References
- 1Aalborg Portland. (2010). Cement og Beton: Håndbog om cement, beton og mørtel [Cement and concrete: Handbook of cement, concrete and mortar]. Aalborg: Aalborg Portland. Retrieved from
www.aalborgportland.dk - 2Akanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, A. O., Davila Delgado, M., Bilal, M., & Bello, S. A. (2018). Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 175–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026
- 3Allacker, K., Mathieux, F., Manfredi, S., Pelletier, N., De Camillis, C., Ardente, F., & Pant, R. (2014). Allocation solutions for secondary material production and end of life recovery: Proposals for product policy initiatives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 88, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.016
- 4Amorim Júnior, N. S., Silva, G. A. O., Dias, C. M. R., & Ribeiro, D. V. (2019). Concrete containing recycled aggregates: Estimated lifetime using chloride migration test. Construction and Building Materials, 222, 108–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.136
- 5Andersen, C. M. E., Zimmermann, R. K., Kanafani, K., Rasmussen, F. N., & Birgisdottir, H. (2019). Livscyklusvurdering for cirkulære løsninger med fokus på klimapåvirkning: 620 Forundersøgelse [Life cycle assessment of circular solutions focusing on GHG emissions: Pre-study]. Copenhagen: Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, Aalborg Universitet.
- 6Aye, L., Ngo, T., Crawford, R. H., Gammampila, R., & Mendis, P. (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy and Buildings, 47, 159–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.049
- 7Birgisdóttir, H., Kanafani, K., Kjaer, R., Andersen, C. M. E., Hatic, D., Elmbæk, M., Kamper, M., Falbe-Hansen, M., & Sack-Nielsen, T. (2019). Dialogværktøj—Cirkulær værdigskabelse i den eksisterende bygningsmasse [Dialogue tool—Circular value creation in the existing building stock]. Retrieved from
www.circularitycity.dk - 8CEN. (2012a). EN 15804:2013+A1: Sustainability of constructions works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
- 9CEN. (2012b). EN 15978: Sustainability of construction works—Assessment of environmental performance of buildings—Calculation method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
- 10CEN. (2013). Product category rule for type III environmental product declaration of construction products (to EN 15804:2012). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
- 11CEN. (2019). EN 15804:2012+A2:2019: Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
- 12Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). LCA af genbrug af mursten [LCA of recycling of bricks]. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from
www.mst.dk - 13Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Udredning af teknologiske muligheder for at genbruge og genanvende beton—Miljøprojekt nr. 1667 [Report of technological opportunities for concrete reuse and recycling of [Report of technological opportunities for concrete reuse and recycling of] (Issue 2015). Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from
www.mst.dk - 14Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Samfundsøkonomisk analyse af genbrug af mursten—Miljøprojekt nr. 1904 [Cost–benefit analysis of recycling of bricks—Environmental projekt no. 1904]. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from
www.mst.dk - 15Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Genanvendelse af knust beton i nye betonkonstruktioner [Recycling of crushed concrete in new concrete structures]. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from
www.mst.dk - 16Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). Affaldsstatistik 2017—Miljøprojekt nr. 2012 [Waste statistics 2017—Environmental project no. 2012] (Issue 2102). Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from
www.mst.dk - 17Danish Government. (2019). Aftale om Klimalov [Agreement of Climate policies]. Copenhagen: Danish Government.
- 18Danish Regions, Research Center for Environment and Resources. (2017). Råstoffer: Er der behov for en national strategi? [Raw materials: Is there a need for a national strategy?]. Copenhagen: Danish Regions, Research Center for Environment and Resources.
