References
- 1Altman, DG. 1995. Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14: 526. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.6.526
- 2Brabham, DC. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, 14: 75–90. DOI: 10.1177/1354856507084420
- 3Braun, KL, Nguyen, TT, Tanjasiri, SP, Campbell, J, Heiney, SP, Brandt, HM, Smith, SA, Blumenthal, DS, Hargreaves, M, Coe, K, Ma, GX, Kenerson, D, Patel, K, Tsark, J and Hébert, JR. 2012. Operationalization of Community-Based Participatory Research Principles: Assessment of the National Cancer Institute’s Community Network Programs. American Journal of Public Health, 102: 1195–1203. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304
- 4Cacari-Stone, L, Wallerstein, N, Garcia, AP and Minkler, M. 2014. The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy. American Journal of Public Health, 104: 1615–1623. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961
- 5Cascio, WE. 2018. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci Total Environ, 624: 586–595. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086
- 6Citizen Science Association. 2018. Available at
https://www.citizenscience.org/ [Last accessed 8 November 2019]. - 7Creswell, JW. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
- 8Crowston, K and Prestopnik, NR. 2013. Motivation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Game: A Design Science Evaluation. 450–459. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.413
- 9Durlak, JA, Taylor, RD, Kawashima, K, Pachan, MK, Dupre, EP, Celio, CI, Berger, SR, Dymnicki, AB and Weissberg, RP. 2007. Effects of positive youth development programs on school, family, and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39: 269–286. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9112-5
- 10Eisenhardt, KM and Graebner, ME. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50: 25–32. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
- 11European Citizen Science Association. 2018. Available at
https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/ [Last accessed 8 November 2019]. - 12Foster-Fishman, PG, Nowell, B and Yang, H. 2007. Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol, 39: 197–215. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9109-0
- 13Given, LM. 2008. The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9781412963909
- 14Goetz, JP and Lecompte, MD. 1984. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. Academic Press.
- 15Head, BW and Alford, J. 2013. Wicked Problems. Administration & Society, 47: 711–739. DOI: 10.1177/0095399713481601
- 16Horizon2020. 2018. Horizon 2020. Available at
https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020 [Last accessed 25 October 2018]. - 17Iacovides, I, Jennett, C, Cornish-Trestrail, C and Cox, AL. 2013. Do Games Attract or Sustain Engagement in Citizen Science? A Study of Volunteer Motivations. CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts. DOI: 10.1145/2468356.2468553
- 18Irwin, A. 2018. Citizen Science Comes of Age. Nature, 480. 25 October 2018. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07106-5
- 19Israel, BA, Schulz, A, Parker, E, Becker, A, Allen, A and Guzman, J. 2000.
Community-Based Participatory Research Principles . In: O’fallon, LR, Tyson, FL and Dearry, A (eds.), Rationale and Policy Recommendations, A Keynote Address at the Preliminary Meeting of Successful Models of Community–Based Participatory Research, Final Report, 29–31. Washington, DC: NIEHS. - 20Israel, BA, Schulz, AJ, Parker, EA and Becker, AB. 2008.
Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles . Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass. - 21Lincoln, YS and Guba, EG. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
- 22Loseke, D. 2017. Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315135601
- 23Miles, MB, Huberman, AM and Saldana, J. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage.
- 24Mirabelli, MC, Kunzli, N, Avol, E, Gilliland, FD, Gauderman, WJ, Mcconnell, R and Peters, JM. 2009. Respiratory symptoms following wildfire smoke exposure: airway size as a susceptibility factor. Epidemiology, 20: 451–9. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31819d128d
- 25Moran, D. 2002. Introduction to phenomenology. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203196632
- 26Morse, JM. 2015. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315588501
- 27Morse, JM, Barrett, M, Mayan, M, Olson, K and Spiers, J. 2002. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 1: 13–22. DOI: 10.1177/160940690200100202
- 28Morse, JM and Niehaus, L. 2009.
Principles and procedures of mixed methods design . Walnut Creek, CA: Left. - 29National Interagency Fire Center. 2018. Fire Statistics. Available at
https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html [Last accessed 14 November 2019]. - 30Nov, O, Arazy, O and Anderson, D. 2011. Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference,
ACM , 68–74. DOI: 10.1145/1940761.1940771 - 31Nowell, B and Albrecht, K. 2018. A reviewer’s guide to qualitative rigor. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muy052
- 32Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2015. Executive Office of the President. Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies.
- 33Palinkas, LA, Horwitz, SM, Green, CA, Wisdom, JP, Duan, N and Hoagwood, K. 2015. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42: 533–544. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
- 34Paperwork Reduction Act. 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act . United States. - 35Patton, MQ. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
- 36Patton, MQ. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation tools. 4th. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- 37Provan, KG and Milward, HB. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1–33. DOI: 10.2307/2393698
- 38Raddick, MJ, Bracey, G, Gay, PL, Lintott, CJ, Murray, P, Schawinski, K, Szalay, AS and Vandenberg, J. 2010. Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9. DOI: 10.3847/AER2009036
- 39Rappold, AG, Reyes, J, Pouliot, G, Cascio, WE and Diaz-Sanchez, D. 2017. Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure. Environ Sci Technol, 51: 6674–6682. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06200
- 40Rappold, AG, Stone, S, Cascio, WE, Neas, LM, Kilaru, VJ, Carraway, MS, Szykman, J, Ising, A, Cleve, WE, Meredith, JT, Vaughan-Batten, H, Deyneka, L and Devlin, RB. 2011. Peat Bog Wildfire Smoke Exposure in Rural North Carolina Is Associated with Cardiopulmonary Emergency Department Visits Assessed through Syndromic Surveillance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119: 1415–1510. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1003206
- 41Reed, J, Raddick, MJ, Lardner, A and Carney, K. 2013. An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Motivations for Participating in Zooniverse, a Collection of Virtual Citizen Science Projects. 610–619. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.85
- 42Reid, CE, Brauer, M, Johnston, FH, Jerrett, M, Balmes, JR and Elliott, CT. 2016a. Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure. Environ Health Perspect, 124: 1334–43. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409277
- 43Reid, CE, Jerrett, M, Tager, IB, Petersen, ML, Mann, JK and Balmes, JR. 2016b. Differential respiratory health effects from the 2008 northern California wildfires: A spatiotemporal approach. Environ Res, 150: 227–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.012
- 44Rittel, HWJ and Webber, MM. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155–169. DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
- 45Rotman, D, Preece, J, Hammock, J, Procita, K, Hansen, D, Parr, C, Lewis, D and Jacobs, D. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work,
ACM , 217–226. DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145238 - 46U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Environmental Protection Belongs to the Public, A Vision for Citizen Science at EPA. Available at
https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/nacept_cs_report_final_508_0.pdf [Last accessed 2019]. - 47U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Smoke Sense Study: A Citizen Science Project Using a Mobile App. Available at
www.epa.gov/air-research/smoke-sense-study-citizen-science-project-using-mobile-app [Last accessed 2019]. - 48Wettstein, ZS, Hoshiko, S, Fahimi, J, Harrison, RJ, Cascio, W and Rappold, AG. 2018. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergency department visits associated with wildfire smoke exposure in California in 2015. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007492
- 49Wiggins, A and Crowston, K. 2011. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,
IEEE , 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207