Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Does Policy Conceptualise Citizen Science? A Qualitative Content Analysis of International Policy Documents Cover

How Does Policy Conceptualise Citizen Science? A Qualitative Content Analysis of International Policy Documents

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Volume 4 (2019): Issue 1
By: Susanne Hecker,  Nina Wicke,  Muki Haklay and  Aletta Bonn  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. 1Ballard, HL, Dixon, CGH and Harris, EM. 2017. Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208: 65–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
    Back to article
  2. 2Bauer, MW. 2016. Kritische Beobachtungen zur Geschichte der Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: Bonfadelli, H, et al. (eds.), Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, 17–40. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_2
    Back to article
  3. 3Bela, G, Peltola, T, Young, JC, Balázs, B, Arpin, I, Pataki, G, Hauck, J, Kelemen, E, Kopperoinen, L, Van Herzele, A, Keune, H, Hecker, S, Suškevičs, M, Roy, HE, Itkonen, P, Külvik, M, László, M, Basnou, C, Pino, J and Bonn, A. 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30: 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
    Back to article
  4. 4Blaney, R, Pocock, M and Jones, G. 2016. Citizen science and environmental monitoring: towards a methodology for evaluating opportunities, costs and benefits. Available at https://www.ceh.ac.uk/citizen-science-best-practice-guide [Last accessed 17 January 2019].
    Back to article
  5. 5BMBF. 2017. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany. Richtlinie zur Förderung von bürgerwissenschaftlichen Vorhaben (Citizen Science). In: Research, FMoEa (eds.), Bundesanzeiger vom 01.08.2016.
    Back to article
  6. 6Bonn, A, Richter, A, Vohland, K, Pettibone, L, Brandt, M, Feldmann, R, Goebel, C, Grefe, C, Hecker, S, Hennen, L, Hofer, H, Kiefer, S, Klotz, S, Kluttig, T, Krause, J, Küsel, K, Liedtke, C, Mahla, A, Neumeier, V, Premke-Kraus, M, Rillig, MC, Röller, O, Schäffler, L, Schmalzbauer, B, Schneidewind, U, Schumann, A, Settele, J, Tochtermann, K, Tockner, K, Vogel, J, Volkmann, W, von Unger, H, Walther, D, Weisskopf, M, Wirth, C, Witt, T, Wolst, D and Ziegler, D. 2016. Greenpaper Citizen Science Strategy 2020 for Germany. Available at https://www.buergerschaffenwissen.de/citizen-science/publikationen-ressourcen [Last accessed 27 November 2018].
    Back to article
  7. 7Bonney, R. 1996. Citizen science: A Lab tradition. Living Bird, 15(4): 7–15.
    Back to article
  8. 8Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. Bioscience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
    Back to article
  9. 9Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2015. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 2–16. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
    Back to article
  10. 10Brenton, P, von Gavel, S, Vogel, E and Marie-Elise Lecoq, M-E. 2018. Technology infrastructure for citizen science. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy (in press), 63–80. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.12
    Back to article
  11. 11Brossard, D and Lewenstein, BV. 2009. A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice to Inform Theory. In: Kahlor, L and Stout, P (eds.), Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication, 11–39. New York: Routledge.
    Back to article
  12. 12Business Dictionary. 2018. Policy. Available at http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/policy.html [Last accessed 15 January 2019].
    Back to article
  13. 13Cain, BE, Dalton, RJ and Scarrow, SE. 2006. Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  14. 14Cavalier, D and Kennedy, EB. 2016. The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
    Back to article
  15. 15Ceccaroni, L, Bowser, A and Brenton, P. 2017. Civic education and citizen science: Definitions, categories, knowledge representation. In: Ceccaroni, L and Piera, J (eds.), Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research, 1–23. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch001
    Back to article
  16. 16Chandler, M, See, L, Copas, K, Bonde, AM, López, BC, Danielsen, F, Legind, JK, Masinde, S, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Newman, G. 2017. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213: 280–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
    Back to article
  17. 17Chapman, C and Hodges, C. 2017. Can Citizen Science Seriously Contribute to Policy Development?: A Decision Maker’s View. In: Ceccaroni, L and Piera, J (eds.), Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research, 246–261. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch012
    Back to article
  18. 18Cooper, CB and Lewenstein, BV. 2016. Two meanings of citizen science. In: Cavalier, D and Kennedy, EB (eds.), The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, 51–62. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
    Back to article
  19. 19Crall, AW, Jordan, R, Holfelder, K, Newman, GJ, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2013. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6): 745–764. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511434894
    Back to article
  20. 20Cronje, R, Rohlinger, S, Crall, A and Newman, G. 2011. Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 10(3): 135–145. DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611
    Back to article
  21. 21Danielsen, F, Burgess, ND, Coronado, I, Enghoff, M, Holt, S, Jensen, PM, Poulsen, MK and Rueda, RM 2018. The value of indigenous and local knowledge as citizen science. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 110–123. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.15
    Back to article
  22. 22DITOs consortium. 2017. Citizen Science and Open Science: Synergies and Future Areas of Work, February 2018. Available at http://www.togetherscience.eu/about/deliverables/policy-brief-on-do-it-yourself-biotechnology [Last accessed 01 October 2018].
