Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement Cover

Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement

Buildings and Cities
Volume 6 (2025): Issue 1
By: Zhuozhang Li,  Minna Sunikka-Blank,  Ruchit Purohit and  Flora Samuel  
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. 1Aernouts, N., Cognetti, F., & Maranghi, E. (Eds.). (2023). Urban living lab for local regeneration. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-19748-2
    Back to article
  2. 2Akbil, E., & Butterworth, C. (2025). Urban rooms and the expanded ecology of urban living labs. Buildings and Cities, 6(1), 544–560. 10.5334/bc.607
    Back to article
  3. 3Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. 10.1080/01944366908977225
    Back to article
  4. 4Baibarac, C., & Petrescu, D. (2019). Co-design and urban resilience: Visioning tools for commoning resilience practices. CoDesign, 15(2), 91–109. 10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145
    Back to article
  5. 5Bailer, S. (2024). Caring infrastructures: Transforming the arts through feminist curating. Transcript. 10.1515/9783839475454
    Back to article
  6. 6Bakshi, M. (2025). A city divided by a gap in healthy life expectancy. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crkxdpz16jvo
    Back to article
  7. 7Barrett, R. F., Borkar, S., Dosanjh, S. S., Hammond, S. D., Heroux, M. A., Hu, X. S., Luitjens, J., Parker, S. G., Shalf, J., & Tang, L. (2013). On the role of co-design in high performance computing. Advances in Parallel Computing, 24, 141–155. 10.3233/978-1-61499-324-7-141
    Back to article
  8. 8Baxter, J.-S. (2022). From urban living labs towards critical spatial design: Decolonising knowledge in urban design and planning using critical reflexivity. Nordic Journal of Urban Studies, 2(2), 124–140. 10.18261/njus.2.2.3
    Back to article
  9. 9Belfield, A., & Petrescu, D. (2024). Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs. CoDesign, 21(2), 171–194. 10.1080/15710882.2024.2381792
    Back to article
  10. 10Brownill, S. (2021). Capturing the history of community-led planning. The Journal of the Town and Country Planning Association, 74–75. http://bit.ly/peoplesplans
    Back to article
  11. 11Cataldo, M. L., Rynehart, S., White, C., & Larsen, K. (2021). Remembering radical roots: Lived experience participation movements and the risks and responsibilities of co-design in community-led change. Parity, 34(6), 13–16.
    Back to article
  12. 12Chilvers, J., Pallett, H., & Hargreaves, T. (2018). Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, 42, 199–210. 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020
    Back to article
  13. 13Choi, J. H., Braybrooke, K., & Forlano, L. (2023). Care-full co-curation: Critical urban placemaking for more-than-human futures. City, 27(1–2), 15–38. 10.1080/13604813.2022.2149945
    Back to article
  14. 14Combrinck, C., & Porter, C. J. (2021). Co-design in the architectural process. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(3), 738–751. 10.1108/ARCH-06-2020-0105
    Back to article
  15. 15Cranfield, B., & Mulvey, M. (2023). More than a meeting: Performing the workshop in the art institution. Performance Research, 28(2), 4–13. 10.1080/13528165.2023.2260685
    Back to article
  16. 16Cutler, A. (2018). The value of values: Reflections on Tate Exchange. Tate Papers, 30. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/30/rounthwaite-lazy-objects
    Back to article
  17. 17Derr, V. (2015). Integrating community engagement and children’s voices into design and planning education. CoDesign, 11(2), 119–133. 10.1080/15710882.2015.1054842
    Back to article
  18. 18Ebbesson, E., Lund, J., & Smith, R. C. (2024). Dynamics of sustained co-design in urban living labs. CoDesign, 20(3), 422–439. 10.1080/15710882.2024.2303115
    Back to article
  19. 19Escobar, O., Faulkner, W., & Rea, H. J. (2014). Building capacity for dialogue facilitation in public engagement around research. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 2(1), 87–111. 10.55207/ZJXO1175
    Back to article
  20. 20Farrell, T. (2014). The Farrell review of architecture and the built environment. https://farrellreview.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/The-Farrell-Review.pdf
    Back to article
  21. 21Fernández, O. (2011). Just what is it that makes ‘curating’ so different, so appealing? Oncurating.Org, 8, 40–42.
    Back to article
  22. 22Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). SUNY Press.
