Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementation of a Global Citizen Science App in Community-Based Water Monitoring: Lessons Learned from the CrowdWater Experiences in Latin America Cover

Implementation of a Global Citizen Science App in Community-Based Water Monitoring: Lessons Learned from the CrowdWater Experiences in Latin America

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Volume 10 (2025): Issue 1
By: Sara Blanco-Ramírez,  Camila Bañales-Seguel,  Clara Guardado-Torrez,  Jan Seibert and  Ilja van Meerveld  
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. 1Adame, F. 2021. Meaningful collaborations can end “helicopter research”, Nature. DOI: 10.1038/D41586-021-01795-1
    Back to article
  2. 2Benyei, P, Pardo-de-Santayana, M, Aceituno-Mata, L, Calvet-Mir, L, Carrascosa-García, M, Rivera-Ferre, M, Perdomo-Molina, A and Reyes-García, V. 2021 Participation in Citizen Science: Insights from the CONECT-e Case Study. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(4) pp. 755–788. DOI: 10.1177/0162243920948110
    Back to article
  3. 3Benyei, P, Skarlatidou, A, Argyriou, D, Hall, R, Theilade, I, Turreira- García, N, Latreche, D, Albert, A, Berger, D, Cartró-Sabaté, M, Chang, J, Chiaravalloti, R, Cortesi, A, Danielsen, F, Haklay, M, Jacobi, E, Nigussie, A, Reyes-García, V, Rodrigues, E, Sauini, T, Shadrin, V, Siqueira, A, Supriadi, Tillah, M, Tofighi-Niaki, A, Vronski, N and Woods, T. 2023. Challenges, Strategies, and Impacts of Doing Citizen Science with Marginalised and Indigenous Communities: Reflections from Project Coordinators. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 21, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.514
    Back to article
  4. 4Blake, C, Rhanor, A and Pajic, C. 2020. The Demographics of Citizen Science Participation and Its Implications for Data Quality and Environmental Justice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.320
    Back to article
  5. 5Blanco-Ramírez, S, van Meerveld, I and Seibert, J. 2023. Citizen science approaches for water quality measurements. Science of the Total Environment, 897, p. 165436. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165436
    Back to article
  6. 6Buytaert, W, Zulkafli, Z, Grainger, S, Acosta, L, Alemie, TC, Bastiaensen, J, De Bièvre, B, Bhusal, J, Clark, J, Dewulf, A, Foggin, M, Hannah, DM, Hergarten, C, Isaeva, A, Karpouzoglou, T, Pandeya, B, Paudel, D, Sharma, K, Steenhuis, T, Tilahun, S, Van Hecken, G and Zhumanova, M. 2014. Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2: 26. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2014.00026
    Back to article
  7. 7Clerc-Schwarzenbach, F, Seibert, J, Vis, M and van Meerveld, I. (in review): Value of waterlevel-class observations for hydrological model calibration. Hydrological Sciences Journal.
