Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment Cover

Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The evaluation process for assessing potentially hazardous chemical substances when reusing concrete construction products in indoor environments.

Table 1

The most common VOC compounds, compound groups or compound categories are based on a dataset of concrete samples analysed using the bulk method (n = 1,382).

COMPOUNDNUMBER OF OBSERVATIONSFREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE (%)P90 (μg/m3 g)P95 (μg/m3 g)Max (μg/m3 g)
TVOC1382100%701207300
1-Butanol96870%1835310
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol92867%28421500
Hydrocarbon mixturea30422%15387800
C9-alcoholsb22416%613200
2-Methyl-1-propanol17613%0.7233

[i] Notes: aMixture may include both aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, determined as toluene equivalents. The boiling point range of compounds detected in the hydrocarbon mixture varies by sample. The hydrocarbon mixture presented here may include compounds with boiling points approximately in the range of 50–350°C. bDetermined as toluene equivalents. The P90 value, P95 value, and maximum value (Max) refer to the entire dataset. For details, see Appendix A.

Table 2

Principles and interpretation for hazardous chemical substances assessment in reuse contexts

PRINCIPLEINTERPRETATION FOR REUSE ASSESSMENT
Process-based assessmentChemical hazard assessment should be structured as a staged process that progresses from existing information (e.g. use history, demolition audits, constituents) to targeted investigations only when uncertainties remain.
Context-dependenceThe relevance of chemical hazards is determined by the origin, use environment and intended application of the product. Construction products originating from typical indoor environments are unlikely to contain hazardous substances that would prevent reuse once contaminated surface materials have been removed.
Avoidance of unnecessary testingAssessment approaches should minimise routine laboratory testing and rely on targeted investigations only where justified by identified risks or uncertainties.
Exposure-oriented evaluationThe relevance of hazardous substances depends primarily on exposure pathways and the intended use context, rather than on the mere presence of substances.
Regulatory integrationChemical legislation (REACH, POP) should be integrated into reuse processes in a way that supports practical implementation without creating disproportionate barriers. However, the relevance and implications of these obligations may vary between different construction product types and materials and should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Interface managementEffective reuse assessment requires linking chemical evaluation with demolition audits, documentation practices and building permitting procedures.
Information obligations and transfer (SVHC/SCIP)The transfer of chemical information (e.g. SVHC communication, SCIP data) across life-cycle stages is essential for maintaining chemical safety in reuse systems.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.832 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 808 - 823
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 29, 2026
Published on: Aug 7, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Katja Tähtinen, Aku Helin, Evgeny Parshintsev, Hanna Hovi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.