References
- 1Alvesson, M., and Skoldberg, K. (2018)
Reflexive Methodology : New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 3rd ed. ed, Reflexive Methodology. Sage Text UK, London. - 2Balázs, B., Mooney, P., Nováková, E., Bastin, L., and Jokar Arsanjani, J. (2021)
Data Quality in Citizen Science , in: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 139–157. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_8 - 3Bates, J., Lin, Y.-W., and Goodale, P. (2016) Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data & Society 3,
2053951716654502 . DOI: 10.1177/2053951716654502 - 4Baudry, J., Tancoigne, É., and Strasser, B.J. (2021). Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 399–424. DOI: 10.1177/03063127211058791
- 5Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J.C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., et al. (2016) Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology 30, 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
- 6Benyei, P., Skarlatidou, A., Argyriou, D., Hall, R., Theilade, I., Turreira-García, N., Latreche, D., et al. (2023) Challenges, strategies, and impacts of doing citizen science with marginalised and indigenous communities: reflections from project coordinators. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8(1), p.
21 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.514 - 7Bieszczad, S.R., Fochler, M., and Brodschneider, R. (2023) How citizen scientists see their own role and expertise: an explorative study of the perspectives of beekeepers in a citizen science project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8(1), p.
26 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.501 - 8Caccamo, M., Pittino, D., and Tell, F. (2023) Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature. Technovation 122,
102645 . DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102645 - 9Charvolin, F. (2024) Faune France: Amateur Naturalists’ Attachment and Indebtedness in a Citizen Science Biodiversity Database. Science as Culture 33, 321–341. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2025775
- 10Christine, D.I., and Thinyane, M. (2021) Citizen science as a data-based practice: A consideration of data justice. Patterns 2,
100224 . DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100224 - 11Cieslik, K.J., Leeuwis, C., Dewulf, A.R.P.J., Lie, R., Werners, S.E., van Wessel, M., Feindt, P., and Struik, P.C. (2018) Addressing socio-ecological development challenges in the digital age: Exploring the potential of Environmental Virtual Observatories for Connective Action (EVOCA). NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 86–87, 2–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2018.07.006
- 12Coghlan, D., and Brannick, T. (2014)
Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization , Fourth Edition. ed. SAGE Publications Ltd, 55 City Road. DOI: 10.4135/9781529682861 - 13Dang, H.-A.H., and Serajuddin, U. (2020) Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement challenges and further reflections. World Development 127,
104570 . DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.024 - 14Eitzel, M, Cappadonna, J, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, R, West, SE, Virapongse, A, Kyba, C, Bowser, A, Cooper, C and Sforzi, A. (2017) Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
- 15Fraisl, D., Campbell, J., See, L., Wehn, U., Wardlaw, J., Gold, M., Moorthy, I., et al. (2020) Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science 15, 1735–1751. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
- 16Fraisl, D., See, L., Campbell, J., Danielsen, F., and Andrianandrasana, H.T. (2023) The contributions of citizen science to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and other international agreements and frameworks. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 8(1), p.
27 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.643 - 17Franzoni, C., Poetz, M., and Sauermann, H. (2022) Crowds, citizens, and science: a multi-dimensional framework and agenda for future research. Industry and Innovation 29, 251–284. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1976627
- 18Frigerio, D., Richter, A., Per, E., Pruse, B., and Vohland, K. (2021)
Citizen Science in the Natural Sciences , in: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., and Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.), The science of citizen science. Springer International Publishing Cham, pp. 79–96. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_5 - 19Giardullo, P. (2023) Non-experts’ participation in processes of scientific knowledge creation: The case of Citizen Science. Sociology Compass 17,
e13100 . DOI: 10.1111/soc4.13100 - 20Haklay, M. (2013)
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation , in: Sui, D., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M. (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 105–122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - 21Heaton, L. (2024) Chains of Participation in Producing Biodiversity Infrastructures: Digital Reconfigurations of Scientific Work. Science as Culture 33, 297–320. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2025774
- 22Hecker, S., Bonney, R., Haklay, M., Hölker, F., Hofer, H., Goebel, C., Gold, M., et al. (2018) Innovation in citizen science – perspectives on science-policy advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 3(1), p.
