References
- 1Alender, B. 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): A04. DOI: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 2Batson, CD, Ahmad, N and Tsang, JA. 2002. Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3): 429–445. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00269
- 3Beza, E, Steinke, J, Van Etten, J, Reidsma, P, Fadda, C, Mittra, S, Mathur, P and Kooistra, L. 2017. What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers. PloS One, 12(5):
e0175700 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175700 - 4Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 5Bonney, R, Shirk, JL, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Ballard, HL, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Parrish, JK. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- 6Borg, I and Lingoes, J. 2012. Multidimensional Similarity Structure Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4768-5
- 7Brislin, RW. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3): 185–216. DOI: 10.1177/135910457000100301
- 8Clary, EG and Snyder, M. 1999. The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5): 156–159. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037
- 9Colléony, A and Shwartz, A. 2020. When the winners are the losers: Invasive alien bird species outcompete the native winners in the biotic homogenization process. Biological Conservation, 241: 108314. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108314
- 10Curtis, V. 2015. Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: A study of Foldit. Science Communication, 37(6): 723–746. DOI: 10.1177/1075547015609322
- 11Davis, LF, Ramírez-Andreotta, MD and Buxner, SR. 2020. Engaging diverse citizen scientists for environmental health: Recommendations from participants and Promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 7. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.253
- 12Devictor, V, Whittaker, RJ and Beltrame, C. 2010. Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions, 16(3): 354–362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.x
- 13Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 14Frensley, T, Crall, A, Stern, M, Jordan, R, Gray, S, Prysby, M, Newman, G, Hmelo-Silver, C, Mellor, D and Huang, J. 2017. Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.84
- 15Follett, R and Strezov, V. 2015. An analysis of citizen science based research: usage and publication patterns. PloS One, 10(11):
e0143687 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143687 - 16Ganzevoort, W, van den Born, RJ, Halffman, W and Turnhout, S. 2017. Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
- 17Guiney, MS and Oberhauser, KS. 2009. Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology, 1(4): 187–197. DOI: 10.1089/eco.2009.0030
- 18Johnson, MF, Hannah, C, Acton, L, Popovici, R, Karanth, KK and Weinthal, E. 2014. Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environmental Change, 29: 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006
- 19Koss, RS, Miller, K, Wescott, G, Bellgrove, A, Boxshall, A, McBurnie, J, Bunce, A, Gilmour, P and Ierodiaconou, D. 2009. An evaluation of Sea Search as a citizen science programme in Marine Protected Areas. Pacific Conservation Biology, 15(2): 116–127. DOI: 10.1071/PC090116
- 20Land-Zandstra, AM, Devilee, JL, Snik, F, Buurmeijer, F and van den Broek, JM. 2016. Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 45–60. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515602406
- 21Land-Zandstra, AM, van Beusekom, M, Koppeschaar, C and van den Broek, J. 2016. Motivation and learning impact of Dutch flu-trackers. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1): A04. DOI: 10.22323/2.15010204
- 22Larson, LR, Cooper, CB, Futch, S, Singh, D, Shipley, NJ, Dale, K, LeBaron, GS and Takekawa, JY. 2020. The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242: 108428. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428
- 23Levontin, L and Bardi, A. 2018. Pro-social goals in achievement situations: Amity goal orientation enhances the positive effects of mastery goal orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 2736. DOI: 10.1177/0146167218765745
- 24Levontin, L and Bardi, A. 2019. Using personal values to understand the motivational basis of amity goal orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(8), 1258–1269. DOI: 10.1177/0146167218765745
- 25Levontin, L, Gilad, Z and Chako, S. 2018. The Citizen Science (CS) Motivation Scale [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from
https://cs-eu.net/news/questionare-motivation-citizen-science-scale . - 26Lotfian, M, Ingensand, J and Brovelli, MA. 2020. A framework for classifying participant motivation that considers the typology of citizen science projects. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12), p. 704. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9120704
- 27Maund, PR, Irvine, KN, Lawson, B, Steadman, J, Risely, K, Cunningham, AA and Davies, ZG. 2020. What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects. Biological Conservation, 246: 108587. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587
