Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
iNaturalist as a Tool to Improve Agroecological Biodiversity Knowledge: An Ecuadorian Case Study Cover

iNaturalist as a Tool to Improve Agroecological Biodiversity Knowledge: An Ecuadorian Case Study

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Agri Andes Ecuador. (2019) Agri Andes Ecuador project. iNaturalist Ecuador. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://ecuador.inaturalist.org/projects/agri-andes-ecuador
  2. BioBlitz Guide. (2024) BioBlitz Guide. iNaturalist. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/bioblitz+guide
  3. Bowser, A., Hansen, D., He, Y., Boston, C., Reid, M., Gunnell, L. and Preece, J., (2013) Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications. 2 October 2013 Toronto Ontario Canada: ACM. pp. 1825. DOI: 10.1145/2583008.2583011
  4. Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V. and Shirk, J. (2009) Citizen Science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy, BioScience, 59(11): 977984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  5. Campbell, C.J., Barve, V., Belitz, M.W., Doby, J.R., White, E., Seltzer, C., Di Cecco, G., et al. (2023) Identifying the identifiers: How iNaturalist facilitates collaborative, research-relevant data generation and why it matters for biodiversity science, BioScience, 73(7): 533541. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad051
  6. Cardenas, T., Teixidor-Toneu, I., Navarrete, I., Montufar, R. and Dangles, O., (2025) Divergent knowledge and perceptions of insects by organic and non-organic farming in the Ecuadorian Andes, Agriculture and Human Values, 42(3): 20932109. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-025-10755-8
  7. Curatola Fernández, G.F., Obermeier, W.A., Gerique, A., López Sandoval, M.F., Lehnert, L.W., Thies, B. and Bendix, J., (2015) Land Cover Change in the Andes of Southern Ecuador—Patterns and Drivers, Remote Sensing, 7(3): 25092542. DOI: 10.3390/rs70302509
  8. Curilén, A. and Luciano, Á., (2023) Análisis de la relación entre nicho térmico y el grado de especialización de plantas y polinizadores en una red de polinización altoandina en Chile Central. (Analysis of the relationship between thermal niche and the degree of specialization of plants and pollinators in a high Andean pollination network in Central Chile). Available in: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/198367.
  9. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Foster, G.L., Owen, L. and Persello, S., (2016) Exploring the role of smartphone technology for citizen science in agriculture, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(2): 25. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0359-9
  10. Dimson, M. and Gillespie, T.W., (2023) Who, where, when: Observer behavior influences spatial and temporal patterns of iNaturalist participation, Applied Geography, 153: 102916. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102916
  11. D’Onofrio, G., Arza, V. and Actis, G., (2024) Ciencia ciudadana en América Latina: Perspectivas y políticas públicas UNESCO. (Citizen science in Latin America: perspectives and public policies). DOI: 10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2024.184.61781
  12. Ebitu, L., Avery, H., Mourad, K.A. and Enyetu, J., (2021) Citizen science for sustainable agriculture – A systematic literature review, Land Use Policy, 103: 105326. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105326
  13. Echeverria, A., Ariz, I., Moreno, J., Peralta, J. and Gonzalez, E.M., (2021) Learning Plant Biodiversity in Nature: The Use of the Citizen–Science Platform iNaturalist as a Collaborative Tool in Secondary Education, Sustainability, 13(2): 735. DOI: 10.3390/su13020735
  14. Finquelievich, S. and Fischnaller, C., (2014) Ciencia ciudadana en la Sociedad de la Información: nuevas tendencias a nivel mundial, (Citizen science in the Information society: new global trends), Ibero-American Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 9(27): 1131. Available in: <https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132014000300002&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 1850-0013.
  15. Fritz, S., See, L., Carlson, T., Haklay, M. (Muki), Oliver, J.L., Fraisl, D., Mondardini, R., et al. (2019) Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Nature Sustainability, 2(10): 922930. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3
  16. Gardiner, M.M. and Roy, H.E., (2022) The Role of Community Science in Entomology, Annual Review of Entomology, 67(1): 437456. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-072121-075258
  17. Gerits, F., Cooreman, H., Triste, L., Reubens, B., Verheyen, K. and Messely, L., (2024) Participation changed my mindset. Transformative learning about agrobiodiversity in citizen science projects, Environmental Education Research, 30(2): 283305. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2023.2252627
  18. Grattarola, F., Bergós, L., Carabio, M., Montiel, R. and González, S., (2024) NaturalistaUY en Uruguay: un caso de ciencia comunitaria en América Latina desde una perspectiva crítica. (NaturalistaUY in Uruguay: a case of community science in Latin America from a critical perspective). DOI: 10.62059/LatArXiv.preprints.180
  19. Guarderas, P., Smith, F. and Dufrene, M., (2022) Land use and land cover change in a tropical mountain landscape of northern Ecuador: Altitudinal patterns and driving forces, PLoS ONE, 17(7): e0260191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260191
  20. Hanappe, P., Dunlop, R., Maes, A., Steels, L. and Duval, N., (2016) Agroecology: A Fertile Field for Human Computation, Human Computation, 3(1): 225233. DOI: 10.15346/hc.v3i1.13
  21. Henning, T., Acuña-Castillo, R., Cornejo, X., Gonzáles, P., Segovia, E., Sato, A.A.W. and Weigend, M., (2023) When the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence: Nasa (Loasaceae) rediscoveries from Peru and Ecuador, and the contribution of community science networks, PhytoKeys, 229: 119. DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.229.100082