    Back to article
  23. 23Fitz, A., & Krasny, E. (2019). Critical care. Architecture and urbanism for a broken planet. In A. Fitz & E. Krasny (Eds.), Critical care: Architecture and urbanism for a broken planet (pp. 10–22). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12273.003.0002
    Back to article
  24. 24Forde, T. (2021). Co-curation as feminist practice: Exhibiting the work of Marion Adnams. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 20(1–2), 97–112. 10.1080/14702029.2021.1925852
    Back to article
  25. 25Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population (M. Senellart, F. Ewald & A. Fontana, Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230245075
    Back to article
  26. 26Gray, C. M., & Kou, Y. (2019). Co-producing, curating, and defining design knowledge in an online practitioner community. CoDesign, 15(1), 41–58. 10.1080/15710882.2018.1563193
    Back to article
  27. 27Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S., & Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 392–429. 10.1111/1468-0009.12197
    Back to article
  28. 28Guillen-Royo, M. (2018). Sustainability and wellbeing: Human-scale development in practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315762135
    Back to article
  29. 29Herberg, J. (2022). The critique of co-creation: Democratic dialogue or displaced politics? In F. A. Kluge (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: A research mode for real-world problems (pp. 24–37). Berlin: Max Planck Society/Population Europe. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/287679
    Back to article
  30. 30Huybrechts, L., Benesch, H., & Geib, J. (2017). Institutioning: Participatory design, co-design and the public realm. CoDesign, 13(3), 148–159. 10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006
    Back to article
  31. 31ICOM. (2022, August). ICOM approves a new museum definition. https://icom.museum/en/news/icom-approves-a-new-museum-definition/
    Back to article
  32. 32Iervolino, S. (2023). Co-curating with trans people: The challenges of collaborating with heterogenous minoritised communities. Museum Management and Curatorship, 38(2), 117–140. 10.1080/09647775.2023.2188481
    Back to article
  33. 33Inch, A. (2023). An archive of political possibilities? Planning Theory and Practice, 24(3), 301–303. Routledge. 10.1080/14649357.2023.2246303
    Back to article
  34. 34Jans, M. (2004). Children as citizens: Towards a contemporary notion of child participation. Childhood, 11(1), 27–44. SAGE. 10.1177/0907568204040182
    Back to article
  35. 35Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 22–27. 10.22215/timreview/742
    Back to article
  36. 36Kaika, M. (2010). Architecture and crisis: Re-inventing the icon, re-imag(in)ing London and re-branding the City. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), 453–474. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00398.x
    Back to article
  37. 37Kampelmann, S., Kaethler, M., & Hill, A. V. (2018). Curating complexity: An artful approach for real-world system transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 59–71. 10.1016/J.EIST.2017.10.005
    Back to article
  38. 38Knickel, M., Caniglia, G., Knickel, K., Šūmane, S., Maye, D., Arcuri, S., Keech, D., Tisenkopfs, T., & Brunori, G. (2023). Lost in a haze or playing to partners’ strengths? Learning to collaborate in three transdisciplinary European living labs. Futures, 152. 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103219
    Back to article
  39. 39Lawson, V., Purohit, R., Samuel, F., Brennan, J., Farrelly, L., Golden, S., & Mcvicar, P. M. (2022). Public participation in planning in the UK: A review of the literature. www.ccqol.org
    Back to article
  40. 40Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Blackwell.
    Back to article
  41. 41Lissandrello, E., & Morelli, N. (2017). Guidelines on participatory approach and co-design workshops D2.4. www.muv2020.eu
    Back to article
  42. 42Lupp, G., Zingraff-Hamed, A., Huang, J. J., Oen, A., & Pauleit, S. (2021). Living labs—a concept for co-designing nature-base solutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–22. 10.3390/su13010188
    Back to article
  43. 43Malmberg, K., & Vaittinen, I. (Eds.). (2017). Living lab methodology handbook. 10.5281/zenodo.1146321
    Back to article
  44. 44Massari, S., Galli, F., Mattioni, D., & Chiffoleau, Y. (2023). Co-creativity in living labs: Fostering creativity in co-creation processes to transform food systems. Journal of Science Communication, 22(3). 10.22323/2.22030203
    Back to article
  45. 45Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. Apex Press.
