Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sow Wild! Effective Methods and Identification Bias in Pollinator-Focused Experimental Citizen Science Cover

Sow Wild! Effective Methods and Identification Bias in Pollinator-Focused Experimental Citizen Science

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Aceves-Bueno, E, Adeleye, AS, Feraud, M, Huang, Y, Tao, M, Yang, Y and Anderson, SE. 2017. The Accuracy of Citizen Science Data: A Quantitative Review. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 98(4): 278290. DOI: 10.1002/bes2.1336
  2. 2Appenfeller, LR, Lloyd, S and Szendrei, Z. 2020. Citizen science improves our understanding of the impact of soil management on wild pollinator abundance in agroecosystems. PLOS ONE, 15(3): e0230007. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230007
  3. 3Austen, GE, Bindemann, M, Griffiths, RA and Roberts, DL. 2016. Species identification by experts and non-experts: Comparing images from field guides. Scientific Reports, 6: 33634. DOI: 10.1038/srep33634
  4. 4Bąkowski, M, Piekarska-Boniecka, H and Dolańska-Niedbała, E. 2013. Monitoring of the Red-Belted Clearwing Moth, Synanthedon myopaeformis, and its Parasitoid Liotryphon crassiseta in Apple Orchards in Yellow Moericke Traps. Journal of Insect Science, 13(4): 111. DOI: 10.1673/031.013.0401
  5. 5Birkin, L and Goulson, D. 2015. Using citizen science to monitor pollination services: Citizen science and pollination services. Ecological Entomology, 40: 311. DOI: 10.1111/een.12227
  6. 6Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  7. 7Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 216. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
  8. 8Breeze, TD, Bailey, AP, Balcombe, KG, Brereton, T, Comont, R, Edwards, M, Garratt, MP, Harvey, M, Hawes, C, Isaac, N, Jitlal, M, Jones, CM, Kunin, WE, Lee, P, Morris, RKA, Musgrove, A, O’Connor, RS, Peyton, J, Potts, SG, … Carvell, C. 2021. Pollinator monitoring more than pays for itself. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(1): 4457. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13755
  9. 9Buffington, ML, Garretson, A, Kula, RR, Gates, MW, Carpenter, R, Smith, DR and Kula, AAR. 2020. Pan trap color preference across Hymenoptera in a forest clearing. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, eea.13008. DOI: 10.1111/eea.13008
  10. 10Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Froehlich, HE, Schmidt, N, Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J and Parrish, JK. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
  11. 11Burgio, G and Sommaggio, D. 2007. Syrphids as landscape bioindicators in Italian agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120(2–4): 416422. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.10.021
  12. 12Chandler, M, See, L, Copas, K, Bonde, AMZ, López, BC, Danielsen, F, Legind, JK, Masinde, S, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Newman, G, Rosemartin, A and Turak, E. 2017. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213: 280294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
  13. 13Clare, JDJ, Townsend, PA, Anhalt-Depies, C, Locke, C, Stenglein, JL, Frett, S, Martin, KJ, Singh, A, Van Deelen, TR and Zuckerberg, B. 2019. Making inference with messy (citizen science) data: When are data accurate enough and how can they be improved? Ecological Applications, 29(2). DOI: 10.1002/eap.1849
  14. 14Cruickshanks, K, Lakeman Fraser, P, Dennis, E, Bulman, C, Burgess, S, Townsend, S, Evans, L and Jackson, M. 2018 Polli:Nation: 2016–2017 Survey Results. Accessed June 2022. Available at: https://www.opalexplorenature.org/polli-nation.
