References
- 1Aguzzi, J, Doya, C, Tecchio, S, De Leo, FC, Azzurro, E, Costa, C, Sbragaglia, V, Del Rio, J, Navarro, J, Ruhl, HA, Company, JB, Favali, P, Purser, A, Thomsen, L, and Catalan, IA. 2015. Coastal observatories for monitoring of fish behaviour and their responses to environmental changes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 25: 463–483. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-015-9387-9
- 2Bies, MJ and Neal, JW. 2016. Comparison of pulsed gastric lavage and acrylic stomach tubes for sampling the diet of Butterfly Peacock Bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 145: 854–859. DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2016.1167778
- 3Carlson, AK, Fincel, MJ and Graeb, BD. 2016. Otolith microchemistry reveals natal origins of Walleyes in Missouri River reservoirs. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 36: 341–350. DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2015.1135214
- 4Chin, A. 2014. “Hunting porcupines”: citizen scientists contribute new knowledge about rare coral reef species. Pacific Conservation Biology, 20(1): 48–53. DOI: 10.1071/PC140048
- 5Clavero, M, Ninyerola, M, Hermoso, V, Filipe, AF, Pla, M, Villero, D, Brotons, L and Delibes, M. 2017. Historical citizen science to understand and predict climate-driven trout decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284(1846): 1–7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1979
- 6Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176: 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- 7Dembkowski, DJ, Isermann, DA and Koenigs, RP. 2017. Walleye age estimation using otoliths and dorsal spines: Preparation techniques and sampling guidelines based on sex and total length. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 8: 474–486. DOI: 10.3996/052017-JFWM-038
- 8Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10: 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 9Dillman, DA, Smyth, JD and Christian, LM. 2014.
Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method . New York: John Wiley & Sons. - 10Edgar, GJ, Stuart-Smith, RD, Cooper, A, Jacques, M and Valentine, J. 2017. New opportunites for conservation of handfishes (Family Brachionichthyidae) and other inconspicuous and threatened marine species through citizen science. Biological Conservation, 208: 174–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.028
- 11Eleta, I, Clavell, GG, Highi, V and Balestrini, M. 2019. The promise of participation and decision-making power in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 8, 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.171
- 12Etikan, I, Musa, SA and Alkassim, RS. 2015. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
- 13Fairclough, DV, Brown, JI, Carlish, BJ, Crisafulli, BM and Keay, IS. 2014. Breathing life into fisheries stock assessments with citizen science. Scientific Reports, 4: 7249. DOI: 10.1038/srep07249
- 14Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). 2019. Snook anglers asked to help with research. Accessed on 4-10-2019.
https://myfwc.com/research/saltwater/fish/snook/anglers-help/ . - 15Fritsches, KA, Partridge, JC, Pettigrew, JC and Marshall, JN. 2000. Colour vision in billfish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 355: 1253–1256. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0678
- 16Galbraith, M, Bollard-Breen, B and Towns, DR. 2016. The community-conservation conundrum: Is citizen science the answer? Land, 5(4): 37. DOI: 10.3390/land5040037
- 17Granek, EF, Madin, EMP, Brown, MA, Figueira, WF, Cameron, DS, Hogan, Z, Kristianson, G, de Villiers, P, Williams, JE, Post, JR, Zahn, S and Arlinghaus, R. 2008. Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: Global case studies. Conservation Biology, 22(5): 1125–1134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00977.x
- 18Gray, S, Shwom, R and Jordan, R. 2012. Understanding factors that influence stakeholder trust of natural resource science and institutions. Environmental Management, 49: 663–674. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7
- 19Heimstad, ES, Grønstøl, G, Hetland, KT, Alarcon, JM, Rylander, C and Mariussen, E. 2015. A survey of dioxin-like contaminants in fish from recreational fishing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187: 509. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4728-7
- 20Jentoft, S, McCay, BJ and Wilson, DC. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, 22: 423–436. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00040-7
- 21Jordan, R, Crall, A, Gray, S, Phillips, T and Mellor, D. 2015. Citizen science as a distinct field of inquiry. BioScience, 65: 208–211. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu217
- 22Koenigs, RP, Bruch, RM and Kamke, KK. 2013. Impacts of aging error on Walleye management in the Winnebago system. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 33: 900–908. DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2013.815667
- 23Kornis, MS, Webster, JL, Lane, AA, Pankow, KW, Mann, K, Cressman, SR and Bronte, CR. 2017. Recovery rates of stocked and wild Chinook salmon in Lake Michigan, 2011–2015. Report #2017-07, USFWS-Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, New Franken, WI.
