References
- 1 Albert, A and Haklay, M. 2018. Innovation Management Plan: ‘Making citizen science work’. Deliverable 6.6, Doing It Together Science Horizon 2020 project.
- 2 Bela, G, Peltola, T, Young, JC, Balázs, B, Arpin, I, Pataki, G, Hauck, J, Kelemen, E, Kopperoinen, L, Van Herzele, A, Keune, H, Hecker, S, Suškevičs, M, Roy, HE, Itkonen, P, Külvik, M, László, M, Basnou, C, Pino, J and Bonn, A. 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science: Lessons from the Study of Nature. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
-
3
Bio Intelligence Service.
2010.
Scoping report on Lay, local and traditional knowledge, Service contract 3403/B2009/EEA53737 for the for European Environment Agency on technical support for the Late Lessons project . Paris, France. -
4
Blaney,
RJP,
Pocock,
M and
Jones,
GD. 2016.
Citizen science and environmental monitoring: towards a methodology for evaluating opportunities, costs and benefits . Final report. London, UK: UK Environmental Observation Framework. - 5 Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Froehlich, HE, Schmidt, N, Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J and Parrish, JK. 2017. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208: 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
- 6 Burke, TA, Cascio, WE, Costa, DL, Deener, K, Fontaine, TD, Fulk, FA, Jackson, LE, Munns, WR, Orme-Zavaleta, J, Slimak, MW and Zartarian, VG. 2017. Rethinking Environmental Protection: Meeting the Challenges of a Changing World. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(3): A43–A49. DOI: 10.1289/EHP1465
- 7 Chandler, M, See, L, Copas, K, Bonde, AMZ, López, BC, Danielsen, F, Legind, JK, Masinde, S, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Newman, G, Rosemartin, A and Turak, E. 2017. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213: 280–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
- 8 Chantre, E, Guichard, L, Ballot, R, Jacquet, F, Jeuffroy, M-H, Prigent, C and Barzman, M. 2016. Co-click’eau, a participatory method for land-use scenarios in water catchments. Land Use Policy, 59: 260–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.001
- 9 Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4): 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- 10 Convention of the Biological Diversity. 2013. Quick guides to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Version 2.
-
11
Cooper,
CB,
Shirk,
J and
Zuckerberg,
B. 2014.
The Invisible Prevalence of Citizen Science in Global
Research: Migratory Birds and Climate Change. PLOS
ONE, 9(9):
e106508 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106508 -
12
Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science
Act. 2016 (15 USC 3724). Available at:
https://www.citizenscience.gov/about [Last accessed 9 September 2018]. - 13 Danielsen, F, Pirhofer-Walzl, K, Adrian, TP, Kapijimpanga, DR, Burgess, ND, Jensen, PM, Bonney, R, Funder, M, Landa, A, Levermann, N and Madsen, J. 2014. Linking Public Participation in Scientific Research to the Indicators and Needs of International Environmental Agreements: Monitoring environmental agreements. Conservation Letters, 7(1): 12–24. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12024
- 14 Donald, PF, Green, RE and Heath, MF. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 268(1462): 25–29. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
-
15
EU-Ares. 2016
1443186. Strategic plan 2016–2020, DG Environment; 7th Environment action programme to 2020 Decision No 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’ . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. -
16
EU-Communication.
2017.
COM (2017) 312 final. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Actions to Streamline Environmental Reporting. Brussels, 9 June 2017 . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. -
17
EU-Communication.
2017.
SWD (2017) 139 final: An Action Plan for nature, people and the economy . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. -
18
EU-Communication.
2018a.
COM (2018) 10 final: EU actions to improve environmental compliance and governance . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. -
19
EU-Communication.
2018b.
COM (2018) 395 final: EU Pollinators Initiative . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. -
20
Eurostat.
2019. Common bird index (EU
aggregate), 1990–2016.
Available at
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/t2020_rn130 [last accessed 18 February 2019]. -
21
EU-Water Framework Directive.
2000/60/EC.
