References
- 1ADHOC. 2012. The Report of Land and Housing Rights 2011. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
- 2Agrawal, A and Angelsen, A. 2009. Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options, 1: 201–212.
- 3Anonymous. 2004. Independent Forest Sector Review: The Forest Sector in Cambodia. Report to the Government of Cambodia.
- 4Argyriou, D, Lauridsen, N, Dyrmose, AM and Brofeldt, S. 2015a. The current status of Prey Lang. 1st Monitoring report with information from PLCN patrolling. On behalf of PLCN – Copenhagen University.
- 5Argyriou, D, Theilade, I and Graham, D. 2017. Prey Lang: The current status – 6th Monitoring report. On behalf of PLCN – Copenhagen University.
- 6Argyriou, D, Tistan, A, Theilade, I, Vogt, C, Turreira Garcia, N, Mitterhofer, P and Brofeldt, S. 2015b. The current status of Prey Lang. 3rd Monitoring report with information from PLCN patrolling. On behalf of PLCN – Copenhagen University.
- 7Becker, CD, Agreda, A, Astudillo, E, Costantino, M and Torres, P. 2005. Community-based monitoring of fog capture and biodiversity at Loma Alta, Ecuador enhance social capital and institutional cooperation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11): 2695–2707. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-8402-1
- 8Bellfield, H, Sabogal, D, Goodman, L and Leggett, M. 2015. Case study report: Community-based monitoring systems for REDD+ in Guyana. Forests, 6(1): 133–156. DOI: 10.3390/f6010133
- 9Berkes, F, Colding, J and Folke, C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological applications, 10(5): 1251–1262. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
- 10Brammer, JR, Brunet, ND, Burton, AC, Cuerrier, A, Danielsen, F, Dewan, K, Mulrennan, M, et al. 2016. The role of digital data entry in participatory environmental monitoring. Conservation Biology, 30(6): 1277–1287. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12727
- 11Brofeldt, S, Theilade, I, Burgess, ND, Danielsen, F, Poulsen, MK, Adrian, T, Kurniawan, Y, et al. 2014. Community monitoring of carbon stocks for REDD+: Does accuracy and cost change over time? Forests, 5(8): 1834–1854. DOI: 10.3390/f5081834
- 12Burton, AC. 2012. Critical evaluation of a long-term, locally-based wildlife monitoring program in West Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(12): 3079–3094. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0355-6
- 13Cáceres, R, Belding, E, Parikh, T and Subramanian, L. 2012. Information and communication technologies for development. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3: 12–14. DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2012.46
- 14Carter, J. 1996. Recent approaches to participatory forest resource assessment. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
- 15Chazdon, RL. 2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 320(5882): 1458–1460.
- 16Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 176(1): 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- 17Danielsen, F, Adrian, T, Brofeldt, S, van Noordwijk, M, Poulsen, MK, Rahayu, S, Budiman, A, et al. 2013a. Community monitoring for REDD+: International promises and field realities. Ecology and Society, 18(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-05464-180341
- 18Danielsen, F, Burgess, ND and Balmford, A. 2005. Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11): 2507–2542. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0
- 19Danielsen, F, Burgess, ND, Balmford, A, Donald, PF, Funder, M, Jones, JP, Child, B, et al. 2009. Local participation in natural resource monitoring: A characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology, 23(1): 31–42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x
- 20Danielsen, F, Mendoza, MM, Tagtag, A, Alviola, PA, Balete, DS, Jensen, AE, Poulsen, MK, et al. 2007. Increasing conservation management action by involving local people in natural resource monitoring. Ambio, 36(7): 566–570. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[566:ICMABI]2.0.CO;2
- 21Danielsen, F, Pirhofer-Walzl, K, Adrian, T, Kapijimpanga, D, Burgess, ND, Jensen, PM, Bonney, R, Madsen, J, et al. 2013b. Linking public participation in scientific research to the indicators and needs of international environmental agreements. Conservation Letters 7, 12–24. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12024
- 22Danielsen, F, Skutsch, M, Burgess, ND, Jensen, PM, Andrianandrasana, H, Karky, B, Phartiyal, P, et al. 2011. At the heart of REDD+: A role for local people in monitoring forests? Conservation letters, 4(2): 158–167. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00159.x
- 23Dhaka, BL and Chayal, K. 2010. Farmers’ experience with ICTs on transfer of technology in changing agri-rural environment. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 10(3): 114–118.