- 24Kovačić, M and Svensen, R. 2018. The confirmed and continuous northern distribution of Thorogobius ephippiatus (Teleostei: Gobiidae) with the scientific use of recreational fishing data. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34: 691–693. DOI: 10.1111/jai.13584
- 25Klein, ZB, Bonvechio, TF, Bowen, BR and Quist, MC. 2017. Precision and accuracy of age estimates obtained from anal fin spines, dorsal fin spines, and sagittal otoliths for known-age Largemouth Bass. Southeastern Naturalist, 16: 225–234. DOI: 10.1656/058.016.0209
- 26Land-Zandstra, AM, van Beusekom, MM, Koppeschaar, CE and Van den Broek, JM. 2016. Motivation and learning impact of Dutch flu-trackers. Journal of Science Communication, 15: 1–26. DOI: 10.22323/2.15010204
- 27Lyons, J, Rypel, AL, Hansen, JF and Rowe, DC. 2017. Fillet weight and fillet yield: new metrics for the management of panfish and other consumption-oriented recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 37: 550–557. DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2017.1296514
- 28Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR). 2018.
2018 Minnesota fishing regulations . St. Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. - 29New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 2019. Request for assistance with Coho Salmon head collection. Accessed on 4-10-2019.
https://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/112942.html . - 30North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). 2019. Carcass collection program. Accessed on 4-10-2019.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/mf/carcass-collection . - 31Pew Research Center. 2019.
Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally . Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available:pewglobal.org/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally/ . (February 2019). - 32Post, DM. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology, 83(3): 703–718. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0703:USITET]2.0.CO;2
- 33South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR). 2019. Marine – Red Snapper carcass drop off program. Accessed on 4-10-2019.
http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/carcassdropoff.html . - 34Stevenson, DK and Campana, S. 1992.
Canadian special publication of fisheries and aquatic sciences: Otolith microstructure examination and analysis . Ottawa, Canada: Canada Communication Group. - 35Thorson, JT, Scheuerell, MD, Semmens, BX and Pattengill-Semmens, CV. 2014. Demographic modeling of citizen science data informs habitat preferences and population dynamics of recovering fishes. Ecology, 95(12): 3251–3258. DOI: 10.1890/13-2223.1
- 36Varian, A, Hendrickson, D, Olson, K and Piszczek, P. 2017. Access based creel survey of the open water and winter fishery 2015–2016 and walleye population estimate on the St. Louis River Estuary, St. Louis County, Minnesota and Douglas County, Wisconsin. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Completion Report, Job 998.
- 37Weltersbach, MS, Strehlow, HV, Ferter, K, Klefoth, T, de Graff, M and Dorow, M. 2018. Estimating and mitigating post-release mortality of European eel by combining citizen science with a catch-and-release angling experiment. Fisheries Research, 201: 98–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.01.010
- 38Westphal, LM, Longoni, M, LeBlanc, CL and Wali, A. 2008. Anglers’ appraisals of the risks of eating sport-caught fish from industrial areas: lessons from Chicago’s Calumet region. Research in Human Ecology, 15(1): 46–62.
- 39Williams, SM, Holmes, BJ and Pepperell, JG. 2015. The novel application of non-lethal citizen science tissue sampling in recreational fisheries. PloS ONE, 10(9):
e0135743 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135743 - 40Williams, JE, Rummel, S, Lemon, J, Barney, M, Smith, K, Fesenmyer, K and Schoen, J. 2016. Engaging a community of interest in water quality protection: Anglers monitoring wadeable streams. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71: 114A–119A. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.5.114A
- 41Zischke, MT, Farley, JH, Griffiths, SP and Tibbetts, IR. 2013. Reproductive biology of wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri, off eastern Australia. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 23: 491–506. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-013-9304-z