Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Just-in-Time Training Improves Accuracy of Citizen Scientist Wildlife Identifications from Camera Trap Photos Cover

Just-in-Time Training Improves Accuracy of Citizen Scientist Wildlife Identifications from Camera Trap Photos

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1Ahrends, A, Rahbek, C, Bulling, MT, Burgess, ND, Platts, PJ, Lovett, JC, Kindemba, VW, Owen, N, Sallu, AN, Marshall, AR, Mhoro, BE, Fanning, E and Marchant, R. 2011. Conservation and the botanist effect. Biological Conservation, 144(1): 131140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.008
  2. 2Austen, GE, Bindemann, M, Griffiths, RA and Roberts, DL. 2016. Species identification by experts and non-experts: Comparing images from field guides. Scientific Reports, 6(August): 17. DOI: 10.1038/srep33634
  3. 3Bhattacharjee, Y. 2005. Citizen scientists supplement work of Cornell researchers, Science, 308(5727): 14021403. DOI: 10.1126/science.308.5727.1402
  4. 4Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  5. 5Bonney, R, Shirk, JL, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Ballard, HL, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Parrish, JK. 2014. Citizen science: Next steps for citizen science, Science, 343(6178): 14361437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
  6. 6Boudreau, S and Yan, N. 2004. Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based Invader, surveillance program for an aquatic Bythotrephes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 91: 1726. DOI: 10.1023/B:EMAS.0000009228.09204.b7
  7. 7Casanovas, P, Lynch, HJ and Fagan, WF. 2014. Using citizen science to estimate lichen diversity. Biological Conservation, 171: 18. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.020
  8. 8Crall, AW, Newman, GJ, Stohlgren, TJ, Holfelder, KA, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2011. Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conservation Letters, 4(6): 433442. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x
  9. 9Danielsen, F, Jensen, PM, Burgess, ND, Altamirano, R, Alviola, PA, Andrianandrasana, H, Brashares, JS, Burton, AC, Coronado, I, Corpuz, N, Enghoff, M, Fjeldså, J, Funder, M, Holt, S, Hübertz, H, Jensen, AE, Lewis, R, Massao, J, Mendoza, MM, Ngaga, Y, Pipper, CB, Poulsen, MK, Rueda, RM, Sam, MK, Skielboe, T, Sørensen, M and Young, R. 2014. A multicountry assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities. BioScience, 64(3): 236251. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu001
  10. 10Delaney, DG, Sperling, CD, Adams, CS and Leung, B. 2007. Marine invasive species: Validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10(1): 117128. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0
  11. 11Freitag, A and Pfeffer, MJ. 2013. Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science ‘success’. PLoS ONE, 8(5): 15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064079
  12. 12Fuccillo, KK, Crimmins, TM, de Rivera, CE and Elder, TS. 2015. Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. International Journal of Biometeorology, 59(7): 917926. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7
  13. 13Gardiner, MM, Allee, LL, Brown, PMJ, Losey, JE, Roy, HE and Smyth, RR. 2012. Lessons from lady beetles: Accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(9): 471476. DOI: 10.1890/110185
  14. 14Gollan, J, De Bruyn, LL, Reid, N and Wilkie, L. 2012. Can volunteers collect data that are comparable to professional scientists? A study of variables used in monitoring the outcomes of ecosystem rehabilitation. Environmental Management, 50(5): 969978. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9924-4
  15. 15Gooliaff, TJ and Hodges, KE. 2018. Measuring agreement among experts in classifying camera images of similar species. Ecology and Evolution, 8(22): 1100911021. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4567
  16. 16Harmsen, BJ, Foster, RJ, Sanchez, E, Gutierrez-González, CE, Silver, SC, Ostro, LET, Kelly, MJ, Kay, E and Quigley, H. 2017. Long term monitoring of jaguars in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize; Implications for camera trap studies of carnivores, Boyce, M.S. (ed.). PLOS ONE, 12(6): e0179505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179505
  17. 17Jiguet, F. 2009. Method learning caused a first-time observer effect in a newly started breeding bird survey. Bird Study, 56(2): 253258. DOI: 10.1080/00063650902791991
  18. 18Jones, MJ. 2001. Just-in-time training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 3(4): 480487. DOI: 10.1177/15234220122238409
  19. 19Kelling, S, Johnston, A, Hochachka, WM, Iliff, M, Fink, D, Gerbracht, J, Lagoze, C, La Sorte, FA, Moore, T, Wiggins, A, Wong, WK, Wood, C and Yu, J. 2015. Can observation skills of citizen scientists be estimated using species accumulation curves? PLoS ONE, 10(10): 120. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139600
  20. 20Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 551560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
  21. 21Newman, G, Crall, A, Laituri, M, Graham, J, Stohlgren, T, Moore, JC, Kodrich, K and Holfelder, KA. 2010. Teaching citizen science skills online: Implications for invasive species training programs. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 9(4): 276286. DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2010.530896
  22. 22Prysby, MD and Oberhauser, KS. 2004. Temporal and geographic variation in monarch densities: Citizen scientists document monarch population patterns. In: The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation, 920.
