Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras Cover

Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1Ablah, E, Brown, J, Carroll, B and Bronleewe, T. 2016. A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach to Identifying Environmental Concerns. Journal of Environmental Health; Denver, 79(5): 1419.
  2. 2Allen, BL. 1998. Women Scientists and Feminist Methodologies in Louisiana’s Chemical Corridor. Michigan Feminist Studies, 13(1). DOI: 10.1080/08164649.1998.9994909
  3. 3Allen, BL. 2018. Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(6): 947971. DOI: 10.1177/0162243918758380
  4. 4Amrhein, V, Greenland, S and McShane, B. 2019. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748): 305. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
  5. 5Anderson, RT, Sorlie, P, Backlund, E, Johnson, N and Kaplan, GA. 1997. Mortality Effects of Community Socioeconomic Status. Epidemiology, 8(1): 4247. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00007
  6. 6Anon. 1970. Clean Air Act. 42.
  7. 7Armstrong, D, Gosling, A, Weinman, J and Marteau, T. 1997. The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study. Sociology, 31(3): 597606. DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031003015
  8. 8Averett, N. 2017. New Blood: The Promise of Environmental Health Citizen Science Projects. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(11). DOI: 10.1289/EHP2484
  9. 9Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4: 7181.
  10. 10Barzyk, TM, Huang, H, Williams, R, Kaufman, A and Essoka, J. 2018. Advice and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Citizen-Science Environmental Health Assessments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15050960
  11. 11Baum, F, MacDougall, C and Smith, D. 2006. Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(10): 854857. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662
  12. 12Beasley, TM and Schumacker, RE. 1995. Multiple Regression Approach to Analyzing Contingency Tables: Post Hoc and Planned Comparison Procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1): 7993. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797
  13. 13Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 216. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
  14. 14Brody, JG, Dunagan, SC, Morello-Frosch, R, Brown, P, Patton, S and Rudel, RA. 2014. Reporting individual results for biomonitoring and environmental exposures: lessons learned from environmental communication case studies. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 13(40). DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-40
  15. 15Brown, P. 1997. Popular Epidemiology Revisited. Current Sociology, 45(3): 137156. DOI: 10.1177/001139297045003008
  16. 16Bruyere, B and Rappe, S. 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 503516. DOI: 10.1080/09640560701402034
  17. 17Bullard, RD. 2008. Google-Books-ID: Wh9qiXueaL0C. Dumping In Dixie: Race, Class, And Environmental Quality, 3rd Ed. Westview Press.
  18. 18Cacari-Stone, L, Wallerstein, N, Garcia, AP and Minkler, M. 2014. The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9): 16151623. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961
  19. 19Carballo-Cárdenas, EC and Tobi, H. 2016. Citizen science regarding invasive lionfish in Dutch Caribbean MPAs: Drivers and barriers to participation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 133: 114127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.014
  20. 20Carr, AJL. 2004. Policy Reviews and Essays. Society & Natural Resources, 17(9): 841849. DOI: 10.1080/08941920490493846
  21. 21Carrera, JS, Brown, P, Brody, JG and Morello-Frosch, R. 2018. Research altruism as motivation for participation in community-centered environmental health research. Social Science & Medicine, 196: 175181. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.028
  22. 22Clary, EG and Snyder, M. 1999. The Motivations to Volunteer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5): 156159. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037
  23. 23Cole, LW and Foster, SR. 2000. From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. New York, UNITED STATES: New York University Press.
  24. 24Conforma Tech, Inc. 2014. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment: Los Reales Landfill Expansion Project. 35.