- 19Danish Standards. (2006). DS 411 Norm for betonkonstruktioner [DS 411 Standard for concrete structures]. Copenhagen: Danish Standards.
https://nota.dk/bibliotek/bog/ds-411-norm-betonkonstruktioner#ebook - 20Densley Tingley, D., & Davison, B. (2012). Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for deconstruction. Building and Environment, 57, 387–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.005
- 21Di Maria, A., Eyckmans, J., & Van Acker, K. (2018). Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. Waste Management, 75, 3–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.028
- 22DTU Department of Civil Engineering. (2019). Skrøner om genbrug af gammel beton skal fakta-tjekkes [Facts about recycling old concrete must be fact checked]. Kongens Lyngby: DTU Department of Civil Engineering. Retrieved from
https://www.dtu.dk/nyheder/nyhed?id=986ABAA8-CFD2-4BC5-AA0B-C978D4C160FA - 23Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birgisdóttir, H., & Birkved, M. (2018). Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly. Building Research & Information, 47(6), 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1517458
- 24ecoinvent. (2020). ecoinvent. Retrieved from
https://www.ecoinvent.org/ - 25Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Cowes: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
- 26Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2016). Circularity in the built environment: Case studies. Cowes: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
- 27Emami, N., Heinonen, J., Marteinsson, B., Säynäjoki, A., Junnonen, J. M., Laine, J., & Junnila, S. (2019). A life cycle assessment of two residential buildings using two different LCA database–software combinations: Recognizing uniformities and inconsistencies. Buildings, 9(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.3390/buildings9010020
- 28EPD Danmark, The Danish Technological Institute & Gamle Mursten. (2017). EPD for Gamle Mursten [EPD on recycled bricks] (MD-16077-DA). Retrieved from
www.teknologisk.dk - 29European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the circular economy. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1453384154337&uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 - 30European Commission & Joint Research Centre. (2012). The International Reference Life Cycle Data system (ILCD) handbook. DOI: 10.2788/85727
- 31Frischknecht, R. (2010). LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(7), 666–671. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-010-0201-6
- 32Frischknecht, R., Balouktsi, M., Lützkendorf, T., Aumann, A., Birgisdottir, H., Grosse Ruse, E., Hollberg, A., Kuittinen, M., Lavagna, M., Lupišek, A., Passer, A., Peuportier, B., Ramseier, L., Röck, M., Trigaux, D., & Vancso, D. (2019). Environmental benchmarks for buildings: needs, challenges and solutions—71st LCA forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, 18 June 2019. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 2272–2280. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01690-y
- 33Gala, A. B., Raugei, M., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2015). Introducing a new method for calculating the environmental credits of end-of-life material recovery in attributional LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(5), 645–654. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0861-3
- 34Geyer, R., Kuczenski, B., Zink, T., & Henderson, A. (2016). Common misconceptions about recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1010–1017. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12355
- 35International Energy Agency & Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. (2018). 2018 Global status report: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Retrieved from
www.globalabc.org - 36International Energy Agency & Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. (2019). 2019 Global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emissions, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Retrieved from
www.iea.org - 37Islam, H., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., & Bhuiyan, M. A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of shipping container home: A sustainable construction. Energy and Buildings, 128, 673–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.002
- 38Kallesøe, A. J., Clausen, R. J., Skar, S., Von Platen-Hallermund, F., Ditlefsen, C. B., Kalvig, P., & Ma, M. (2016). Indvinding af danske mineralske råstoffer—en geografisk sammenstilling [Extraction of Danish mineral raw materials] (Vol. Mima rappo 2016/1). Copenhagen: Videncenter for Mineralske Råstoffer og Materialer (MiMa) under De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland (GEUS).
- 39Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery, 4th edn. Hoboken: Wiley.
