References
- 1Alatalo, E., Kuoppa, J., Kyrönviita, M., Laine, M., & Karppi, L. (2017). From ideas competition to citizen’s vision. Planning Hiedanranta in follow-on workshops. Tampere: The City of Tampere.
https://www.e-julkaisu.fi/tampereen_kaupunki/from-ideas-competition-to-citizens-visions/mobile.html#pid=1 - 2Alatalo, E., Kyrönviita, M., & Leino, H. (2019). Tyhjät tilat kaupunkien voimavaraksi! Politiikkasuositus. [Vacant spaces as resources of the city! Policy brief]. Tampereen yliopisto, Tampere.
https://www.aka.fi/globalassets/3-stn/1-strateginen-tutkimus/tiedon-kayttajalle/politiikkasuositukset/politiikkasuositukset/19_2_tyhjat_tilat_kaupunkien_voimavaraksi.pdf - 3Alatalo, E., Leino, H., Laine, M., & Turku, V. (2023a). Heating up the sauna: Analogue model unraveling the creativity of public participation. Planning Theory, 23(1), 22–41. 10.1177/14730952231166567
- 4Alatalo, E., Turku, V., Milián Bernal, D., & Kyrönviita, M. (2023b). Learning urban activism: A retrospective look at how to engage students. DATUTOP, 41, 169–194.
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-3007-1 - 5Antaki, N., & Petrescu, D. (2023). Designers’ roles in civic pedagogies of co-making: Lessons from the global south and north. CoDesign, 19(1), 51–73. 10.1080/15710882.2022.2123927
- 6Artto, K., Ahola, T., & Vartiainen, V. (2016). From the front end of projects to the back end of operations: Managing projects for value creation throughout the system lifecycle. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 258–270. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.003
- 7Baxter, J.-S. (2022). From urban living labs towards critical spatial design: Decolonising knowledge in urban design and planning using critical reflexivity. Nordic Journal of Urban Studies, 2(2), 124–140. 10.18261/njus.2.2.3
- 8Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- 9Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154. 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
- 10Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317–335. 10.1177/0969776418787222
- 11Carmona, M. (2009). Design coding and the creative, market and regulatory tyrannies of practice. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2643–2667. 10.1177/0042098009344226
- 12Chevalier, J. M. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351033268
- 13Clark, A., Holland, C., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2009). Learning to see: Lessons from a participatory observation research project in public spaces. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 345–360. 10.1080/13645570802268587
- 14Crossan, J., Cumbers, A., McMaster, R., & Shaw, D. (2016). Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens: The practice of DIY citizenship. Antipode, 48(4), 937–955. 10.1111/anti.12220
- 15De Lille, C. S. H., & Overdiek, A. (2021). From system to local to system: Design principles to scale for a system in transition. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD10.
https://rsdsymposium.org/system-design-principles-to-scale/ - 16Fabian, L., & Samson, K. (2015). Claiming participation – a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166–184. 10.1080/17549175.2015.1056207
- 17Frantzeskaki, N., Broto, V. C., Coenen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Urban sustainability transitions. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315228389
- 18Hemphill, M. A., & Richards, K. A. R. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231. 10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
- 19Hernberg, H., & Hyysalo, S. (2024). Modes of intermediation: How intermediaries engage in advancing local bottom-up experimentation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 51, 100849. 10.1016/j.eist.2024.100849
- 20Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 22–27. 10.22215/timreview/742
- 21Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. 10.1016/j. respol.2018.10.006
- 22Korpinen, V., & Pulkkinen, R. (2015). Hiedanrannan ihmiset. [The people of Hiedanranta] Kuowi Oy & Tampereen kaupunki.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hiedanrannan-ihmiset/58434043 - 23Kronsell, A., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2018). Experimental governance: The role of municipalities in urban living labs. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 988–1007. 10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631
- 24Kyrönviita, M., & Leino, H. (2025). Fulfill the dream: Advancing skateboarders’ agency through experimenting and interaction with urban infrastructure. Journal of Urbanism, 1–20. 10.1080/17549175.2025.2507320
- 25Kyrönviita, M., & Wallin, A. (2022). Building a DIY skatepark and doing politics hands-on. City, 26(4), 646–663. 10.1080/13604813.2022.2079879
- 26Lehtimäki, H., Jokinen, A., & Pitkänen, J. (2023). Erratum to ‘Project-based practices for promoting a sustainability transition in a city organization and its urban context’ [Int. J. Proj. Manag., 41 (2023), 102516]. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102539. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102539
- 27Lehtovuori, P., Edelman, H., Rintala, J., Jokinen, A., Rantanen, A., Särkilahti, M., & Joensuu, T. (2016). Hiedanrannan kehittämisvisio: Tiivis ja intensiivisesti vihreä Tampere City West. [Hiedanranta vision: the compact and intensively green Tampere City West] Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto, Arkkitehtuurin laitos.
https://trepo.tuni.fi//handle/10024/116771 - 28MacKinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253–270. 10.1177/0309132512454775
- 29Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110. 10.1177/0042098017705546
- 30Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 401–416. 10.1080/08941920903305674
- 31Morris, P. W. G. (2013). Reconstructing project management. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118536698
- 32Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S. (eds.) (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation. Routledge. 10.1080/15575330.2025.2498835
- 33Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & von Wirth, T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 718–733. 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1672525
- 34Okely, J. (2012). Anthropological practice: Fieldwork and the ethnographic method. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003084563
- 35Othengrafen, F., Ziehl, M., Herrmann, S., & Pencic, D. (2024).
