Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
MMC for housing: sectoral perception on governance challenges Cover

MMC for housing: sectoral perception on governance challenges

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Survey respondents against Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) sector equivalence.

Note: *A 3.5% allowance for SOC’s ‘other’ roles is not recorded within the Construction Industry Training Board’s (CITB) data.

Source: CITB (2025).

Figure 2

Policy areas referenced within the white (shown in white) and grey (shown in grey) literature review.

Source: Morgan et al. (2025).

Table 1

Policy purpose clusters and the 25 policy areas.

POLICY PURPOSE CLUSTER AND DESCRIPTIONPOLICY AREAPOLICY AREA ABBREVIATIONPOLICY AREA DESCRIPTION
Pipeline predictability:
Policies that enable a predictable demand and supply of homes for housebuilders in England
1Skilled labourProvision of appropriately skilled labour to the sector
2InterventionsGovernment interventions for research, capital funding and land release
3Stable supply chainCreation of a stable supply chain for MMC sector
4TargetsSetting of clear housing targets
5Reform planningReforming the planning system
6DataCollection, publication and use of high-quality data
7MandatesEnforced mandates for MMC use in social housing
Regulations and guidelines:
Policies that create the regulations and guidelines to which housebuilders work
8Energy usePolicies directed at reducing energy use in new houses
9Whole lifeIntroduction of whole-life assessments for new houses
10StandardsEstablishment of specific standards for MMC components and systems
11Building regulationsBuilding regulations revised to address MMC systems
12H&S and welfareEnhanced health, safety and welfare standards for housebuilders
13CertificationAdoption of certification systems for MMC components and systems
14DefinitionsClearer use of the MMC definitions within targets and standards
Commercial market:
Policies that shape the commercial and business environment in which housebuilders work
15ValuationFull valuation of MMC systems for purposes of grants and mortgages
16ProcurementLegal and commercial procurement practices to suit MMC stages
17LendingProvision of competitive lending for houses using MMC systems
18InsuranceProvision of competitive insurance for MMC products and companies
19WarrantiesAccess to warranties for houses using MMC systems
20Tax and grants incentivesGovernment incentives for the MMC sector through tax and grants
Robustness:
Policies that require housebuilders to focus on quality, value and durability
21QualityEstablishment of quality standards for completed houses
22ConsumerData collection and publication on consumer experiences of MMC
23DurabilityRequirement to publish records of the durability of housebuilding systems
24CorporateEstablishment of sector-wide key performance indicators (KPIs) for use in corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment
25AdaptabilityRequirements for future adaptability to MMC-built houses

[i] Note: MMC = modern methods of construction.

Source: Adapted from Morgan et al. (2025) and used for the survey questionnaire.

Figure 3

Respondents’ means for each policy area by its importance (blue), effect (green) and impact (red) on modern methods of construction (MMC) use for housebuilding in England.

Figure 4

Employer type: means for each policy area by its impact on modern methods of construction (MMC) use for housebuilding in England.

Figure 5

Contractors and their directors/owners: means for each policy area by its impact on modern methods of construction (MMC) use for housebuilding in England.

Table 2

Comparison of the literature review policy references, and survey rankings, by importance, effect and impact on the use of modern methods of construction (MMC) in housebuilding in England.

LITERATURE REVIEW AREAS REFERENCEDSURVEY RESPONSES
BY IMPORTANCEBY EFFECTBY IMPACT
1QualitySkilled labourSkilled labourSkilled labour
2Skilled labourStable supply chainQualityQuality
3Energy useQualityStable supply chainStable supply chain
4Government interventionsHousing targetsH&S and welfareH&S and welfare
5Stable supply chainH&S and welfareWarrantiesEnergy use

[i] Note: H&S = health and safety.

Figure 6

Disaggregated group heat map of five key policy areas ranked 1–5 by their impact on modern methods of construction (MMC) use for housebuilding in England.

Note: 1 = first choice, 5 = last choice.

Table 3

Summary of the correlations between employer type and knowledge of: housebuilding sector, modern methods of construction (MMC), and policy and housebuilding.

SPEARMAN’S RHOCORRELATION COEFFICIENTSIGNIFICANCE (TWO-TAILED)
Knowledge of the housebuilding sector–0.212**p < 0.001
Knowledge of MMC–0.248**p < 0.001
Knowledge of policy and housebuilding–0.094*p = 0.036

[i] Note: Correlation significant at the **0.01 and *0.05 levels (two-tailed).

Figure 7

Respondent’s self-assessed personal values in relation to innovation, by employer type.

Figure 8

Effect on the decision to purchase a new house built using modern methods of construction (MMC), and the expectation of purchase cost compared with a house built traditionally, by employer type.

Note: See the key to Figure 7.

Figure 9

Employer-type heat map of the five key policy areas ranked 1–5 by their impact on modern methods of construction (MMC) use for housebuilding in England.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.791 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 991 - 1009
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 27, 2026
Published on: Aug 19, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jonathan Morgan, Chris Goodier, Robert Schmidt III, Kudirat Ayinla, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.