References
- Akkerman, SF and Bakker, A. 2011. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2): 132–169. DOI: 10.3102/0034654311404435
- Averett, N. 2015. Citizen volunteers pitch in on digitization backlog. BioScience, 65(6): 632–632. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv055
- Ballard, HL, Robinson, LD, Young, AN, Pauly, GB, Higgins, LM, Johnson, RF and Tweddle, JC. 2017. Contributions to conservation outcomes by natural history museum-led citizen science: Examining evidence and next steps. Biological Conservation, 208: 87–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.040
- Blagoderov, V, Kitching, I, Livermore, L, Simonsen, T and Smith, V. 2012. No specimen left behind: industrial scale digitization of natural history collections. ZooKeys, 209: 133–146. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.209.3178
- Bonney, R. 1996. Citizen science: A lab tradition. Living bird: for the study and conservation of birds, 15: 7–15.
- Causer, T and Wallace, V. 2012. Building a volunteer community: results and findings from Transcribe Bentham. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6(2).
- Derry, S, Pea, R, Barron, B, Engle, R, Erickson, F, Goldman, R, Hall, R, Koschmann, T, Lemke, J, Sherin, M and Sherin, B. 2010. Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1): 3–53. DOI: 10.1080/10508400903452884
- Du Bois, J. 2007.
The stance triangle . In: Englebretson, R (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse, Pragmatics & Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du - Eitzel, M, Cappadonna, J, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, R, Virapongse, A, West, S, Kyba, C, Bowser, A, Cooper, C, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, A, Harris, E, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shilling, F, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T, Davis, B and Jiang, Q. 2017. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
- Eleta, I, Clavell, G, Righi, V and Balestrini, M. 2019. The promise of participation and decision-making power in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 8. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.171
- Ellis, R and Waterton, C. 2004. Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and Public Policy, 31(2): 95–105. DOI: 10.3152/147154304781780055
- Ellis, R and Waterton, C. 2005. Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: The whereabouts of amateurs, professionals, and nature in knowing biodiversity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23: 673–693. DOI: 10.1068/d353t
- Ellwood, E, Dunckel, B, Flemons, P, Guralnick, R, Nelson, G, Newman, G, Newman, S, Paul, D, Riccardi, G, Rios, N, Seltmann, K and Mast, A. 2015. Accelerating the digitization of biodiversity research specimens through online public participation. BioScience, 65(4): 383–396. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv005
- Ellwood, E, Henry Bart, J, Doosey, M, Jue, D, Mann, J, Nelson, G, Rios, N and Mast, A. 2016. Mapping life – Quality assessment of novice vs. expert georeferencers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.30
- European Citizen Science Association. 2015. Ten principles of citizen science. London, United Kingdom: ECSA.
- Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219–245. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363
- Frensley, T, Crall, A, Stern, M, Jordan, R, Gray, S, Prysby, M, Newman, G, Hmelo-Silver, C, Mellor, D and Huang, J. 2017. Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.84
- Ganzevoort, W, van den Born, R, Halffman, W and Turnhout, S. 2017. Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26: 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
- Golumbic, Y, Orr, D, Baram-Tsabari, A and Fishbain, B. 2017. Between vision and reality: A study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 6. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.53
- Greeno, J and Engeström, Y. 2014.
Learning in activity . In: Sawyer, R (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 128–147. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.009 - Guba, E and Lincoln, Y. 1994.
Competing paradigms in qualitative research . In: Dezin, N and Lincoln, Y (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 105–117. - Hall, R and Stevens, R. 2015.
Interaction analysis: approaches to knowledge in use . In: diSessa, A, Levin, M and Brown, N (Eds.), Knowledge and Interaction: A Synthetic Agenda for the Learning Sciences. Routledge, pp. 72–108. DOI: 10.4324/9781315757360 - Hetland, P. 2011. Science 2.0: Bridging science and the public. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6: 326–340.