  22. HLPE, (2019) Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition of the committee on world food security.
  23. INABIO, (2019) iNaturalist Ecuador. Available at https://ecuador.inaturalist.org/pages/nosotros [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
  24. iNaturalist. (2024) Observation Accuracy Experiment — Results (experiment 3). Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://www.inaturalist.org/observation_accuracy_experiments/3?tab=research_grade_results
  25. iNaturalist. (2025) Red iNaturalist. Available at https://www.inaturalist.org/sites/network [Last accessed 9 January 2023].
  26. Jones, J.S., Guézou, A., Medor, S., Nickson, C., Savage, G., Alarcón-Ruales, D., Galloway, T.S., et al. (2022) Microplastic distribution and composition on two Galápagos island beaches, Ecuador: Verifying the use of citizen science derived data in long-term monitoring, Environmental Pollution, 311: 120011. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120011
  27. Kobori, H., Dickinson, J.L., Washitani, I., Sakurai, R., Amano, T., Komatsu, N., Kitamura, W., et al. (2016) Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation, Ecological Research, 31(1): 119. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-015-1314-y
  28. Kobori, H., Ellwood, E., Miller-Rushing, A. and Sakurai, R., (2018) Citizen Science. In: p. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10571-8
  29. Lewinsohn, T.M., Almeida Neto, M., Almeida, A., Prado, P.I. and Jorge, L.R., (2022) From insect-plant interactions to ecological networks, Biota Neotropica, 22: e20221399. DOI: 10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2022-1399
  30. López-Guillén, E., Herrera, I., Bensid, B., Gómez-Bellver, C., Ibáñez, N., Jiménez-Mejías, P., Mairal, M., Mena-García, L., et al.(2024) Strengths and Challenges of Using iNaturalist in Plant Research with Focus on Data Quality, Diversity, 16(1): 42. DOI: 10.3390/d16010042
  31. Martínez-Sagarra, G., Castilla, F. and Pando, F., (2022) Seven Hundred Projects in iNaturalist Spain: Performance and Lessons Learned, Sustainability, 14(17): 11093. DOI: 10.3390/su141711093
  32. Medrano-Vizcaíno, P., Brito-Zapata, D., Rueda-Vera, A., Jarrín-V, P., García-Carrasco, J.-M., Medina, D., Aguilar, J., et al. (2023) First national assessment of wildlife mortality in Ecuador: An effort from citizens and academia to collect roadkill data at country scale, Ecology and Evolution, 13(3): e9916. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9916
  33. Meeus, S., Silva-Rocha, I., Adriaens, T., Brown, P.M.J., Chartosia, N., Claramunt-López, B., Martinou, A.F., et al.(2023) More than a Bit of Fun: The Multiple Outcomes of a Bioblitz, BioScience, 73(3): 168181. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac100
  34. Mendes, J., Pinho, T.M., Neves dos Santos, F., Sousa, J.J., Peres, E., Boaventura-Cunha, J., Cunha, M. et al.(2020) Smartphone Applications Targeting Precision Agriculture Practices—A Systematic Review, Agronomy, 10(6): 855. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10060855
  35. Mina, D. [@diegofernandominachala3759] (2023, December 30). Bumblebee on a flower [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/aEkNbjEI0ag
  36. Mourad, K.A., Hosseini, S.H. and Avery, H., (2020) The Role of Citizen Science in Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainability, 12(24): 10375. DOI: 10.3390/su122410375
  37. Mupangwa, W., Maharaj, U., Taylor, J., Dickens, C., Choruma, D., Pike, T., Dirwai, T.L., et al.(2025) Developing a conceptual framework for a citizen Science-based agroecology self-assessment tool, Frontiers in Agronomy, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1646470
  38. Natural History Museum. (2019) TOOLKIT: How to create a citizen science field site. from https://nhm.org/sites/default/files/2019-04/citizen_science_planner.pdf
  39. Páez-Vacas, M., Bustamante, M.R., Baer, N., Oleas, N.H., Argoti, M.A., Espinoza, F.S., Lozano, Z., et al. (2023) Citizen science as a tool for education: First Bioblitz in Quito, Ecuador, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1141(1): 012004. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1141/1/012004
  40. Pernat, N., Memedemin, D., August, T., Preda, C., Reyserhove, L., Schirmel, J. and Groom, Q., (2024) Extracting secondary data from citizen science images reveals host flower preferences of the Mexican grass-carrying wasp Isodontia mexicana in its native and introduced ranges, Ecology and Evolution, 14(6): e11537. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11537
  41. Potsikas, M., Prouska, K., Efthimiou, G., Plakitsi, K. and Kornelaki, A.-C., (2023) Citizen science practice around Lake Pamvotis and the Ioannina Castle: Using iNaturalist to foster connectedness to nature in citizens and university students, International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(3): 450463. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.07.002
