References
- 1Allf, BC, Cooper, CB, Larson, LR, Dunn, RR, Futch, SE, Sharova, M and Cavalier, D. 2022. Citizen Science as an Ecosystem of Engagement: Implications for Learning and Broadening Participation. BioScience, 72(7): 651–663. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac035
- 2Aristeidou, M and Herodotou, C. 2020. Online Citizen Science: A Systematic Review of Effects on Learning and Scientific Literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.224
- 3Ballard, HL and Belsky, JM. 2010. Participatory action research and environmental learning: implications for resilient forests and communities. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6): 611–627. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2010.505440
- 4Bela, G, Peltola, T, Young, JC, Balázs, B, Arpin, I, Pataki, G, Hauck, J, Kelemen, E, Kopperoinen, L, Van Herzele, A, Keune, H, Hecker, S, Suškevičs, M, Roy, HE, Itkonen, P, Külvik, M, László, M, Basnou, C, Pino, J and Bonn, A. 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
- 5Bonney, R, Ballard, HL, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Phillips, TB, Shirk, JL and Wilderman, CC. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report.
- 6Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 2–16. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
- 7Borland, J. 2021. From Bird Cams to Scientific Inquiry: Seeking greater understanding of experiences and outcomes that result from co-created scientific investigations. Available at
https://www.informalscience.org/bird-cams-scientific-inquiry-seeking-greater-understanding-experiences-and-outcomes-result-co (Last accessed 30 September 2022). - 8Bruckermann, T, Greving, H, Stillfried, M, Schumann, A, Brandt, M and Harms, U, 2022. I’m fine with collecting data: Engagement profiles differ depending on scientific activities in an online community of a citizen science project. In: Fronzetti Colladon, A (ed.), PLOS ONE, 17(10):
e0275785 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275785 - 9Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- 10Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Phillips, T and Bonney, R. 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02197-120211
- 11Crall, AW, Jordan, R, Holfelder, K, Newman, GJ, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2012. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6): 745–764. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511434894
- 12Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 13Evans, C, Abrams, E, Reitsma, R, Roux, K, Salmonsen, L and Marra, PP. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 589–594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
- 14Fox, J and Monette, G. 1992. Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(417): 178–193. DOI: 10.2307/2290467
- 15Fox, J and Weisberg, S. 2019. An R companion to applied regression. Third edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
- 16Greving, H, Bruckermann, T, Schumann, A, Straka, TM, Lewanzik, D, Voigt-Heucke, SL, Marggraf, L, Lorenz, J, Brandt, M, Voigt, CC, Harms, U and Kimmerle, J. 2022. Improving attitudes and knowledge in a citizen science project about urban bat ecology. Ecology and Society, 27(2): 24. DOI: 10.5751/ES-13272-270224
- 17Haywood, BK. 2016. Beyond Data Points and Research Contributions: The Personal Meaning and Value Associated with Public Participation in Scientific Research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(3): 239–262. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659
- 18Haywood, BK and Besley, JC. 2014. Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1): 92–106. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513494560
- 19Hiller, SE and Kitsantas, A. 2014. The Effect of a Horseshoe Crab Citizen Science Program on Middle School Student Science Performance and STEM Career Motivation. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6): 302–311. DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12081
- 20Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3): 346–363. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810425
- 21Jakositz, S, Ghasemi, R, McGreavy, B, Wang, H, Greenwood, S and Mo, W. 2022. Tap-Water Lead Monitoring through Citizen Science: Influence of Socioeconomics and Participation on Environmental Literacy, Behavior, and Communication. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 148(10): 04022060. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0002055
- 22Jordan, RC, Gray, SA, Howe, DV, Brooks, WR and Ehrenfeld, JG. 2011. Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen-Science Programs. Conservation Biology, 25(6): 1148–1154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x
- 23Kolb, DA. 1984. Experiential Learning Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- 24Law, E, Williams, AC, Wiggins, A, Brier, J, Preece, J, Shirk, J and Newman, G. 2021. The Science of Citizen Science. DOI: 10.1145/3022198.3022652
- 25Lenth, RV. 2022. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.7.3.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans . - 26Lüdecke, D, Ben-Shachar, M, Patil, I, Waggoner, P and Makowski, D. 2021. performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60): 3139. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03139
- 27Lynch, LI, Dauer, JM, Babchuk, WA, Heng-Moss, T and Golick, D. 2018. In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach. Insects, 9(1): 16. DOI: 10.3390/insects9010016
- 28Masters, K, Lintott, C, Holmes, K, Greenhill, A, Simmons, B, Oh, EY, Cox, J and Graham, G. 2016. Science learning via participation in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3). DOI: 10.22323/2.15030207
- 29Newman, G, Wiggins, A, Crall, A, Graham, E, Newman, S and Crowston, K. 2012. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298–304. DOI: 10.1890/110294
- 30Peter, M, Diekötter, T, Höffler, T and Kremer, K. 2021a. Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. People and Nature, 3(2): 294–311. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10193
- 31Peter, M, Diekötter, T, Kremer, K and Höffler, T. 2021b. Citizen science project characteristics: Connection to participants’ gains in knowledge and skills. PLoS ONE, 16(7): 1–30. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253692
- 32Phillips, T, Porticella, N and Bonney, R. 2017. Skill for Science Inquiry Scale (Generic). Technical Brief Series. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. DOI: 10.17226/23595
- 33Phillips, T, Porticella, N, Constas, M and Bonney, R. 2018. A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2): 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
- 34Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3): 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
- 35Prather, EE, Cormier, S, Wallace, CS, Lintott, C, Jordan Raddick, M and Smith, A. 2013. Measuring the Conceptual Understandings of Citizen Scientists Participating in Zooniverse Projects: A First Approach. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1). DOI: 10.3847/AER2013002
- 36Price, CA and Lee, H-S. 2013. Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7): 773–801. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21090
- 37R Core Team. 2022.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.https://www.R-project.org/ . - 38Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- 39Smith, CE and Cribbie, R. 2014. Factorial ANOVA with unbalanced data: A fresh look at the types of sums of squares. Journal of Data Science, 12: 385–404. DOI: 10.6339/JDS.201407_12(3).0001
- 40Taber, KS. 2018. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6): 1273–1296. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
- 41Toomey, AH and Domroese, MC. 2013. Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Human Ecology Review, 20(1): 50-67.
- 42Wardropper, CB, Dayer, AA, Goebel, MS and Martin, VY. 2021. Conducting conservation social science surveys online. Conservation Biology, 35(5): 1650–1658. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13747
- 43Wickham, H. 2016.
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis . Springer-Verlag New York.https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org . DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4