  25. 25Creswell, JW and Poth, CN. 2017. Google-Books-ID: DLbBDQAAQBAJ. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  26. 26Damian, RI, Su, R, Shanahan, M, Trautwein, U and Roberts, BW. 2015. Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3): 473489. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000024
  27. 27Davidson, J. 2018. Qualitative Research and Complex Teams. Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190648138.001.0001
  28. 28Davidson, J, Thompson, S and Harris, A. 2017. Qualitative Data Analysis Software Practices in Complex Research Teams: Troubling the Assumptions About Transparency and Portability. Qualitative Inquiry. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417731082
  29. 29Davis, LF, Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, McLain, JET, Kilungo, A, Abrell, L and Buxner, S. 2018. Increasing Environmental Health Literacy through Contextual Learning in Communities at Risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10): 2203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102203
  30. 30Deci, EL and Ryan, RM. 2008. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3): 182185. DOI: 10.1037/a0012801
  31. 31Deckers, L. 2018. Motivation: Biological, psychological, and environmental. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315178615
  32. 32Deitrick, LM, Paxton, HD, Rivera, A, Gertner, EJ, Biery, N, Letcher, AS, Lahoz, LM, Maldonado, E and Salas-Lopez, D. 2010. Understanding the Role of the Promotora in a Latino Diabetes Education Program. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3): 386399. DOI: 10.1177/1049732309354281
  33. 33Den Broeder, L, Devilee, J, Van Oers, H, Schuit, AJ and Wagemakers, A. 2018. Citizen Science for public health. Health Promotion International, 33(3): 505514. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw086
  34. 34Den Broeder, L, Lemmens, L, Uysal, S, Kauw, K, Weekenborg, J, Schönenberger, M, Klooster-Kwakkelstein, S, Schoenmakers, M, Scharwächter, W, Weerd, A, van de Baouchi, SE, Schuit, AJ and Wagemakers, A. 2017. Public Health Citizen Science; Perceived Impacts on Citizen Scientists: A Case Study in a Low-Income Neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.89
  35. 35Dhillon, CM. 2017. Using citizen science in environmental justice: participation and decision-making in a Southern California waste facility siting conflict. Local Environment, 22(12): 14791496. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1360263
  36. 36Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
  37. 37Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 4047. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
  38. 38English, PB, Richardson, MJ and Garzón-Galvis, C. 2018. From Crowdsourcing to Extreme Citizen Science: Participatory Research for Environmental Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1): 335350. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013702
  39. 39Evans, C, Abrams, E, Reitsma, R, Roux, K, Salmonsen, L and Marra, PP. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 589594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
  40. 40Foster, A and Dunham, IM. 2015. Volunteered geographic information, urban forests, & environmental justice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 53: 6575. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.08.001
  41. 41Frensley, T, Crall, A, Stern, M, Jordan, R, Gray, S, Prysby, M, Newman, G, Hmelo-Silver, C, Mellor, D and Huang, J. 2017. Bridging the Benefits of Online and Community Supported Citizen Science: A Case Study on Motivation and Retention with Conservation-Oriented Volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.84
  42. 42Gall, MD, Gall, JP and Borg, WR. 2007. Collecting Research Data with Questionnaires and Interviews. In: Educational Research: An Introduction, 8th ed. Pearson.
  43. 43García-Pérez, MA and Núñez-Antón, V. 2003. Cellwise Residual Analysis in Two-Way Contingency Tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5): 825839. DOI: 10.1177/0013164403251280
  44. 44Gee, GC and Payne-Sturges, DC. 2004. Environmental Health Disparities: A Framework Integrating Psychosocial and Environmental Concepts. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(17): 16451653. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7074
  45. 45Guest, G, Bunce, A and Johnson, L. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1): 5982. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
  46. 46Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, 105122. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
  47. 47Haklay, M. 2015. Citizen science and policy: A European perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
  48. 48Heaney, CD, Wilson, S, Wilson, O, Cooper, J, Bumpass, N and Snipes, M. 2011. Use of community-owned and -managed research to assess the vulnerability of water and sewer services in marginalized and underserved environmental justice communities. Journal of Environmental Health, 74(1): 8. DOI: 10.1289/isee.2011.00095
  49. 49Heaney, CD, Wilson, SM and Wilson, OR. 2007. The West End Revitalization Association’s Community-Owned and -Managed Research Model: Development, Implementation, and Action. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 1(4): 339349. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0037
  50. 50Hibbert, S, Piacentini, M and Dajani, HA. 2003. Understanding volunteer motivation for participation in a community-based food cooperative. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1): 3042. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.199
  51. 51Hobbs, SJ and White, PCL. 2012. Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20(6): 364373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002
  52. 52Hoover, E. 2016. ‘We’re not going to be guinea pigs;’ Citizen Science and Environmental Health in a Native American Community. Journal of Science Communication, 15(01). DOI: 10.22323/2.15010205
  53. 53Hunter, JB, de Zapien, JG, Papenfuss, M, Fernandez, ML, Meister, J and Giuliano, AR. 2004. The Impact of a Promotora on Increasing Routine Chronic Disease Prevention among Women Aged 40 and Older at the U.S.-Mexico Border. Health Education & Behavior, 31(4_suppl): 18S28S. DOI: 10.1177/1090198104266004
  54. 54Hurtado, S, Newman, CB, Tran, MC and Chang, MJ. 2010. Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148): 515. DOI: 10.1002/ir.357
  55. 55IBM. 2017. SPSS Statistics for Windows 25. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  56. 56Ingram, M, Sabo, S, Rothers, J, Wennerstrom, A and de Zapien, JG. 2008. Community Health Workers and Community Advocacy: Addressing Health Disparities. Journal of Community Health, 33(6): 417424. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-008-9111-y
  57. 57Israel, BA, Eng, E, Schulz, AJ and Parker, EA. 2012. Google-Books-ID: tPsB6SV20LoC. Methods for Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. John Wiley & Sons.
