Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reference study for biogenic carbon storage in the residential building stock Cover

Reference study for biogenic carbon storage in the residential building stock

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Research design.

Table 1

Distribution of floor area (%) according to the source of material intensity data.

Floor area of observations (%)71%
Floor area of observations (%) extrapolated by the closest decade value27%
Floor area of observations (%) extrapolated using another building typology2%

[i] Source: Floor area of observations (%) from Kaasalainen et al. (2023).

Table 2

Replacement cycles for relevant wood material categories.

MATERIAL CATEGORYDEFINITION IN MATERIAL INVENTORYAVERAGE CYCLEMINIMUM CYCLEMAXIMUM CYCLE
Wood in building structureWood (solid), i.e. solid timber, including planks, beams and battens, and glued laminated timber (glulam) incorporated in the foundations, walls, floor structure, roofs and other building-structure elementsBuilding lifeBuilding lifeBuilding life
Woodchip insulation, i.e. woodchips, sawdust or a mixture of them used as loose insulationBuilding life40 yearsBuilding life
Wood fibre insulation (solid), i.e. solid woodfibre sheets used as insulationBuilding lifeBuilding lifeBuilding life
Wood products, i.e. wood-based products such as plywood, chipboard and oriented strand board (OSB), excluding medium-density fibreboard (MDF) and glulamBuilding life40 yearsBuilding life
Wood in complementary products (e.g. windows, doors)Wood (solid), i.e. solid timber, including planks, beams and battens, and glulam contained in windows and doors50 years30 years70 years
Wood products, i.e. wood-based products such as plywood, chipboard and OSB, excluding MDF and glulam50 years30 years70 years

[i] Note: The material inventory definition is based on Kaasalainen et al. (2023).

Figure 2

Comparison of residential building stock production gross floor area (GFA; m2) and remaining stock GFA (m2) in Helsinki by construction era and building typology.

Figure 3

Normalised distribution of residential gross floor area (GFA; m2) by building typology and primary load-bearing and facade material across construction periods in Helsinki.

Figure 4

Distribution of the existing biogenic carbon in residential buildings in Helsinki by construction era, material category and building typology.

Figure 5

Estimated biogenic carbon storage in the existing residential stock in Helsinki compared with the biogenic carbon storage estimates derived using replacement cycles and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) default 35-year half-life.

Table 3

Sensitivity analysis of replacement-cycle assumptions and their effect on the original biogenic carbon remaining in use.

SCENARIOREPLACEMENT CYCLE (YEARS)ORIGINAL CARBON REMAINING (KT C)SHARE OF ORIGINAL HWP REMAINING IN USE (%)SHARE OF REPLACED HWP (%)THEORETICAL HALF-LIFE EQUIVALENT (YEARS)
Short service life30–4019067%33%51
Average service life5026693%7%503
Long service life7027897%3%1,899

[i] Note: Theoretical half-life equivalent is derived with a first-order decay function. HWP = harvested wood products.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.849 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 1128 - 1145
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 23, 2026
Published on: Oct 15, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Oana Iliescu, Ilmari Talvitie, Ali Amiri, Seppo Junnila, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.