Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cooperative learning in design studios: a pedagogy for net-positive performance Cover

Cooperative learning in design studios: a pedagogy for net-positive performance

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. 1Altomonte, S. (2009). Environmental education for sustainable architecture. Review of European Studies, 1(2), 1221. DOI: 10.5539/res.v1n2p12
  2. 2Altomonte, S., Rutherford, P., & Wilson, R. (2014). Mapping the way forward: Education for sustainability in architecture and urban design. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21, 143154. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1311
  3. 3Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  4. 4Anthony, K. H. (2002). Designing for diversity: Implications for architectural education in the twenty-first century. Journal of Architectural Education, 55(4), 257267. DOI: 10.1162/104648802753657969
  5. 5Attia, S., Lioure, R., & Declaude, Q. (2020). Future trends and main concepts of adaptive facade systems. Energy Science & Engineering. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.725
  6. 6Balaras, C. A., Droutsa, K., Argiriou, A. A., & Asimakopoulos, D. N. (2000). Potential for energy conservation in apartment buildings. Energy and Buildings, 31(2), 143154. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00028-6
  7. 7Braaksma, N., Srivastava, M., & Ulven, C. (2018). EXO-SKINS: Self-actuating, thermally-responsive, laminated bio-composite for retrofit. In Proceedings of the Facade Tectonics Conference, Los Angeles, US. Retrieved from https://www.facadetectonics.org/papers/exo-skins
  8. 8Christenson, M. (2017). Kinds of designing and their functions in analyzing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 611626. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-016-9370-3
  9. 9Cuff, D. (1989). The social art of design at the office and the academy. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6(3), 186203.
  10. 10Dilsiz, A. D., Felkner, J., Habert, G., & Nagy, Z. (2019). Embodied versus operational energy in residential and commercial buildings: Where should we focus? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1343(Conference 1). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1343/1/012178
  11. 11Dunster, D. (1990). Collaboration in education: The diploma project at the Bartlett School, 1988–89. Journal of Architectural Education, 43(2), 1421. DOI: 10.1080/10464883.1990.10758555
  12. 12Dutton, T. (1987). Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
  13. 13Elefante, C. (2018). Existing buildings: The elephant in the room. Architect Magazine, October. https://www.architectmagazine.com/aia-architect/aiaperspective/existing-buildings-the-elephant-in-the-room_o
  14. 14Emam, M., Taha, D., & ElSayad, Z. (2019). Collaborative pedagogy in architectural design studio: A case study in applying collaborative design. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 163170. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2018.03.005
  15. 15Giordano, R., Serra, V., Demaria, E., & Duzel, A. (2017). Embodied energy versus operational energy in a nearly zero energy building case study. Energy Procedia, 111, 367376. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.198
  16. 16Godwin, A. (2017). Unpacking latent diversity. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10042228. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29062
  17. 17Groat, L., & Ahrentzen, S. (1996). Reconceptualizing architectural education for a more diverse future: Perceptions and visions of architectural students. Journal of Architectural Education, 49(3), 166183. DOI: 10.1080/10464883.1996.10734679
  18. 18Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2001). Architectural research methods. Wiley.
  19. 19Hastie, M. (2019). Design team performance: A comparison between self-formed teams and teams with diverse cognitive modes. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). Retrieved from https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/13825. DOI: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13825
  20. 20Horner, B., Young-Jahangeer, M., & Dhunpath, R. (2016). Performing problems on the pavement: An innovative approach to architectural education in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Architectural Education, 70(2), 203213. DOI: 10.1080/10464883.2016.1197667
  21. 21Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T., & Smith, D. (2002). The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS Studio Culture Task Force. American Institute of Architecture Students. http://www.aias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The_Redesign_of_Studio_Culture_2002.pdf
  22. 22Kress, G., & Schar, M. (2011). Initial conditions: The structure and composition of effective design teams. In DS 68–7: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 7: Human Behaviour in Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 August 2011. Retrieved from https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/30690/INITIAL+CONDITIONS%3A+THE+STRUCTURE+AND+COMPOSITION+OF+EFFECTIVE+DESIGN+TEAMS
  23. 23Kwok, A., & Grondzik, W. (2018). The Green Studio handbook: Environmental strategies for schematic design. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315624327
  24. 24LaFrance, M. (2013). Technology roadmap: Energy efficient building envelopes. International Energy Agency (IEA). Retrieved from https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/sites/default/files/technology_roadmap_energy_efficient_building_envelopes.pdf
  25. 25Lapadula, M. I., & Quiroga, C. (2012). Heritage as a pedagogical resource and platform for exploration in architectural design education. Journal of Architecture, 17(4), 591607. DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2012.709028
  26. 26Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trcka, M., Costola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483493. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016
  27. 27Lstiburek, J. W. (2007). The perfect wall. ASHRAE Journal, 49(5), 7478.