  23. 23Ratnieks, F, Schrell, F, Sheppard, R, Brown, E, Bristow, O and Garbuzov, M. 2016. Data reliability in citizen science: learning curve and the effects of training method, volunteer background and experience on identification accuracy of insects visiting ivy flowers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(10): 12261235. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12581
  24. 24Roy, HE, Baxter, E, Saunders, A and Pocock, MJO. 2016. Focal plant observations as a standardised method for pollinator monitoring: Opportunities and limitations for mass participation citizen science. PLoS ONE, 114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150794
  25. 25Sauer, JR, Link, WA, Fallon, JE, Pardieck, KL and Ziolkowski, DJ. 2013. The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary analysis and species accounts. North American Fauna, 79(79): 132. DOI: 10.3996/nafa.79.0001
  26. 26Silvertown, J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9): 467471. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
  27. 27Starr, J, Schweik, CM, Bush, N, Fletcher, L, Finn, J, Fish, J and Bargeron, CT. 2014. Lights, camera…citizen science: Assessing the effectiveness of smartphone-based video training in invasive plant identification. PLoS ONE, 9(11): e111433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111433
  28. 28Sullivan, BL, Aycrigg, JL, Barry, JH, Bonney, RE, Bruns, N, Cooper, CB, Damoulas, T, Dhondt, AA, Dietterich, T, Farnsworth, A, Fink, D, Fitzpatrick, JW, Fredericks, T, Gerbracht, J, Gomes, C, Hochachka, WM, Iliff, MJ, Lagoze, C, La Sorte, FA, Merrifield, M, Morris, W, Phillips, TB, Reynolds, M, Rodewald, AD, Rosenberg, KV, Trautmann, NM, Wiggins, A, Winkler, DW, Wong, W-K, Wood, CL, Yu, J and Kelling, S. 2014. The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169: 3140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
  29. 29Swanson, A, Kosmala, M, Lintott, C and Packer, C. 2016. A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 520531. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12695
  30. 30Thompson, AA and Mapstone, BD. 1997. Observer effects and training in underwater visual surveys of reef fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 154: 5363. DOI: 10.3354/meps154053
  31. 31van der Wal, R, Sharma, N, Mellish, C, Robinson, A and Siddharthan, A. 2016. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 550561. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12705
  32. 32von Ahn, L. 2009. Human computation. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference – DAC ’09, 418419. DOI: 10.1145/1629911.1630023
  33. 33White, RL, Sutton, AE, Salguero-Gómez, R, Bray, TC, Campbell, H, Cieraad, E, Geekiyanage, N, Gherardi, L, Hughes, AC, Jørgensen, PS, Poisot, T, DeSoto, L and Zimmerman, N. 2015. The next generation of action ecology: novel approaches towards global ecological research. Ecosphere, 6(8): art134. DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00485.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.219 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 12, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2019
Published on: Mar 4, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Roshni Katrak-Adefowora, Jessica L. Blickley, Amanda J. Zellmer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.