Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrating life-cycle GHG emissions into a building’s economic evaluation Cover

Integrating life-cycle GHG emissions into a building’s economic evaluation

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. 1ABS. (2008). “Environmental Issues: People’s Views and Practices.” In Environmental issues: People’s views and practices, March. Retrieved September 8, 2015, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4602.0~Mar+2008~Chapter~Introduction++?OpenDocument
  2. 2ABS. (2010). Characteristics of Australian homes and implications for energy efficiency. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/4614.0.55.002Main%20Features4Apr%202010?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4614.0.55.002&issue=Apr%202010&num=&view
  3. 3Adams, M., Burrows, V., & Richardson, S. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront. London: World Green Building Council.
  4. 4Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. Journal of Environment & Development, 21, 152180. DOI: 10.1177/1070496512442508
  5. 5Architecture 2030. (2019). Buildings generate nearly 40% of annual global GHG emissions. Why the building sector? Retrieved June 16, 2019, from https://architecture2030.org/buildings_problem_why/
  6. 6Ariyarante, C. I., & Moncaster, A. (2014). Standalone calculation tools are not the answer to embodied carbon assessment. Energy Procedia, 62, 150159. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.376
  7. 7Atkinson, G., Bateman, I. J., & Mourato, S. (2012). Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 2247. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grs007
  8. 8Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA). (2018). Solar. Canberra, ACT: Australia Government. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://arena.gov.au/renewable-energy/solar/
  9. 9Autodesk. (2019). Green building studio: Building performance analysis. Autodesk. Retrieved October 28, 2019, from https://gbs.autodesk.com/GBS/
  10. 10Ball, J. (2018). Hot air won’t fly: The new climate consensus that carbon pricing isn’t cutting it. Joule, 2, 24912494. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.019
  11. 11Bateman, I. J., & Lovett, A. A. (2000). Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 60, 301323. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2000.0388
  12. 12BRE. (2019). BREEAM. Wallingford: Building Research Establishment (BRE). Retrieved June 10, 2019, from http://www.breeam.com
  13. 13BSI. (2011a). PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Macquarie Park: British Standards Institution (BSI).
  14. 14BSI. (2011b). Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Macquarie Park: British Standards Institution (BSI).
  15. 15Buys, L., Barnett, K., Miller, E., & Bailey, C. (2005). Smart housing and social sustainability: Learning from the residents of Queensland’s research house. Australian Journal of Emerging Technology and Society, 3, 4357.
  16. 16CEN. (n.d.). CEN/TC 350: Sustainability of construction works. Retrieved June 26, 2020, from https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:481830&cs=181BD0E0E925FA84EC4B8BCCC284577F8. Brussels: CEN-CENELEC.
  17. 17Chastas, P., & Theodosiou, D. B. (2016). Embodied energy in residential buildings—Towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review. Building and Environment, 105, 267282. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.040
  18. 18Crabtree, L., & Hes, D. (2009). Sustainability uptake in housing in metropolitan Australia: An institutional problem, not a technological one. Housing Studies, 24, 203224. DOI: 10.1080/02673030802704337
  19. 19Cradduck, L., & Warren, C. M. (2019). Goodwill hunting: Developing a methodology for identifying and incorporating goodwill into residential land valuations. Property Management, 37(5) 597609. DOI: 10.1108/PM-11-2018-0057
  20. 20Crawford, R. H. (2011). Life cycle assessment in the built environment. Abingdon: Spon. DOI: 10.4324/9780203868171
  21. 21Crawford, R. H., et al. (2019). Environmental performance in construction. Retrieved October 16, 2019, from https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/research/projects/current/environmental-performance-in-construction
  22. 22Crawford, R. H., Bartak, E. L., Stephan, A., & Jensen, C. A. (2016). Evaluating the life cycle energy benefits of energy efficiency regulations for buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 435451. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.061
  23. 23Crawford, R. H., Bontinck, P., Stephan, A., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Hybrid life cycle inventory methods—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 12731288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176
  24. 24Crawford, R. H., & Stephan, A. (2014). Pink batts: What did it teach us about building better buildings? The Conversation. Retrieved September 17, 2015, from http://theconversation.com/pink-batts-what-did-it-teach-us-about-building-better-buildings-21644
  25. 25Crawford, R. H., Stephan, A., & Prideaux, F. (2019). Environmental Performance in Construction (EPiC) database. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
  26. 26Dalton, B., & Fuerst, F. (2018). The ‘green value’ proposition in real estate. In Routledge handbook of sustainable real estate (pp. 177200). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.1201/9781315622750-12
  27. 27Delahunty, E. (2019). How much does it cost to build a house in 2019? Sydney: Real Estate. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www.realestate.com.au/advice/how-much-does-it-cost-to-build-a-house/
  28. 28De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy and Buildings, 140, 6880. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075
  29. 29Dixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2012). Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 37303743. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.021
  30. 30Doan, D., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243260. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007
  31. 31Dobes, L., Leung, J., & Argyrous, G. (2016). Social cost–benefit analysis in Australia and New Zealand: The state of current practice and what needs to be done. Acton: ANU Press, The Australian National University. DOI: 10.22459/SCBAANZ.04.2016
  32. 32DGNB. (2020). DGNB. Stuttgart: Deutsche Gesellschaft für nachhaltiges Bauen. Retrieved March 2, 2020, from https://www.dgnb.de/en/index.php
  33. 33DSIRE. (2019). Property tax exclusion for solar energy systems. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program/detail/558
  34. 34Enever, N., Isaac, D., & Daley, M. (2009). The valuation of property investments, 7th edn, London: Estates Gazette.