    Back to article
  23. 23Durant, JR. 1993. What is scientific literacy? In: Durant, JR and Gregory, J (eds.), Science and culture in Europe, 129–137. London: Science Museum.
    Back to article
  24. 24Durant, JR. 1999. Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5): 313–319. DOI: 10.3152/147154399781782329
    Back to article
  25. 25ECSA. 2015. ECSA Policy Paper #1: Endorsing the German Green Paper on Citizen Science. Available at https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/documents [Last accessed 29 January 2019].
    Back to article
  26. 26ECSA. 2016. ECSA Policy Paper #2: Endorsing the White Paper on Citizen Science for Europe. Available at https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/documents [Last accessed 29 January 2019].
    Back to article
  27. 27Eitzel, MV, Cappadonna, JL, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, RE, Virapongse, A, West, SE, Kyba, CCM, Bowser, A, Cooper, CB, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, AN, Harris, ES, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shilling, FM, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T, Davis, BY and Jiang, Q. 2017. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
    Back to article
  28. 28European Commission. 2013a. Commission Staff Working Document. EU Shared Environmental Information System Implementation Outlook. SWD (2013) 18 final. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/seis/pdf/seis_implementation_en.pdf [Last accessed 11 September 2019]
    Back to article
  29. 29European Commission. 2013b. Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology, Special Eurobarometer 401. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/yearFrom/1974/yearTo/2013/surveyKy/1096 [Last accessed 09 February 2018].
    Back to article
  30. 30Feldman, RE, Žemaitė, I and Miller-Rushing, AJ. 2018. How training citizen scientists affects the accuracy and precision of phenological data. International Journal of Biometeorology, 62(8): 1421–1435. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1540-4
    Back to article
  31. 31Fowler, A, Whyatt, JD, Davies, G and Ellis, R. 2013. How reliable are citizen-derived scientific data? Assessing the quality of contrail observations made by the general public. Transactions in GIS, 17(4): 488–506. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12034
    Back to article
  32. 32Freitag, A, Meyer, R and Whiteman, L. 2016. Strategies Employed by Citizen Science Programs to Increase the Credibility of Their Data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.6
    Back to article
  33. 33G7 Science Academies. 2019. Citizen science in the Internet era. Available at: https://rsc-src.ca/en/release-2019-statements-g7-science-academies [Last accessed 07 June 2019].
    Back to article
  34. 34Gibbons, M, Limoges, C, Nowotny, H, Trow, M, Scott, P and Schwartzman, S. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
    Back to article
  35. 35Göbel, C, Cappadonna, JL, Newman, GJ, Zhang, J and Vohland, K. 2017. More than just networking for citizen science: Examining core roles of practitioner organizations. In: Ceccaroni, L and Piera, J (eds.), Analyzing the role of citizen science in modern research, 24–49. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch002
    Back to article
  36. 36Gregory, J and Miller, S. 1998. Science in Public, Communication, Culture and Credibility. Cambridge: Perseus.
