The Formation and Maintenance of Communities of Practice: The Role of Book Reviews in British Archaeology 1840&ndash;1860

Heather Keeble

doi:10.5334/bha-728

Abstract

The nineteenth century was a pivotal time for archaeology which aimed to distance itself from its antiquarian roots through the establishment of national bodies, its own methodology and by striving for academic credibility. This was also the time when Britain experienced an explosion of print, with about 125,000 newspaper and periodical titles being published.¹ In response, the review journal became a popular and pervasive genre. Although reviews have been used in single-author studies, they have received little attention outside of the literary fields. A recent issue of the Victorian Periodicals Review has, however, demonstrated the potential of reviews as a source for the history of other disciplines.² This paper will focus on reviews of books on Romano-British archaeology published between 1840 and 1860 to show how they can illuminate the development of archaeology during this formative period. It will reveal that book reviews played a crucial role in shaping and maintaining the scholarly community, helping to determine membership, aims and objectives. Reviews also affected subject methodology, by promoting how to conduct research and disseminate findings. Reviewers found themselves in a powerful position, with a platform to reach and influence the general public and the ability to support or undermine authors and their projects.

References

Anderson, Patricia. The Printed Image and the Transformation of Popular Culture 1790–1860. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brake, Laurel. “Literary Criticism and the Victorian Periodicals.” The Yearbook of English Studies 16 (1986): 92–116. DOI: 10.2307/3507768
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Breeze, David J. “The British Archaeological Association and the Genesis of J.C. Bruce’s The Roman Wall.” Journal of the British Archaeological Association 170, no. 1 (2017): 196–203. DOI: 10.1080/00681288.2017.1366626
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruce, Rev. John Collingwood. The Wallet-Book of the Roman Wall: A Guide to the Pilgrims Journeying Along the Barrier of the Lower Isthmus. London: Longman, 1863.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brusias, Mirjam. “Photograph’s Fits and Starts: The Search for Antiquity and its Image in Victorian Britain.” History of Photography 40, no. 3 (2016): 250–266. DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2016.1209027
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cook, Brian F. “British Archaeologists in the Aegean.” In The Study of the Past in the Victorian Age, edited by Vanessa Brand, 139–54. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 73, 1998.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cutts, Rev. Edward L. Colchester Castle: Not a Roman Temple. London: George Bell, 1853.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dobie, Judith, and Chris Evans. Archaeology and Illustrators: A History of the Ancient Monuments Drawing Office. Research Department Research Series, 33. London: Historic England, 2010. DOI: 10.5284/1052451
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Engberts, Christiaan. “Scholarship, Community Formation and Book Review: The Literarisches Centralblatt as Arena and Meeting Place.” Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 20 (2021): 651–79. DOI: 10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.019.14050
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evans, Christopher. “‘Delineating Objects’: Nineteenth-Century Antiquarian Culture and the Project of Archaeology.” In Visions of Antiquity: The Society of Antiquaries of London 1707–2007, edited by Susan Pearce, 267–305. London: Society of Antiquaries, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fermanis, Porscha. “‘Literary Dealers in the Rococo of History’: Book Reviews and Historical Specialisation, 1820–50.” Victorian Periodicals Review 55, no. 2 (2022): 237–56. DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2022.0015
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forster, Antonia. “Avarice or Interest: The Secrets of Eighteenth-Century Reviewing.” The Yale University Library Gazette 81, no. 3 (2007): 167–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40859358
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hoselitz, Virginia. Imagining Roman Britain: Victorian Responses to a Roman Past. Woodbridge: Royal Historical Society, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jenkins, Ian. Archaeologists and Aesthetes in the Sculptural Galleries of the British Museum 1800–1939. London: British Museum Press, 1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jerdan, William. The Autobiography of William Jerdan: With his Literary, Political, and Social Reminiscences and Correspondence during the Last Fifty Years, Vol. 3. London: Arthur Hall, 1852.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keeble, Heather D. W. “How to Get Ahead in Archaeology: Reviewing as a Strategy for Nineteenth-Century Archaeologists.” Internet Archaeology (forthcoming).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keeble, Heather D. W. “Roman Archaeology in the News: The Contribution Made by the Provincial Press to the Dissemination of Roman Archaeological Information in Nineteenth–Century Britain.” Ph.D. diss, University of Leicester, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/2381/44878