  15. 15Dennis, EB, Morgan, BJT, Brereton, TM, Roy, DB and Fox, R. 2017. Using citizen science butterfly counts to predict species population trends: Citizen Science Butterfly Trends. Conservation Biology, 31(6): 13501361. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12956
  16. 16Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
  17. 17Dickinson, JL, Zuckerberg, B and Bonter, DN. 2010. Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1): 149172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
  18. 18Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2016. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
  19. 19Droege, S, Tepedino, VJ, Lebuhn, G, Link, W, Minckley, RL, Chen, Q and Conrad, C. 2010. Spatial patterns of bee captures in North American bowl trapping surveys. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 3(1): 1523. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00074.x
  20. 20Falk, S, Foster, G, Comont, R, Conroy, J, Bostock, H, Salisbury, A, Kilbey, D, Bennett, J and Smith, B. 2019. Evaluating the ability of citizen scientists to identify bumblebee (Bombus) species. PLOS ONE, 14(6): e0218614. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218614
  21. 21Fraisl, D, Campbell, J, See, L, Wehn, U, Wardlaw, J, Gold, M, Moorthy, I, Arias, R, Piera, J, Oliver, JL, Masó, J, Penker, M and Fritz, S. 2020. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(6): 17351751. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
  22. 22Gardiner, MM, Allee, LL, Brown, PM, Losey, JE, Roy, HE and Smyth, RR. 2012. Lessons from lady beetles: Accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(9): 471476. DOI: 10.1890/110185
  23. 23Geroff, RK, Gibbs, J and McCravy, KW. 2014. Assessing bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity of an Illinois restored tallgrass prairie: methodology and conservation considerations. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(5): 951964. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-014-9703-z
  24. 24Griffiths-Lee, J, Nicholls, E and Goulson, D. 2020. Companion planting to attract pollinators increases the yield and quality of strawberry fruit in gardens and allotments. Ecological Entomology, 45(5): 10251034. DOI: 10.1111/een.12880
  25. 25Griffiths-Lee, J, Nicholls, E and Goulson, D. 2022. Sown mini-meadows increase pollinator diversity in gardens. Journal of Insect Conservation. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-022-00387-2
  26. 26Hall, AAG, Johnson, SN, Cook, JM and Riegler, M. 2019. High nymphal host density and mortality negatively impact parasitoid complex during an insect herbivore outbreak. Insect Science, 26(2): 351365. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12532
  27. 27Heneberg, P and Bogusch, P. 2014. To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera? Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(6): 11231136. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-014-9723-8
  28. 28Hutchinson, LA, Oliver, TH, Breeze, TD, Bailes, EJ, Brünjes, L, Campbell, AJ, Erhardt, A, … Garratt, MPD. 2021. Using ecological and field survey data to establish a national list of the wild bee pollinators of crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 315: 107447. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107447
  29. 29IPBES. 2016. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Potts, SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca, VL and Ngo, HT (eds), Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany. Accessed June 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3402856
  30. 30Klein, A-M, Vaissiere, BE, Cane, JH, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Cunningham, SA, Kremen, C and Tscharntke, T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608): 303313. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
  31. 31Kleinke, B, Prajzner, S, Gordon, C, Hoekstra, N, Kautz, A and Gardiner, M. 2018. Identifying Barriers to Citizen Scientist Retention When Measuring Pollination Services. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 2. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.99
  32. 32Krahner, A, Schmidt, J, Maixner, M, Porten, M and Schmitt, T. 2021. Evaluation of four different methods for assessing bee diversity as ecological indicators of agro-ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107573. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107573
  33. 33Kremen, C, Ullman, KS and Thorp, RW. 2011. Evaluating the Quality of Citizen-Scientist Data on Pollinator Communities: Citizen-Scientist Pollinator Monitoring. Conservation Biology, 25(3): 607617. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x
  34. 34Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(1): e0147152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
  35. 35Law, E, Gajos, KZ, Wiggins, A, Gray, ML and Williams, A. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Implications of Uncertainty. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 15441561. DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998197
  36. 36Leong, JoanM and Thorp, RW. 1999. Colour-coded sampling: The pan trap colour preferences of oligolectic and nonoligolectic bees associated with a vernal pool plant: Pan trap colour preferences of bees. Ecological Entomology, 24(3): 329335. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00196.x
  37. 37Lye, GC, Osborne, JL, Park, KJ and Goulson, D. 2012. Using citizen science to monitor Bombus populations in the UK: Nesting ecology and relative abundance in the urban environment. Journal of Insect Conservation, 16(5): 697707. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9450-3
  38. 38Maher, S, Manco, F and Ings, TC. 2019. Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground-nesting bees. Ecosphere, 10(10). DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2911
  39. 39Mason, L and Arathi, HS. 2019. Assessing the efficacy of citizen scientists monitoring native bees in urban areas. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17: e00561. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00561
  40. 40McCravy, K. 2018. A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems. Insects, 9(4): 170. DOI: 10.3390/insects9040170
  41. 41Merenlender, AM, Crall, AW, Drill, S, Prysby, M and Ballard, H. 2016. Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology, 30(6): 12551265. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12737
  42. 42OED. 2014. “citizen science”. Oxford English Dictionary.
