Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Increasing civic resilience in urban living labs: city authorities’ roles Cover

Increasing civic resilience in urban living labs: city authorities’ roles

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

The phases of Hiedanranta ULL and the main roles of the city authorities.

PHASE 1: SETTING THE STAGE (2015–2019)PHASE 2: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN (2017–2022)PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION (2022–ONGOING)
Main activitiesTaking vacant spaces back into use with citizens and small enterprisesCreating the spatial and functional concept of the area, until first city plansGuiding and forcing collaborations to make innovations real
Main roles of city authorities balancing between social and technical innovationsSupporting social innovation: new collaborations, experimentsSupporting technical innovation: including new spatial, functional and technical innovationsSupporting technical innovation that will support social innovation in the future
Main roles of city authorities balancing between driving change and changing themselvesChanging themselves as becoming open and courageous partners in several experiments, of which some also failed, creating new legal entities to do soDriving the change by being the leaders of the collaborative design and consolidating the results into legal documentsChanging themselves by creating new legal entities to guide and manage the building of the area until future residents and other users arrive
Table 2

The context-connecting practices city authorities used to promote civic resilience across different phases of Hiedanranta ULL.

CONTEXT-CONNECTING PRACTICEPHASE 1: SETTING THE STAGE (2015–2019)PHASE 2: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN (2017–2022)PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION (2022–ONGOING)
Bringing actors and contexts togetherRenting vacant spaces out cheaply with the demand of organising events that invite new people to the area and fostering practices that bring culture, innovation and planning togetherEarly co-design workshops and developing local collective spaces (e.g. public sauna) and inviting new kinds of citizensDemanding, with legal contracts, that builders collaborate to create shared spaces for citizens on a block level and developing a digital platform for citizens (to share spaces, things, services; to support communality; to save energy)
Creating persistent tacticsDeliberate openness of the development process and recognising possible strong future actor groups to collaborate with (e.g. skateboarders)Inviting citizens back several times to check on and further develop the plans and solidifying ideas to legal documents and creating citizen–expert coalitionsEstablishing a new legal entity (Hiedanrannan Palvelut Oy) that owns and manages the shared spaces until new residents arrive and establishing efficient public transport early
Catalysing positive impact loopsChoosing actors that diversify social groups (e.g. Sopimusvuori) and brave adoption of new rolesSupporting emerged strong concepts (e.g. Nordic Superblock) that inspire varied actorsResidents will own and manage the new variety and quality shared spaces on a block level, deciding themselves how the use of spaces develop in future
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.610 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2025
Published on: Nov 18, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Elina Alatalo, Markus Laine, Mikko Kyrönviita, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.