References
- 1Allf, B.C. (2023) Evaluating the Citizen Science Experience: Motivation, Participation and Learning. Unpublished dissertation (PhRD), North Carolina State University. Available at
https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.20/41158 (Last accessed 13 August 2024). - 2Allf, B.C., Cooper, C.B., Larson, L.R., Dunn, R.R., Futch, S.E., Sharova, M. and Cavalier, D. (2022) Citizen Science as an Ecosystem of Engagement: Implications for Learning and Broadening Participation. BioScience, 72(7), pp. 651–663. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac035
- 3Allf, B.C., Larson, L.R. and Cooper, C.B. (2023) Unpublished data.
- 4Aristeidou, M. and Herodotou, C. (2020) Online Citizen Science: A Systematic Review of Effects on Learning and Scientific Literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), pp. 11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.224
- 5Baumeier, A. (2020) Are E-Newsletters The Future for Community Newspapers? Unpublished thesis (BA), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DOI: 10.17615/xyzc-0p75
- 6Becker-Klein, R., Davis, C., Phillips, T.B., Del Bianco, V., Grack Nelson, A. and Ronning, E.C. (2023) Using Shared Embedded Assessment Tools to Understand Participant Skills: Processes and Lessons Learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), pp. 20. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.487
- 7Boas, T.C., Christenson, D.P. and Glick, D.M. (2020) Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(2), pp. 232–250. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.28
- 8Cheng, J.C.H. and Monroe, M.C. (2012) Connection to Nature: Children’s Affective Attitude Toward Nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), pp. 31–49. DOI: 10.1177/0013916510385082
- 9Church, S.P., Payne, L.B., Peel, S. and Prokopy, L.S. (2018) Beyond water data: benefits to volunteers and to local water from a citizen science program. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(2), pp. 306–326. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1415869
- 10Cook, K. (2009) Fun at Work: Construct Definition and Perceived Impact in the Workplace. Unpublished dissertation (PhD), Griffith University. Available at:
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:149735083 (Last accessed 13 August 2024). - 11Cruz, S.M. and Manata, B. (2020) Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, pp. 363. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363
- 12Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013) Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. London, UK: Ebury Digital.
- 13Davis, C., Del Bianco, V., Peterman, K., Grover, A., Phillips, T. and Becker-Klein, R. (2022) Diverse and Important Ways Evaluation can Support and Advance Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), pp. 30. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.482
- 14Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2012)
Self-Determination Theory . In: Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A. and Higgins, E. (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 416–436. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249215.n21 - 15Dismore, H. and Bailey, R. (2011) Fun and enjoyment in physical education: young people’s attitudes. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), pp. 499–516. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2010.484866
- 16Fan, W. and Yan, Z. (2010) Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), pp. 132–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
- 17Fincham, B. (2016) The Sociology of Fun. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-31579-3
- 18Fram, S.M. (2013) The Constant Comparative Analysis Method Outside of Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), pp. 1–25. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1569
- 19Gamer, M., Lemon, J., Fellows, I. and Singh, P. (2019) irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. DOI: 10.32614/CRAN.package.irr
- 20Groves, R.M., Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J.L. and Little, R.J.A. (eds.) (2001) Survey Nonresponse, 1st Edition. New York, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
- 21Harms, J., Biegler, S., Wimmer, C., Kappel, K. and Grechenig, T. (2015) Gamification of online surveys: Design process, case study and evaluation. In: Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany on
14–18 September 2015 , pp. 219–236. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_16 - 22Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M. and Zubek, R. (2004) MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 4(1), pp. 1722.