    Back to article
  46. 46McKeon, E. (2022). Cura, the curatorial and paradoxes of care. Performance Research, 27(6–7), 174–182. 10.1080/13528165.2022.2198322
    Back to article
  47. 47McKercher, K. A. (2020). Beyond sticky notes: Doing co-design for real: Mindsets, methods and movements. Beyond Sticky Notes.
    Back to article
  48. 48Melhuish, C., Benesch, H., Sully, D., & Holmberg, I. M. (Eds.). (2022). Co-curating the city: Universities and urban heritage past and future. UCL Press. 10.14324/111.9781800081826
    Back to article
  49. 49Moynat, O., & Sahakian, M. (2024). Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers. Buildings & Cities, 5(1). 10.5334/bc.457
    Back to article
  50. 50Nguyen, N. T., Collins, A., & Collins, C. M. (2024). Trends and patterns in the application of co-production, co-creation, and co-design methods in studies of green spaces: A systematic review. Environmental Science and Policy, 152, 103642. 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103642
    Back to article
  51. 51Nikonanou, N., & Misirloglou, T. (2023). ‘Together we curate’: Cultural participation and collective curation. Museum & Society, 21(1), 31–44. 10.29311/mas.v21i1.4048
    Back to article
  52. 52Obrist, H. U. (2015). Ways of curating. Penguin.
    Back to article
  53. 53Oldenhof, L., Rahmawan-Huizenga, S., van de Bovenkamp, H., & Bal, R. (2020). The governance challenge of urban living laboratories: Using liminal ‘in-between’ space to create livable cities. In C. van Montfort & A. Michels (Eds.), Partnerships for Livable Cities (pp. 293–315). Springer International. 10.1007/978-3-030-40060-6_15
    Back to article
  54. 54O’Neill, P. (2016). The culture of curating and the curating of cultures. MIT Press.
    Back to article
  55. 55Palmer, V. J., Bibb, J., Lewis, M., Densley, K., Kritharidis, R., Dettmann, E., Sheehan, P., Daniell, A., Harding, B., Schipp, T., Dost, N., & McDonald, G. (2023). A co-design living labs philosophy of practice for end-to-end research design to translation with people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family and kinship groups. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206620
    Back to article
  56. 56Parsons, E., Kearney, T., Surman, E., Cappellini, B., Moffat, S., Harman, V., & Scheurenbrand, K. (2021). Who really cares? Introducing an ‘ethics of care’ to debates on transformative value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 122, 794–804. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.058
    Back to article
  57. 57Peoples’ Plans. (2023). https://www.peoplesplans.org/peoplesplans/timeline
    Back to article
  58. 58Price, C., & Obrist, H.-U. (2009). Cedric Price/Hans Ulrich Obrist – Conversation series v. 21. Walther König.
    Back to article
  59. 59Puerari, E., de Koning, J. I. J. C., von Wirth, T., Karré, P. M., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). 10.3390/su10061893
    Back to article
  60. 60Purohit, R., Samuel, F., Brennan, J., Farrelly, L., Golden, S., & McVicar, M. (2024). Improving neighbourhood quality of life through effective consultation processes in the UK: Learnings from the project Community Consultation for Quality of Life. Cities and Health, 8(4), 741–758. 10.1080/23748834.2024.2375849
    Back to article
  61. 61Richter, D. (2023). Curating: Politics of display, politics of site, politics of transfer and translation, politics of knowledge production. https://www.on-curating.org/book/curating-politics-of-display-politics-of-site-politics-of-transfer-and-translation-politics-of-knowledge-production.html
    Back to article
  62. 62Ride, P. (2020). Participation in the art museum: Defining new models for public engagement at Tate Exchange. Tate Papers, 34. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/34/participation-art-museum-new-models-public-engagement-tate-exchange
    Back to article
  63. 63Riding, D. (2021). Curating spaces for not-knowing. Tate Papers, 34. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/34/curating-spaces-for-not-knowing
    Back to article
  64. 64Sachs Olsen, C., & van Hulst, M. (2024). Reimagining urban living labs: Enter the urban drama lab. Urban Studies, 61(6), 991–1012. 10.1177/00420980231187771
    Back to article
  65. 65Salmi, A., & Mattelmäki, T. (2021). From within and in-between–co-designing organizational change. CoDesign, 17(1), 101–118. 10.1080/15710882.2019.1581817
    Back to article
  66. 66Samanani, F. (2024). Caring for life in common: Care, diversity and the paradox of the commons. Journal of Urban Affairs, 47(8), 2787–2893. 10.1080/07352166.2024.2419061
    Back to article
  67. 67Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design, 4, 5–18. 10.1080/15710880701875068
    Back to article
  68. 68Sheikh, S. (2013). Towards the exhibition as research. In P. O’Neil & M. Wilson (Eds.), Curating research (pp. 32–46). Open Editions.
