Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

References

  1. Allison, D.B. (2019). Engaging Communities in Museums. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351037068
  2. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  3. Association of Science & Technology Centers (ASTC) (2022). Introduction to Community Science. Available at https://communityscience.astc.org/overview/ [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  4. Bettis, A.J. and Pepin, S. (2019). Strengthening support for grantees: Four lessons for foundations, The Foundation Review, 11(3). DOI: 10.9707/1944-5660.1484
  5. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C.C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  6. Cajete, G. (1999). Native Science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers.
  7. Caplan, S. (2024). How trust-based philanthropy removes barriers around grant applications, NonProfit PRO, 20 February. [Online access at https://www.nonprofitpro.com/post/how-trust-based-philanthropy-removes-barriers-around-grant-applications/ [Last accessed 5 Sep. 2025].
  8. Cawley, M., Bratschi, P., Vincent, I., Hine-Laverack, S., Ballista, J., Lima, I. and Tejada, A., (2023). A “watershed” model for community engagement in museums, Journal of Museum Education, 48(4), pp. 339345. DOI: 10.1080/10598650.2023.2293470
  9. Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP) (2023). State of nonprofits 2023: What funders need to know, a report of CEP’s Nonprofit Voice Project. Available at https://cep.org/report-backpacks/state-of-nonprofits-2023-what-funders-need-to-know/ [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  10. Center for Implementation (2024). The Collaboration Spectrum. Available at https://thecenterforimplementation.com/toolbox/the-collaboration-spectrum [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  11. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (2024). Technical Report: June 2024 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/php/technical-report/h5n1-06052024.html [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  12. Charles, A., Loucks, L., Berkes, F. and Armitage, D. (2020). Community science: A typology and its implications for governance of social-ecological systems, Environmental Science & Policy, 106, pp. 7786. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.019.
  13. Coffin-Schmitt, J.L., Clements, N., Marshall, G., Liu, L., Trombitas, A., Wang, Z., Yuan, S., et al. (2023). Wild and backyard food use during COVID-19 in upstate New York, United States, Frontiers in Nutrition, 10(1222610). DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1222610
  14. Community Science Institute (CSI) (n.d.). Water Quality Database. New York, updated November 18, 2025. https://www.database.communityscience.org
  15. Eitzel, M., Cappadonna, J., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R., West, S.E., Virapongse, A., Kyba, C., et al. (2017). Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), p. 1. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
  16. Feinstein, N.W., Hsu-Borger, E., Bequette, M.B., Garibay, C., Jones-Rizzi, J., Ronning, E.C. and West, C.P. (2024). Racial equity, reflection, and organizational change in museums, Curator the Museum Journal, 68(1), pp. 243257. DOI: 10.1111/cura.12643
  17. Fiske, A., Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2019). Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine, Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(9), pp. 617622. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105253
  18. Foo, K. and Stanlick, S. (2025). Putting diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice into practice: The four dimensions of inclusivity for public participatory science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 10(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.794
  19. Foti, N. (2022). A “Tyranny of structurelessness”? The benefits and burdens of power sharing and governance models in citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.528
  20. Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S. and Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research Impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study, Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), pp. 392429. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197
  21. Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S. and Vohland, K. (2021). What is citizen science? The challenges of definition. In: Vohland, K. et al. (eds.) The Science of Citizen Science, Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1333. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
  22. Hall, D.M., Avellaneda-Lopez, P.M., Ficklin, D.L., Knouft, J.H. and Lowry, C. (2024). Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science, BioScience, 74(5), pp. 319321. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae020
  23. Halvorsrud, K., Kucharska, J., Adlington, K., Rüdell, K., Brown Hajdukova, E., Nazroo, J., Haarmans, et al. (2019). Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature, Journal of Public Health, 43(1), pp. 197208. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz126
  24. Hoffman, J. (2017). Throwing Shade in RVA, Available at: https://jeremyscotthoffman.com/throwing-shade [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  25. Institute for Science & Policy (2021). Navigating Misinformation: Resources for local communities and newsrooms to address growing concerns about misinformation. Available at: https://institute.dmns.org/perspectives/series/navigating-misinformation/ [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  26. International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) (2017). IAP2 Core Values. Available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/2017_core_values-24x36_iap2_.pdf [Last accessed 21 Oct. 2025].