    Back to article
  8. 8Cohen, A., Matthew, M, Neville, KJ and Kelsey Wrightson, K. 2021. Colonialism in Community-Based Monitoring: Knowledge Systems, Finance, and Power in Canada. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(7), pp. 1988–2004. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1874865
    Back to article
  9. 9Collins, M, Arienzo, MM, Nieminen, S, Hatchett, BJ, Nolin, A and Jennings, KS. 2023. Effective Engagement While Scaling Up: Lessons from a Citizen Science Program Transitioning from Single- to Multi-Region Scale. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 65, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.622
    Back to article
  10. 10Cooper, CB., Rasmussen, LM and Jones, ED. 2021. Perspective: The Power (Dynamics) of Open Data in Citizen Science. Frontiers in Climate, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.637037
    Back to article
  11. 11Costa, D, Aziz, U, Elliott, J, Baulch, H, Roy, B, Schneider, K and Pomeroy, J. 2020. The Nutrient App: Developing a smartphone application for on-site instantaneous community-based NO3 and PO4 monitoring. Environmental Modelling & Software, 133, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104829
    Back to article
  12. 12Denzin, NK. 2017. Sociological methods: A sourcebook, Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook, Routledge, 590 pp. DOI: 10.4324/9781315129945
    Back to article
  13. 13Deutsch, WG and Ruiz-Córdova, SS. 2015. Trends, challenges, and responses of a 20-year, volunteer water monitoring program in Alabama. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 14. DOI: 10.5751/ES-07578-200314
    Back to article
  14. 14Deutsch, W, Lhotka, L and Ruiz-Córdova, S. 2009. Group Dynamics and Resource Availability of a Long-Term Volunteer Water-Monitoring Program. Society and Natural Resources, 22(7), pp. 637–649. DOI: 10.1080/08941920802078216
    Back to article
  15. 15Etter, S, Strobl, B, Seibert, J and van Meerveld, HJI. 2020. Value of Crowd-Based Water Level Class Observations for Hydrological Model Calibration. Water Resources Research, 56(2), pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026108
    Back to article
  16. 16Etter, S, Strobl, B, Seibert, J, van Meerveld, I, Niebert, K and Stepenuck, KF. 2023. Why do people participate in app-based environment-focused citizen science projects? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105682
    Back to article
  17. 17Eyng, V, Gomes, M, Câmpera, L and Hercos, A. 2022. Engagement in a Citizen Science Project in the Amazon Basin. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 28, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.453
    Back to article
  18. 18Falkembach, E and Carillo, AT. 2017. Systematization of Experiences: A Practice of Participatory Research from Latin America. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, pp. 76–82. DOI: 10.4135/9781473921290.n8
    Back to article
  19. 19Flores, C, Ramos, M, Ruiz, S, Manson, R, Aranda, E and Deutsch, W. 2013. Monitoreo comunitario del agua: retos y aprendizaje desde la perspectiva de Global Water Watch-México. Ciudad de México: GWW (Global Water Watch).
    Back to article
  20. 20Flores Rojas, D and Huamantinco Araujo, A. 2017. Desarrollo de una herramienta de vigilancia ambiental ciudadana basada en macroinvertebrados bentónicos en la cuenca del Jequetepeque (Cajamarca, Perú). Ecología Aplicada, 16(2). DOI: 10.21704/rea.v16i2.1014
    Back to article
  21. 21Fraisl, D, Campbell, J, See, L, Wehn, U, Wardlaw, J, Gold, M, Moorthy, I, Arias, R, Piera, J, Oliver, J L, Masó, J, Penker, M and Fritz, S. 2020. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15, pp. 1735–1751. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
    Back to article
  22. 22Fritz, S, See, L, Carlson, T, Haklay, M, Oliver, JL, Fraisl, D, Mondardini, R, Brocklehurst, M, Shanley, LA, Schade, S, Wehn, U, Abrate, T, Anstee, J, Arnold, S, Billot, M, Campbell, J, Espey, J, Gold, M, Hager, G and He, S. 2019. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10), pp. 922–930. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3
    Back to article
  23. 23Gewin, V. 2023. Pack up the parachute: why global north–south collaborations need to change, Nature, 619(7971), pp. 885–887. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02313-1
    Back to article
  24. 24Grigoletto, F, Antunes de Oliveira, F, Caradi Momesso, C, Rodrigues Nehemy, IK, de Almeida Junior, JE, de Avelar São Pedro, V, Greco, R, Aquino Alves, M and Edwards, T. 2023. Technological Affordance and the Realities of Citizen Science Projects Developed in Challenging Territories. Sustainability, 15(8), pp. 6654–6654. DOI: 10.3390/su15086654
    Back to article
  25. 25Himley, M. 2014. Monitoring the impacts of extraction: science and participation in the governance of mining in Peru. Environment and Planning A, 46, pp. 1069–1087. DOI: 10.1068/a45631
    Back to article
  26. 26Jara, O. 2018. La sistematización de experiencias: práctica y teoría para otros mundos políticos. 1ed. Bogotá: Centro Internacional de Educación y Desarrollo Humano - CINDE.