    Back to article
  69. 69Slingerland, G., & Wang, G. (2024, June 23). Co-design for change: Propositions and dilemmas. 10.21606/drs.2024.527
    Back to article
  70. 70Smit, B., Melissen, F., Font, X., & Dickinger, A. (2024). Destination design: Identifying three key co-design strategies. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(24), 4791–4806. 10.1080/13683500.2024.2332495
    Back to article
  71. 71Smith-Carrier, T., & Van Tuyl, R. (2024). The merits and pitfalls of participatory action research: Navigating tokenism and inclusion with lived experience members. International Review of Public Policy, 6(1). 10.4000/11whj
    Back to article
  72. 72Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28. 10.1162/DESI_a_00207
    Back to article
  73. 73Sunikka-Blank, M., Neto-Bradley, A., & Choudhary, R. (2022). A trans-disciplinary approach to scaling community voices for place sensitive policy-making through places and practices of food. PLoS ONE, 15. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4516/Minna_et_al.pdf
    Back to article
  74. 74Tewdwr-Jones, M., Sookhoo, D., & Freestone, R. (2020). From Geddes’ city museum to Farrell’s urban room: past, present, and future at the Newcastle City Futures exhibition. Planning Perspectives, 35(2), 277–297. 10.1080/02665433.2019.1570475
    Back to article
  75. 75The Book of Cambridge. (2025). Cambridge University Press & Assessment. https://www.junction.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/TheBookofCambridge_WEB.pdf
    Back to article
  76. 76Trentin, A., Rosellini, A., & Djalali, A. (2020). Curating the city. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes, 3(1), 1–8. 10.6092/issn.2612-0496/11961
    Back to article
  77. 77Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003070672
    Back to article
  78. 78Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.
    Back to article
  79. 79Tronto, J. C. (2019). Caring architecture. In Critical care. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12273.003.0004
    Back to article
  80. 80Tsenova, V., Thomas, H., Rime, J., & Galeazzi, F. (2025). Let’s go fly the kite. In Driving Design (pp. 180–185). Distributed Design EU.
    Back to article
  81. 81Uğraş, T., Rızvanoğlu, K., & Gülseçen, S. (2022). New co-design techniques for digital game narrative design with children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31. 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100441
    Back to article
  82. 82UK Gov. (2024). Cambridge Delivery Group: Establishing a growth company. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cambridge-delivery-group-establishing-a-growth-company/cambridge-delivery-group-establishing-a-growth-company
    Back to article
  83. 83Urban Room Network. (2022). Urban Room Network. https://urbanroomsnetwork.org/
    Back to article
  84. 84Viano, C., Tsardanidis, G., Dorato, L., Ruggeri, A., Zanasi, A., Zgeras, G., Mylona, V., Efthymiou, I., & Vlachokyriakos, V. (2023). Living labs for civic technologies: A case study. Community infrastructuring for a volunteer firefighting service. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189226
    Back to article
  85. 85von Bismarck, B. (2016). Curatorial criticality – On the role of freelance curators in the field of contemporary art. Curating Critique, 9, 19–23.
    Back to article
  86. 86von Bismarck, B., Schafaff, J., & Weski, T. (Eds.). (2012). Cultures of the curatorial. Sternberg Press.
    Back to article
  87. 87von Busch, O., & Palmås, K. (2022). The corruption of co-design. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003281443
    Back to article
  88. 88Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
    Back to article
  89. 89Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
    Back to article
  90. 90Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    Back to article
  91. 91Wang, Z., Jiang, T., Huang, J., Tai, Y., & Trapani, P. (2022, June 25). How might we evaluate co-design? A literature review on existing practices. 10.21606/drs.2022.774
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.633 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 19, 2025
Published on: Nov 17, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
urban room,
co-curation,
co-creation,
civic engagement,
care,
participation,
urban living labs,
urban life,
urban planning,
UK

© 2025 Zhuozhang Li, Minna Sunikka-Blank, Ruchit Purohit, Flora Samuel, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 6 (2025): Issue 1Next article