S., Gold, M., Hager, G., Ceccaroni, L. et al. (2021b). Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202108
  17. Hawke, L. D., Dada-Phillips, W., Seiyad, H., Orson, J., Goldsmith, L., Conway, S., Jordan, A. et al. (2025) Best practices guidelines for the engagement of people with lived experience and family members in mental health and substance use health research: a modified Delphi consensus study. Health Expectations, 28, e70152. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70152
  18. Hawke, L. D., Sheikhan, N. Y., Jones, N., Slade, M., Soklaridis, S., Wells, S. and Castle, D. (2022) Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: critical reflections. Health Expectations, 25(5), pp.22992305. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13586
  19. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Becker, A. B., Reyes, C. L., Parker, E. A. and Reyes, A. G. (2026). Community-based participatory research: evolution and significant developments. Annual Review Of Public Health, 47, 135157. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082224-022223
  20. Jorm, A. F. 2015. Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(10), pp.887897. DOI: 10.1177/0004867415600891
  21. Mah, H., Dobson, R. and Thomson, A. (2025). The Importance Of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review On The Value Of Patient And Public Involvement In Health Research. Health Expectations, 28, e70205. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70205
  22. Niederberger, M. and Spranger, J. (2020). Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, p.457. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457
  23. Pain, R., Whitman, G. and Milledge, D. (2022). Participatory action research toolkit: An introduction to using PAR as an approach to learning, research and action. Practice Guide, Durham Univeristy. Avaiable from: https://eprints.icstudies.org.uk/id/eprint/293
  24. Pinfold, V., Burgess, A., Couperthwaite, L., Garavini, E., Gibson, J., Kamvar, R., Kenny, A. et al. (2025). Emerging practice in mental health patient and public involvement research advisory groups: a narrative review. BMC Psychiatry, 25(1), p. 722. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07120-8
  25. Pykett, J., Chrisinger, B., Kyriakou, K., Osborne, T., Resch, B., Stathi, A., Toth, E. et al. (2020) Developing a Citizen Social Science approach to understand urban stress and promote wellbeing in urban communities. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 6 (85). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0460-1
  26. Remmers, G., Albert, A., Laer, J. V., Wildevuur, S., Groot, M. D., Imre, B. and Covernton, E. (2024). Citizen Science For Health: An International Survey On Its Characteristics And Enabling Factors. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.693
  27. Richmond, L., Caton, N., Downs, J., Newton, A., Devereux-Fitzgerald, A. and Brooks, H. (2023). Creating positive experiences of involvement in mental health research. The Lancet Psychiatry, 10(3), pp.220227. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00430-8
  28. Robinson, L. D., Cawthray, J. L., West, S. E., Bonn, A., and Ansine, J. (2018) Ten principles of citizen science. In: S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (eds.) Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy (pp. 2740). London: UCL Press. 10.14324/111.9781787352339
  29. Robinson, J. A., Kocman, D., Speyer, O. and Gerasopoulos, E. (2021) Meeting volunteer expectations—a review of volunteer motivations in citizen science and best practices for their retention through implementation of functional features in CS tools. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12), pp. 20892113. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1853507
  30. Shang, Z (2023) Use of Delphi in health sciences research: a narrative review. Medicine, 102(7), p. e32829. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032829
  31. Silverio, S.A., Sheen, K.S., Bramante, A., Knighting, K., Koops, T.U., Montgomery, E., November, L. et al. (2022). Sensitive, challenging, and difficult topics: Experiences and practical considerations for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, p.16094069221124739. DOI: 10.1177/160940692211247
  32. Smith, E., Bélisle-Pipon, J.-C. and Resnik, D. (2019) Patients as research partners; how to value their perceptions, contribution and labor? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.184
  33. Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D.G. et al. (2017). GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMH, 358. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3453
  34. Todowede, O., Lewandowski, F., Kotera, Y., Ashmore, A., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Boyd, D., Moran, S. et al. (2023) Best practice guidelines for citizen science in mental health research: systematic review and evidence synthesis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, p.e1175311. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175311
  35. Todowede, O., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Boyd, D., Moran, S., Bell, A., Sweeney, A., Hart, A. et al. (2025). How Can Citizen Science Enhance Mental Health Research Quality: Theory Of Change Development. BMJ Open, 15, e091007. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091007
  36. Tøttrup, A. P., Lillemark, M. R., Hansen, J., Svendsen, S. H., Hickinbotham, S., Toftdal, M., Juhl, H. A. et al. (2025) A Concept for Co-Creation in Participatory Science: Insights From Developing the Archaeological Next Generation Lab. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 10(1) p.22. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.832
  37. Van Vaerenbergh, Y. and Thomas, T.D., (2013). Response styles in survey research: A literature review of antecedents, consequences, and remedies. International journal of public opinion research, 25(2), pp.195217. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/eds021
  38. Veldmeijer, L., Terlouw, G., Van Os, J., Van Dijk, O., Van’t Veer, J. and Boonstra, N. (2023). The involvement of service users and people with lived experience in mental health care innovation through design: systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 10, p.e46590. DOI: 10.2196/46590
  39. Weirauch, V., Mainz, A., Nitsche, J., Busse, T.S. and Meister, S., (2026). Consensus-based reporting guidelines for participatory development and evaluation of digital health interventions. NPJ Digital Medicine 9,(169). DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02355-5
  40. Wiggins, A. and Wilbanks, J. (2019) The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), pp.314. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.971 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Page range: 16 - 16
Submitted on: Dec 18, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 12, 2026
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Liz Dowthwaite, Olamide Todowede, Chris Greenhalgh, Doreen Boyd, Stuart Moran, Colleen Ewart, Corrine Hendy, Mike Slade, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.