  43. 43Ollerton, J, Winfree, R and Tarrant, S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 120(3): 321326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
  44. 44R core team. 2020. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
  45. 45Ratnieks, FLW, Schrell, F, Sheppard, RC, Brown, E, Bristow, OE and Garbuzov, M. 2016. Data reliability in citizen science: Learning curve and the effects of training method, volunteer background and experience on identification accuracy of insects visiting ivy flowers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(10): 12261235. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12581
  46. 46Roy, HE, Baxter, E, Saunders, A and Pocock, MJO. 2016. Focal Plant Observations as a Standardised Method for Pollinator Monitoring: Opportunities and Limitations for Mass Participation Citizen Science. PLOS ONE, 11(3): e0150794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150794
  47. 47Saunders, ME and Luck, GW. 2013. Pan trap catches of pollinator insects vary with habitat: Pan trap catches vary with habitat. Australian Journal of Entomology, 52(2): 106113. DOI: 10.1111/aen.12008
  48. 48Schuttler, SG, Sorensen, AE, Jordan, RC, Cooper, C and Shwartz, A. 2018. Bridging the nature gap: Can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(7): 405411. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1826
  49. 49Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Schmidt, NR, Froehlich, HE, Wagner, C, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J, Harsch, MA and Parrish, JK. 2015. Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
  50. 50Toler, TR, Evans, EW and Tepedino, VJ. 2005. Pan-trapping for bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in Utah’s West Desert: the importance of colour diversity. The pan-pacific entomologist, 81: 103113.
  51. 51Wallis, DR and Shaw, PW. 2008. Evaluation of coloured sticky traps for monitoring beneficial insects in apple orchards. New Zealand Plant Protection, 61: 328332. DOI: 10.30843/nzpp.2008.61.6811
  52. 52Westphal, C, Bommarco, R, Carré, G, Lamborn, E, Morison, N, Petanidou, T, Potts, SG, Roberts, SPM, Szentgyörgyi, H, Tscheulin, T, Vaissière, BE, Woyciechowski, M, Biesmeijer, JC, Kunin, WE, Settele, J and Steffan-Dewenter, I. 2008. Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecological Monographs, 78(4): 653671. DOI: 10.1890/07-1292.1
  53. 53Wilson, JS, Griswold, T and Messinger, OJ. 2008. Sampling bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in a desert landscape: are pan traps sufficient? Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 81(3): 288300. DOI: 10.2317/JKES-802.06.1
  54. 54Wilson, JS, Jahner, JP, Starley, L, Calvin, CL, Ikerd, H and Griswold, T. 2016. Sampling bee communities using pan traps: alternative methods increase sample size. Journal of Insect conservation. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-016-9914-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.550 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 6, 2023
Published on: Jun 1, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Janine Griffiths-Lee, Elizabeth Nicholls, Dave Goulson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.