  58. 58Jackson, C, Østerlund, C, Crowston, K, Mugar, G and Hassman, KD. 2014. Motivations for sustained participation in citizen science: Case studies on the role of talk. In: 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 2014 Citeseer. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.196
  59. 59Jordan, RC, Ballard, HL and Phillips, TB. 2012. Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 307309. DOI: 10.1890/110280
  60. 60Kirk, R. 2007. Statistics: an introduction. Nelson Education. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-21274-9_1
  61. 61Krippendorff, K. 2004. Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3): 411433. DOI: 10.1093/hcr/30.3.411
  62. 62Land-Zandstra, AM, Devilee, JLA, Snik, F, Buurmeijer, F and van den Broek, JM. 2016. Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 4560. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515602406
  63. 63Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Google-Books-ID: CAVIOrW3vYAC. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  64. 64Lawson, MA and Lawson, HA. 2013. New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3): 432479. DOI: 10.3102/0034654313480891
  65. 65Liberatore, A, Bowkett, E, MacLeod, CJ, Spurr, E and Longnecker, N. 2018. Social Media as a Platform for a Citizen Science Community of Practice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.108
  66. 66Liboiron, M. 2019. The Power (Relations) of Citizen Science.
  67. 67Lichtveld, M, Kennedy, S, Krouse, RZ, Grimsley, F, El-Dahr, J, Bordelon, K, Sterling, Y, White, L, Barlow, N, DeGruy, S, Paul, D, Denham, S, Hayes, C, Sanders, M, Mvula, MM, Thornton, E, Chulada, P, Mitchell, H, Martin, WJ, Stephens, KU and Cohn, RD. 2016. From Design to Dissemination: Implementing Community-Based Participatory Research in Postdisaster Communities. American Journal of Public Health, 106(7): 12351242. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303169
  68. 68Long, JW, Ballard, HL, Fisher, LA and Belsky, JM. 2016. Questions That Won’t Go Away in Participatory Research. Society & Natural Resources, 29(2): 250263. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1024368
  69. 69Marin, G and Marín, BV. 1991. Hispanics: Who are they? In: Research with Hispanic Populations. Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park: United States of America, California, Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc. p. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985734
  70. 70Mason, M. 2010. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428
  71. 71May, ML, Bowman, GJ, Ramos, KS, Rincones, L, Rebollar, MG, Rosa, ML, Saldana, J, Sanchez, AP, Serna, T, Viega, N, Villegas, GS, Zamorano, MG and Ramos, IN. 2003. Embracing the local: enriching scientific research, education, and outreach on the Texas-Mexico border through a participatory action research partnership. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(13): 15711576. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5771
  72. 72Measham, TG and Barnett, GB. 2008. Environmental Volunteering: motivations, modes and outcomes. Australian Geographer, 39(4): 537552. DOI: 10.1080/00049180802419237
  73. 73Minkler, M, Garcia, AP, Williams, J, LoPresti, T and Lilly, J. 2010. Sí Se Puede: Using Participatory Research to Promote Environmental Justice in a Latino Community in San Diego, California. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5): 796812. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-010-9490-0
  74. 74Minkler, M, Vásquez, VB, Tajik, M and Petersen, D. 2008. Promoting Environmental Justice Through Community-Based Participatory Research: The Role of Community and Partnership Capacity. Health Education & Behavior, 35(1): 119137. DOI: 10.1177/1090198106287692
  75. 75Minkler, M and Wallerstein, N. 2011. Google-Books-ID: 1Wry09vE_HUC. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.
