References
- 1Adelman, L. M., Falk, J. H., & James, S. (2000). Impact of National Aquarium in Baltimore on visitors’ conservation attitudes, behavior, and knowledge. Curator: The Museum Journal, 43(1), 33–61. DOI: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2000.tb01158.x
- 2Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001).
A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives . In L. W. Anderson & D. R. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. New York, New York: Longman. - 3Bloom, B. S. (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals . New York, New York: Longman. - 4Cudaback, C. (2008). Ocean literacy: there’s more to it than content. Oceanography, 21(4), 10–11. DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2008.21
- 5Falk, J. H., & Gillespie, K. L. (2009). Investigating the role of emotion in science center visitor learning. Visitor Studies, 12(2), 112–132. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20414
- 6Fauville, G., Strang, C., Cannady, M. A., & Chen, Y. F. (2019). Development of the International Ocean Literacy Survey: Measuring knowledge across the world. Environmental Education Research, 25(2), 238–263. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1440381
- 7Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy reports. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20414
- 8Fink, L. D. (2003).
A taxonomy of significant learning . In L. D. Fink (Eds.), Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Wiley. - 9Gutwill, J. P. (2018). Science self-efficacy and lifelong learning: Emerging adults in science museums. Visitor Studies, 21(1), 31–56. DOI: 10.1080/10645578.2018.1503875
- 10Kidd, A. H., & Kidd, R. M. (1997). Aquarium visitors’ perceptions and attitudes toward the importance of marine biodiversity. Psychological Reports, 81(3), 1083–1088. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.3f.1083
- 11Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Center for Effective Performance.
- 12McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012).
Understanding by design framework . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. - 13National Research Council. (2015).
Guide to implementing the next generation science standards . The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/18802 - 14Orr, R. B., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and using learning objectives. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), fe3. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073
- 15Schoepp, K. (2019). The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 615–627. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1392500
- 16Stanny, C. J. (2016). Reevaluating Bloom’s Taxonomy: What measurable verbs can and cannot say about student learning. Education Sciences, 6(4), 37. 319. DOI: 10.3390/educsci6040037
- 17Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2019). Feasible options for behavior change toward more effective ocean literacy: a systematic review. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 273. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00273
- 18Strang, C., & Tran, L. (2022). NMEA Special Report# 3. Current: The Journal of Marine Education, 26(4).
- 19Wharton, J., Khalil, K., Fyfe, C., & Young, A. (2019).
Effective practices for fostering empathy towards marine life . In G. Fauville, D. Payne, M. Marrero, A. Lantz-Andersson & F. Crouch (Eds.), Exemplary practices in marine science education (pp. 157–168). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90778-9_10 - 20Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005).
Understanding by design . Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. - 21Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1