References
- 1Alender, B. (2016). Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: A deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3), A04. 10.22323/2.15030204
- 2Auerbach, J., Barthelmess, E.L., Cavalier, D., Cooper, C.B., Fenyk, H., Haklay, M., Hulbert, J.M., Kyba, C.C.M., Larson, L.R., Lewandowski, E., and Shanley, L. (2019). The problem with delineating narrow criteria for citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31),
15336 . 10.1073/pnas.1909278116 - 3Baker, D.J., Freeman, S.N., Grice, P.V., and Siriwardena, G.M. (2012). Landscape-scale responses of birds to agri-environment management: A test of the English Environmental Stewardship scheme. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(4), 871–882. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02161.x
- 4Begeny, C.T., Ryan, M.K., Moss-Racusin, C.A., and Ravetz, G. (2020). In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening. Science Advances, 6(26),
eaba7814 . 10.1126/sciadv.aba7814 - 5Blanchard, A.L., McBride, A.G., and Ernst, B.A. (2022). How are we similar? Group level entitativity in work and social groups. Small Group Research, 54(3), 369–395. 10.1177/10464964221117483
- 6Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between Frame Setting and Frame Sending: How Journalists Contribute to News Frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61–82. 10.1111/comt.12027
- 7Cai, H., Luo, Y.L., Shi, Y., Liu, Y., and Yang, Z. (2016). Male= science, female= humanities: Both implicit and explicit gender-science stereotypes are heritable. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 412–419. 10.1177/1948550615627367
- 8Ceci, S.J., Kahn, S., and Williams, W.M. (2023). Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 24(1), 15–73. 10.1177/15291006231163179
- 9Chan, H.-W., Pong, V., and Tam, K.-P. (2019). Cross-national variation of gender differences in environmental concern: Testing the sociocultural hindrance hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 51(1), 81–108. 10.1177/0013916517735149
- 10Cheng, S.J., Gaynor, K.M., Moore, A.C., Darragh, K., Estien, C.O., Hammond, J.W., Lawrence, C., Mills, K.L., Baiz, M.D., Ignace, D., Khadempour, L., McCary, M.A., Rice, M.M., Tumber-Dávila, S.J., and Smith, J.A. (2023). Championing inclusive terminology in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(5), 381–384. 10.1016/j.tree.2022.12.011
- 11Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
- 12Cooper, C.B., Hawn, C.L., Larson, L.R., Parrish, J.K., Bowser, G., Cavalier, D., Dunn, R.R., Haklay, M., Gupta, K.K., and Jelks, N.O. (2021). Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549), 1386–1388. 10.1126/science.abi6487
- 13Desrochers, J.E. and Zelenski, J.M. (2023). Why are males not doing these environmental behaviors?: Exploring males’ psychological barriers to environmental action. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25042–25060. 10.1007/s12144-022-03587-w
- 14Dickinson, J.L. and Crain, R. (2019). An experimental study of learning in an online citizen science project: Insights into study design and waitlist controls. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). 10.1146/annurev-environ-030713-154609
- 15Dietz, T. and Whitley, C.T. (2018). Environmentalism, norms, and identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12334–12336. 10.1073/pnas.1817487115
- 16Druckman, J.N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225–256. 10.1023/A:1015006907312
- 17Dunlap, R.E., Xiao, C., and McCright, A.M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10(4), 23–48. 10.1080/714000580
- 18Echavarren, J.M. (2023). The Gender Gap in Environmental Concern: Support for an Ecofeminist Perspective and the Role of Gender Egalitarian Attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(9), 610–623. 10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3
- 19Eitzel, M.V., Cappadonna, J.L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R.E., Virapongse, A., West, S. E., Kyba, C., Bowser, A., Cooper, C.B., and Sforzi, A. (2017). Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). 10.5334/cstp.96
- 20Ellwood, E.R., Pauly, G.B., Ahn, J., Golembiewski, K., Higgins, L.M., Ordeñana, M.A., and von Konrat, M. (2023). Citizen science needs a name change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(6), 485–489. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.03.003
- 21Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- 22Feng, C.X. (2021). A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 8(1), 1–19. 10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4
- 23Goldsmith, R.E., Feygina, I., and Jost, J.T. (2013).