    Back to article
  37. 37Groom, Q, Weatherdon, L and Geijzendorffer, IR. 2016. Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2): 612–617. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12767
    Back to article
  38. 38Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information – overview and typology of participation. In: Sui, DZ, Elwood, S and Goodchild, MF (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, 105–122. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
    Back to article
  39. 39Haklay, M. 2015. Citizen Science and policy: A European perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
    Back to article
  40. 40Hecker, S, Bonney, R, Haklay, M, Hölker, F, Hofer, H, Goebel, C, Gold, M, Makuch, Z, Ponti, M, Richter, A, Robinson, L, Iglesias, JR, Owen, R, Peltola, T, Sforzi, A, Shirk, J, Vogel, J, Vohland, K, Witt, T and Bonn, A. 2018a. Innovation in Citizen Science – Perspectives on Science-Policy Advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.114
    Back to article
  41. 41Hecker, S, Garbe, L and Bonn, A. 2018b. The European citizen science landscape – a snapshot. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 190–200. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.20
    Back to article
  42. 42Heiss, R and Matthes, J. 2017. Citizen Science in the Social Sciences: A Call For More Evidence. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1): S.22–26. DOI: 10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
    Back to article
  43. 43Hollow, B, Roetman, PEJ, Walter, M and Daniels, CB. 2015. Citizen science for policy development: The case of koala management in South Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 47: 126–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.007
    Back to article
  44. 44Hyder, K, Townhill, B, Anderson, LG, Delany, J and Pinnegar, JK. 2015. Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy? Marine policy, 59: 112–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.022
    Back to article
  45. 45Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
    Back to article
  46. 46Irwin, A and Wynne, B. 1996. Misunderstanding Science: The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511563737
    Back to article
  47. 47Joint Research Centre. 2017. Citizen Science in EU Policies – Policy Brief.
    Back to article
  48. 48Jones, RA. 2014. Reflecting on Public Engagement and Science Policy. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1): 27–31. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513482614
    Back to article
  49. 49Kamp, J, Oppel, S, Heldbjerg, H, Nyegaard, T and Donald, PF. 2016. Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long-term population declines of common birds in Denmark. Diversity and Distributions, 22(10): 1024–1035. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12463
    Back to article
  50. 50Kelly, R, Fleming, A, Pecl, G, Richter, A and Bonn, A. 2019. Social license through citizen science: a tool for marine conservation. Ecology and Society, 24(1): 16. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10704-240116
    Back to article
  51. 51Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 551–560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
    Back to article
  52. 52Kukartz, U. 2016. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa.
    Back to article
  53. 53Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1): e0147152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
    Back to article
  54. 54Lukyanenko, R, Parsons, J and Wiersma, Y. 2016. Emerging problems of data quality in citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 447–449. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12706
    Back to article
  55. 55Mayring, P. 2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken, 12., Neuausgabe, 12., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Aufl. Weinheim: Beltz Pädagogik.
    Back to article
  56. 56Mazumdar, S, Ceccaroni, L, Piera, J, Hölker, F, Berre, AJ, Arlinghaus, R and Bowser, A. 2018. Citizen science technologies and new opportunities for participation. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy (in press), 303–320. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.28
    Back to article
  57. 57McKinley, DC, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Ballard, HL, Bonney, R, Brown, H, Cook-Patton, SC, Evans, DM, French, RA, Parrish, JK, Phillips, TB, Ryan, SF, Shanley, LA, Shirk, JL, Stepenuck, KF, Weltzin, JF, Wiggins, A, Boyle, OD, Briggs, RD, Chapin, SF, III, Hewitt, DA, Preuss, PW and Soukup, MA. 2017. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208: 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
    Back to article
  58. 58Miah, A. 2017. Nanoethics, Science Communication, And A Fourth Model For Public Engagement. NanoEthics, 11(2): 139–152. DOI: 10.1007/s11569-017-0302-9
    Back to article
  59. 59Mirowski, P. 2017. Is ‘grassroots’ citizen science a front for big business? Available from: https://aeon.co/essays/is-grassroots-citizen-science-a-front-for-big-business [Last accessed: 07 June 2018].
    Back to article
  60. 60Mirowski, P. 2018. The future (s) of open science. Social studies of science, 48(2): 171–203. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718772086
    Back to article
  61. 61Nascimento, S, Iglesias, JMR, Owen, R, Schade, S and Shanley, L. 2018. Citizen science for policy formulation and implementation. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 219–240. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.23
    Back to article
  62. 62National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    Back to article
  63. 63Norris, P. 2002. Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610073
    Back to article
  64. 64Peter, V, Maier, F, Mejlgaard, N, Bloch, C, Madsen, EB, Griessler, E, Wuketich, M, Meijer, I, Woolley, R, Lindner, R, Bührer, S, Jäger, A, Tsipouri, L and Stilgoe, J. 2018. Monitoring the evolution and benefits of responsible research and innovation. Brussels. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fdd7dd10-c071-11e8-9893-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-86068597 [Last accessed 07 June 2019].