  76. 76Morello-Frosch, R, Zuk, M, Jerrett, M, Shamasunder, B and Kyle, AD. 2011. Understanding The Cumulative Impacts Of Inequalities In Environmental Health: Implications For Policy. Health Affairs; Chevy Chase, 30(5): 87987. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0153
  77. 77Mugar, G, Østerlund, C, Hassman, KD, Crowston, K and Jackson, CB. 2014. Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing – CSCW ’14, 109119. 2014 Baltimore, Maryland, USA: ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531721
  78. 78National Academies of Sciences, E. 2018. Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. DOI: 10.17226/25183
  79. 79National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2019. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering.
  80. 80Newman, G, Newman, S, Wiggins, A, Crall, A, Graham, E and Crowston, K. 2012. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298304. DOI: 10.1890/110294
  81. 81O’Fallon, LR and Dearry, A. 2002. Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(Suppl 2): 155159. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2155
  82. 82Ottinger, G. 2010. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2): 244270. DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337121
  83. 83Penner, LA. 2002. Dispositional and Organizational Influences on Sustained Volunteerism: An Interactionist Perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3): 447467. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00270
  84. 84Perovich, LJ, Ohayon, JL, Cousins, EM, Morello-Frosch, R, Brown, P, Adamkiewicz, G and Brody, JG. 2018. Reporting to parents on children’s exposures to asthma triggers in low-income and public housing, an interview-based case study of ethics, environmental literacy, individual action, and public health benefits. Environmental Health, 17(1): 48. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-018-0395-9
  85. 85Phillips, T, Minarchek, M, Porticella, N, Shirk, J, Wilderman, C, Ellenbogen, K and Bonney, R. 2014. DEVISE: Building evaluation capacity in PPSR and Informal Science Education. Cornell Lab of Ornithology: Ithaca, NY, USA.
  86. 86Phillips, TB. 2018. Motivation and Barriers in Environmentally Based Citizen Science: A Mixed Methods Comparative Case Study.
  87. 87Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3): 665690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
  88. 88Pocock, MJO, Tweddle, JC, Savage, J, Robinson, LD and Roy, HE. 2017. The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PloS One, 12(4): e0172579. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172579
  89. 89Raddick, MJ, Bracey, G, Gay, PL, Lintott, CJ, Cardamone, C, Murray, P, Schawinski, K, Szalay, AS and Vandenberg, J. 2013. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists. arXiv:1303.6886 [astro-ph, physics:physics].
  90. 90Rambonnet, L, Vink, SC, Land-Zandstra, AM and Bosker, T. 2019. Making citizen science count: Best practices and challenges of citizen science projects on plastics in aquatic environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 145: 271277. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.056
  91. 91Ramírez, DM, Ramírez-Andreotta, MD, Vea, L, Estrella-Sánchez, R, Wolf, AMA, Kilungo, A, Spitz, AH and Betterton, EA. 2015. Pollution Prevention through Peer Education: A Community Health Worker and Small and Home-Based Business Initiative on the Arizona-Sonora Border. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(9): 1120911226. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120911209
  92. 92Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brody, J, Lothrop, N, Loh, M, Beamer, P and Brown, P. 2016. Reporting back environmental exposure data and free choice learning. Environmental Health, 15(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0080-1
  93. 93Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Artiola, J, Maier, RM and Gandolfi, AJ. 2015. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. International Public Health Journal, 7(1).
  94. 94Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Artiola, JF, Maier, RM, Gandolfi, AJ, Caron, RM and Merrick, J. 2014. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study.
  95. 95Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Beamer, P and Maier, RM. 2013. Home gardening near a mining site in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona: Assessing arsenic exposure dose and risk via ingestion of home garden vegetables, soils, and water. Science of the Total Environment, 454–455: 373383. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.063
  96. 96Rodenbeck Sven, E and Maslia Morris, L. 1998. Groundwater Modeling and GIS to Determine Exposure to TCE at Tucson. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 2(2): 5361. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(1998)2:2(53)
  97. 97Rotman, D, Hammock, J, Preece, J, Hansen, DL, Boston, CL, Bowser, A and He, Y. 2014. Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries. In: 2014. DOI: 10.9776/14054
  98. 98Ryan, RL, Kaplan, R and Grese, RE. 2001. Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5): 629648. DOI: 10.1080/09640560120079948
  99. 99Sandhaus, S. 2017. Evaluating the Motivations, Knowledge, and Efficacy of Participants in Environmental Health Citizen Science Projects. The University of Arizona.