- Hetland, P. 2019. Constructing publics in museums’ science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 28(8): 958–972. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519870692
- Hetland, P. 2020.
The quest for reciprocity: Citizen science as a form of gift exchange . In: Hetland, P, Pierroux, P and Esborg, L (Eds.), A History of Participation in Museums and Archives. Routledge, pp. 257–277. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519870692 - Hill, A, Guralnick, R, Smith, A, Sallans, A, Gillespie, R, Denslow, M, Gross, J, Murrell, Z, Conyers, T, Oboyski, P, Ball, J, Thomer, A, Prys-Jones, R, de la Torre, J, Kociolek, P and Fortson, L. 2012. The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science. ZooKeys, 209: 219–233. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.209.3472
- Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development, Environment and society. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203202395
- Jackson, C, Osterlund, C, Mugar, G, Hassman, K and Crowston, K. 2015. Motivations for sustained participation in crowdsourcing: Case studies of citizen science on the role of talk. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
IEEE Computer Society , Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 1624–1634. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.196 - Jordan, B and Henderson, A. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1): 39–103. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
- Kasperowski, D and Hillman, T. 2018. The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects. Social Studies of Science, 48: 564–588. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718778806
- Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Lawrence, A, 2006. ‘No personal motive?’ Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place & Environment, 9: 279–298. DOI: 10.1080/13668790600893319
- Lendemer, J, Thiers, B, Monfils, A, Zaspel, J, Ellwood, E, Bentley, A, LeVan, K, Bates, J, Jennings, D, Contreras, D, Lagomarsino, L, Mabee, P, Ford, L, Guralnick, R, Gropp, R, Revelez, M, Cobb, N, Seltmann, K and Aime, M. 2020. The Extended Specimen Network: A strategy to enhance US biodiversity collections, promote research and education. BioScience, 70: 23–30. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biz140
- Liberatore, A, Bowkett, E, MacLeod, C, Spurr, E and Longnecker, N. 2018. Social media as a platform for a citizen science community of practice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3: 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.108
- Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: 10.1075/impact.3
- McAllum, K. 2018. Volunteers as Boundary Workers: Negotiating Tensions Between Volunteerism and Professionalism in Nonprofit Organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 32: 534–564. DOI: 10.1177/0893318918792094
- Merckx, J, Van Roie, M, Gómez-Zurita, J and Dekoninck, W. 2018. From theory to practice: A photographic inventory of museum collections to optimize collection management. Biodiversity Informatics, 13: 38–48. DOI: 10.17161/bi.v13i0.7036
- Mugar, G, Østerlund, C, Hassman, K.D, Crowston, K and Jackson, C. 2014. Planet Hunters and Seafloor Explorers: Legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science. Presented at the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014). DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531721
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25183
- National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. 2016. Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology. Oslo: The Norwegian National Committees for Research Ethics.
- Norsk Botanisk Forening. 2020. Om Oss [About Us], n.d. Available at:
https://botaniskforening.no/om-oss [Last accessed 12 December 2020]. - Phillips, T, Ballard, H, Lewenstein, B and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103: 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
- Phillips, T, Porticella, N, Constas, M and Bonney, R. 2018. A Framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3: 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
- Sforzi, A, Tweddle, J, Vogel, J, Lois, G, Wägele, W, Lakeman-Fraser, P, Makuch, Z and Vohland, K. 2018.
Citizen science and the role of natural history museums . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (Eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press, pp. 429–444. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.36 - Shirk, J, Ballard, H, Wilderman, C, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, B, Krasny, M and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2): 29. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- Star, S and Griesemer, J. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001
- Turnhout, E, Lawrence, A and Turnhout, S. 2016. Citizen science networks in natural history and the collective validation of biodiversity data. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 532–539. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12696
- Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
- Wertsch, J. 1994. The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1: 202–208. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174299.002
- Yin, R. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.