- 40Kylili, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2017). Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 280–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013
- 41Lendager, A., & Vind, D. L. (2018). A changemaker’ guide to the future. Retrieved from
https://www.achangemakersguidetothefuture.com/ - 42Lendager Group. (2013). Upcycle house. Copenhagen: Lendager Group. Retrieved from
https://lendager.com/arkitektur/upcycle-house/ - 43Lendager Group. (2018). Upcycle studios. Copenhagen: Lendager Group. Retrieved from
https://lendager.com/arkitektur/upcycle-studios/ - 44Lendager Group. (2019). Ressourcerækkerne [Resource rows]. Copenhagen: Lendager Group. Retrieved from
https://lendager.com/arkitektur/ressourceraekkerne/ - 45Lützkendorf, T. (2017). Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: Trends, lessons and tensions. Building Research & Information, 46(5), 594–614. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1356126
- 46Nußholz, J. L. K., Rasmussen, F. N., & Milios, L. (2019a). Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141(February), 308–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036
- 47Nußholz, J. L. K., Rasmussen, F. N., Whalen, K., & Plepys, A. (2019b). A circular business model for material reuse in buildings: Implications on value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118546. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118546
- 48Ökobaudat. (2018). Process data set: Isolierglas 2-Scheiben (en). Ökobaudat. Retrieved from
https://www.oekobaudat.de/OEKOBAU.DAT/datasetdetail/process.xhtml?uuid=d941f45e-1244-419c-a083-e4a49fb5498e&version=01.00.073 - 49Ökobaudat. (2019). Ökobaudat. Retrieved from
https://www.oekobaudat.de/ - 50Passer, A., Lasvaux, S., Allacker, K., De Lathauwer, D., Spirinckx, C., Wittstock, B., Kellenberger, D., Gschösser, F., Wall, J., & Wallbaum, H. (2015). Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years’ experience in different European countries. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(9), 1199–1212. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0926-3
- 51PRÉ. (2020). SimaPro. Amersfoort: PRÉ. Retrieved from
https://simapro.com/ - 52Ramos Huarachi, D. A., Gonçalves, G., de Francisco, A. C., Canteri, M. H. G., & Piekarski, C. M. (2020). Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 80, 106335. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106335
- 53Randers Tegl. (n.d.). Beregning af forbrug af mursten [Calculating consumption of bricks]. Aalborg: Randers Tegl. Retrieved May 14, 2020, from
https://www.randerstegl.dk/dk/mursten/fuldmuret-byggeri/beregning-af-murstensforbrug - 54Region Midtjylland. (n.d.). Circularity city. Aarhus: Region Midtjylland. Retrieved February 13, 2020, from
http://www.circularitycity.dk/ - 55Rosholm, L. S., Kalvig, P., & Fold, N. (2016). Råstofforsyning. Fra sand og sten til betonbyggeri. MiMa rapport 2016/2 [Raw material supply. From sand and stone to concrete buildings. MiMa report 2016/2]. Copenhagen: Videncenter for Mineralske Råstoffer og Materialer (MiMa) under De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland (GEUS).
- 56Sandahl, M. W. (2019). Teknologisk Institut: Mursten med cement-mørtel skal genanvendes [Danish Technological Institute: Bricks with cement mortar must be reused]. Copenhagen: Bygge- & Anlægsavisen. Retrieved from
https://bygge-anlaegsavisen.dk/Teknologisk-Institut-Mursten-med-cement-moertel-skal-genanvendes - 57Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S., & Horvath, A. (2017). Can life-cycle assessment produce reliable policy guidelines in the building sector? Environmental Research Letters, 12, 013001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa54ee
- 58United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from
https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement - 59Vadenbo, C., Hellweg, S., & Astrup, T. F. (2017). Let’s be clear(er) about substitution: A reporting framework to account for product displacement in life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(5), 1078–1089. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12519
- 60Vinduesgrossisten. (n.d.). Snittegninger, 2 lags trævinduer [Detail drawings, 2 layered wooden windows]. Svenstrup: Vinduesgrossisten.
- 61Wahlström, M., Laine-Yliijoki, J., Järnström, H., Kaartinen, T., Erlandsson, M., Palm Cousins, A., Wik, O., Suer, P., Oberender, A., Hjelmar, O., Birgisdóttir, H., Butera, S., Astrup, T. F., & Jørgensen, A. (2014). Environmentally sustainable construction products and materials—Assessment of release and emissions (Vol. 28, 2014: 3). Oslo: Nordic Innovation.
- 62Yang, K. H., Seo, E. A., & Tae, S. H. (2014). Carbonation and CO2 uptake of concrete. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 46, 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.01.004
- 63Zink, T., & Geyer, R. (2017). Circular economy rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 593–602. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12545