Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
References
- Aiello, E., Donovan, C., Duque, E., Fabrizio, S., Flecha, R., Holm, P., Molina, S., Oliver, E., & Reale, E. (2021). Effective strategies that enhance the social impact of social sciences and humanities research. Evidence & Policy, 17(1), 131–146. 10.1332/174426420X15834126054137
- Azari, R., & Rashed-Ali, H. (Eds.). (2021). Research methods in building science and technology. Springer.
- Baum, A., & Valins, S. (2024). Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies of social density. Routledge.
- Bochner, A. (2023).
Suffering happiness: On autoethnography’s ethical calling . In Grant, A. (Ed.), Writing philosophical autoethnography (pp. 23–40). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003274728 - Bracken, L., & Oughton, E. (2006). ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(3), 371–382. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00218.x
- Brunner, L. M. (2025). Out of the comfort zone—Reflections on interdisciplinary efforts between urban studies and cognitive sciences. Cities & Health. 10.1080/23748834.2025.2538911
- CCA. (2025). The state of science, technology, and innovation in Canada 2025. Expert panel. Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). 10.60870/0zkv-5q08
- Cole, R. J., Brown, Z., & McKay, S. (2010). Building human agency: A timely manifesto. Building Research & Information, 38(3), 339–350. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1356120
- Dalton, A., Wolff, K., & Bekker, B. (2022). Interdisciplinary research as a complicated system. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. 10.1177/16094069221100397
- Daniel, K. L., McConnel, M., Schuchardt, A., & Peffer, M. E. (2022). Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop. PLoS One, 17(4),
e0267234 . 10.1371/journal.Ipone.0267234 - Day, J. K., & O’Brien, W. (2017). Oh behave! Survey stories and lessons learned from building occupants in high-performance buildings. Energy Research and Social Science, 31, 11–20. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.037
- Day, J. K., Ruiz, S., O’Brien, W., & Schweiker, M. (2020). Seeing is believing: An innovative approach to post-occupancy evaluation. Energy Efficiency, 13(3), 473–486. 10.1007/s12053-019-09817-8
- de Wilde, P. (2019). Ten questions concerning building performance analysis. Building and Environment, 153, 110–117. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.019
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage.
- Evans, G. W., & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 85–94. 10.1006/jevp.1998.0089
- Gram-Hanssen, K., & Georg, S. (2018). Energy performance gaps: Promises, people, practices. Building Research & Information, 46(1), 1–9. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1356127
- Guerra-Santin, O., Xu, L., & Boess, S. (2024). An interdisciplinary model for behavior in residential buildings: Bridging social sciences and engineering approaches. Energy Research & Social Sciences, 118, 103746. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103746
- Haddow, G., & Hammarfelt, B. (2019), Quality, impact, and quantification: Indicators and metrics use by social scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70, 16–26. 10.1002/asi.24097
- Hadfield-Hill, S., Horton, J., Kraftl, P., Balestieri, J. A. P., Vilanova, M. R. N., Dias, R. A., & Soares, P. V. (2020). Spaces of interdisciplinary in/congruity: The coming together of engineers and social scientists in planning for sustainable urban environments. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12(3), 251–266. 10.1080/19463138.2020.1759606
- Hub for Advanced Buildings. (n.d.). Wellbeing and comfort in the built environment: Current projects. Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto.
https://hab.civmin.utoronto.ca/research_area/wellbeing-and-comfort-in-the-built-environment/ - Jetten, J., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G., & Jones, J. M. (2014). How groups affect our health and well-being: The path from theory to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8, 103–130. 10.1111/sipr.12003
- Jones, P., & MacDonald, N. (2007). Getting it wrong the first time: Building an interdisciplinary research relationship. Area, 39(4), 490–498. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00767.x
- Kendra, J., & Nigg, J. (2014). Engineering and the social sciences: historical evolution of interdisciplinary approaches to hazard and disaster. Engineering Studies, 6(3), 134–159. 10.1080/19378629.2014.978335
- Kozlov, M., Garisto, D., & Chen, E. (2026). Massive budget cuts for science proposed again by Trump administration. Nature, 652, 547–548.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01105-7 - Lorimer, K., Knight, R., & Shoveller, J. (2022). Improving the health and social wellbeing of young people: Exploring the potential of and for collective agency. Critical Public Health, 32(2), 145–152. 10.1080/09581596.2020.1786501
- Masterson, V. A., Mahajan, S. L., & Tengö, M. (2018). Photovoice for mobilizing insights on human well-being in complex social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 23(3). 10.5751/ES-10259-230313
- Millum, J., & Garnett, M. (2019). How payment for research participation can be coercive. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(9), 21–31. 10.1080/15265161.2019.1630497
- Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177. 10.1111/cobi.12326
- Opsal, T., Wolgemuth, J., Cross, J., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E., Colomer, S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). ‘There are no known benefits ….’ Considering the risk/benefit ratio of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1137–1150. 10.1177/1049732315580109
- Pitt, C. R. (2025). Ending well: Values in concluding or transitioning community educational technology projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 1415–1437. 10.1111/bjet.13598
- Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70–86. 10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.007
- Różyńska, J. (2022). The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(3), 449–464. 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1
- Rylance, R. (2015). Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity. Nature, 525, 313–315. 10.1038/525313a
- Schweber, L., & Leiringer, R. (2012). Beyond the technical: A snapshot of energy and buildings research. Building Research & Information, 40(4), 481–492. 10.1080/09613218.2012.675713
- Siedlok, F., & Hibbert, P. (2014). The organization of interdisciplinary research: Modes, drivers and barriers. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 194–210. 10.1111/ijmr.12016
- Stockemer, D., Stockemer, G., & Glaeser, J. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences. Springer.
- Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: The methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1209–1225. 10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8
- Tweed, C., & Zapata-Lancaster, G. (2018). Interdisciplinary perspectives on building thermal performance. Building Research & Information, 46(5), 552–565. 10.1080/09613128/2018.1379815
- Vladova, G., Haase, J., & Friesike, S. (2025). Why, with whom, and how to conduct interdisciplinary research? A review from a researcher’s perspective. Science and Public Policy, 52(2), 165–180. 10.1093/scipol/scae070
- Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. 10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185
- Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. 10.1177/109019819702400309
- Williams, J., & Roth, W. M. (2019).
Theoretical perspectives on interdisciplinary mathematics education . In Doig, B., Williams, J., Swanson, D., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Drake, P. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary mathematics education. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6_3 - Winksel, M. (2014). Embedding social sciences in interdisciplinary research: Recent experiences from interdisciplinary energy research. Science as Culture, 23(3), 413–418. 10.1080/0950431.2014.926150
- Woolley, R., Sanchez-Barrioluengo, M., Turpin, T., & Marceau, J. (2015). Research collaboration in the social sciences: What factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration? Science and Public Policy, 42(4), 567–582. 10.1093/scipol/scu074
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.797 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 653 - 666
Submitted on: Feb 10, 2026
Accepted on: May 9, 2026
Published on: May 28, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2026 Garrett T. Morgan, Marianne F. Touchie, John Robinson, Alstan Jakubiec, Judy Tran, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.