References
- 1Ballard, HL, Dixon, CGH and Harris, EM. 2017. Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208: 65–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
- 2Barcelo-Ordinas, JM, Garcia-Vidal, J, Doudou, M, Rodrigo-Muñoz, S and Cerezo-Llavero, A. 2018. Calibrating low-cost air quality sensors using multiple arrays of sensors. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 1–6. Barcelona. DOI: 10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377051
- 3Castell, N, Dauge, FR, Schneider, P, Vogt, M, Lerner, U, Fishbain, B, Broday, D and Bartonova, A. 2017. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environment International, 99: 293–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
- 4Castell, N, Schneider, P, Grossberndt, S, Fredriksen, MF, Sousa-Santos, G, Vogt, M and Bartonova, A 2018. Localized real-time information on outdoor air quality at kindergartens in Oslo, Norway using low-cost sensor nodes. Environmental Research, 165(December 2016): 410–419. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.019
- 5Castell, N, Viana, M, Minguillón, MC, Guerreiro, C and Querol, X. 2013. Real-world application of new sensor technologies for air quality monitoring. ETC/ACM Technical Paper, 16.
- 6Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 176(1–4): 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- 7Cornwell, ML and Campbell, LM. 2012. Co-producing conservation and knowledge: Citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42(1): 101–120. DOI: 10.1177/0306312711430440
- 8Danielsen, F, Burgess, ND and Balmford, A. 2005. Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0
- 9Duvall, RM, Long, RW, Beaver, MR, Kronmiller, KG, Wheeler, ML and Szykman, JJ. 2016. Performance evaluation and community application of low-cost sensors for ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Sensors, 16(10): 1698. DOI: 10.3390/s16101698
- 10EEA (European Environmental Agency). 2015. Air quality in Europe — 2015 report. Luxembourg, Europe.
- 11EEA (European Environmental Agency). 2018. Air quality in Europe — 2018 report. Luxembourg, Europe.
- 12Evans, C, Abrams, E, Reitsma, R, Roux, K, Salmonsen, L and Marra, P. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19: 589–594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
- 13Francis, L and Stockwell, H. 2014. Science in the City: Monitoring air quality in the Barbican. [online access at
https://mappingforchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Barbican-Final-Report-draft_12012015_edited.pdf ]. - 14Groulx, M, Brisbois, MC, Lemieux, CJ, Winegardner, A and Fishback, LA. 2017. A Role for Nature-Based Citizen Science in Promoting Individual and Collective Climate Change Action? A Systematic Review of Learning Outcomes. Science Communication, 39. DOI: 10.1177/1075547016688324
- 15Haklay, M and Eleta, I. 2019.
On the Front Line of Community-Led Air Quality Monitoring . In: Nieuwenhuijsen, M and Khreis, H (eds.), Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning, 563–580. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_27 - 16HEI (Health Effects Institute). 2018.
State of Global Air 2018: Special Report . Boston, MA. [online access athttps://www.stateofglobalair.org/sites/default/files/soga-2018-report.pdf ]. - 17Hsu, Y-C, Dille, P, Cross, J, Dias, B, Sargent, R and Nourbakhsh, I. 2017.
Community-Empowered Air Quality Monitoring System . In: CHI 2017. Denver, CO, USA. [online access athttp://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03293 ]. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025853 - 18Johnson, MF, Hannah, C, Acton, L, Popovici, R, Karanth, KK and Weinthal, E. 2014. Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environmental Change, 29: 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006
- 19Kloetzer, L, Jennett, C, Francis, L and Haklay, M. 2017.
Community Engagement Around Poor Air Quality in London: Citizen inquiry in a citizen science “Mapping for Change” project . In: Citizen Inquiry, 42–62. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315458618-4 - 20Kumar, P, Morawska, L, Martani, C, Biskos, G, Neophytou, M, Sabatino, S, Bell, M, Norford, L and Britter, R. 2015. The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environ. Int., 75: 199–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019
- 21Macdonell, M, Raymond, M, Wyker, D, Finster, M, Chang, YS, Raymond, T, Temple, B and Scofield, M. 2013. Research and Development Highlights: Mobile Sensors and Applications. Washington, DC.
- 22Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch (Qualitative Research: A Handbook), 468–475. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42
- 23McKinley, DC, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Ballard, HL, Bonney, R, Brown, H, Cook-Patton, S, et al. 2017. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208: 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
- 24Muller, CL, Chapman, L, Johnston, S, Kidd, C, Illingworth, S, Foody, G, Overeem, A and Leigh, RR. 2015. Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential. International Journal of Climatology, 35(11): 3185–3203. DOI: 10.1002/joc.4210
- 25Overdevest, C, Orr, CH, Stepenuck, K and Huyck Orr, C 2004. Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation. Human Ecology, 11(2): 177–185.
- 26Palmes, ED, Gunnison, AF, Di Mattio, J and Tomczyk, C. 1976. A Personal Sampler for Nitrogen Dioxide. Am Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J, 37: 570–577. DOI: 10.1080/0002889768507522
- 27Ripoll, A, Viana, M, Padrosa, M, Querol, X, Minutolo, A, Hou, KM, Barcelo-Ordinas, JM and García-Vidal, J. 2019. Testing the performance of sensors for ozone pollution monitoring in a citizen science approach. Science of the Total Environment, 651: 1166–1179. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.257
- 28Stepenuck, KF and Green, LT. 2015. Individual-and community-level impacts of volunteer environmental monitoring: a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature. Ecology and Society, 20(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-07329-200319
- 29Van Brussel, S and Huyse, H. 2018. Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 0568: 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1428183
- 30WHO (World Health Organization). 2016. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization. [online access
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250141/1/9789241511353-eng.pdf?ua=1 ] - 31Williams, R, Nash, D, Hagler, G, Benedict, K, Macgregor, IC, Seay, BA, Dye, T, et al. 2018. Peer Review and Supporting Literature Review of Air Sensor Technology Performance Targets. [online access
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-10/documents/peer_review_and_supporting_literature_review_of_air_sensor_technology_performance_targets.pdf] . - 32WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2018. Low-cost sensors for the measurement of atmospheric composition: overview of topic and future applications. Geneva, Switzerland.
- 33Zannella, C. 2017. Milano, cittadini 007 antismog: la mappa delle strade nere. Republica Milano, Maggio 2017 [online access:
https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2017/05/18/news/milano_cittadini_007_antismog_la_mappa_delle_strade_nere-165776489/?ref=search ]. - 34Zerbe, F and Wilderman, C. 2010. Monitoring Impacts of New Gas-Driling Technologies. The Volunteer Monitor, 21(1): 1–20.