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kidd, Daffyd. “Charles Roach Smith and his Museum of London Antiquities.” In Collectors and Collections, The British Museum Yearbook 2, edited by Richard Camber, 105–35. London: British Museum, 1977.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levine, Phillipa. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians and Archaeology in Victorian England, 1835–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malley, Shawn. “Austen Henry Layard and the Periodical Press: Middle Eastern Archaeology and the Excavation of Cultural Identity in Mid-Nineteenth Century Britain.” Victorian Review 22, no. 2 (1996): 152–70. DOI: 10.1353/vcr.1996.0013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mason, Nicholas. “‘The Quack Has Become God’: Puffery, Print and the ‘Death’ of Literature in Romantic-Era Britain.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 60, no. 1 (2005): 1–31. DOI: 10.1525/ncl.2005.60.1.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maurer, Oscar. “Anonymity vs. Signature in Victorian Reviewing.” Studies in English 27, no. 1 (1948): 1–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23309508
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, Tara. “Christmas Books and Victorian Book Reviewing.” Victorian Periodicals Review 45, no. 1 (2012): 49–63. DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2012.0007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moshenka, Gabriel. “Performance and Display at the First Meeting of the British Archaeological Association, Canterbury 1844.” World Archaeology 49, no. 2, (2017): 226–36. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2016.1274236
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moulds, Alison, and Beth Gaskell. “Crafting the Professional Reader in the Military Press.” Victorian Periodicals Review 55, no. 2 (2022): 217–36. DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2022.0014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pooley, Julian. “‘A Laborious and Truly Useful Gentleman’: Mapping the Networks of John Nicols (1745–1826), Printer, Antiquary and Biographer,” Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 38, no. 4 (2015): 497–509. DOI: 10.1111/1754-0208.12344
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, Sarah. “‘Gratefully Dedicated to the Subscribers’: The Archaeological Publishing Projects and Achievements of Charles Roach Smith.” Internet Archaeology 45 (2017). DOI: 10.11141/ia.45.6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, Sarah. “Pioneers, Publishers and the Dissemination of Archaeological Knowledge: a study of publishing in British archaeology 1816–1851.” Internet Archaeology 35 (2013). DOI: 10.11141/ia.35.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, Sarah. “Samuel Lysons and His Circle: Art, Science and the Remains of Roman Britain.” Bulletin of the History of Archaeology 23, no. 2 (2013): 1–22. DOI: 10.5334/bha.2323
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shuttleworth, Sally, and Geoffrey Cantor. “Introduction.” In Science Serialized: Representations of the Sciences in Nineteenth-Century Periodicals, edited by Geoffrey Cantor and Sally Shuttleworth, 1–16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6080.003.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Speight, Sarah J. “A Gentlemanly Pastime: Antiquarianism, Adult Education and the Clergy in England c. 1750–1960.” History of Education 40, no. 2 (2011): 143–55. DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2010.518633
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
St. Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thornton, Amara. “‘…A Certain Faculty for Extracting Cash’: Collective Sponsorship in Late 19th and Early 20th Century British Archaeology.” Present Pasts 5, no. 1 (2013): 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/pp.55
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Riper, A. Bowdoin. Men Amongst Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Prehistory. London: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wetherall, David. “From Canterbury to Winchester: The Foundation of the Institute.” In Building on the Past: Celebrating 150 Years of the Royal Archaeological Institute, edited by Blaise Vyner, 8–21. London: Royal Archaeological Institute, 1994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wright, David. Bryan Faussett: Antiquary Extraordinary. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2015. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr43jvt
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Formation and Maintenance of Communities of Practice: The Role of Book Reviews in British Archaeology 1840–1860

Abstract

Paradigm

My account