  100. 100Sandhaus, S, Kaufmann, D and Ramirez-Andreotta, M. 2018. Public participation, trust and data sharing: gardens as hubs for citizen science and environmental health literacy efforts. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(1): 5471. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2018.1542752
  101. 101Saunders, B, Sim, J, Kingstone, T, Baker, S, Waterfield, J, Bartlam, B, Burroughs, H and Jinks, C. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4): 18931907. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  102. 102Saxton, DI, Brown, P, Seguinot-Medina, S, Eckstein, L, Carpenter, DO, Miller, P and Waghiyi, V. 2015. Environmental health and justice and the right to research: institutional review board denials of community-based chemical biomonitoring of breast milk. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 14: 90. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0076-x
  103. 103Scammell, MK. 2010. Qualitative Environmental Health Research: An Analysis of the Literature, 1991–2008. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8): 11461154. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901762
  104. 104Scammell, MK, Senier, L, Darrah-Okike, J, Brown, P and Santos, S. 2009. Tangible evidence, trust and power: Public perceptions of community environmental health studies. Social Science & Medicine, 68(1): 143153. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.002
  105. 105Scott, DN. 2016. ‘We Are the Monitors Now’: Experiential Knowledge, Transcorporeality and Environmental Justice. Social & Legal Studies, 25(3): 261287. DOI: 10.1177/0964663915601166
  106. 106Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
  107. 107Soleri, D, Long, J, Ramirez-Andreotta, M, Eitemiller, R and Pandya, R. 2016. Finding Pathways to More Equitable and Meaningful Public-Scientist Partnerships. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.46
  108. 108Sorensen, AE, Jordan, R, Blaise, G, Brown, J, Campbell, L, Aronson, M and Johnson, M. 2018. Drivers of Public Participation in Urban Restoration Stewardship Programs: Linkages Between Environmental Identity and Knowledge, and Motivations. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 44: 266282.
  109. 109Sorensen, AE, Jordan, RC, LaDeau, SL, Biehler, D, Wilson, S, Pitas, J-H and Leisnham, PT. 2019. Reflecting on Efforts to Design an Inclusive Citizen Science Project in West Baltimore. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.170
  110. 110Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C. 2020. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. In: 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. p. DOI: 10.4135/9781483348858
  111. 111Tracy, SJ. 2010. Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10): 837851. DOI: 10.1177/1077800410383121
  112. 112Trumbull, DJ, Bonney, R, Bascom, D and Cabral, A. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84(2): 265275. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<;265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5
  113. 113Turner, D. 2010. Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3): 754760.
  114. 114U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1998. Health Consultation: Dioxin contaminated Aerial Spraying Landing Locations Kellner, Icehouse, and Sixshooter Canyons, 9.
  115. 115US EPA. 2018. Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Hayden and Miami Areas; Lead and Sulfur Dioxide Control Measures-Copper Smelters.
  116. 116Vousden, CL, Sapru, S and Johnson, JE. 2014. Communicating About Biomonitoring and the Results of a Community -Based Project: A Case Study on One State’s Experience. Journal of Environmental Health; Denver, 77(5): 2026.
  117. 117Wallerstein, N and Duran, B. 2010. Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1): S40S46. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036
  118. 118Walpole, M. 2003. Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1): 4573. DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044
  119. 119Wenger, E. 2011. Communities of practice: A brief introduction.
  120. 120West, S and Pateman, R. 2016. Recruiting and Retaining Participants in Citizen Science: What Can Be Learned from the Volunteering Literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
  121. 121Wilson, S, Campbell, D, Dalemarre, L, Fraser-Rahim, H and Williams, E. 2014. A Critical Review of an Authentic and Transformative Environmental Justice and Health Community — University Partnership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(12): 1281712834. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111212817
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.253 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: May 15, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2019
Published on: Mar 3, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Leona F. Davis, Mónica D. Ramírez-Andreotta, Sanlyn R. Buxner, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.