  28. 28Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2015). The nature of positive. Building Research & Information, 43(1), 710. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2014.911565
  29. 29McPeek, K. T., & Morthland, L. (2010). Collaborative design pedagogy: An examination of the four levels of collaboration. In D. Durling, R. Bousbaci, L. Chen, P. Gauthier, T. Poldma, S. Roworth-Stokes, & E. Stolterman (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, 2010 Conference of the Design Research Society. Université de Montréal. http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/085.pdf
  30. 30Menold, J., & Jablokow, K. (2019). Exploring the effects of cognitive style diversity and self-efficacy beliefs on final design attributes in student design teams. Design Studies, 60, 71102. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2018.08.001
  31. 31Miller, C., Burke, L., & Glick, W. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 3958. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199801)19:1>;39::AID-SMJ932<3.0.CO;2-A
  32. 32Mitchell, R., & Nicholas, S. (2006). Knowledge creation in groups: The value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory and open-mindedness norms. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 6774. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500113
  33. 33Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century: The hierarchy of energy. Columbia University Press.
  34. 34Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2016). Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment—What does the evidence say? Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 687700. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036
  35. 35Rasmussen, F. N., Malmqvist, T., Moncaster, A., Wiberg, A. H., & Birgisdóttir, H. (2018). Analysing methodological choices in calculations of embodied energy and GHG emissions from buildings. Energy and Buildings, 158, 14871498. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.013
  36. 36Sadineni, S. B., Madala, S., & Boehm, R. F. (2011). Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 36173631. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.014
  37. 37Srinivasan, R., & Moe, K. (2015). The hierarchy of energy in architecture: Emergy analysis. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315753676
  38. 38Srivastava, M. (2019a). From problem to net positive: The transformation of existing, inefficient building stock. In Proceedings of the Reynolds Symposium: Education by Design, Portland, OR, US.
  39. 39Srivastava, M. (2019b). Absenting authorship, resurrecting readership. Paper presented at 2019 Fall Conference, LESS TALK | MORE ACTION: Conscious Shifts in Architectural Education, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA), Palo Alto, CA, US.
  40. 40Srivastava, M., Barton, J., & Christenson, C. (2019). The death of the desk crit. Paper presented at the 2019 ACSA/EAAE Teachers Conference, Practice of Teaching | Teaching of Practice, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA), Antwerp.
  41. 41Srivastava, M., & Christenson, M. (2018). Play in architectural pedagogy: Shifting allegiances and trading projects. In 2018 Fall Conference: Play with the Rules. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA).
  42. 42Stein, B. (2008). Refurbishment as a challenge for future architects. In S. Roaf & A. Bairstow (Eds.), Proceedings of the Oxford Conference: A Re-evaluation of Education in Architecture (pp. 153156). WIT Press.
  43. 43Stevenson, F., Roberts, A., & Altomonte, S. (2009). Designs on the planet: A workshop series on architectural education and the challenges of climate change. In C. Demers & A. Potvin (Eds.), Architecture, Energy and the Occupant’s Perspective: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture. Les Presses de l’Université Laval. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/14089/1/plea_2009.pdf
  44. 44Sung, D. K. (2009). Skin deep: Breathing life into the layer between man and nature. In The American Institute of Architects report on university research, vol. 3. American Institute of Architects (AIA).
  45. 45Sung, D. (2016). A new look at building facades as infrastructure. Engineering, 2(1), 6368. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.008
  46. 46United States Global Change Research Program. (2018). Fourth National Climate Assessment, Vol. II: Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States. Retrieved from https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/
  47. 47Vassigh, S., & Spiegelhalter, T. (2014). Integrated design pedagogy for energy efficient design: Tools for teaching carbon neutral building design. Energy Procedia, 57, 20622069. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.171
  48. 48Vowles, H., Low, J., & Doron, H. R. (2012). Investigating architecture studio culture in the UK: A progress report. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 2649. DOI: 10.11120/jebe.2012.07020026
  49. 49Wigginton, M., & Harris, J. (2000). Intelligent skins. Butterworth-Heinemann.
  50. 50Yung, P., Lam, K. C., & Yu, C. (2013). An audit of life cycle energy analyses of buildings. Habitat International, 39, 4354. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.45 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 4, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 3, 2020
Published on: Sep 21, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Malini Srivastava, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.