References
- 1Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI.
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548 - 2Baptista, A. V. (2014). ‘With all my heart’: Mature students’ emotions while doing a research-based PhD. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 914–918. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.807
- 3Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
- 4Buirski, N. (2022). ‘Ways of being’: A model for supportive doctoral supervisory relationships and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1387–1401. 10.1080/07294360.2021.1910209
- 5Cowling, M., Crawford, J., Allen, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. (2023). Using leadership to leverage ChatGPT and artificial intelligence for undergraduate and postgraduate research supervision. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 89–103. 10.14742/ajet.8598
- 6Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74–88. 10.14742/ajet.8843
- 7Doloriert, C., Sambrook, S., & Stewart, J. (2012). Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 732–750. 10.1108/03090591211255566
- 8Giddens, A. (2014).
Structuration theory: Past, present and future . In Giddens’ theory of structuration (pp. 201–221). Routledge. - 9Harding, D., & Boyd, P. (2024). Generative AI and PhD supervision: A covert third wheel or a seat at the table? In Thomson, C., & Neilson, C. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) (pp 91–100).
ARCOM .https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/archive/2024-Indexed-Papers.pdf - 10Hemer, S. R. (2012). Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 827–839. 10.1080/07294360.2012.674011
- 11Huallpa, J. J. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105–115. 10.21533/pen.v11.i4.200
- 12Jackson, D., Power, T., & Usher, K. (2021). Learning to be a doctoral supervisor: Experiences and views of nurse supervisors of higher degree research students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(7–8), 1060–1069. 10.1111/jocn.15651
- 13Jones, A., & Blass, E. (2019). The impact of institutional power on higher degree research supervision: Implications for the quality of doctoral outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 1485–1494. 10.13189/ujer.2019.070702
- 14Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., … & Kazienko, P. (2023). ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none. Information Fusion, 99, 101861. 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101861
- 15Lindén, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision and learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639–662. 10.1080/03075079.2011.596526
- 16Lovitts, B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who does not, and why. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296–325. 10.1353/jhe.0.0006
- 17Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). ‘Becoming and being writers’: The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263–275. 10.1080/01580370802439870
- 18Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 207–221. 10.1080/01580370701424650
- 19McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011).
New academics as supervisors: A steep learning curve with challenges, tensions and pleasures . In McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (Eds.), Doctoral education: research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 37–55). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4 - 20McNamee, S., & Tilsen, J. (2021).
Relational responsibility: Ethics and power in supervision . In Ness, O., McNamee, S., & Kvello, Ø. (Eds.), Relational processes in counselling and psychotherapy supervision (pp. 55–75). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-030-71010-1_4 - 21Megahed, F. M., Chen, Y. J., Ferris, J. A., Knoth, S., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2024). How generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (mis) used in SPC practice, education, and research? An exploratory study. Quality Engineering, 36(2), 287–315. 10.1080/08982112.2023.2206479
- 22Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Tawde, A., & Rane, J. (2023). ChatGPT is not capable of serving as an author: Ethical concerns and challenges of large language models in education. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(10), 851–874. 10.48185/jaai.v5i1.1052
- 23Ribau, I. (2020). Doctoral supervisors and PhD students’ perceptions about the supervision process in a young European University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 36–46. 10.13189/ujer.2020.080105
- 24Robertson, M. J. (2017). Trust: The power that binds in team supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1463–1475. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1325853
- 25Sambrook, S., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision … a view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 71–84. 10.1080/03098770701781473
- 26Tang, K. S., Cooper, G., & Nielsen, W. (2024). Philosophical, legal, ethical, and practical considerations in the emerging use of generative AI in academic journals: Guidelines for research in science education (RISE). Research in Science Education, 54(5), 797–807. 10.1007/s11165-024-10192-3
- 27Wadee, A. A., Keane, M., Dietz, A. J., & Hay, D. (2010). Effective PhD supervision: Mentorship and coaching. Rozenberg.
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/38561 - 28Wichmann-Hansen, G., Bach, L. W., Eika, B., & Mulvany, M. J. (2011).
Successful PhD supervision: A two-way process . Castanho, M. A., & Guner G. (Eds.), The researching, teaching, and learning triangle (vol. 10, pp. 55–64). Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0568-9_5