Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Marine Citizen Science: Recent Developments and Future Recommendations Cover

Marine Citizen Science: Recent Developments and Future Recommendations

Open Access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. Anderson, JA and Alford, AB. 2014. Ghost fishing activity in derelict blue crab traps in Louisiana. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 79(1–2): 261267. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.002
  2. Borg, Y, Grigonyte, AM, Boeing, P, Wolfenden, B, Smith, P, Beaufoy, W, Rose, S, Ratisai, T, Zaikin, A and Nesbeth, DN. 2016. Open source approaches to establishing Roseobacter clade bacteria as synthetic biology chassis for biogeoengineering. PeerJ, 4: e2031. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2031
  3. Ceccaroni, L, Bowser, A and Brenton, P. 2017. Civic education and citizen science: Definitions, categories, knowledge representation. In: Ceccaroni, L and Piera, J (eds.), Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research. IGI Global. pp. 123. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch001
  4. Cigliano, JA, Meyer, R, Ballard, HL, Freitag, A, Phillips, TB and Wasser, A. 2015. Making marine and coastal citizen science matter. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115: 7787. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.012
  5. Compas, ED and Wade, S. 2018. Testing the waters: a demonstration of a novel water quality mapping system for citizen science groups. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2): 111. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.124
  6. Dean, AJ, Church, EK, Loder, J, Fielding, KS and Wilson, KA. 2018. How do marine and coastal citizen science experiences foster environmental engagement? Journal of environmental management, 213: 409416. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.080
  7. Delaney, DG, Sperling, CD, Adams, CS and Leung, B. 2008. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10(1): 117128. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0
  8. Dickinson, JL, Zuckerberg, B and Bonter, DN. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 41: 149172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
  9. Follett, R and Strezov, V. 2015. An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS ONE, 10(11): 114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143687
  10. Freitag, A, Meyer, R and Whiteman, L. 2016. Strategies employed by citizen science programs to increase the credibility of their data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1): 2. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.6
  11. Gewert, B, Ogonowski, M, Barth, A and MacLeod, M. 2017. Abundance and composition of near surface microplastics and plastic debris in the Stockholm Archipelago, Baltic Sea. Marine pollution bulletin, 120(1–2): 292302. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.062
  12. Golumbic, YN, Orr, D, Baram-Tsabari, A and Fishbain, B. 2017. Between vision and reality: A study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 6. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.53
  13. Haklay, M. 2015. Citizen science and policy: a European perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2015.
  14. Hermoso, MI, Martin, V, Stotz, W, Gelcich, S and Thiel, M. 2019. How does the diversity of divers affect the design of citizen science projects? Frontiers in Marine Science, 6: 239. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00239
  15. Hesley, D, Burdeno, D, Drury, C, Schopmeyer, S and Lirman, D. 2017. Citizen science benefits coral reef restoration activities. Journal for Nature Conservation, 40: 9499. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.09.001
  16. Hidalgo-Ruz, V and Thiel, M. 2013. Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project. Marine environmental research, 87: 1218. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015
  17. Horne, R. 2013. Seeking sailors to help measure phytoplankton populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(18): 71077107. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1306732110
  18. Horoszowski-Fridman, YB, Brêthes, JC, Rahmani, N and Rinkevich, B. 2015. Marine silviculture: Incorporating ecosystem engineering properties into reef restoration acts. Ecological Engineering, 82: 201213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.104
  19. Hyder, K, Townhill, B, Anderson, LG, Delany, J and Pinnegar, JK. 2015. Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy? Marine policy, 59: 112120. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.022
  20. Jefferson, R, McKinley, E, Capstick, S, Fletcher, S, Griffin, H and Milanese, M. 2015. Understanding audiences: making public perceptions research matter to marine conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115: 6170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014
  21. Jones, BL, Unsworth, RK, McKenzie, LJ, Yoshida, RL and Cullen-Unsworth, LC. 2018. Crowdsourcing conservation: The role of citizen science in securing a future for seagrass. Marine pollution bulletin, 134: 210215. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.005
  22. Kelly, R, Fleming, A, Pecl, GT, Richter, A and Bonn, A. 2019. Social License through Citizen Science: A Tool for Marine Conservation. Ecology and Society, 24(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-10704-240116
  23. Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 551560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
  24. Lukyanenko, R, Parsons, J and Wiersma, YF. 2016. Emerging problems of data quality in citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 447449. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12706
  25. Malpica-Cruz, L, Chaves, LC and Côté, IM. 2016. Managing marine invasive species through public participation: Lionfish derbies as a case study. Marine Policy, 74: 158164. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.027
  26. Martin, V, Christidis, L, Lloyd, D and Pecl, G. 2016a. Understanding drivers, barriers and information sources for public participation in marine citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(2): A02. DOI: 10.22323/2.15020202
  27. Martin, V, Lloyd, D, Pecl, GT and Christidis, L. 2015. Deliberate design must include audience research: key considerations for marine citizen science projects in Australia. 2015 Australian Citizen Science Conference (p. 6).