  35. 35European Commission. (2020). Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Brussels: Directorate-General for Communication. Retrieved March 2, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-performance-of-buildings/energy-performance-buildings-directive
  36. 36Falk, J., Simpkins, K., & Gaffney, O. (2019). Roadmap provides 36 solutions to cut greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 worldwide. Stockholm: Future Earth, Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://futureearth.org/2019/09/18/roadmap-provides-36-solutions/
  37. 37Farhan, S. A., Shafiq, N., Azizli, K. A. M., Umar, U. A., & Gardezi, S. S. S. (2014). Embodied carbon of buildings: tools, methods and strategies. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 567, 565570. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.565
  38. 38Fay, R., Treloar, G., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: A case study. Building Research & Information, 28, 3141. DOI: 10.1080/096132100369073
  39. 39Fouche, M., & Crawford, R. H. (2015). The Australian construction industry’s approach to embodied carbon assessment: A scoping study. In R. H. Crawford & A. Stephan (Eds.), Living and learning: Research for a better built environment. 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2015, Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne: The Architectural Science Association and The University of Melbourne.
  40. 40Fuerst, F., & Warren-Myers, G. (2018). Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices. Energy Economics, 74: 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.041
  41. 41GBCA. (2006). The dollars and sense of green buildings. Barangaroo: Green Building Council Australia (GBCA).
  42. 42GBCA. (2019). Green Star. Barangaroo: Green Building Council Australia (GBCA). Retrieved June 10, 2019, from https://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/
  43. 43Geltner, D., & Mei, J. (1995). The present value model with time-varying discount rates: Implications for commercial property valuation and investment decisions. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(2), 119135. DOI: 10.1007/BF01098657
  44. 44Hamedani, A., & Huber, F. (2012). A comparative study of ‘DGNB’, ‘LEED’ and ‘BREEAM’ certificate system in urban sustainability. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 155, 121132. DOI: 10.2495/SC120111
  45. 45Hall, T. (2016). What has happened to the Australian backyard? Melbourne: ArchitectureAU. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://architectureau.com/articles/what-has-happened-to-the-australian-backyard/
  46. 46HIA Economics. (2018). Housing 100 (Report, Edition 208/2019). Campbell: Housing Industry Association.
  47. 47HM Government. (2018). Conservation of fuel and power: Approved Document L. London: HM Government. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/conservation-of-fuel-and-power-approved-document-l
  48. 48Hoff, M. (2017). 8 Ways to sequester carbon to avoid climate catastrophe. New York: EcoWatch. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://www.ecowatch.com/carbon-sequestration-2461971411.html
  49. 49IEA. (2019). Global status report for building and construction 2019. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).
  50. 50InterNACHI. (2012). InterNACHI’s estimated life expectancy chart. Boulder: International Association of Certified Home Inspectors Inc. (InterNACHI).