  42. Puig, B., (2021) Una propuesta didáctica para la enseñanza-aprendizaje de insectos, plantas y el problema de la pérdida de polinizadores, Revista eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias, (A teaching proposal for teaching and learning about insects, plants, and the problem of pollinator loss, eureka magazine on science teaching and dissemination) 18(3): 120. DOI: 10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i3.3203
  43. RAWGraphs. (2013) RAWGraphs. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://app.rawgraphs.io/
  44. Remelgado, R., Levers, C. and Cord, A.F., (2025) Cultivated lands: blind spots in global biodiversity data, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 40(12): 11551158. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2025.09.017
  45. Riquelme, C., (2024) iNaturalist como plataforma para documentar la funga chilena. (iNaturalist as a platform for documenting chilean fungi). DOI: 10.32942/X25G9D
  46. Ruck, A., van der Wal, R. S. C., Hood, A. L., Mauchline, A. G., Potts, S. F., WallisDeVries, M. and Öckinger, E., (2024) Farmland biodiversity monitoring through citizen science: A review of existing approaches and future opportunities, Ambio, 53(2): 257275. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01929-x
  47. Ryan, S.F., Adamson, N.L., Aktipis, A., Andersen, L.K., Austin, R., Barnes, L., Beasley, M.R., et al. (2018) The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1891): 20181977. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1977
  48. Saenz-Lituma, G., (2025) The Agroecological Transition of Farms in the Ecuadorian Andes Through the Lens of the Main Agroecological Structure, land degradation & development, 36(2): 424440. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.5368
  49. Schade, S., Pelacho, M., van Noordwijk, T. (C. G.E.), Vohland, K., Hecker, S. and Manzoni, M., (2021) Citizen Science and Policy. In the science of citizen science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 351371. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_18
  50. Stevenson, R., Merrill, C. and Burn, P., (2021) Useful Biodiversity Data Were Obtained by Novice Observers Using iNaturalist During College Orientation Retreats, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 27. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.407
  51. Struelens, Q., Mina, D. and Dangles, O., (2024) A Landscape’s Social and Ecological Services are Equally Valued by Andean Farmers When Deciding Where to Grow a Crop, Mountain Research and Development, 44(2): R10R19. DOI: 10.1659/mrd.2024.00001
  52. Turley, N.E., Kania, S.E., Petitta, I.R., Otruba, E.A., Biddinger, D.J., Butzler, T.M., Sesler, V.V., et al. (2024) Bee monitoring by community scientists: comparing a collections-based program with iNaturalist, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, saae014. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saae014
  53. Ulloa, M., (2023) WCS Ecuador promueve la ciencia ciudadana como estrategia para prevenir los delitos ambientales en el país. (Ecuador promotes citizen science as a strategy to prevent environmental crimes in the country) (2023). Available at https://ecuador.wcs.org/Recursos/Noticias/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/18759/WCS-Ecuador-promueve-la-ciencia-ciudadana-como-estrategia-para-prevenir-los-delitos-ambientales-en-el-pais.aspx [Last accessed 2 September 2024].
  54. van de Gevel, J., van Etten, J. and Deterding, S., (2020) Citizen science breathes new life into participatory agricultural research. A review, Agronomy for sustainable development, 40(5): 35. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-020-00636-1
  55. White, E., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. and Guralnick, R., (2023) Quantifying error in occurrence data: Comparing the data quality of iNaturalist and digitized herbarium specimen data in flowering plant families of the southeastern United States, PLOS ONE, 18(12): e0295298. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295298
  56. Wittmann, J., Girman, D. and Crocker, D., (2019) Using iNaturalist in a Coverboard Protocol to Measure Data Quality: Suggestions for Project Design, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 21. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.131
  57. Wu, Y. and Hsu, W.-J., (2024) What improves students’ participation in a school-based citizen science project? Through the lens of practitioners, International Journal of Science Education, 120. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2024.2311088
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.819 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 17
Submitted on: Nov 26, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2026
Published on: Jul 23, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Diego Mina, Rommel Montúfar, Mayra Coro, Olivier Dangles, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.