- 24Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Purcell, K, et al. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 25Ens, EJ. 2012. Monitoring outcomes of environmental service provision in low socio-economic indigenous Australia using innovative CyberTracker Technology. Conservation and Society, 10(1): 42. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.92194
- 26Fernandez-Gimenez, M, Ballard, H and Sturtevant, V. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02400-130204
- 27Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Díaz-Reviriego, I, Guèze, M, Cabeza, M, Pyhälä, A and Reyes-García, V. 2016. Local perceptions as a guide for the sustainable management of natural resources: Empirical evidence from a small-scale society in Bolivian Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 21(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-08092-210102
- 28Folke, C, Carpenter, S, Walker, B, Scheffer, M, Elmqvist, T, Gunderson, L and Holling, CS. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
- 29Galtung, J. 1985. Twenty-five years of peace research: Ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research, 22(2): 141–158. DOI: 10.1177/002234338502200205
- 30Global Witness. 2009. Cambodia: Country for sale. How Cambodia’s elite has captured the country’s extractive industries. A report by Global Witness, February 2009.
www.globalwitness.org/en/reports/country-sale/ - 31Gray, M and Kalpers, J. 2005. Ranger based monitoring in the Virunga–Bwindi region of East-Central Africa: A simple data collection tool for park management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11): 2723–2741. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-8406-x
- 32Hansen, MC, Potapov, PV, Moore, R, Hancher, M, Turubanova, S, Tyukavina, A, Kommareddy, A, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160): 850–853. DOI: 10.1126/science.1244693
- 33Hayes, B, Khou, E, Thy, N, Furey, N, Sophea, C, Holden, J, Seiha, H, Sarith, P, Pengly, L and Simpson, V. 2015. Biodiversity Assessment of Prey Lang – Kratie, Kampong Thom, Stung Treng and Preah Vihear Provinces. USAID, Winrock International and Conservation International.
- 34HRC—Human Rights Council. 2012. Report of the Special Sapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Cambodia: A Human Rights Analysis of Economic and Other Land Concessions in Cambodia.
www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-63-Add1_en.pdf [accessed 1 August 2017]. - 35Jiao, X, Smith-Hall, C and Theilade, I. 2015. Rural household incomes and land grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 48, 317–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.008
- 36Kalusopa, T. 2005. The challenges of utilizing information communication technologies (ICTs) for the small-scale farmers in Zambia. Library Hi Tech, 23(3): 414–424. DOI: 10.1108/07378830510621810
- 37Kim, SY. 2014. Democratizing mobile technology in support of volunteer activities in data collection. Ph.D. Thesis. Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- 38Larrazábal, A, McCall, MK, Mwampamba, TH and Skutsch, M. 2012. The role of community carbon monitoring for REDD+: A review of experiences. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 4(6): 707–716. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.008
- 39Lewis, J and Nkuintchua, T. 2012. Accessible technologies and FPIC: Independent monitoring with forest communities in Cameroon. Participatory Learning and Action, 65(13): 151–165.
- 40Lindenmayer, DB and Likens, GE. 2009. Adaptive monitoring: A new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 482–486. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005
- 41Mahanty, S, Suich, H and Tacconi, L. 2013. Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes. Land Use Policy, 31, 38–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.009
- 42Milne, S. 2015. Cambodia’s unofficial regime of extraction: Illicit logging in the shadow of transnational governance and investment. Critical Asian Studies, 47(2): 200–228. DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2015.1041275
- 43Mittermeier, RA, Myers, N, Gil, PR and Mittermeier, CG. 1999. Hotspots: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Conservation International, Washington DC, USA and CEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico.
- 44Peter, Z and Pheap, A. 2015.
(Un)protected areas . Cambodia Daily, August 1, 2015.www.cambodiadaily.com/unprotectedareas/ [accessed 1 August 2017] and donor ad hoc working group, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. - 45Pham, TT, Moeliono, M, Brockhaus, M, Le, DN, Wong, GY and Le, TM. 2014. Local preferences and strategies for effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of PES revenues in Vietnam: Lessons for REDD+. Human Ecology, 42(6): 885–899. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-014-9703-3
- 46Shah, P, Gandhi, N and Armstrong, L. 2014.
Mobile Applications for Indian Agriculture Sector: A case study . - 47Shirk, J, Ballard, H, Wilderman, C, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, Bonney, R, et al. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- 48Skutsch, M. (ed.) 2011. Community Forest Monitoring for the Carbon Market. Earthscan, London.
- 49Somanathan, E, Prabhakar, R and Mehta, BS. 2009. Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11): 4143–4147. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810049106
- 50Stevens, M, Vitos, M, Altenbuchner, J, Conquest, G, Lewis, J and Haklay, M. 2014. Taking participatory citizen science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2): 20–29. DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2014.37
- 51Theilade, I and de Kok, R. 2015. Editorial — The status of botanical exploration and plant conservation in Cambodia. Cambodian Journal of Natural History, 2: 117–120.
- 52Thompson, OR, Paavola, J, Healey, JR, Jones, JPG, Baker, TR and Torres, J. 2013. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Transaction costs of six Peruvian projects. Ecology and Society, 18: 17. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05239-180117
- 53Vergara-Asenjo, G, Sharma, D and Potvin, C. 2015. Engaging stakeholders: Assessing accuracy of participatory mapping of land cover in Panama. Conservation Letters, 8(6): 432–439. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12161
- 54Whitelaw, G, Vaughan, H, Craig, B and Atkinson, D. 2003. Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 88(1): 409–418. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025545813057
- 55Zhao, M, Brofeldt, S, Li, Q, Xu, J, Danielsen, F, Læssøe, SBL, Theilade, I, et al. 2016. Can Community Members Identify Tropical Tree Species for REDD+ Carbon and Biodiversity Measurements? PloS one, 11(11):
e0152061 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152061