  27. International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) (2024). IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum. Available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/iap2_spectrum_2024.pdf [Last accessed 21 Oct. 2025].
  28. Lee, S.K., Choi, J.E., Shin, M.K., Kim, C.J., Lee, S.K., Im, J.Y., Byun, H.S., et al. (2004). The types and characteristics of educational programs in major natural history museums of the world, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), pp. 357374.
  29. McCreedy, D., Maryboy, N., Litts, B., Streit, T. and Jafri, J. (2018). What does working ‘with’ (not ‘for’) our communities look like? Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. Available at: https://informalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/BP-11-Working-With-Communities.pdf [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  30. McElheny, A. (2024). How empathy and engagement will shape the future of museums. Quinn Evans, 22 January. Available at: https://www.quinnevans.com/news/how-empathy-and-engagement-will-shape-the-future-of-museums [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  31. Morales-Garzón, S., Parker, L.A., Hernández-Aguado, I., González-Moro Tolosana, M., Pastor-Valero, M. and Chilet-Rosell, E. (2023). Addressing health disparities through community participation: A scoping review of co-creation in public health, Healthcare, 11(7), p. 1034. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11071034
  32. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) (2019). NHMLAC community science office guidelines for building equitable partnerships. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yKm9OVAERuF5vYlguf30mmJutCYxROUJ09SRNIXzSFg/edit?tab=t.0 [Last accessed 13 Sep. 2025].
  33. Ontario Museum Association (2015). Engaging your community: A toolkit for museums. Toronto, Ontario. Available at: https://www.tamarackcommunity.ca/library/engaging-your-community-a-toolkit-for-museums [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  34. Resnik, D.B., Elliott, K.C. and Miller, A.K. (2015). A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science, Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 475481. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.008
  35. Robinson, D., Delany, J. and Sugden, H. (2024). Beyond science: Exploring the value of co-created citizen science for diverse community groups, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1), p. 13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.682.
  36. Sickler, J. and Ong, A. (2023). Community science initiative seed grant program. External Evaluation Summary Report. Available at: https://www.astc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ASTC-Community-Science_Partnership-Planning-Seed-Grant_Evaluation-Summary-Report.pdf [Last accessed 16 April, 2026]
  37. Sickler, J. and Ong, A. (2025). Cultivating community science stipend program. Evaluation report. Available at: https://communityscience.astc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ASTC-CCSS-Evaluation-Report.pdf [Last accessed 16 April, 2026]
  38. Sittenfeld, D., Farooque, M., Helmuth, B., Benson, S., Hostetler, E., Choi, F., Weller, N., et al. (2022). Citizen science, civics, and resilient communities: Informing community resilience policies through local knowledge, community values, and community-generated data, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.516
  39. Storksdieck, M., Stylinski, C. and Bailey, D. (2016). Typology for public engagement with science: a conceptual framework for public engagement involving scientists. Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning, Oregon State University. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf [Last accessed 11 Dec. 2025].
  40. Varga, M. and Williams, N. (2023). Scientist-community partnerships: A scientist’s guide to successful collaboration. Union of Concerned Scientists. Available at https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/SCP-2023.pdf [Last accessed 16 April, 2026].
  41. Vaughn, L.M. and Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory Research methods – choice points in the research process, Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). DOI: 10.35844/001c.13244
  42. Walker, D.W., Smigaj, M. and Tani, M. (2020). The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 8(1). DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1488
  43. Ziervogel, G., Enqvist, J., Metelerkamp, L. and Van Breda, J. (2021). Supporting transformative climate adaptation: community-level capacity building and knowledge co-creation in South Africa, Climate Policy, 22(5), pp. 607622. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1863180
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.920 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 10
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2026
Published on: May 4, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Marcos Aguilar, Aretzy Amaya, Ary Amaya, Melissa Ballard, Jacob Camarillo, Yvette Casas, Max Cawley, Jenny Crayne, Gabrielle Crowe, Gabriel Cumming, Malinalli M. Diaz, Minnie Ferguson, Bertha Flores, Lila Higgins, Stepheny Hine, Axayacatzi Kuauhtzin, Carla Norwood, Angie Ong, Miguel Ordeñana, Jenni Rogan, Alice Rossignol, Jessica Sickler, Sam Tayag, Leah Valerio, Imani Vincent, Naomi Wallace, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.