  51. 51IPCC. (2019). IPCC. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://www.ipcc.ch/
  52. 52ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework, edition 2. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
  53. 53ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044:2006: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines, edition 2. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
  54. 54Jane, A. (2010). How is carbon stored in trees and wood products? Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://forestlearning.edu.au/images/resources/How%20carbon%20is%20stored%20in%20trees%20and%20wood%20products.pdf
  55. 55Kane, A. (2016). Green homes: Would you pay more for energy and water efficiency? The Guardian. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/jun/23/green-homes-would-you-pay-more-for-energy-and-water-efficien
  56. 56Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  57. 57Kishore, R. (1996). Discounted cash flow analysis in property investment valuations. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 14(3), 6370. DOI: 10.1108/14635789610118280
  58. 58Ko, Y.-S., & No, S. T. (2015). A study on comparison of building energy simulation and measurement results for a city hall. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 3, 19. DOI: 10.4236/jbcpr.2015.31001
  59. 59Langston, Y. L., & Langston, C. A. (2008). Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: An analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies. Construction Management and Economics, 26, 147160. DOI: 10.1080/01446190701716564
  60. 60Leskinen, N., Vimpari, J., & Seppo, J. (2020a). The impact of on-site renewable energy production on property values. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 12(7), 222. DOI: 10.1108/JERER-11-2019-0041
  61. 61Leskinen, N., Vimpari, J., & Seppo, J. (2020b). Using real estate market fundamental to determine the correct discount rates for decentralised energy investment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53(February). DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101953
  62. 62Leviston, Z., Malkin, S., Green, M., & Gardner, J. (2015). The EnergyFit Home Initiative: Message frame testing. Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization (CSIRO). Retrieved December 12, 2019, from www.lowcarbonlivingcrc.com.au/resources/crc-publications/crclcl-project-reports/rp3016-2016-final-report-associated-working-papers
  63. 63Mandell, S., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2011). Willingness to pay for sustainable housing. Journal of Housing Research, 20(1), 3551. DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2011.12092034
  64. 64McGee, C., Partridge, E., Carrad, N., & Milne, G. (2008). Mainstreaming sustainable housing: Policies and programs that work. In Proceedings of the 2008 World Sustainable Building Conference, Sydney. Melbourne: SB08.
  65. 65Meier, P. (2002). Life cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis. Madison: Fusion Technology Institute.
  66. 66Menzies, G. F., Banfill, P. F. G., & Turan, S. (2007). Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: A review. Proceedings of the ICE—Construction Materials, 160, 135143. DOI: 10.1680/coma.2007.160.4.135
  67. 67Musaoglu, N., Erten, E., Bozbay Aksu, A., & Cetin, M. (2014). Optimizing the production of goods and services by Mediterranean woodland ecosystems in the context of global changes. Istanbul: FFEM.
  68. 68Ng, S. T., Chen, Y., & Wong, J. M. W. (2013). Variability of building environmental assessment tools on evaluating carbon emissions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 131141. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.07.003
  69. 69Oates, W. E. (1969). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77, 957971. DOI: 10.1086/259584
  70. 70Olubunmi, O. A., Xia, P. B., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Green building incentives: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 16111621. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.028
  71. 71Omar, W., Doh, J., & Panuwatwanich, K. (2014). Variations in embodied energy and carbon emission intensities of construction materials. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 49, 3148. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.003
  72. 72Oviir, A. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) in the framework of the next generation Estonian building standard building certification as a strategy for enhancing sustainability. In SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference, Build Green and Renovate Deep. Tallinn and Helsinki: Energy Procedia. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.159
  73. 73Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  74. 74Palmon, O., & Smith, B. A. (1998). New evidence on property tax capitalization. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 10991111. DOI: 10.1086/250041
  75. 75Pearse, R. (2017). Pricing carbon in Australia: Contestation, the state and market failure. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315363455
  76. 76Plumer, B., & Popovish, N. (2019). These countries have prices on carbon. Are they working? New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/02/climate/pricing-carbon-emissions.html
  77. 77Preston, B. (2015). Economic valuation of the environment. Paper presented at the Land and Environment Court Annual Conference, 28 May 2015, Manly, Australia.
  78. 78Price, R., Thornton, S., & Nelson, S. (2007). The social cost of carbon and the shadow price of carbon: What they are, and how to use them in economic appraisal in the UK (December 7). London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
  79. 79Rauf, A., & Crawford, R. H. (2015). Building service life and its effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings. Energy, 79, 140148. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.093
  80. 80Rawlinson, S. (2019). Construction cost guide 2019: For housing, small commercial and industrial buildings. Perth, WA: author.
  81. 81Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 374388. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9
  82. 82Reed, R. (2007). Energy efficiency and property values. Paper presented at the 17th PRRES Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Australia.
  83. 83Reeves, T., Issa, R., & Olbina, S. (2012). Validation of building energy modeling tools: Ecotect™, Green Building Studio™ and IES<VE>™. Paper presented at the Winter Simulation Conference, Germany.