Directive 2000/60/EC, of the European Parliament and of the Council. Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (in particular: Art. 14 “Public Information and consultation”) , 23 October 2000. ELI:http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. - 22 Fritz, S, Fonte, C and See, L. 2017. The Role of Citizen Science in Earth Observation. Remote Sensing, 9(4): 357. DOI: 10.3390/rs9040357
-
23
Hadj-Hammou,
J,
Loiselle,
S,
Ophof,
D and
Thornhill,
I. 2017.
Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of
citizen science and agency monitoring data. PLOS
ONE, 12(12):
e0188507 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188507 - 24 Haklay, M. 2015. Citizen science and policy: a European perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
- 25 Hecker, S, Bonney, R, Haklay, M, Hölker, F, Hofer, H, Goebel, C, Gold, M, Makuch, Z, Ponti, M, Richter, A, Robinson, L, Iglesias, JR, Owen, R, Peltola, T, Sforzi, A, Shirk, J, Vogel, J, Vohland, K, Witt, T and Bonn, A. 2018. Innovation in Citizen Science – Perspectives on Science-Policy Advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.114
- 26 Hyder, K, Townhill, B, Anderson, LG, Delany, J and Pinnegar, JK. 2015. Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy? Marine Policy, 59: 112–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.022
- 27 McKinley, DC, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Ballard, HL, Bonney, R, Brown, H, Cook-Patton, SC, Evans, DM, French, RA, Parrish, JK, Phillips, TB, Ryan, SF, Shanley, LA, Shirk, JL, Stepenuck, KF, Weltzin, JF, Wiggins, A, Boyle, OD, Briggs, RD, Chapin, SF, Hewitt, DA, Preuss, PW and Soukup, MA. 2017. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208: 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
-
28
Nascimento,
S, Rubio
Iglesias, JM,
Owen,
RP,
Schade,
S and
Shanley,
L. 2018.
Citizen science for policy formulation and implementation . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 219–240. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 29 Newman, G, Chandler, M, Clyde, M, McGreavy, B, Haklay, M, Ballard, H, Gray, S, Scarpino, R, Hauptfeld, R, Mellor, D and Gallo, J. 2017. Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biological Conservation, 208: 55–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019
-
30
Owen,
RP and
Parker,
AJ. 2018.
Citizen science in environmental protection agencies . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 284–300. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 31 Pocock, MJO, Chapman, DS, Sheppard, LJ and Roy, HE. 2014. Choosing and using citizen science: a guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
-
32
Pocock,
MJO,
Tweddle,
JC,
Savage,
J,
Robinson,
LD and
Roy,
HE. 2017.
The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental
citizen science. PLOS ONE,
12(4):
e0172579 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172579 -
33
Roy,
HE,
Pocock,
MJO,
Preston,
CD,
Roy,
DB,
Savage,
J,
Tweddle,
JC and
Robinson,
LD. 2012.
Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring . Final report. London, UK: UK Environmental Observation Framework. Available athttp://www.ukeof.org.uk/documents/understanding-citizen-science.pdf [Last accessed 6 September 2018]. -
34
Schade,
S,
Manzoni,
M,
Tsinaraki,
C,
Kotsev,
A,
Fullerton,
KT,
Sgnaolin,
R,
Spinelli,
F and
Mitton,
I. 2017. Using
new data sources for policymaking. EUR 28940 EN,
Luxembourg: Publications
Office of the European Union, ISBN
978-92-79-77078-4 , JRC109472. -
35
Schade,
S,
Tsinaraki,
C and European Commission
and Joint Research Centre. 2016.
Survey report: data management in citizen science projects ; EUR 27920 EN; Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. - 36 Snep, RPH, Wallis DeVries, M and Opdam, P. 2011. Conservation where people work: A role for business districts and industrial areas in enhancing endangered butterfly populations? Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(1): 94–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.002
-
37
Socientize.
2014.
Citizen science for Europe: towards a better society of empowered citizens and enhanced research . Green paper on citizen science for Europe. Zaragoza, Spain: European Commission. - 38 Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Schmidt, NR, Froehlich, HE, Wagner, C, Hille Ris Lambers, J, Tewksbury, J, Harsch, MA and Parrish, JK. 2015. Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
- 39 Turrini, T, Dörler, D, Richter, A, Heigl, F and Bonn, A. 2018. The threefold potential of environmental citizen science – Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225: 176–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
- 40 UNEA. 2017. Global vision statement. Nairobi, Kenya: Science-Policy Business Forum, 3rd UN Environmental Assembly.
- 41 Weichselgartner, J and Kasperson, R. 2010. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 20(2): 266–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
-
42
Williams,
J,
Chapman,
C,
Leibovici,
DG,
Loïs,
G,
Matheus,
A,
Oggioni,
A,
Schade,
S,
See,
L and
Lodewijk van Genuchten,
PP. 2018.
Maximising the impact and reuse of citizen science data . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 219–240. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339