    Back to article
  27. 27Johnson, N, Druckenmiller, ML, Danielsen, F and Pulsifer, PL. 2021. The Use of Digital Platforms for Community-Based Monitoring. BioScience, 71(5), pp. 452–466. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa162
    Back to article
  28. 28Juhász, L and Mooney, P. 2022. “I Think I Discovered a Military Base in the Middle of the Ocean”—Null Island, the Most Real of Fictional Places. IEEE Access, 10, pp. 84147–84165. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3197222
    Back to article
  29. 29Kimura, AH and Kinchy, A. 2016. Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, pp. 331–361. DOI: 10.17351/ests2016.99
    Back to article
  30. 30Kimura, AH and Kinchy, A. 2019. Science by the People: Participation, Power, and the Politics of Environmental Knowledge. Rutgers University Press. 240 pp. DOI: 10.36019/9780813595115
    Back to article
  31. 31Liboiron, M. 2021. Decolonizing geoscience requires more than equity and inclusion, Nature Geoscience, 14(12), pp. 876–877. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00861-7
    Back to article
  32. 32López-Garay, H and Pérez-Perdomo, MT. 2024. El enfoque de la Investigación Acción Participativa (IAP) en el estudio de las problemáticas regionales. Edited by López-Garay, H and Pérez-Perdomo, MT. Ediciones Unibagué. 262 pp. DOI: 10.35707/9789587544435
    Back to article
  33. 33Lowry, CS, and Fienen, MN. 2013. CrowdHydrology: Crowdsourcing hydrologic data and engaging citizen scientists. GroundWater, 51(1), pp. 151–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00956.x
    Back to article
  34. 34Lynn, SJ, Kaplan, N, Newman, S, Scapino, R, and Newman, G. 2019. Designing a Platform for Ethical Citizen Science: A Case Study of CitSci.org. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.227
    Back to article
  35. 35Malthus, TJ, Ohmsen, R and van der Woerd, HJ. 2020. An evaluation of citizen science smartphone apps for Inland water quality assessment. Remote Sensing, 12(10). DOI: 10.3390/rs12101578
    Back to article
  36. 36Miller-Rushing, A, Primack, R and Bonney, R. 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), pp. 285–290. DOI: 10.1890/110278
    Back to article
  37. 37North, T, Moore, P, Birch, W, Markle, C, Freeman, H, Furukawa, A, Hudson, D, Wilkinson, S and Waddington, J. 2023. iWetland: A Community Science Platform for Monitoring Wetland Water Levels. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 7, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.448
    Back to article
  38. 38Pareja, C, Honey-Rosés, J, Kunz, N, Fraser, J and Xavier, A. 2018. What Participation? Distinguishing Water Monitoring Programs in Mining Regions Based on Community Participation. Water, 10(1325), pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.3390/w10101325
    Back to article
  39. 39Pateman, R, Dyke, A and West, S. 2021. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.369
    Back to article
  40. 40Pateman, RM and West, SE. 2023. Citizen Science: Pathways to Impact and why Participant Diversity Matters. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 50, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.569
    Back to article
  41. 41Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL., Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), pp. 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
    Back to article
  42. 42Rangecroft, S, Clason, C, Dextre, RM, Richter, I, Kelly, C, Turin, C, Grados-Bueno, CV, Fuentealba, B, Hernandez, MC, Julca, SM, Martin, J and Guy, JA. 2024. GC Insights: Lessons from participatory water quality research in the upper Santa River basin, Peru. Geoscience Communication, 7(2), pp. 145–150. DOI: 10.5194/gc-7-145-2024
    Back to article
  43. 43Rinderer, M, Komakech, HC, Müller, D, Wiesenberg, GLB and Seibert, J. 2015. Qualitative soil moisture assessment in semi-arid Africa – the role of experience and training on inter-rater reliability. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (8), pp. 3505–3516. DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-3505-2015
    Back to article
