Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Keep the Flow: Citizen Science as Agonistic Learning Cover

Keep the Flow: Citizen Science as Agonistic Learning

Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. 1Ayob, S and Omidire, MF. 2021. Storyboards as a qualitative method of exploring learners’ experience with the use of a multilingual support strategy. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20: 117. DOI: 10.1177/16094069211034391
  2. 2Balázs, B, Mooney, P, Nováková, E, Bastin, L and Arsanjani, J. 2021. Data Quality in Citizen Science. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_8
  3. 3Ballard, H. 2021. Community-driven science: evidence of and implications for equity, justice, science learning, and participation Editorial. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 58: 621624. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21690
  4. 4Bozelek, V, Gachago, D, Alexander, L, Watters, K, Wood, D, Ivala, E and Herrington, J. 2013. The use of emerging technologies for authentic learning: A South African study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4): 629638. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12046
  5. 5Crain, R, Cooper, C and Dickinson, JL. 2014. Citizen science: a tool for integrating studies of human and natural systems. Annual Revue of Environmental Resources, 39(1): 641665. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-030713-154609
  6. 6Eitzel, M, Cappadonna, JL, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, RE, Virapongse, A, West, SE, Kyba, CCM, Bowser, A, Cooper, CB, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, AN, Harris, ES, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shillinng, FM, Dorler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T and Davis, BY. 2017. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 120. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
  7. 7Ernst, A. 2019. Review of factors influencing social learning within participatory environmental governance. Ecology and Society, 24(1): 3. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10599-240103
  8. 8Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of justice. Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
  9. 9Gillis, A and Jackson, W. 2002. Research methods for nurses: methods and interpretation. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
  10. 10Goldin, J, Mokomela, R, Villholth, K and Kanyerere, T. 2021. Diamonds on the soles of their feet: groundwater monitoring in the Limpopo, South Africa. Journal for Education for Sustainable Development, 15(1): 2550. DOI: 10.1177/09734082211014435
  11. 11Haklay, M, Fraisl, D, Tzovaras, BG, Hecker, S, Gold, M, Hager, G, Ceccaroni, L, Kieslinger, B, When, U, Woods, S, Nold, C, Balázs, B, Mazzonetto, M, Ruefenacht, S, Shanley, LA, Wagenknecht, K, Motion, A, Sforzi, A, Riemenschneider, D, Dorler, D, Heigl, F, Schaefer, Lindner, A, Weißpflug, M, Mačiulienė, M and Vohland, K. 2021. Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. Royal Society: Open Science, 8. 202108. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202108
  12. 12Ingold, T. 2017. On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(1): 927. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12541
  13. 13Ingold, T. 2015. Life of Lines. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315727240
  14. 14Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Psychology Press.
  15. 15Jadallah, CC and Ballard, HL. 2021. Social learning in conservation and natural resource management: taking a sociocultural perspective. Ecology and Society, 26(4): 37. DOI: 10.5751/ES-12654-260437
  16. 16Klenk, N. 2018. From network to meshwork: Becoming attuned to difference in transdisciplinary environmental research encounters. Environmental Science and Policy, 89: 315321. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.007
  17. 17Klenk, N and Meehan, K. 2015. Climate change and transdisciplinary science: Problematizing the integration imperative. Environmental Science and Policy, 54: 160167. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017
  18. 18Koch, T, Selim, P and Kralik, D. 2002. Enhancing lives through the development of a community-based participatory action research programme. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11: 109117. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00563.x
  19. 19Mechlem, K. 2016. Groundwater governance: the role of legal frameworks at the local and national level–established practice and emerging trends. Water, 8: 347. DOI: 10.3390/w8080347
  20. 20Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London and New York: Verso.
  21. 21Oxman, N. 2016. Age of Entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. DOI: 10.21428/7e0583ad
  22. 22Pittaway, E and Bartolomei, L. 2012. Community consultations using reciprocal research methodologies. University of New South Wales.
  23. 23Reason, P and Bradbury, H. 2006. A handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. 24Ruttkay, V. 2020. Anatomy of tragedy: the skeptical gothic in Mary Shelley’s in Frankenstein. Palgrave Communications, 6(35). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0408-5
  25. 25Schellhammer, B. 2018. Dialogical Self as a Prerequisite for Intercultural Adult Education. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31(1): 621. DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2017.1298486
  26. 26Simeon, L, Tracie, M, Api, UK, Gane, B and Thomas, B. 2010. Successful models of youth leadership: A study of Papua New Guinea youth. Pacific Adventist University with Pacific Leadership Program.
  27. 27Suransky, C and Alma, H. 2018. An Agonistic Model of Dialogue. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31: 2238. DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2017.1298487
  28. 28Tronto, J. 2012. Partiality based on relational responsibilities: another approach to global ethics. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3): 303316. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704058
  29. 29Tronto, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
  30. 30Vadi, V. 2008. Sapere aude! Access to knowledge as a human right and a key instrument of development. International Journal of Communications Law & Policy, 12.
  31. 31Van Riper, AB. 2003. What the public thinks it knows about science: popular culture and its role in shaping the public’s perception of science and scientists. EMBO Rep, 4: 11041107. DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400040pmid:14647201
  32. 32Veiga, AK, Saraiva, AM, Chapman, AD, Morris, PJ, Gendreau, C, Schigel, D and Robertson, TJ. 2017. A conceptual framework for quality assessment and management of biodiversity data. PLoS One, 12(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178731
  33. 33Wehn, U, Ajates, R, Fraisl, D, Gharesifard, M, Gold, M, Hager, G, Oliver, JL, See, L, Shanley, LA, Ferri, M, Howitt, C, Monego, M, Pfeiffer, E and Wood, C. 2021. Capturing and communicating impact of citizen science for policy: A storytelling approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113082
  34. 34Wikstrom, A. 2013. Storyboarding: Framing and reframing opportunities in the front-front end of innovation. Dissertation, Malardalen University.
  35. 35Young, IM. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
  36. 36Zaelzer, C. 2020. The value n science-art partnerships for science education and science communication. ENEURO, 7(4). DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0238-20.2020
  37. 37Zemblyas, M. 2015. Pedagogy of discomfort and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics and Education, 10(2): 163174. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2015.1039274
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.515 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: May 9, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 25, 2022
Published on: Feb 7, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Jacqueline Goldin, Carolina Suransky, Thokozani Kanyerere, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.