4 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.114 - 23Hecker, S., and Taddicken, M. (2022) Deconstructing citizen science: a framework on communication and interaction using the concept of roles. Journal of Science Communication 21(01),
A07 . DOI: 10.22323/2.21010207 - 24Hepp, A., Jarke, J., and Kramp, L. (2022)
New perspectives in cCritical data studies: The ambivalences of data power—an introduction , in: Hepp, A., Jarke, J., and Kramp, L. (Eds.), New perspectives in critical data studies: The ambivalences of data power. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_1 - 25Iliadis, A. and Russo, F. (2016) Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society 3,
2053951716674238 . DOI: 10.1177/2053951716674238 - 26Jasanoff, S. (2010)
States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, Transferred to digital print ed . Routledge, London, XII, 317 Seiten. - 27Johnson, N., Druckenmiller, M.L., Danielsen, F., and Pulsifer, P.L. (2021) The use of digital platforms for community-based monitoring. BioScience 71, 452–466. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa162
- 28Kanwal, S., Nunes, M., Arif, D., Hui, C., and Madden, A. (2019) Application of Boundary Objects in Knowledge Management Research: A Review. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 17 (2). DOI: 10.34190/EJKM.17.02.001
- 29Kasperowski, D., and Hagen, N. (2022) Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance. Social Studies of Science 52, 447–462. DOI: 10.1177/03063127221085241
- 30Kennedy, H., Steedman, R., and Jones, R. (2022)
Researching public trust in datafication: reflections on the deliberative citizen jury as method , in: Hepp, A., Jarke, J., Kramp, L. (Eds.), New perspectives in critical data studies: The ambivalences of dData power. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland, pp. 391–414. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_17 - 31Kettunen, J., Silander, J., Lindholm, M., Lehtiniemi, M., Setälä, O., and Kaitala, S (2016)
Changing role of citizens in national environmental monitoring , in: European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. Ubiquity Press, London, pp. 257–267. DOI: 10.5334/bax.s - 32Kuusisto, E. (2008)
Veden kierto. Hydrologinen palvelu Suomessa 1908–2008 . Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. - 33Land-Zandstra, A., Agnello, G., and Gültekin, Y.S. (2021)
Participants in citizen science , in: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., and Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland, pp. 243–259. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_13 - 34Lauser, M.J.F. (2024) Climate risk maps as boundary objects for future forests. Environmental Science & Policy 162,
103908 . DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103908 - 35Lyytimäki, J., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Halme, M., Linnanen, L., Mönkkönen, M., Ratinen, I., Salonen, A.O., et al. (2025) Assessing the effectiveness of Finland’s sustainable development policy to facilitate a sustainability transition. Discover Sustainability 6,
751 . DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-01658-z - 36Mahr, D., and Dickel, S. (2019) Citizen science beyond invited participation: nineteenth century amateur naturalists, epistemic autonomy, and big data approaches avant la lettre. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41,
41 . DOI: 10.1007/s40656-019-0280-z - 37Neff, G., Tanweer, A., Fiore-Gartland, B., and Osburn, L. (2017) Critique and contribute: A practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science. Big Data 5, 85–97. DOI: 10.1089/big.2016.0050
- 38Norström, A.V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M.F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A.T., et al. (2020) Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3, 182–190. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
- 39Ottinger, G. (2022) Misunderstanding citizen science: Hermeneutic ignorance in U.S. environmental regulation. Science as Culture 31, 504–529. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710
- 40Palacin, V., Gilbert, S., Orchard, S., Eaton, A., Ferrario, M.A., and Happonen, A., (2020) Drivers of participation in digital citizen science: Case studies on Järviwiki and Safecast. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 5(1), p.
22 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.290 - 41Pasgaard, M., Breed, C., Heines, M., Knudsen, L., Brom, P., Schmidt, A., and Engemann, K. (2023) Citizen science beyond science: A collaborative approach for transformative sustainable development. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 8(1), p.
41 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.574 - 42Peltola, T. and Arpin, I. (2018)
Science for everybody? Bridging the socio-economic gap in urban biodiversity monitoring . In: Hecker et al. (Eds). Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, UCL Press, pp.369–380,2018 . DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.32 - 43Peltola, T. and Ratamäki, O. (2024) Sharing epistemic power: digitally mediated wolf monitoring in Finland. Science as Culture 33, 342–365. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2023.2214148
- 44Poisson, A.C., McCullough, I.M., Cheruvelil, K.S., Elliott, K.C., Latimore, J.A., and Soranno, P.A. (2020) Quantifying the contribution of citizen science to broad-scale ecological databases. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18, 19–26. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2128
- 45Pritchard R., Sauls L.A., Oldekop J.A., Kiwango W.A., and Brockington D. (2022) Data justice and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 36(5):
e13919 . DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13919 - 46Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balázs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., Mooney, P., et al. (2020) Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy 49,
103978 . DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 - 47Shirk, J.L., Ballard, H.L., Wilderman, C.C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., et al. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society
17 . DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229 - 48Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M., Hoyte, S., van Oudheusden, M., and Bishop, I.J. (2024) How can bottom-up citizen science restore public trust in environmental governance and sciences? Recommendations from three case studies. Environmental Science & Policy 160,
103854 . DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103854 - 49Staffa, R.K., Riechers, M., and Martín-López, B. (2022) A feminist ethos for caring knowledge production in transdisciplinary sustainability science. Sustainability Science 17, 45–63. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-01064-0
- 50Star, S.L., and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001
- 51Stone, D. (2016)
Quantitative Analysis as Narrative , in: Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science. Eds. R.A.W. Rhodes and Mark Bevir. Routledge, pp. 157–170. - 52Strasser, B.J., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., and Tancoigne, E. (2019) “Citizen science”? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies 32, 52–76. DOI: 10.23987/sts.60425
- 53Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Heinisch, B., Massetti, L., Ugolini, F., and Popov, S. (2025) Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science. Science and Public Policy 52, 329–342. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scae078
- 54Tengö, M., Austin, B.J., Danielsen, F., and Fernández-Llamazares, Á. (2021) Creating Synergies between Citizen Science and Indigenous and Local Knowledge. BioScience 71, 503–518. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab023
- 55Turbé, A., Barba, J., Pelacho, M., Mudgal, S., Robinson, L.D., Serrano-Sanz, F., Sanz, F., et al. (2020) Correction: Understanding the citizen science landscape for European environmental policy: An assessment and recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 5(1), p.
5 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.308 - 56Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F., and Bonn, A. (2018) The threefold potential of environmental citizen science - Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation 225, 176–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
- 57United Nations (2022)
The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 . United Nations, New York. - 58von Gönner, J., Masson, T., Köhler, S., Fritsche, I., and Bonn, A. (2024) Citizen science promotes knowledge, skills and collective action to monitor and protect freshwater streams. People and Nature 6, 2357–2373. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10714
- 59Vuori, K.-M., and Korjonen-Kuusipuro, K. (2018) Kolme kertomusta järviemme tilasta. Alue ja Ympäristö 47, 50–61. DOI: 10.30663/ay.65784
- 60Young, O.R. (2017)
Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for earth system governance , in: Kanie, N., and Biermann, F. (Eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. The MIT Press, p.0 . DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10894.003.0007