    Back to article
  65. 65Pocock, MJO, Tweddle, JC, Savage, J, Robinson, LD and Roy, HE. 2017. The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PLoS ONE, 12(4): e0172579. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172579
    Back to article
  66. 66Richter, A, Dörler, D, Hecker, S, Heigl, F, Pettibone, L, Sanz, FS, Vohland, K and Bonn, A. 2018. Benefits from capacity building in citizen science: insights from strategic development programs in Europe. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 269–283. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.26
    Back to article
  67. 67Riesch, H and Potter, C. 2014. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public understanding of science, 23(1): 107–120. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513497324
    Back to article
  68. 68Rowe, G and Frewer, LJ. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science Technology & Human Values, 25: 3–29. DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500101
    Back to article
  69. 69Royal Society (Great Britain) and Bodmer, WF. 1985. The public understanding of science. Report of a Royal Society ad hoc group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. London: Royal Society.
    Back to article
  70. 70Schiele, B. 2008. On and about the deficit model in an age of free flow. In: Cheng, D, Claessens, M, Gascoigne, T, Metcalfe, J, Schiele, B and Shi, S (eds.), Communicating science in social contexts – New models, new practices, 91–117. Springer.
    Back to article
  71. 71Serrano Sanz, F, Holocher-Ertl, T, Kieslinger, B, Sanz García, F and Silva, CG. 2014. White paper on citizen science for Europe. Available at http://www.socientize.eu/?q=eu/content/download-socientize-white-paper [Last accessed 27 November 2018].
    Back to article
  72. 72Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2): 29. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
    Back to article
  73. 73Smallman, M. 2018. Citizen Science and Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Hecker, S, et al. (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 241–253. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.24
    Back to article
  74. 74Stilgoe, J, Lock, SJ and Wilsdon, J. 2014. Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1): 4–15. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513518154
    Back to article
  75. 75Strasser, BJ, Baudry, J, Mahr, D, Sanchez, G and Tancoigne, E. 2018. “Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science and Technology Studies. Available at: https://www.rri-tools.eu/-/-citizen-science-rethinking-science-and-public-participation. DOI: 10.23987/sts.60425
    Back to article
  76. 76US Congress. 2017. Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science Act. 15 USC §3724.
    Back to article
  77. 77van Deth, JW. 2009. Politische Partizipation. In: Kaina, V and Römmele, A (eds.), Politische Soziologie, 141–161. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-91422-0_6
    Back to article
  78. 78van Swaay, CAM, van Strien, AJ, Aghababyan, K, Åström, S, Botham, M, Brereton, T, Carlisle, B, Chambers, P, Collins, S, Dopagne, C, Escobés, R, Feldmann, R, Fernández-García, JM, Fontaine, B, Goloshchapova, S, Gracianteparaluceta, A, Harpke, A, Heliölä, J, Khanamirian, G, Komac, B, Kühn, E, Lang, A, Leopold, P, Maes, D, Mestdagh, X, Monasterio, Y, Munguira, ML, Murray, T, Musche, M, Õunap, E, Pettersson, LB, Piqueray, J, Popoff, S, Prokofev, I, Roth, T, Roy, DB, Schmucki, R, Settele, J, Stefanescu, C, Švitra, G, Teixeira, SM, Tiitsaar, A, Verovnik, R and Warren, MS. 2016. The European Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species 1990–2015. Report VS2016.019, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen. Available at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/511714/.
    Back to article
  79. 79Vantieghem, P, Maes, D, Kaiser, A and Merckx, T. 2016. Quality of citizen science data and its consequences for the conservation of skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae) in Flanders (northern Belgium). Journal of Insect Conservation, 21(3): 451–463. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-016-9924-4
    Back to article
  80. 80Walters, LC, Aydelotte, J and Miller, J. 2000. Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review. 60(4): 349–359. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00097
    Back to article
  81. 81Wiggins, A and Crowston, K. 2012. Goals and tasks: Two typologies of citizen science projects. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 04.01.2012 – 07.01.2012. Wailea, HI. 3426–3435. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.295
    Back to article
  82. 82Wiggins, A, Newman, G, Stevenson, RD and Crowston, K. 2011. Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science. In 2011 Seventh IEEE International Conference on e-Science Workshops, 14–19. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27
    Back to article
  83. 83Woodcock, J, Greenhill, A, Holmes, K, et al. 2017. Crowdsourcing citizen science: Exploring the tensions between paid professionals and users. Journal of Peer Production, 10.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.230 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 29, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2019
Published on: Dec 2, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
conceptualisation of citizen science,
international policy,
qualitative content analysis

© 2019 Susanne Hecker, Nina Wicke, Muki Haklay, Aletta Bonn, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 4 (2019): Issue 1Next article