  44. 44San Llorente Capdevila, A, Kokimova, A, Ray, SS, Avellán, T, Kim, J and Kirschke, S. 2020. Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring. Science of The Total Environment (780), pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137843
    Back to article
  45. 45Seibert, J, Strobl, B, Etter, S, Hummer, P, and van Meerveld, HJ. 2019. Virtual Staff Gauges for Crowd-Based Stream Level Observations. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2019.00070
    Back to article
  46. 46Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
    Back to article
  47. 47Skarlatidou, A and Haklay, M. 2021. Geographic Citizen Science Design No one left behind. Edited by Skarlatidou, A and Haklay, M. UCL Press. 365 pp. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv15d8174
    Back to article
  48. 48Strobl, B, Etter, S, van Meerveld, I and Seibert, J. 2019. Accuracy of crowdsourced streamflow and stream level class estimates. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(5), pp. 823–841. DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2019.1578966
    Back to article
  49. 49Thiel, M, Baeza Álvarez, J, Diaz, M, de Veer, D, Dittmann, S, Guevara-Torrejón, V, Ahumada, GH, Honorato-Zimmer, D, Kiessling, T, Leyton Muñoz, A, López-Xalín, N, Nuñez, P, Sepúlveda, JM and Vásquez, N. 2023. Communication strategies in an international school citizen science program investigating marine litter. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11:1270413. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1270413
    Back to article
  50. 50Ulloa, A, Godfrid, J, Damonte, G, Quiroga, C and López, AP. 2020. Monitoreos hídricos comunitarios: conocimientos locales como defensa territorial y ambiental en Argentina, Perú y Colombia. Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 69, pp. 77–97. DOI: 10.17141/iconos.69.2021.4489
    Back to article
  51. 51Ureta, S, Llona, M, Rodríguez-Oroz, D, Valenzuela, D, Trujillo-Espinoza, C, Guiñez, C, Rebolledo, A, Maiza, MJ, and Rodríguez Beltrán, C. 2022. Nuestros Suelos: exploring new forms of public engagement with polluted soils. Journal of Science Communication, 21(01), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.22323/2.21010801
    Back to article
  52. 52van Emmerik, T, Seibert, J, Strobl, B, Etter, S, den Oudendammer, T, Rutten, M, bin Ab Razak, MS and van Meerveld, I. 2020. Crowd-Based Observations of Riverine Macroplastic Pollution. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8 (298), pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.00298
    Back to article
  53. 53Vázquez, L. 2019. ¿Ciencia de resistencia? Monitoreos ambientales participativos en contextos de conflicto ambiental. Reflexiones desde una mirada decolonial’, Revista de Paz y Conflictos, 12, pp. 57–79. DOI: 10.30827/revpaz.v12i2.10399
    Back to article
  54. 54Walker, DW, Smigaj, M and Tani, Masakazu. 2020. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. WIREs Water. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1488
    Back to article
  55. 55Weeser, B, Stenfert Kroese, J, Jacobs, SR, Njue, N, Kemboi, Z, Ran, A, Rufino, MC and Breuer, L. 2018. Citizen science pioneers in Kenya – A crowdsourced approach for hydrological monitoring. Science of The Total Environment, 631-632, pp. 1590–1599. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.130
    Back to article
  56. 56West, S, Dyke, A and Pateman, R. 2021. Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.5334/CSTP.370
    Back to article
  57. 57Ziegler, S and Arias-Segura, J. 2022. Rural connectivity in Latin America and the Caribbean state of play, challenges and actions for digitalization and sustainable development. 109 p. https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/21350
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.749 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 9, 2025
Published on: Mar 21, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
community engagement,
water monitoring,
workshops,
mobile phone app,
participatory science,
qualitative methods

© 2025 Sara Blanco-Ramírez, Camila Bañales-Seguel, Clara Guardado-Torrez, Jan Seibert, Ilja van Meerveld, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2025): Issue 1Next article