Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Planning and Executing Scientifically Sound Community Science in a Public-Facing Institution Cover

Planning and Executing Scientifically Sound Community Science in a Public-Facing Institution

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1Baker, AN, Miranda, AM, Garneau, NL and Hayes, JE. 2018. Self-reported smoking status, Tas2r38 variants, and propylthiouracil phenotype: an exploratory crowdsourced cohort study. Chemical Senses, 43: 617625. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjy053
  2. 2Boxer, EE and Garneau, NL. 2015. Rare haplotypes of the gene TAS2R38 confer bitter taste sensitivity in humans. SpringerPlus, 4: 505. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1277-z
  3. 3Bartoshuk, LM, Duffy, VB and Miller, IJ. 1994. PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior, 56(6): 11651171. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90361-1
  4. 4Burgess, B, et al. 2018. Effects of cd36 genotype on oral perception of oleic acid supplemented safflower oil emulsions in two ethnic groups: a preliminary study. Journal of Food Science. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14115
  5. 5Cattaneo, C, et al. 2019. New insights into the relationship between taste perception and oral microbiota composition. Scientific Reports, 2019 Mar 5; 9(1): 3549. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40374-3
  6. 6Cochran, C, Coughlin, B and Garneau, N. 2013. Health Sciences: a newcomer and a pioneer. In: Krell, FT (ed.), (Number 4, December 31, 2013). Denver Museum of Nature & Science Annals, 363382. Denver: Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
  7. 7Cochran, C, et al. 2013. Education: informal science learning for the public. In: Krell, FT (ed.), (Number 4, December 31, 2013). Denver Museum of Nature & Science Annals, 105136. Denver: Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
  8. 8Delwiche, JF, Buletic, Z and Breslin, PA. 2001. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiology & Behavior, 74: 329337. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00568-6
  9. 9Eldeghaidy, S, et al. 2018. An automated method to detect and quantify fungiform papillae in the human tongue: validation and relationship to phenotypical difference in taste perception. Physiology & Behavior, 184: 226234. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.003
  10. 10Feeney, EL and Hayes, JE. 2014. Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6. Physiology & Behavior, 128: 148154. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.013
  11. 11Fischer, ME, et al. 2013. Factors related to fungiform papillae density: a Beaver Dam offspring study. Chemical Senses, 2013 Oct; 38(8): 669677. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt033
  12. 12Fox, AL. 1932. The Relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 18: 115120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.18.1.115
  13. 13Garneau, NL, et al. 2014. Crowdsourcing taste research: genetic and phenotypic predictors of bitter taste perception as a model. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8(33). DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00033
  14. 14Golumbic, YN, Orr, D, Baram-Tsabari, A and Fishbain, B. 2017. Between vision and reality: a study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 6. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.53
  15. 15Hayes, JE, Bartoshuk, LM, Kidd, JR and Duffy, VB. 2008. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chemical Senses, 33: 255265. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm084
  16. 16Irwin, A. 2018. No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research. Nature, 562: 480482. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07106-5
  17. 17Kassem, HS, Girolami, F and Sanoudou, D. 2012. Molecular genetics made simple. Global Cardiology Science and Practice, 2012(1): 6. Published online 2012 Jul 4. DOI: 10.5339/gcsp.2012.6
  18. 18Kim, UK, Jorgenson, E, Coon, H, Leppert, M, Risch, N and Drayna, D. 2003. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science, 299: 12211225. DOI: 10.1126/science.1080190
  19. 19McNamara, P. 2012. Genetics of Taste: summative evaluation report. Unpublished manuscript, Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
  20. 20McNamara, P. 2017. More than a taste of citizen science: Front-end evaluation report. Unpublished manuscript, Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
  21. 21Miller, IJ, Jr and Reedy, FE, Jr. 1990. Quantification of fungiform papillae and taste pores in living human subjects. Chemical Senses, 15(3): 281294. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/15.3.281
  22. 22Miller-Rushing, A, Primack, R and Bonney, R. 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10: 285290. DOI: 10.1890/110278
  23. 23Nuessle, TM, et al. 2015. Denver papillae protocol for objective analysis of fungiform papillae. Journal of Visualized Experiments. DOI: 10.3791/52860
  24. 24Piochi, M, et al. 2017. Comparing manual counting to automated image analysis for the assessment of fungiform papillae density on human tongue. Chemical Senses, 42(7): 553561. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx035
  25. 25Reynolds, S, Burgess, ME, Hymowitz, N, Snyder, DJ and Lane, SJ. 2017. Fungiform papilla number and olfactory threshold assessment in males with and without barth syndrome. Chemical Perception, 10(60). DOI: 10.1007/s12078-017-9228-4
  26. 26Rubenstein, S. 2009. Across the land, people are fuming over an herb (no, not that one)-cilantro haters boo ‘fetid barb of green’; a prominent critic recants. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition, [online]. 13 Feb 2009. Available at: <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123446387388578461> 13 Feb 2009: A.1. [Accessed 06 February 2019].
  27. 27Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. 2016. 2016 citizen science updates, [online]. Available at <https://serc.si.edu/2016citizenscienceupdate> [Accesssed 6 July 2019].
  28. 28Spinelli, S, et al. 2017. Investigating preferred coffee consumption contexts using open-ended questions. Food Quality and Preference, 61: 6373. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.05.003
  29. 29Tucker, RM, Nuessle, TM, Garneau, NL, Smutzer, G and Mattes, RD. 2015. No difference in perceived intensity of linoleic acid in the oral cavity between obese and nonobese individuals. Chemical Senses, 17. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv040
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.263 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 9, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 27, 2019
Published on: Mar 9, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Tiffany M. Nuessle, Patricia A. McNamara, Nicole L. Garneau, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.