  84. 84REN Energy. (2019). Going renewable: Onsite generation. Portland: REN Energy. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://www.renenergyglobal.com/insights/going-renewable/onsite-generation
  85. 85RepuTex Energy. (2019). So what is the current Australian carbon spot price? Melbourne: RepuTex. Retrieved September 13, 2019, from https://www.reputex.com/blog/insights-what-is-the-current-australian-carbon-spot-price/
  86. 86Robati, M., Oldfield, P., Nezhad, A., & Carmichael, D. (2018). Embodied carbon and capital cost impact of current value engineering practices: A case study. Sydney: Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living.
  87. 87Robinson, R. (1989). Property valuation & investment analysis: A cash flow approach. Sydney, NSW: Law Book Co.
  88. 88Röcka, M., Saadeb, M., Balouktsic, M., Rasmussend, F., Birgisdottird, H., Frischknechte, R., Habertf, G., Lützkendorfc, T., & Passera, A. (2020). Embodied GHG emissions of buildings—The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy, 258 (no. 114107). DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107
  89. 89Schomers, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 1630. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002
  90. 90Schwartz, Y., & Raslan, R. (2013). Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 62, 350359. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.022
  91. 91Sitar, M., & Krajnc, K. (2008). Sustainable housing renewal. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(10), 6166. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.61.66
  92. 92Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.
  93. 93Stavins, R. (2019). The future of US carbon-pricing policy (No. 25912). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). DOI: 10.3386/w25912
  94. 94Stumpf, A., Kim, H., & Jenicek, E. (2011). Early design energy analysis using building information modeling technology (Installation Technology Transfer Program). Chicago: US Army Corps of Engineers. DOI: 10.21236/ADA552789
  95. 95Sturgis, S., & Roberts, G. (2010). Redefining zero: Carbon profiling as a solution to whole life carbon emission measurement in buildings. London: RCIS Research.
  96. 96Sustainable Propensity. (2011). The value of carbon in decision-making (Policy Brief November). Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://institute.smartprosperity.ca
  97. 97Tobin, J., & Brainard, W. C. (1976). Asset markets and the cost of capital (Discussion Paper No. 427). New Haven: Cowles Foundation.
  98. 98Thorpe, D. (2019). New buyers and renters want eco-friendly homes. Sydney: The Fifth Estate. Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https://www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/residential-2/new-buyers-and-renters-want-eco-friendly-homes/
  99. 99Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2016). Environmental and natural resource economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
  100. 100UKGBC. (2014). Embodied Carbon Week—Seeing the whole picture. In Embodied Carbon Week 2014. London: UKGBC.
  101. 101UNEP. (2018). Buildings and construction sector—Huge untapped potential for emission reductions. Geneva: United Nations: UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/press-release/buildings-and-construction-sector-huge-untapped-potential-emission
  102. 102USGBC. (2019). LEED. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council (USGBC). Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://new.usgbc.org/leed
  103. 103Van der Lugt, P. (2013). Carbon storage utilising timber products. Environment Industry Magazine, issue 6, 7680.
  104. 104Wang, H., & Zhai, Z. (2016). Advances in building simulation and computational techniques: A review between 1987 and 2014. Energy and Buildings, 128, 319335. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.080
  105. 105Warren-Myers, G. (2017). New homebuyers and the challenges of navigating sustainability and energy efficiency with Australian volume builders. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. Energy Procedia. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.611
  106. 106Wong, P. S. P., Lindsay, A., Crameri, L., & Holdsworth, S. (2015). Can energy efficiency rating and carbon accounting foster greener building design decision? An empirical study. Building and Environment, 87, 255264. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.006
  107. 107Wu, H., Crawford, R. H., Warren-Myers, G., Dave, M., & Noguchi, M. (2015). Concept and barriers for the economic value of low energy houses. In COBRA 2015. Sydney: RICS.
  108. 108Wyatt, P. (2008). Property valuation: In an economic context. London: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9780470691892
  109. 109Yinger, J., Bloom, H. S., & Boersch-Supan, A. (2016). Property taxes and house values: The theory and estimation of interjurisdictional property tax capitalization. San Diego: Elsevier.
  110. 110Zecca, C., Weir, N., Bailey, D., & Cowles, T. (2015). Embodied energy in building materials. University of Massachusetts: Debating Science. Retrieved January 12, 2020, from https://blogs.umass.edu/natsci397a-eross/embodied-energy-in-building-materials/
  111. 111Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan: Universiti Teknologi.
  112. 112Zizzo, R., Kyriazis, J., & Goodland, H. (2017). Embodied carbon of buildings and infrastructure: International policy review. Vancouver: Forestry Innovation Investment.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.36 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2020
Published on: Jul 13, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Monique Schmidt, Robert H. Crawford, Georgia Warren-Myers, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.