The Gender Gap in Environmental Attitudes: A System Justification Perspective . In M. Alston and K. Whittenbury (Eds.), Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impacts of Climate Change (pp. 159–171). Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_12 - 24Groulx, M., Brisbois, M.C., Lemieux, C.J., Winegardner, A., and Fishback, L. (2017). A role for nature-based citizen science in promoting individual and collective climate change action? A systematic review of learning outcomes. Science Communication, 39(1), 45–76. 10.1177/1075547016688324
- 25Haywood, B.K. (2016). Beyond data points and research contributions: The personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(3), 239–262. 10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659
- 26Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K.T., Uhlik, J., and Dörler, D. (2019). Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(17), 8089–8092. 10.1073/pnas.1903393116
- 27Ibrahim, K., Khodursky, S., and Yasseri, T. (2021). Gender imbalance and spatiotemporal patterns of contributions to citizen science projects: The case of Zooniverse. Frontiers in Physics, 9,
650720 . 10.3389/fphy.2021.650720 - 28Jönsson, M., Kasperowski, D., Coulson, S.J., Nilsson, J., Bína, P., Kullenberg, C., Hagen, N., van der Wal, R., and Peterson, J. (2024). Inequality persists in a large citizen science programme despite increased participation through ICT innovations. Ambio, 53(1), 126–137. 10.1007/s13280-023-01917-1
- 29Kaplan Mintz, K., Arazy, O., and Malkinson, D. (2023). Multiple forms of engagement and motivation in ecological citizen science. Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 27–44. 10.1080/13504622.2022.2120186
- 30Kymlicka, W. (2003). Immigration, citizenship, multiculturalism: Exploring the links. The Political Quarterly, 74(s1), 195–208. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2003.00590.x
- 31Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. 10.1080/17524030903529749
- 32Leach, M. and Fairhead, J. (2002). Manners of contestation: “citizen science” and “indigenous knowledge” in West Africa and the Caribbean. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 299–311. 10.1111/1468-2451.00383
- 33Liebenberg, L., Lombard, M., Shermer, M., Xhukwe, U., Biesele, M., Carruthers, P., Kxao, O., Hansson, S.O., Langwane, H.K., and Elbroch, L. M. (2021). Tracking science: An alternative for those excluded by citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1). 10.5334/cstp.284
- 34Lin Hunter, D.E., Newman, G.J., and Balgopal, M.M. (2023). What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 21(5), 244–250. 10.1002/fee.2635
- 35Mahmoudi, D., Hawn, C.L., Henry, E.H., Perkins, D.J., Cooper, C.B., and Wilson, S.M. (2022). Mapping for whom? Communities of color and the citizen science gap. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 21(4), 372–388. 10.14288/acme.v21i4.2178
- 36Marini, M. and Banaji, M.R. (2022). An implicit gender sex-science association in the general population and STEM faculty. The Journal of General Psychology, 149(3), 299–326. 10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502
- 37Mathevet, R., Bousquet, F., Larrère, C., and Larrère, R. (2018). Environmental stewardship and ecological solidarity: Rethinking social-ecological interdependency and responsibility. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31, 605–623. 10.1007/s10806-018-9749-0
- 38McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<;6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
- 39Norgaard, K. and York, R. (2005). Gender Equality and State Environmentalism. Gender and Society, 19(4), 506–522. JSTOR. 10.1177/0891243204273612
- 40Pateman, R.M., Dyke, A., and West, S.E. (2021). The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 1–16. 10.5334/cstp.369
- 41Pearson, A.R., Schuldt, J. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Ballew, M.T., and Larson-Konar, D. (2018). Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49),
12429 . 10.1073/pnas.1804698115 - 42Phillips, T.B., Ballard, H.L., Lewenstein, B.V., and Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690. 10.1002/sce.21501
- 43Rosenberg, K.V., Dokter, A.M., Blancher, P.J., Sauer, J.R., Smith, A.C., Smith, P.A., Stanton, J.C., Panjabi, A., Helft, L., and Parr, M. (2019). Decline of the North American avifauna. Science, 366(6461), 120–124. 10.1126/science.aaw1313
- 44Ryan, R.L., Kaplan, R., and Grese, R.E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5), 629–648. 10.1080/09640560120079948
- 45Smith, D. C. (2001). Environmentalism, Feminism, and Gender. Sociological Inquiry, 71(3), 314–334. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01115.x
- 46Strasser, B.J., Tancoigne, E., Baudry, J., Piguet, S., Spiers, H., Luis-Fernandez Marquez, J., Kasparian, J., Grey, F., Anderson, D., and Lintott, C. (2023). Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science. PLOS ONE, 18(11),
e0293289 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0293289 - 47Thomson
Jr. , R.A., Salazar, E.S., and Ecklund, E.H. (2021). The very ivory tower: Pathways reproducing racial-ethnic stratification in US academic science. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44(7), 1250–1270. 10.1080/01419870.2020.1786144 - 48Vasiliades, M.A., Hadjichambis, A.C., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Adamou, A., and Georgiou, Y. (2021). A systematic literature review on the participation aspects of environmental and nature-based citizen science initiatives. Sustainability, 13(13),
7457 . 10.3390/su13137457 - 49Whyte, K.P. and Cuomo, C.J. (2016).
Ethics of caring in environmental ethics . In S. Gardiner and A. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics (pp. 234–247). Oxford University Press Oxford. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199941339.013.22 - 50Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., and Jackman, S. (2008). Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(8), 1–25. 10.18637/jss.v027.i08