- 23Imbault, C., Shore, D. and Kuperman, V. (2018) Reliability of the sliding scale for collecting affective responses to words. Behavioral Research Methods, 50, pp. 2399–2407. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1016-9
- 24Jordan, R., Crall, A., Gray, S., Phillips, T. and Mellor, D. (2015) Citizen Science as a Distinct Field of Inquiry. BioScience, 65(2), pp. 208–211. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu217
- 25Kals, E., Schumacher, D. and Montada, L. (1999) Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), pp. 178–202. DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972056
- 26Kleespies, M.W., Braun, T., Dierkes, P.W. and Wenzel, V. (2021) Measuring Connection to Nature—A Illustrated Extension of the Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale. Sustainability, 13(4), pp. 1761. DOI: 10.3390/su13041761
- 27Koo, T.K. and Li, M.Y. (2016) A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), pp. 155–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- 28Larson, L.R., Cooper, C.B., Futch, S., Singh, D., Shipley, N.J., Dale, K., LeBaron, G.S., et al. (2020) The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242, pp. 108428. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428
- 29Larson, L.R., Stedman, R.C., Cooper, C.B. and Decker, D.J. (2015) Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, pp. 112–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004
- 30Larson, R.B. (2019) Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), pp. 534–547. DOI: 10.1177/1470785318805305
- 31Lucardie, D. (2014) The Impact of Fun and Enjoyment on Adult’s Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, pp. 439–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.696
- 32Malone, T.W. and Lepper, M.R. (1987)
Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning . In: Snow, R.E. and Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 388. - 33Manfredo, M.J., Teel, T.L., Don Carlos, A.W., Sullivan, L., Bright, A.D., Dietsch, A.M., Bruskotter, J. et al. (2020) The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 34(6), pp. 1549–1559. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13493
- 34Masters, K., Oh, E.Y., Cox, J., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Graham, G., Greenhill, et al. (2016) Science learning via participation in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3), pp. A07. DOI: 10.22323/2.15030207
- 35McDowell, T. (2004) Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes. Unpublished dissertation (PhD), Alliant International University.
- 36McManus, I.C. and Furnham, A. (2010) “Fun, Fun, Fun”: Types of Fun, Attitudes to Fun, and their Relation to Personality and Biographical Factors. Psychology, 1(3), p. 159. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2010.13021
- 37Perry, D.L. (2012) What Makes Learning Fun? Principles for the Design of Intrinsically Motivating Museum Exhibits. Plymouth, UK: Rowman Altamira.
- 38Peter, M., Diekötter, T., Höffler, T. and Kremer, K. (2021) Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. People and Nature, 3(2), pp. 294–311. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10193
- 39Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Bonney, R. and Grack-Nelson, A. (2015) Interest in Science and Nature Scale (Adult Version), Technical Brief Series. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
- 40Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M. and Bonney, R. (2018) A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), pp. 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
- 41Poris, M. (2005) Understanding what fun means to today’s kids. Young Consumers, 7(1), pp. 14–22. DOI: 10.1108/17473610610701358
- 42R Core Team. (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at
https://www.R-project.org/ (Last accessed 13 August 2024). - 43Raddick, M.J., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., Schawinski, et al. (2013) Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1), pp. 010106. DOI: 10.3847/AER2011021
- 44Robinson, L.D., Cawthray, J.L., West, S.E., Bonn, A. and Ansine, J. (2018)
Ten principles of citizen science . In: Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J. and Bonn, A. (eds.) Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London, UK: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2 - 45Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), pp. 420–428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
- 46Staus, N.L., Falk, J.H., Price, A., Tai, R.H. and Dierking, L.D. (2021) Measuring the long-term effects of informal science education experiences: challenges and potential solutions. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), pp. 3. DOI: 10.1186/s43031-021-00031-0
- 47Tasci, A.D.A. and Ko, Y.J. (2015) A FUN-SCALE for Understanding the Hedonic Value of a Product: The Destination Context. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(2), pp. 162–183. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2015.1038421
- 48Wankel, L.M. and Sefton, J.M. (1989) A Season-Long Investigation of Fun in Youth Sports. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(4), pp. 355–366. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.11.4.355
- 49Wynes, S. and Nicholas, K.A. (2017) The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), pp. 074024. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541