  28. Martin, V, Smith, L, Bowling, A, Christidis, L, Lloyd, D and Pecl, G. 2016b. Citizens as scientists: what influences public contributions to marine research? Science Communication, 38(4): 495522. DOI: 10.1177/1075547016656191
  29. Martin, VY, Christidis, L and Pecl, GT. 2016c. Public interest in marine citizen science: is there potential for growth? BioScience, 66(8): 683692. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw070
  30. NOAA. 2018. Available at https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/exploration.html. [Last Accessed 1 March, 2019]
  31. Nursey-Bray, M, Palmer, R and Pecl, G. 2018. Spot, log, map: Assessing a marine virtual citizen science program against Reed’s best practice for stakeholder participation in environmental management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 151(1—9). DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.031
  32. Pocock, MJ, Chandler, M, Bonney, R, Thornhill, I, Albin, A, August, T, Bachman, S, Brown, PM, Cunha, DGF, Grez, A and Jackson, C. 2018. A vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science. Advances in Ecological Research, 59: 169223. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003
  33. R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  34. Roy, HE, Pocock, MJ, Preston, CD, Roy, DB, Savage, J, Tweddle, JC and Robinson, LD. 2012. Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. In Final report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum.
  35. Schläppy, ML, Loder, J, Salmond, J, Lea, A, Dean, AJ and Roelfsema, CM. 2017. Making waves: marine citizen science for impact. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4(146). DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00146
  36. Shamir, L, Yerby, C, Simpson, R, von Benda-Beckmann, AM, Tyack, P, Samarra, F, Miller, P and Wallin, J. 2014. Classification of large acoustic datasets using machine learning and crowdsourcing: Application to whale calls. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(2): 953962. DOI: 10.1121/1.4861348
  37. Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2): 29. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
  38. Silvertown, J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(9): 467471. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
  39. Thiel, M, Penna-Díaz, MA, Luna-Jorquera, G, Salas, S, Sellanes, J and Stotz, W. 2014. Citizen scientists and marine research: volunteer participants, their contributions, and projection for the future. In Hughes, RN, Hughes, DJ and Smith, IP (eds.), Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 52: pp. 257314. DOI: 10.1201/b17143
  40. Toh, TC, Ng, CSL, Loke, HX, Taira, D, Toh, KB, Afiq-Rosli, L, Du, RCP, Cabaitan, P, Sam, SQ, Kikuzawa, YP and Chou, LM. 2017. A cost-effective approach to enhance scleractinian diversity on artificial shorelines. Ecological engineering, 99: 349357. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.066
  41. United Nations. 2017. Factsheet: People and Oceans. In The Ocean Conference, New York, June 5–9, 2017.
  42. West, SE and Pateman, RM. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 15: 110. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
  43. Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.270 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2019
|
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2020
|
Published on: Nov 30, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Andrew Sandahl, Anders P. Tøttrup, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.