- 28Nov, O, Arazy, O and Anderson, D. 2011. Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. In: The AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). Barcelona, Spain on
July 2011 . - 29Nov, O, Arazy, O and Anderson, D. 2014. Scientists@ Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PloS One, 9(4):
e90375 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375 - 30Raddick, MJ, Bracey, G, Gay, PL, Lintott, CJ, Murray, P, Schawinski, K, Szalay, AS and Vandenberg, J. 2010. Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1). DOI: 10.3847/AER2009036
- 31Raddick, MJ, Bracey, G, Gay, PL, Lintott, CJ, Cardamone, C, Murray, P, Schawinski, K, Szalay, AS and Vandenberg, J. 2013. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1). DOI: 10.3847/AER2011021
- 32Reed, J, Raddick, MJ, Lardner, A and Carney, K. 2013. An exploratory factor analysis of motivations for participating in Zooniverse, a collection of virtual citizen science projects. In: The 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI on
January 2013 , pp. 610–619. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.85 - 33Richter, A, Comay, O, Svenningsen, CS, Larsen, JC, Hecker, S, Tøttrup, AP, Pe’er, G, Dunn, RR, Bonn, A and Marselle, M. 2021. Motivation and support services in citizen science insect monitoring: A cross-country study. Biological Conservation, 263: 109325. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109325
- 34Robinson, JA, Kocman, D, Speyer, O and Gerasopoulos, E. 2021. Meeting volunteer expectations—a review of volunteer motivations in citizen science and best practices for their retention through implementation of functional features in CS tools. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12), 2089–2113. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1853507
- 35Rotman, D, Hammock, J, Preece, J, Hansen, D, Boston, C, Bowser, A and He, Y. 2014. Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries. In: The iConference 2014 Proceedings, Berlin, Germany on
March 2014 , pp. 110–124. - 36Rotman, D, Preece, J, Hammock, J, Procita, K, Hansen, D, Parr, C, Lewis, D and Jacobs, D. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In: The ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Bellevue, WA on
February 2012 , pp. 217–226. DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145238 - 37Rutherford, AC, Bu, F, Dawson, A and McCall, V. 2019. Literature review to inform the development of Scotland’s Volunteering Outcomes Framework. University of Stirling report for the Scottish Government, April 2019. Available at
https://www.gov.scot/publications/literature-review-scotlandsvolunteeringoutcomes-framework/ . - 38Ryan, RM and Deci, EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1): 54–67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
- 39Sagiv, L, Roccas, S, Cieciuch, J and Schwartz, SH. 2017. Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(9): 630–639. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0185-3
- 40Schuttler, SG, Sorensen, AE, Jordan, RC, Cooper, C and Shwartz, A. 2018. Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(7): 405–411. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1826
- 41Schwartz, SH. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1): 1–65. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
- 42Schwartz, SH, Cieciuch, J, Vecchione, M, Davidov, E, Fischer, R, Beierlein, C, Ramos, A, Verkasalo, M, Lönnqvist, JE, Demirutku, K and Dirilen-Gumus, O. 2012. Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4): 663–688. DOI: 10.1037/a0029393
- 43Schwartz, SH, Cieciuch, J, Vecchione, M, Torres, C, Dirilen-Gumus, O and Butenko, T. 2017. Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 241–258. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2228
- 44Shye, S. 2010. The motivation to volunteer, a systemic quality of life theory. Social Indicators Research, 98: 183–200. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9545-3
- 45Tinati, R, Luczak-Roesch, M, Simperl, E and Hall, W. 2016. Because science is awesome: studying participation in a citizen science game. In: The 8th ACM Conference on Web Science, Hannover, Germany on
May 2016 , pp. 45–54. DOI: 10.1145/2908131.2908151 - 46Turbé, A, Barba, J, Pelacho, M, Mugdal, S, Robinson, LD, Serrano-Sanz, F, Sanz, F, Tsinaraki, C, Rubio, JM and Schade, S. 2019. Understanding the citizen science landscape for European environmental policy: an assessment and recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.239
- 47Wehn, U and Almomani, A. 2019. Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 101: 341–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002
- 48West, S, Pateman, R and Dyke, A. 2016.
Motivations and data submissions in citizen science . report for DEFRA (Project number PH0475). Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York. - 49West, S, Dyke, A and Pateman, R. 2021. Variations in the Motivations of Environmental Citizen Scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 14, 1–18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.370
- 50Wright, DR, Underhill, LG, Keene, M and Knight, AT. 2015. Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society & Natural Resources, 28(9): 1013–1029. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976