Community resilience: Transformative capacity as driver for social cohesion and sustainable development . In F. Othengrafen, S. Herrmann, D. Pencic and S. Lazarevski (Eds.), Social cohesion and resilience through citizen engagement (pp. 19–33). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781035317103.00011 - 36Overdiek. (2024). Citylab X: Towards a lens on the urban living lab as driver of systemic innovation. Contexts. The Systemic Design Journal, 2. 10.58279/v2002
- 37Petrescu, D., Petcou C., & Baibarac, C. (2016). Co-producing commons-based resilience: Lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information, 44(7), 717–736. 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
- 38Portelli, J. P., & McMahon, B. J. (2004). “Why critical-democratic engagement?” Journal of Maltese Education Research, 2(2), 39–45.
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/18926/1/2.%20WHY%20CRITICAL-DEMOCRATIC%20ENGAGEMENT.pdf - 39Puerari, E., De Koning, J. I., Von Wirth, T., Karré, P. M., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893. 10.3390/su10061893
- 40Rikala, S., Wallin, A., & Sjöblom, J. (2023). Miten sosiaalista kestävyyttä tehdään? Ruohonjuuritason toimijoiden sosiaaliset käytännöt entisen tehdasalueen elävöittämisessä. [How social sustainability is made? Social practices of grassroots organizations in activating a formal factory area] Sosiologia, 60(1), 5–21.
https://journal.fi/sosiologia/article/view/128681 - 41Rizzo, A., Ekelund, B., Bergström, J., & Ek, K. (2020).
Participatory design as a tool to create resourceful communities in Sweden . In C. Smaniotto Costa, M. Mačiulienė, M. Menezes & B. Goličnik Marušić (Eds.), Co-creation of public open places. Practice – reflection – learning (pp. 95–108). Lusófona University Press. 10.24140/2020-sct-vol.4 - 42Robazza, G. (2024).
Public life on stage: Urban living labs as cultural performative spaces . In A. Melis, R. Vavetsi & A. Chisty (Eds.), The architecture of exhibitions: Experiential design. Routledge. - 43Rohracher, H. (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of choice: The case of green electricity labelling. Environmental Planning A, 41, 2014–2028. 10.1068/a41234
- 44Sjöblom, J., Kuoppa, J., Laine, M., & Alatalo, E. (2021). Crafting a planning issue with citizens in the context of planning competition: a case of ‘Nordic Superblock’. Journal of Urban Design, 26(1), 117–131. 10.1080/13574809.2020.1832886
- 45Statistics Finland. (2025). Statistics Finland’s free-of-charge statistical databases. Preliminary population structure by area, 2024M01*-2024M01*.
https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vamuu/statfin_vamuu_pxt_11lj.px - 46The City of Tampere. (2016). Competition programme, The Hiedanranta district of Tampere – international ideas competition.
https://www.safa.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016_Tampere_hiedanranta_kilpailuohjelma_competitionprogramme.pdf - 47The City of Tampere. (2017a). Evaluation minutes, The Hiedanranta district of Tampere – international ideas competition.
https://www.safa.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016_Tampereen_Hiedanranta_Arvostelupoytakirja_eng_fi.pdf - 48The City of Tampere. (2017b). Hiedanranta Structure Plan.
https://www.tampere.fi/sites/default/files/2022-05/hiedanranta_rakennesuunnitelma.pdf - 49The City of Tampere. (2020). Hiedanranta Master Plan.
https://www.tampere.fi/sites/default/files/2022-05/hiedanrannan-yleissuunnitelma-saavutettava-raportti-englanniksi.pdf - 50The City of Tampere. (2025). Hiedanrannan alueen suunnittelu ja kaavoitus. [The design and planning of Hiedanranta]
https://www.tampere.fi/kaupunkisuunnittelu/kaupunkiymparisto-uudistuu/hiedanranta/hiedanrannan-alueen-suunnittelu-ja-kaavoitus - 51Turku, V., Jokinen, A., & Jokinen, P. (2022). How do time-bound practices initiate local sustainability pathways? Sustainable Cities and Society, 79,
103697 . 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103697 - 52Virkkala, I. (2016). Hiedanrannan talkoot. [Making Hiedanranta together] Uusi kaupunki kollektiivi, Kuowi Oy & Tampereen kaupunki.